Date |
Text |
2009-03-30 10:48:38 | ** DENIED REVIEW ** |
| 3RD REVIEW, 1ST REVIEW UNDER PERMIT APPLICATION. |
| |
| |
| 1) NOTE: PLEASE BE SURE ALL INFORMATION ON THE INPUT |
| DATA REPORT OF THE SUBMITTED ENERGY CALCULATIONS |
| COORDINATES WITH THE PLANS. THIS HAS BEEN NOTED FOR THE |
| THIRD TIME. 13-415.2, 13-415.2.ABC.1.1, .1.2 AND .1.3. |
| PREVIOUS REVIEW GAVE SOME EXAMPLES OF ITEMS ON PLANS |
| WHICH WERE NOT IN THE IDR. THE EXTERIOR LIGHTING WAS |
| NOTED AS AN EXAMPLE; HOWEVER THERE IS A SUBSTANTIAL |
| AMOUNT OF EXTERIOR FIXTURES ON PLANS WHICH ARE STILL |
| NOT IN THE IDR. |
| FOR EXAMPLE: WHAT ABOUT ALL THE LIGHTING ON SHEET E-2? |
| |
| FOR EXAMPLE: THE IDR SHOWS MANUAL CONTROLS FOR ALL |
| INTERIOR LIGHTING. PLANS DO NOT SHOW THE SAME. |
| |
| FOR EXAMPLE: THE M FIXTURE ON THE FIXTURE LEGEND IS |
| SHOWN WITH 2-42WATT BULBS YET THE IDR ONLY INDICATES |
| ONE -42WATT BULB IN EACH FIXTURE. |
| THE M FIXTURES ON E-8 ARE MISSING IN THE COUNT ALSO. |
| |
| FOR EXAMPLE: THE KW RATING OF THE WATER HEATER ON PLANS |
| IS GREATER THAN THAT OF THE IDR. |
| |
| PLEASE BE SURE THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS CERTIFICATION |
| SHEET IS SIGNED, DATED AND SEALED. THE COVER SHEET IS |
| NOT COMPLETE AS AN EXCEPTION FOR COVER SHEETS OF |
| REPORTS. FS 471.025, FAC 61G15-23.002 |
| 13-101, 13-103.1.1.1, 13-400.A.3 |
| |
| 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 13-415.1.ABC.1.1, .1.2 FOR SPACE |
| CONTROLS REQUIRED IN ROOMS 114/115. THE RESPONSE SEEMS |
| TO MAKE NOTE OF POLE SWITCHES. WHERE IS THE OCCUPANCY |
| SENSORS/DEVICES LOCATED? SEE SECTION 13-415.1.ABC.1.2 |
| FOR CONFERENCE ROOMS AND BREAK ROOMS WHICH REQUIRE |
| OCCUPANCY SENSORS OF SOME TYPE. LIGHTING NEEDS TO BE |
| TURNED OFF WITHIN 30MINS. IT IS NOT CLEAR HOW THE |
| DEVICES AND THE NOTES PROVIDED WILL ACCOMPLISH THIS |
| REQUIREMENT. |
| BASED ON THE SYMBOL LEGEND THESE ARE STANDARD DEVICES. |
| |
| 3) NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT THE MANUFACTURES SPECS/CUT |
| SHEETS FOR THE SERVICE ENTRANCE RATED MAIN/ATS. THE |
| RESPONSE MENTIONS THIS WILL BE DONE BY CONTRACTOR |
| HOWEVER NO SUBMITTAL WAS IN THE SUBMITTED |
| PLANS/PACKAGE. |
| THE RESPONSE LETTER GOES INTO DETAIL WITH RESPECT TO |
| THE MANUFACTURE WHICH IS NOT KNOWN AT THIS TIME BASED |
| ON THE BID PROCESS ETC. PLEASE SUBMIT ANY LISTED SE |
| RATE MAIN/ATS WHICH MEETS LISTING REQUIREMENTS AND |
| MINIMUM CODE REQUIREMENTS. AS LONG AS A PRODUCT IS |
| CHOSEN WHICH MEETS CODE THE, SUBMITTAL MAY ALWAYS BE |
| CHANGED AT A LATER DATE. |
| 110.3, 90.7, 230.70, 230.76, 230.79. |
| |
| ** AN EXAMPLE WOULD BE JUST LIKE A WINDOW PRODUCT |
| APPROVAL: A WINDOW IS REQUIRED TO BE CHOSEN MEETING |
| MINIMUM WIND LOADS, IMPACT RATINGS ETC AND HAVE FLORIDA |
| PRODUCT APPROVAL/MIAMI-DADE APPROVAL. THAT WINDOW MAY |
| NOT BE THE ONE CHOSEN FOR THE BID HOWEVER IT MEETS CODE |
| AND MINIMUM DESIGN CRITERIA. THEY OFTEN ARE REVISED AT |
| A LATER DATE WHICH IS ONLY A SUBMITTAL TO CHANGE THE |
| PRODUCT. |
| |
| |
| |
| ** IMPORTANT ** |
| ONCE AUDIT/REVIEWS ARE COMPLETE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP |
| FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE |
| ALL OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED |
| SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. |
| DO NOT LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. |
| PLEASE DO NOT ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO PLANS. ANY |
| ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION SUCH AS PRODUCT APPROVALS, |
| SPEC/CUT SHEETS, CALCULATIONS ETC. SHOULD BE PLACED |
| INTO TWO SETS/FOLDERS/BINDERS ETC. |
| PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS |
| SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE. |
| THIS WILL HELP IN THE AUDIT/REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID |
| ANY DELAYS. |
| |
| |
| IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS; OR IF COMMENTS ARE NOT |
| TYPED IN A CLEAR MANNER PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO |
| CONTACT THIS REVIEWER. |
| |
| DEWEY PALMER |
| ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II |
| CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| 561-805-6717 |
| [email protected] |
| |