Date |
Text |
2009-01-06 09:03:04 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| PERMIT: 08090593 |
| ADD: 6880 N JOG RD |
| CONT:MAJOR WORKING DRAWING REVIEW |
| TEL: (772)231-4301 |
| |
| FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE |
| W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS |
| * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS |
| |
| OFFICE BUILDING TYPE II-B 1,800 SQ FT |
| S-2 MAINTENANCE BUILDING TYPE II-B 1,000 SQ FT |
| |
| JAN 06/2009 |
| 2ND REVIEW |
| ACTION: DENIED |
| |
| 1A) INFORMATIONAL: WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE |
| INDICATE THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS |
| NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL |
| REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE |
| REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION |
| PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL HELP TO |
| EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED |
| COOPERATION. |
| |
| |
| 1B) PLEASE SUBMIT 2 OF ALL SURVEYS, PLANS, REPORTS, |
| REVISIONS , PRODUCT APPROVALS AND OR SUBMITTALS FOR |
| REVIEW FOR PERMIT. IF YOUR PROJECT WILL REQUIRE A |
| RESIDENT INSPECTOR OR IF YOUR PROJECT IS A THRESHOLD |
| BUILDING REQUIRING A THRESHOLD INSPECTOR THEN (3) THREE |
| SETS OF ALL SAID DOCUMENTS WILL BE REQUIRED FOR PERMIT |
| ISSUANCE. 106.1* /2004 SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS WEST PALM |
| BEACH ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. |
| |
| 1C-1E) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 2) 2ND REQUEST, COMMENT RESPONSE SHEET INDICATES SOILS |
| REPORTS WERE SUBMITTED, NOT IN THIS REVIEW. 1802.2.1 |
| QUESTIONABLE SOIL. WHERE THE SAFE-SUSTAINING POWER OF |
| THE SOIL IS IN DOUBT, OR WHERE A LOAD-BEARING VALUE |
| SUPERIOR TO THAT SPECIFIED IN THIS CODE IS CLAIMED, THE |
| BUILDING OFFICIAL SHALL REQUIRE THAT THE NECESSARY |
| INVESTIGATION BE MADE. SUCH INVESTIGATION SHALL COMPLY |
| WITH THE PROVISIONS OF SECTIONS 1802.4 THROUGH 1802.6 . |
| |
| 3) COMPLIED, BUILDING PROVISO: 109.3.10* IMPACT OF |
| CONSTRUCTION. |
| |
| 4) COMPLIED, BUILDING PROVISO: 109.3.10.1 HURRICANE |
| PROTECTION. |
| |
| 5) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 6) ENERGY CALCULATION ARE IN THIS SUBMITTAL, BUT ARE |
| THE WRONG VERSION . PLEASE REVIEW SECTION 13-400.3..A. |
| |
| 7-10) THE COUNTY DOES NOT REQUIRE PRODUCT APPROVALS AT |
| TIME OF PERMIT SUBMISSION. THE CITY OF WEST PALM DOES |
| REQUIRE THE FULL PRODUCT APPROVAL PACKAGE, THERE ARE |
| OLD MIAMI-DADE REPORTS THAT STILL HAVE NOT HAD THEIR |
| ANCHOR CALCULATION UPDATED TO THE 2004 FBC, WHICH MEANS |
| UNDER THE 2001 FBC 1.33 INCREASES WERE TAKEN IN STEEL |
| FASTENERS, 1605.3.1.1. AS STATED IN COMMENT (1B) |
| PRODUCT APPROVAL REPORTS ARE REQUIRED AT TIME OF |
| APPLICATION. HIGHLIGHT GLAZING SYSTEM TO BE USED IF |
| THERE IS MULTIPLE GLAZING UNIT TYPES. |
| |
| 7) 2ND REQUEST,1609.1.4 PROTECTION OF OPENINGS IN |
| WIND-BORNE DEBRIS REGIONS, EXTERIOR GLAZING THAT |
| RECEIVES POSITIVE PRESSURE IN THE LOWER 60 FEET (18.3 |
| M) IN BUILDINGS SHALL BE ASSUMED TO BE OPENINGS AND THE |
| BALANCE OF GLAZED OPENINGS IN THE REST OF THE BUILDING |
| SHALL BE ASSUMED TO BE ZERO UNLESS SUCH GLAZING THAT |
| RECEIVES POSITIVE PRESSURE IS IMPACT RESISTANT OR |
| PROTECTED WITH AN IMPACT RESISTANT COVERING MEETING THE |
| REQUIREMENTS OF SSTD 12, ASTM E 1886 AND ASTM E 1996, |
| OR MIAMI-DADE TAS 201, 202 AND 203 REFERENCED THEREIN |
| AS FOLLOWS: 1. GLAZED OPENINGS LOCATED WITHIN 30 FEET |
| (9.1 M) OF GRADE SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE |
| LARGE MISSILE TEST. 2. GLAZED OPENINGS LOCATED MORE |
| THAN 30 FEET (9.1 M) ABOVE GRADE SHALL MEET THE |
| PROVISIONS OF THE SMALL MISSILE TEST. |
| |
| 8)2ND REQUEST, FL BLD CODE 1609.6.2.2 COMPONENTS & |
| CLADDING, PROVIDE 2 COPIES OF PRODUCT TESTING REPORTS, |
| MISSING REPORTS ARE AS FOLLOWS: |
| 8A) FIXED WINDOWS |
| 8B) MULLIONS |
| 8C) EXTERIOR GLAZED DOORS |
| 8D) EXTERIOR METAL DOORS |
| 8E) ROLL UP DOORS |
| 8F) WALL LOUVERS |
| 8G) TRUSS ANCHORS |
| 8H) ROOF ASSEMBLIES |
| 8I) SOFFITS |
| |
| 9) 2ND REQUEST, PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED WITH PERMIT |
| APPLICATION AFTER OCTOBER 1, 2003 ARE REQUIRED TO |
| COMPLY WITH THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL SYSTEM. FOR |
| INFORMATION PLEASE SEE THE STATE WEBSITE AT |
| WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG. PRODUCTS WITH STATEWIDE |
| APPROVAL ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED WITH A COVER |
| SHEET THAT LISTS THE PRODUCT IDENTITY NUMBER FROM THE |
| STATE. IF THE PRODUCT DOES NOT HAVE STATEWIDE APPROVAL, |
| SUBMIT AN APPLICATION FOR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL OR |
| SITE SPECIFIC FORM PER RULE 9B-72. SEE ATTACHMENT. |
| WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG |
| |
| 10) 2ND EQUEST, WPB ADMIN CODE 106.3* PRODUCT |
| APPROVALS. THOSE PRODUCT WHICH ARE REGULATED BY DCA |
| RULE 9B-72 SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY |
| THE DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL FOR |
| JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. |
| |
| OFFICE BUILDING TYPEII-B |
| |
| 11A) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 11B) 2ND REQUEST, SHEET A-11 & SHEET A-14 APPEAR TO |
| HAVE A 2'X2' LAY IN TILE CEILING, PLANS DO NOT PROVIDE |
| HOW THE 1 HOUR RATING OF WALLS IS TO OCCUR, THROUGH TO |
| THE ROOF DECK OR A 1HR RATED CEILING. 708.1. |
| A) YOUR RESPONCE IS CONFUSING, SHEET AD-3, THE NOTE |
| ADDED TO EXTEND DRYWALL AND INSULATION TO THE UNDER |
| SIDE OF THE ROOF DECK DOES NOT TIE TO A WALL TYPE. A |
| GENERIC WALL TYPE IS DEPICTED AND THE |
| NOTE IS NOT LOCATED NEXT TO WALL TYPE 2A A NONRATED |
| WALL NOR NEXT TO 2-1 A 1 HR RATED WALL ASSEMBLY. |
| |
| B) PLEASE PROVIDE THE DETAIL OF HOW THE RATED WALL WILL |
| FASTEN INTO THE ROOF DECK ASSEMLBY, ALSO NOTE WHAT TYPE |
| OF FLEXIBLE SEALENT SHALL BE USED.713.1 FIRE RESISTANT |
| JOINT SYSTEMS. |
| |
| C) THIS SAME CORRIDOR 111 HAS A DOOR# 107 WHICH IS PART |
| OF THE RATED CORRIDOR THE DOOR SCHEDULE DOES NOT |
| INDICATE AS SUCH TABLE 1016.1. |
| |
| D) AD-3 LIFE SAFETY SHEET WILL ALSO NEED TO BE UPDATED |
| FOR A RATED LOBBY WALL AND DOOR 107. |
| |
| E) THE RATING OF CORRIDOR 111 FOR 1 HOUR IS REQUIRED |
| BECAUSE OF THE OCCUPANT LOAD BEING GREATER THAN 30 FOR |
| TRAINING ROOM AND BREAK ROOM WHEN THE FOLDING PARTITION |
| IS NOT USED. IT BECOMES AN |
| ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCY REQUIRING THE CORRIDOR 111TO BE |
| RATED FOR 1 HR. THIS RATING WILL CONTINUE THROUGH TO |
| THE EXIT. THE LOBBY AREA WALL IS NOT INDICATED AS A |
| FIRE RATED WALL. 1016.5CORRIDOR CONTINUITY |
| FIRE-RESISTANCE-RATED CORRIDORS SHALL BE CONTINUOUS |
| FROM THE POINT OF ENTRY TO AN EXIT, AND SHALL NOT BE |
| INTERRUPTED BY INTERVENING ROOMS. EXCEPTION: FOYERS, |
| LOBBIES OR RECEPTION ROOMS CONSTRUCTED |
| AS REQUIRED FOR CORRIDORS SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUED AS |
| INTERVENING ROOMS. THE LOBBY CAN BE USED AS PART OF THE |
| MEANS OF EGRESS BUT THE WALL LABELED 2A WILL NEED TO BE |
| RATED ONE HOUR. |
| |
| F) CORRIDOR 101 IS WITHIN A BUSINESS OCCUPANCY AND WILL |
| NOT BE REQUIRED TO BE 1 HR RATED, IF THE DESIGNER |
| WISHES TO RATE THIS CORRIDOR YOU MAY DO THAT. |
| |
| 11C-D) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 12)2ND REQUEST SHEET A-8 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLIANCE WITH |
| 11-4.22.2 DOORS. ALL DOORS TO ACCESSIBLE TOILET ROOMS |
| SHALL COMPLY WITH 11-4.13. DOORS SHALL NOT SWING INTO |
| CLEAR FLOOR SPACE REQUIRED FOR ANY FIXTURE. SEE ROOMS |
| 120,& 121. |
| 11-4.1.3(11) TOILET FACILITIES. IF TOILET ROOMS ARE |
| PROVIDED, THEN EACH PUBLIC AND COMMON USE TOILET ROOM |
| SHALL COMPLY WITH SECTION 11-4.22. OTHER TOILET ROOMS |
| PROVIDED FOR THE USE OF OCCUPANTS OF SPECIFIC SPACES |
| (I.E., A PRIVATE TOILET ROOM FOR THE OCCUPANT OF A |
| PRIVATE OFFICE) SHALL BE ADAPTABLE. IF BATHING ROOMS |
| ARE PROVIDED, THEN EACH PUBLIC AND COMMON USE BATHROOM |
| SHALL COMPLY WITH SECTION 11-4.23. ACCESSIBLE TOILET |
| ROOMS AND BATHING FACILITIES SHALL BE ON AN ACCESSIBLE |
| ROUTE. |
| |
| 13) 2ND REQUEST, THE RESPONSE COMMENTS INDICATE THIS TO |
| BE A PAVILION, TO BE PART OF THIS PERMIT WE DO NEED |
| INFORMATION AS FAR AS COMPONENTS AND CLADDING YOU |
| INDICATE THIS IS A PRE-ENGINEERED CANOPY, EITHER IT HAS |
| GONE THROUGH THE MANUFACTURED BUILDING PROGRAM WITH THE |
| STATE AND IS APPROVED AS A MANUFACTURED MODULAR |
| BUILDING PROGRAM WITH STATE APPROVED PLANS OR IT WILL |
| NEED |
| PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE ROOFING ASSEMBLY. WITHOUT |
| PLANS THIS AREA WILL BE EXEMPTED FROM THE PERMIT AND |
| PLANS TO BE SUBMITTED UNDER A SEPERATE PERMIT. |
| 106.3.5 MINIMUM PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA FOR BUILDINGS. |
| |
| 15-17) COMPLIED. |
| T THE CONNECTION STATES THAT WELDING OF CONNECTIONS IS |
| PROHIBITED, PLEASE PROVIDE MANUFACTURERS APPROVAL FOR |
| WELDING OF THIS TYPE OF CONNECTION. 106.1.2 ADDITIONAL |
| INFORMATION REQUIRED. |
| |
| 18) 2ND REQUEST. SHEET S-4 INDICATES A FOOTING TYPE A |
| BUT THE PLANS ARE LACKING COLUMN AND BEAM INFORMATION, |
| 1609.2.1 PART OFTHE MAIN WIND FORCE-RESISTING SYSTEM. |
| PLEASE PROVIDE ADDITONAL INFORMATION, 106.1..2. 106.3.5 |
| MINIMUM PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA FOR BUILDINGS. |
| |
| 19) 2ND REQUEST, SHEET A-4 ALSO INDICATES THE ROOFING |
| ASSEMBLY TO BE A PREMANUFACTRED CANOPY, PLEASE PROVIDE |
| PRODUCT INFORMATION, TO BE PART OF THIS PERMIT WE DO |
| NEED INFORMATION AS FAR AS COMPONENTS AND CLADDING YOU |
| INDICATE THIS IS A PRE-ENGINEERED CANOPY, EITHER IT HAS |
| GONE THROUGH THE MANUFACTURED BUILDING PROGRAM WITH THE |
| STATE AND IS APPROVED AS A MANUFACTURED MODULAR |
| BUILDING PROGRAM WITH STATE APPROVED PLANS OR IT WILL |
| NEED PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE ROOFING ASSEMBLY. |
| WITHOUT PLANS THIS AREA WILL BE EXEMPTED FROM THE |
| PERMIT AND PLANS TO BE SUBMITTED UNDER A SEPERATE |
| PERMIT. 106.3.5 MINIMUM PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA FOR |
| BUILDINGS. |
| |
| 20)2ND REQUEST, STRUCTURAL SHEETS S-4, S-6 AND S-8 ROOF |
| PRESSURE ZONES FAIL TO INDICATE PRESSURE ZONE 3 FAIL TO |
| INDICATE CORNER ZONE# 3 AND THE ASSOCIATED PRESSURES, |
| PLEASE REVIEW FIGURE 1609.6.2.2 COMPONENTS AND |
| CLADDING. WITH THE RESPONSE FOR THIS COMMENT IT APPEARS |
| THAT YOUR CODE BOOK HAS NOT BEEN UPDATED. IN 2006 |
| SUPPLEMENTS( BLUE PAGES) THE TABLE 1609.6C HAS BEEN |
| ELIMINATED. PLEASE REVISE SHEET S-6 FOR PRESSURES IN |
| ZONE 3. |
| |
| 21) 2ND REQUEST, GENERATOR PAD IS SHOWN ON SHEET SD-1, |
| IS THIS PAD GOING TO BE PART OF THIS PERMIT OR JUST |
| INFORMATIONAL, THE GENERATOR AND ATTACHMENT TO SLAB |
| WILL BE REVIEWED UNDER A SEPERATE PERMIT. PLEASE |
| PROVIDE SIZE OF GENERATOR PAD, IF STELL REINFORCEMENT |
| IS TO BE INSTALLED AND ANCHORS TO RESIST THE MOMENT OF |
| OVER TURNING. 1609.1.3 ANCHORAGE AGAINST OVERTURNING, |
| UPLIFT AND SLIDDING. |
| |
| 22) STAIR DELETED, COMPLIED. |
| |
| JIM WITMER C. B. O. |
| BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II |
| |
| TEL: (561)805-6715 |
| FAX: (561)659-8026 |
| E-MAIL: [email protected] |
| |
| PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD PUBLIC RECORDS |
| LAW. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS |
| REGARDING CITY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORD, AVAILABLE TO |
| THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. YOUR E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS ARE |
| THEREFORE SUBJECT TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |