Date |
Text |
2008-04-11 14:07:06 | REVIEW #: 1ST |
| ACTION: DENIED |
| |
| FBC 2004 CODE FAMILY W/ 2007 SUPPLEMENTS |
| FBC CH.1 AS AMENDED BY THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| |
| 1. PG AC-1: GENERAL NOTE #2 CALLS FOR RETURN DUCT TO BE |
| TIGHT TO UNDERSIDE OF SUPPLY DUCT. SUFFICIENT SPACE |
| SHALL BE PROVIDED ADJACENT TO ALL MECHANICAL COMPONENTS |
| LOCATED IN OR FORMING A PART OF THE AIR DISTRIBUTION |
| SYSTEM TO ASSURE ADEQUATE ACCESS FOR (1) CONSTRUCTION |
| AND SEALING IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF |
| SECTION 603.1 OF THIS CODE; (2) INSPECTION; AND (3) |
| CLEANING AND MAINTENANCE IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBCM |
| 603.1.3. SHOW HOW THIS IS TO BE ACCOMPLISHED WITH THESE |
| TWO DUCT SYSTEMS TIGHT TO EACH OTHER. |
| |
| 2. PG AC-2: GENERAL NOTES #1 INDICATES THAT EF-1 AND |
| EF-2 ARE TO BE LOCATED ON ROOF ABOVE THE GARAGE, BUT |
| THE GARAGE VENTILATION PLAN AND THE FAN SCHEDULE CALL |
| FOR EF-7 AND EF-8 TO BE FOR THE GARAGE. PLEASE |
| COORDINATE PLANS, SCHEDULES AND NOTES TO CLARIFY THE |
| SCOPE OF WORK. FBCM 401.1 AND FBCB 106.1.1. |
| |
| 3. PG AC-2: PLEASE INDICATE ON PLANS THE SOURCE OF |
| MAKEUP AIR FOR EF-7 IN GARAGE. PLAN INDICATES SF-1 WILL |
| ONLY OPERATE DURING CO ALARM MODE IN CONJUNCTION WITH |
| EF-8. |
| |
| 4. PG AC-2: PLEASE INDICATE ON PLANS WHICH METHOD WAS |
| USED FOR DESIGN OF THE VENTILATION (OUTDOOR AIR). ONE |
| OF TWO METHODS SHALL BE SELECTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH |
| FBCM 403.1 AND 403.4. IT APPEARS THAT TABLE 403.3 WAS |
| USED. HOWEVER, THERE ARE SOME CALCULATIONS WHICH DO NOT |
| CORRESPOND WITH THE TABLE. EXAMPLE: THE RECEPTION AREA |
| IS SHOWN AS BEING 465 SQUARE FEET. THE TABLE PUTS THE |
| OCCUPANT LOAD AT 60 PEOPLE PER 1000SF FOR A TOTAL |
| OCCUPANT LOAD OF 28 PEOPLE. THE TABLE ALSO CALLS FOR A |
| VENTILATION RATE OF 15CFM PER PERSON. THIS GIVES A |
| REQUIREMENT OF 420CFM OF OUTDOOR AIR FOR THIS AREA. |
| THERE ARE OTHER AREAS WHICH APPEAR TO BE MISCALCULATED. |
| PLEASE VERIFY ALL VALUES ON THE OUTDOOR AIR SUMMARY |
| PRIOR TO RESUBMITTAL. |
| |
| |
| 5. PG AC-2: AIR CONDITIONING CONTROL SEQUENCE NOTE #4 |
| CALLS FOR EXHAUST FANS TO BE INTERLOCKED WITH ROOM |
| LIGHT SWITCHES. WHERE MECHANICAL EXHAUST IS REQUIRED BY |
| TABLE 403.3, RECIRCULATION OF AIR FROM SUCH SPACES |
| SHALL BE PROHIBITED. ALL AIR SUPPLIED TO SUCH SPACES |
| SHALL BE EXHAUSTED, INCLUDING ANY AIR IN EXCESS OF THAT |
| REQUIRED BY TABLE 403.3 IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBCM |
| 403.2.1(3). SINCE NOTE #1 REQUIRES SUPPLY FANS TO RUN |
| CONTINUOUS DURING OCCUPIED MODE, HOW WILL THE AIR BEING |
| SUPPLIED TO THE TOILET ROOMS BE EXHAUSTED WHEN LIGHT |
| SWITCHES ARE TURNED OFF? SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THIS |
| SECTION BY EITHER INTERLOCKING EXHAUST FANS WITH AHU?S |
| OR USING TRANSFER DUCTS FOR MAKEUP AIR TO THESE ROOMS. |
| |
| 6. PG AC-2: PLAN SHOWS FOUR CONDENSING UNITS ON ROOF. |
| MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT, APPLIANCES AND SUPPORTS THAT ARE |
| EXPOSED TO WIND SHALL BE DESIGNED AND INSTALLED TO |
| RESIST THE WIND PRESSURES ON THE EQUIPMENT AND THE |
| SUPPORTS AS DETERMINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBCM 301.13. |
| ALSO, CLEARANCES FOR ROOFTOP EQUIPMENT AND APPLIANCES |
| SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBCB 1509.7. PROVIDE DETAIL |
| FOR ROOF CURBS OR PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR PRE-ENGINEERED |
| A/C STANDS AS APPROPRIATE FOR THE INSTALLATION METHOD |
| CHOSEN. IF OTHER THAN A PRE-ENGINEERED SYSTEM IS USED, |
| PROVIDE WIND LOAD CALCULATIONS WITH CORRESPONDING |
| ATTACHMENT DETAILS. |
| |
| 7. ENERGY CALCULATIONS: THERE ARE SOME BUILDING |
| ENVELOPE COMPONENTS IN THE INPUT DATA REPORT (IDR) |
| WHICH DO NOT CORRESPOND WITH THE INFORMATION ON THE |
| PLANS. EXAMPLE: THERE ARE NO DOORS SHOWN IN THE IDR |
| WHILE THE ARCHITECTURAL FLOOR PLAN SHOWS NEW DOORS |
| BEING INSTALLED. EXAMPLE: THE IDR CALLS FOR R-22.2 ON |
| THE ROOF, INCLUDING R-19 MINERAL WOOL BATTS. |
| ARCHITECTURAL PLANS DO NOT CALL FOR R-19 BATTS. PLEASE |
| SHOW ON PLANS HOW THE R-22.2 IS TO BE ACHIEVED OR |
| ADJUST CALCULATIONS TO THE R-VALUE OF THE EXISTING ROOF |
| SYSTEM PLUS THE INSULATION BEING ADDED AS SHOWN ON |
| REFLECTIVE CEILING PLAN. THE OWNER SHALL DEMONSTRATE TO |
| THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT?S SATISFACTION THAT ALL |
| R-VALUES AND EQUIPMENT EFFICIENCIES CLAIMED ARE |
| PRESENT. IF THE BUILDING WAS BUILT AFTER 1980, THE |
| ORIGINAL ENERGY CODE SUBMITTAL MAY BE USED TO |
| DEMONSTRATE EFFICIENCIES IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBCB |
| 13-101.4.2.1. |
| |
| 8. PG A2.3 SHOWS SKYLIGHTS WHICH MAY OR MAY NOT REMAIN. |
| IS THE HEAT GAIN FROM THE SKYLIGHTS INCLUDED IN THE |
| COOLING LOAD CALCULATIONS FOR A/C SIZING? DO THESE |
| SKYLIGHTS HAVE AN IMPACT ON THE R-VALUE OF THE ROOF |
| SYSTEM? PLEASE CLARIFY AND INDICATE WHETHER OR NOT |
| THESE SKYLIGHTS WILL REMAIN. THE PLANS AND |
| SPECIFICATIONS, INCLUDING THE ENERGY CODE CALCULATIONS, |
| SHALL SHOW, IN SUFFICIENT DETAIL, ALL PERTINENT DATA |
| AND FEATURES OF THE BUILDING IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBCB |
| 13-103.2. |
| |
| IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT: |
| RONALD J. REGUEIRO |
| 561.805.6719 |
| [email protected] |