Date |
Text |
2008-10-03 12:06:35 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| |
| SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| 561-805-6724 [email protected] |
| |
| FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 |
| FBC EB FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 EXISTING BUILDING |
| CODE |
| FBC R FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 RESIDENTIAL |
| FBC* CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 |
| FAC FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE |
| FS FLORIDA STATUTE |
| |
| |
| 1. SEE FBC R301.1 WHICH STATES THAT BUILDINGS AND |
| STRUCTURES AND "ALL PARTS THEREOF" SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED |
| TO SAFELY SUPPORT ALL LOADS, INCLUDING WIND. PLEASE |
| DEMONSTRATE WHERE IN EITHER FBC R301 OR FBC CHAPTER 20 |
| A DESIGN CAN PERMIT SCREEN TO 'BLOW OUT' IN 75MPH |
| WINDS. THERE ARE REFERENCES TO 75MPH AND 50MPH IN |
| VARIOUS PLACES ON THE PLAN AND IN THE CALCULATIONS. THE |
| CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH LIES ENTIRELY WITHIN THE 140MPH |
| WIND ZONE, FBC R301. REVISE THE DESIGN AND PLANS |
| ACCORDINGLY OR SHOW EXCEPTION IN THE CODE. IT APPEARS |
| THAT THE ENGINEER IS USING AN EXCEPTION IN THE CODE |
| WHICH IS FOR REMOVABLE ACRYLIC OR VINYL PANELS. FAILURE |
| OF A STRUCTURE COMPONENT AS DESIGN INTENT, EVEN AN ITEM |
| SUCH AS SCREEN, IS NOT PERMITTED IN THE FLORIDA |
| BUIDLING CODE. |
| |
| ALSO, BASED ON NOTES AND SPECIFICATIONS ITEM 6 ON PAGE |
| 3 OF 3, IT APPEARS THAT THE STRUCTURE WILL FAIL AT |
| 50MPH, BEFORE THE SCREEN WILL "BLOW OUT" AT 75MPH. |
| |
| 2. THERE IS A CONFLICT IN THE PLAN REGARDING THE SCREEN |
| DESIGN. PAGE 1 STATES THIS IS INSTALLED WITH SPLINE AND |
| IS DESIGNED TO "BLOW OUT", BUT PAGE 3 STATES SCREEN IS |
| TO BE REMOVED. CLARIFY CONSTRUCTION, FBC*106, FBC R301. |
| |
| 3. THE PLANS MAKE REFERENCE TO FBC CHAPTER 20. THE |
| DESIGN IS TO COMPLY WITH FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, |
| RESIDENTIAL. PLEASE REVISE PLANS TO INCLUDE CORRECT |
| CODE REFERENCES. |
| |
| 4. ONLY ONE SET OF CALCULATIONS WAS SUBMITTED. TWO |
| COMPLETE SETS OF PERMIT DOCUMENTS REQUIRED FOR PERMIT |
| ISSUANCE. HOWEVER, ONE SET OF STRUCTURAL PLANS WILL BE |
| RETAINED. WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE TWO |
| COMPLETE NEW SETS. THE SITE PLAN WILL BE RETURNED TO |
| THE CONTRACTOR AS ONLY STRUCTURALS WILL BE RETAINED. |
| |
| 5. PLANS INDICATE "PREFAB PANELS BY AQUA SHIELD"; |
| ANOTHER NOTE STATES "END PANEL PROFILE". NO DETAILS |
| WERE PROVIDED IN THE PLAN LABELED AS SUCH. AS THE |
| NATURE OF THE PREFAB PANELS IS NOT CLEAR, COMPLIANCE |
| REQUIREMENTS WITH FAC9B72 CANNOT BE DETERMINED. FLORIDA |
| STATE OR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL MAY BE REQUIRED, |
| FAC9B72. SECTION 1 DOES NOT PROVIDE DETAILS OF A PANEL. |
| |
| 6. PROVIDE INFORMATION REGARDING THE EXISTING SLAB AND, |
| IF NO FOOTINGS EXIST, PROVIDE CALCULATIONS TO SHOW HOW |
| THIS WILL RESIST WIND LOADS FBC301.1. NOTE THAT THIS |
| SPAN EXCEEDS THE SPANS ALLOWED FOR SLAB ONLY WITHOUT |
| FOOTING IN THE AAF GUIDE. PAGE 1 STATES THAT THIS |
| DESIGN IS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE AAF GUIDE. |
| |
| 7. SHOW PURLIN LOCATIONS AND SPANS, FBC R301. SOME |
| INFORMATION IS ADDED IN A NOTE ON SHEET 3, BUT AAF |
| GUIDE TREATS PURLINS AS A STRUCTURAL COMPONENT. PURLINS |
| ARE SHOWN ON SIDES; ARE THESE THE ONLY PURLINS ON THIS |
| STRUCTURE? NOTE THAT IN THE AAF GUIDE, THE SECONDARY |
| SUPPORTS ON WALLS ARE GIRTS, PURLINS ARE ON THE ROOF. |
| |
| 8. THE SURVEY SHOWS A 24X36 CONCRETE POOL DECK; THE |
| PROPOSED SCREEN ENCLOSURE IS 35X20. IT APPEARS THAT THE |
| INTENTION IS TO USE THE EXISTING AS THE STRUCTURAL |
| SUPPORT FOR THE ENCLOSURE. REVISE THE SITE PLAN TO |
| CLEARLY SHOW THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT. |
| |
| 9. GOVERNING CODE SHOULD INCLUDE 2007 |
| REVISIONS/SUPPLEMENTS; PLEASE REVISE PLAN. |
| |
| 10. STRUCTURAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED FOR THE PURLIN |
| AND MOUNTING ANGLE, MOUNTING CHANNEL. PROVIDE |
| STRUCTURAL INFORMATION FOR THE BEAMS AND COLUMNS. SHEET |
| 1 SHOWS THE ROOF BEAMS AT 1.5"X2"; IS THIS CORRECT? THE |
| MINIMUM SIZE IN THE AAF GUIDE FOR 140MPH EXPOSURE B IS |
| 2X4, YET CALCULATIONS STATE THIS WAS DESIGNED TO 146 |
| EXPOSURE C. |
| |
| 11. PROVIDE A GIRT TO POST DETAIL, FBC R301, FBC*106. |
| |
| 12. CALCULATIONS REFER TO FBC1613. THIS SECTION IS HIGH |
| VELOCITY; CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH IS NOT WITHIN THE |
| HVHZ. DESIGN MUST BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH NON-HVHZ |
| REQUIREMENTS. ALSO, FBC RESIDENTIAL IS TO BE USED FOR |
| THIS R3 STRUCTURE. |
| |
| 13. COLUMN SIZES NOT SPECIFIED. FBC*106, FBC R301. |
| |
| 14. PROVIDE INFORMATION REGARDING THE HOST STRUCTURE. |
| IS THE ATTACHMENT, SECTION 1 ON PAGE 2, CONNECTING TO |
| THE WALL, UNDER THE FASCIA? |
| |
| 15. PROVIDE A CONNECTION DETAIL, COLUMN TO TRACK AT |
| BOTTOM. FBC R301. |
| |
| 16. PROVIDE A CONNECTION DETAIL, COLUMN TO BEAM, FBC |
| R301. |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |