Date |
Text |
2009-01-14 11:42:59 | ** DENIED 2ND REVIEW ** |
| |
| |
| ** UNTIL DATE OF REVIEW THERE WAS NO SPECIFIC CONTACT |
| FOR ELECTRICAL. DURING REVIEW A CALL WAS PLACED TO JOHN |
| VAUGHAN. ELECTRICAL ENGINEER JAMES MAKO CALLED TO GO |
| OVER COMMENTS. |
| SEVERAL ITEMS WERE GONE OVER HOWEVER AS THE REVIEW WAS |
| NOT COMPLETE AT THE TIME OF THE CONVERSATION A FUTURE |
| CALL MAY BE NEEDED ONCE ALL REVIEW NOTES ARE POSTED. |
| SOME NOTES FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW WILL REMAIN ALONG WITH |
| NEW COMMENTS BASED ON THE DOCUMENTS NOW PLACED ON THE |
| PLANS AND SUBMITTED WITH THE DOCUMENTS. |
| |
| 1) NOTE: PLEASE BE AWARE THAT THE NOTICE OF |
| COMMENCEMENT WHICH WAS RECORDED ON SEPTEMBER 15TH, 2008 |
| HAS BECOME VOID. PLEASE SEE FS 713.13(2). |
| WHEN WORK HAS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 90DAYS OF RECORDING |
| SUCH NOC THE NOC BECOMES VOIDED. THIS WOULD ONLY NEED |
| TO BE RE-RECORDED. |
| THIS COMMENT IS GIVEN AS INFORMATION ONLY TO HELP |
| AVOIDED ANY DELAYS IN THE PERMITTING AND INSPECTION |
| PROCESS FOR THE OWNER AND CONTRACTOR. |
| |
| 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FBC 13-101.1, 13-400.0. |
| THE PREVIOUS REVIEW REQUESTED LIGHTING PERFORMANCE |
| CALCULATIONS IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE FBC CHAPTER 13, |
| 13-415.2. |
| PLEASE SEE 13-415.2.ABC.1.1, .1.2 AND .1.3. |
| THE SUBMITTED METHOD *A* MAY BE USED WHEN YOU HAVE A |
| WHOLE BUILDING OR AN ADDITION WHICH IS NOT INCLUDING |
| ANY RENOVATION TO ANY EXISTING BUILDING AREAS. |
| THE METHOD *A* SUBMITTED DOES NOT CONTAIN ANY |
| SIGNATURE, OR DATE BY THE RESPONSIBLE DESIGNER. |
| MUST CONTAIN THESE PER 13-103.1. PLEASE SEE DESIGNERS |
| PERMITTED TO DO THIS UNDER FLORIDA STATUTES 471, 481 |
| AND 489. |
| THE METHOD *A* SUBMITTED CLEARLY STATES *RENOVATION TO |
| EXISTING BUILDING*. IF THIS IS NOT AN ADDITION, OR |
| WHOLE BUILDING NEW CONSTRUCTION THEN THIS METHOD MAY |
| NOT BE USED. |
| IN ANY CASE ALL INFORMATION ON ANY INPUT DATA REPORT |
| NEEDS TO COORDINATE WITH ALL INFORMATION ON PLANS. |
| THERE ARE SEVERAL ITEMS ON THE IDR AS SUBMITTED WHICH |
| ARE EITHER NOT COMPLETE OR THESE ITEMS ARE NOT THE SAME |
| AS ON PLANS. |
| EXAMPLES: |
| THE METHOD OF LIGHTING CONTROLS STATE *MANUAL ON/OFF*. |
| THIS IS NOT THE CASE AS ANY NEW PRESCRIPTIVE LIGHTING |
| CONTROLS IN A BUILDING GREATER THAN 5K SQ FT SHALL |
| COMPLY WITH 13-415.1.ABC.1, .1.1, .1.2, .1.3 AND .1.4. |
| SEE THE FOLLOWING COMMENT WITH RESPECT TO LIGHTING |
| CONTROLS. |
| EXAMPLE: |
| THE EXTERIOR LIGHTING ON THE IDR IS COMPLETELY BLANK. |
| THIS IS ONE ITEM WHICH THE PLANS CLEARLY CONTAIN |
| EXTERIOR LIGHTING YET THERE ARE NO FIXTURES ON THE |
| IDR.?? |
| THE PLANS INDICATE SPACE BY SPACE FROM TABLE *B*. |
| PLEASE SEE 13-415.2.ABC.1 WHICH CLEARLY STATES THAT IS |
| NOTE PERMITTED TO USE MORE THAN ONE METHOD. |
| THIS REVIEWER IS OK WITH USE OF SPACE BY SPACE FOR |
| LIGHTING PERFORMANCE LEVELS HOWEVER WE WOULD STILL NEED |
| EXTERIOR PER 13-415.2.ABC.1.3. |
| |
| |
| 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 13-415.1.ABC.1.1, .1.2, .1.3 AND |
| .1.4 FOR REQUIRED LIGHTING CONTROLS. |
| ALL LIGHTING IN A BUILDING GREATER THAN 5K SQ FT SHALL |
| CONTAIN SOME SORT OF AUTOMATED CONTROLS SO WHEN THE |
| BUILDING IS NOT OCCUPIED THE LIGHTING. THERE ARE |
| COUNTLESS ARTICLES ON THE ENERGY CODE IN THE STATE OF |
| FLORIDA AS WELL AS THE REQUIREMENTS NATIONALLY IN THE |
| IECC. |
| THE FEDERAL CHANGES IN JULY OF 2004 IN THE INTEREST OF |
| ENERGY CONSERVATION REQUIRED ALL STATES BY THEIR |
| FOLLOWING CODE CYCLE TO ADOPT THE 1999 ASHAE 90.1 OR |
| BETTER. SINCE OCTOBER 1ST, 2005 THE 2004 FBC HAS |
| REQUIRED THIS. THIS HAS BEEN IN THE CODE FOR OVER 3 AND |
| HALF YEARS. THERE HAVE ALSO BEEN SEVERAL REVISIONS TO |
| THE 2004 FBC SINCE ADOPTED IN OCT.2005 |
| THE RESPONSE LETTER CONTAINS RESPONSES TO ALL OTHER |
| COMMENTS WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THIS PREVIOUS COMMENT. |
| THE RESPONSE IS BLANK? |
| ** PLEASE CALL TO GO OVER IF NEEDED. THIS IS NOT A |
| SEPARATE BUILDING BY DEFINITION SMALLER THAN 5K SQ FT. |
| THE SWITCHING SHOWN ON PLANS IS DONE BY STANDARD SINGLE |
| POLE SWITCHES ALONG WITH STANDARD 3-WAY SWITCHES. THE |
| INFORMATION ON SHEET E.04.11 IS NOT ENOUGH FOR |
| COMPLIANCE. THE KITCHEN IS NOT AN AREA WHICH IS EXEMPT |
| PER THE FBC. PLEASE CALL TO GO OVER. THERE ARE |
| SUBSTANTIAL DIFFERENCES IN MOTION SENSORS COMPARED TO |
| DUAL TECHNOLOGY DEVICES AND ALSO THESE SAME TYPE OF |
| DEVICES USED FOR EGRESS WHICH WOULD BE FAIL SAFE |
| OPERATION. |
| |
| 4) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO |
| FBC 11-4.28.1, .2 AND .3 FOR ALL DEVICES FOR FA SYSTEM |
| TO COMPLY WITH MINIMUM LEVELS, HEIGHTS ETC FOR ADA |
| COMPLIANCE. |
| THE RESPONSE MENTIONS TO SEE REVISED PLANS HOWEVER THE |
| FA SHEET E.06 DOES NOT INDICATE THE MINIMUM LEVELS FOR |
| STROBES AND SOUNDING DEVICES. |
| PLEASE ALSO SEE THERE ARE SEVERAL NOTES WHICH THERE |
| SEEMS TO HAVE BEEN SOME SORT OF MISHAP WITH THE |
| PRINTING. SEE NOTES 17 UNDER FIRE ALARM NOTES, NOTES |
| UNDER SEQUENCE OF OPERATION, NOTES UNDER THE SYMBOL |
| LEGENDS WHICH HAS NOTES PRINTED OVER NOTES. MANY ITEMS |
| CAN NOT BE READ. |
| THESE HAVE BEEN HIGH-LIGHTED ON ONE OF THE SET OF |
| PLANS. |
| SHEET E.06.1 ALSO DOES NOT CONTAIN ANY OF THIS MONTHS |
| |
| 5) NOTE: THE FOLLOWING ITEMS WITH RESPECT TO RISER, |
| PANELS, ETC STILL NEED COORDINATION. |
| |
| A) PLEASE SEE PANEL HU-2 WHICH INDICATES 125AMP OVER |
| CURRENT PROTECTION TO A 100AMP DISCONNECT ON THE LINE |
| SIDE OF TRANSFORMER |
| B) PLEASE SEE TRANSFORMER EK. RISER AND PLANS NOTE THIS |
| NEW 45KVA UNIT WILL BE REPLACING THE EXISTING 30 KVA |
| TRANSFORMER. THIS IS OK, HOWEVER PLEASE SEE THE |
| TRANSFORMER SCHEDULE ALONG WITH THE PRIMARY OVER |
| CURRENT PROTECTION. |
| THE SCHEDULE SHOWS A 45KVA TRANSFORMER HOWEVER ONLY |
| WITH THE AMPERAGE RATING OF THE PREVIOUS 30KVA UNIT. |
| 45KVA AT 480V IS 54.15AMPS NOT THE 36 AS LISTED ON |
| SCHEDULE. THE 36 AS LISTED ON SCHEDULE WOULD BE A 30KVA |
| UNIT AT 480V. |
| THIS WILL AFFECT THE OVER CURRENT PROTECTION ON THE |
| PRIMARY ALSO AS THIS IS NOTED AS 45AMPS. |
| THESE ITEMS AFFECT THE POWER PANEL SCHEDULE SHEET AS |
| WELL AS *BOTH* RISERS ON SHEET E.02. |
| 110.3,110.14,450.3,240.4,310.16,408, 240.21 ETC |
| |
| 6) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 210.8B2 AS ALL 15/20AMP 120V |
| RECEPTACLES IN KITCHEN AREAS SHALL BE GFCI/ OR GFCI |
| PROTECTED. SEE CIRCUITS SUCH AS EK-9, EK-11 ARE TWO |
| EXAMPLES IN WHICH NO PROTECTION IS SHOWN. THESE ARE NOT |
| THE ONLY TWO. |
| |
| 7) NOTE: AS NO LIGHTING ETC IS SHOWN FOR A COMPLETE |
| HOOD SYSTEM AND HOOD MAY BE UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT |
| PLEASE KNOW THAT ALL LIGHTING AND ELECTRICAL PER |
| NFPA-96 SHALL BE INTERCONNECTED AND SHUT DOWN UPON |
| ACTIVATION OF SYSTEM FOR FIRE SUPPRESSION. |
| NO INFORMATION NOTED AT THIS TIME AND WILL NEED TO BE |
| NOTED UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT. |
| |
| 8) NOTE: SHEET E.05 CONTAINS SOME NOTES FOR POSSIBLE |
| ACCESS CONTROL. THE SYMBOL LEGEND MAKES NOTE OF |
| POSSIBLE MAG-LOCKS ETC. |
| PLEASE SEE NFPA-101 CHAPTER 7 FOR EGRESS CONTROLS. NO |
| DEVICES UNDER NORMAL OR EMERGENCY CONDITIONS SHALL |
| IMPEDE THE EGRESS OUT OF ANY AREAS. SEE COMMENTS FROM |
| FIRE MARSHAL. |
| AS THE COMPLETE SYSTEM IS NOT DETAILED, THIS MAY BE |
| UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT FOR LOW VOLTAGE ACCESS CONTROLS. |
| FBC 105.1. |
| |
| 9) NOTE: MANY OF THE FIXTURES ARE HALF SHADED AND |
| SYMBOL LEGEND SEEMS TO INDICATE EMERGENCY POWER. THE |
| FIXTURE LEGEND HOWEVER DOES NOT LIST ANY BATTERY BACK |
| UP BALLAST AS REQUIRED. |
| PLEASE ADJUST. NFPA-101 7.8, 7.9, FBC 1006.1 |
| PLEASE ALSO KNOW AS NOTED ABOVE, ANY EGRESS LIGHTING |
| BEING CONTROL BY OCCUPANCY SENSOR TYPES DEVICES PER FBC |
| 13-415.1.ABC.1, SHALL BE FAIL SAFE TYPE CONTROL DEVICES |
| PER FBC 1006.1.2, NFPA-101 7.8.1.2.2. |
| |
| 10) NOTE: PLEASE COMPLETE ALL LIGHTING CIRCUITS ON |
| PLANS AND COORDINATE WITH THE PANEL SCHEDULES. |
| BE SURE TO SEE 7..12F FOR CIRCUITING FOR EMERGENCY AND |
| EXIT LIGHTS. |
| 408.4, FBC 106.1.1, 106.5. |
| |
| |
| ** IMPORTANT ** |
| ONCE AUDIT/REVIEWS ARE COMPLETE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP |
| FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE |
| ALL OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED |
| SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. |
| DO NOT LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. |
| PLEASE DO NOT ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO PLANS. ANY |
| ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION SUCH AS PRODUCT APPROVALS, |
| SPEC/CUT SHEETS, CALCULATIONS ETC. SHOULD BE PLACED |
| INTO TWO SETS/FOLDERS/BINDERS ETC. |
| PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS |
| SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE. |
| THIS WILL HELP IN THE AUDIT/REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID |
| ANY DELAYS. |
| |
| IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS; OR IF COMMENTS ARE NOT |
| TYPED IN A CLEAR MANNER PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO |
| CONTACT THIS REVIEWER. |
| |
| DEWEY PALMER |
| ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II |
| CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| 561-805-6717 |
| [email protected] |
| |
| |