Date |
Text |
2008-08-01 09:02:07 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| |
| SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| 561-805-6724 [email protected] |
| |
| FBCFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 |
| FBC EBFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 EXISTING BUILDING |
| CODE |
| FBC RFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 RESIDENTIAL FBC* |
| CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 |
| |
| FAC FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE |
| FSFLORIDA STATUTE |
| |
| 1.)WHEN RESUBMITTING, ALL CHANGES TO THE PLAN ARE TO |
| BE CLOUDED AND INDICATED WITH REVISION MARKERS, REMOVE |
| AND REPLACE REVISED SHEETS AS NECESSARY.INCLUDE A |
| RESPONSE LETTER INDICATING HOW EACH ITEM WAS |
| ADDRESSED. |
| |
| 2.)ADDRESSED. |
| |
| 3.)PLEASE PROVIDE A BREAKDOWN OF COST FOR THE |
| RENOVATION AREA AND NEW AREAS. |
| |
| 2ND REVIEW, PLEASE PROVIDE A REASONABLE VALUE FOR THIS |
| JOB OR AN ESTIMATE WILL BE DONE USING MARSHALL & SWIFT |
| OR MEANS. |
| |
| 4.)ALL CODE REFERENCES WERE REVISED TO INCLUDE 2007 |
| REVISIONS/SUPPLEMENTS WITH THE EXCEPTION OF C1, |
| PROPOSED, STILL REFERS TO 06 REVISIONS. |
| |
| 5.)PROVIDE A SURVEY FOR THIS PARCEL.THE SITE PLANS |
| PROVIDED ARE NOT CONSISTENT. |
| |
| 2ND REVIEW, SEE SITE PLAN PREPARED BY AB DESIGN.THE |
| EXISTING WAREHOUSE DOES NOT MATCH THE SURVEY OR C1. |
| ONLY ONE SET OF THE SITE PLAN PREPARED BY AB DESIGN WAS |
| SUBMITTED.TWO SETS NEEDED FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE.ONE |
| SET HAS BEEN RETAINED.THEREFORE, IF THESE SHEETS ARE |
| REQUIRED, SUBMIT TWO NEW ORIGINAL SETS. |
| |
| 6.)PROVIDE A SOILS INVESTIGATION REPORT FBC1802.2. |
| TWO ORIGINALS REQUIRED. |
| |
| 2ND REVIEW, SEE THE SOILS REPORT AND FAC61G15-23.002, |
| ENGINEERING REPORTS MUST BE SIGNED, SEALED AND DATED ON |
| A SIGNATURE PAGE OR COVER LETTER BY EACH PROFESSIONAL |
| ENGINEER WHO IS IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE OF ANY PORTION OF |
| THE REPORT, AND IF PRACTICING THROUGH A DULY AUTHORIZED |
| ENGINEERING BUSINESS, THE NAME, ADDRESS AND CERTIFICATE |
| OF AUTHORIZATION NUMBER OF THE ENGINEERING BUSINESS. |
| THE SIGNATURES ARE TO BE ORIGINALS, NOT PHOTOCOPIES. |
| |
| 7.)ADDRESSED. |
| |
| 8.)PARKING STRIPING IS TO COMPLY WITH CITY OF WEST |
| PALM BEACH STANDARD, SEE ATTACHED DETAIL.REVISE C1. |
| |
| ENGINEER?S RESPONSE IS THAT THE CONTRACTOR WILL |
| ADDRESS.AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE IS REQUIRED, AS WELL AS |
| ACCESSIBLE PARKING.THEREFORE, IT APPEARS THAT THE |
| SITE PLAN PREPARED BY AB DESIGN IS REQUIRED FOR CODE |
| COMPLIANCE. |
| |
| SHEET 1, THE PARKING DETAIL DOES NOT MATCH THE SITE |
| PLAN ON THE SAME PAGE.THE SITE PLAN SHOWS A WHEEL |
| STOP, PARKING DETAIL SHOWS A VEHICLE OVERHANG. |
| COMPLIANCE NOT CLEAR, SEE FBC11-4.6.3, OVERHANG SHALL |
| NOT REDUCE THE CLEAR WIDTH OF ACCESSIBLE ROUTE. |
| |
| SEE ALSO COMMENT 23 FROM FIRST LIST; SHOW THE WIDTH OF |
| THE SIDEWALK (ROUTE FROM THE ACCESSIBLE PARKING TO THE |
| FRONT ENTRY), FBC11-4.6.2(1). |
| |
| 9.)ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGNAGE IS TO COMPLY WITH |
| FBC11-4.6.4; THE SIGN IS TO ALSO INCLUDE THE PENALTY. |
| REVISE C1 AND AB DESIGN SHEET 1 OF 3. |
| |
| 2ND REVIEW, NOT ADDRESSED.SHEET 1 WAS NOT REVISED, |
| AND ENGINEER?S RESPONSE IS THAT CONTRACTOR IS TO |
| ADDRESS ACCESSIBLE PARKING. |
| |
| SHOW ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN LOCATION. |
| |
| 10-14.) ADDRESSED. |
| |
| 15.) TENANT SEPARATIONS SHOWN, BUT THE 1 HOUR REQUIRED |
| DETAIL IS NOT COMPLETE.DETAIL 1 A5 WAS PROVIDED, BUT |
| NOTHING ON THE FLOOR PLAN CORRELATES WITH THIS WALL |
| DETAIL. PLEASE PROVIDE A DETAIL MARKER ON THE FLOOR |
| PLAN TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC703.2. |
| |
| PLEASE NOTE ALL REQUIRED FIRE RESISTIVE RATED |
| CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS ON THE PLAN.FOR INSTANCE, |
| WALL BETWEEN OFFICE 1/MENS BATHROOM/BREAK ROOM/CLOSET |
| AND WAREHOUSE BAY 2.ALTHOUGH BLOCK WOULD BY DESIGN BE |
| A 1 HOUR WALL, UNLESS REQUIREMENTS ARE CLARIFIED, IT |
| WOULD NOT BE CLEAR WHETHER FIRE DAMPERS, PENETRATION |
| PROTECTION, SIGNAGE ABOVE DROPPED CEILINGS, ETC. WOULD |
| BE REQUIRED.IF DESIGNING WITH OCCUPANCY SEPARATION, A |
| 3 HOUR IS REQUIRED, SEE OTHER COMMENTS. |
| |
| 16-18.) ADDRESSED. |
| |
| 19.)SEE FBC TABLES 601, 602, 704.8.COMPLIANCE IS TO |
| BE SHOWN ON THE PLAN. |
| |
| 2ND REVIEW, NORTH WALL IS SHOWN AS >30FEET.THE |
| SERVICE ROAD IS 40FEET; DIMENSION SHOULD BE FROM THE |
| EXTERIOR WALL TO CENTERLINE OF THE ROAD, 26FEET. PLEASE |
| REVISE AND CHECK ALL. |
| |
| 20.) ADDRESSED. |
| |
| 21.)AB DESIGN LLC HAS AN APPLICATION PENDING FOR THE |
| BUSINESS LICENSE.UNTIL THIS IS ISSUED, THIS COMPANY |
| NAME CANNOT BE USED ON PLANS. |
| |
| A SET HAS BEEN RETAINED.PLEASE SEE OTHER COMMENTS, |
| REVISE TO ADDRESS COMMENTS, AND SUBMIT TWO NEW ORIGINAL |
| SIGNED, SEALED, DATED SETS.AB DESIGN, LLC IS TO BE |
| REMOVED FROM THE TITLE BLOCK UNLESS A CERTIFICATE OF |
| AUTHORIZATION HAS BEEN OBTAINED. |
| |
| 22.)SHOW ALL REQUIRED DETECTABLE WARNINGS, |
| FBC11-4.29. |
| |
| 23.)FROM FIRST LIST; COMMENT NOT ADDRESSED.SHOW THE |
| SIDEWALK WIDTH ON THE PLAN, SIDEWALK BETWEEN ACCESSIBLE |
| PARKING AND THE BUILDING.C1 SHOWS A 44INCH SIDEWALK, |
| WITH A NOTE "SIDEWALK AS SHOWN ON PLAN" BUT THE |
| ENGINEER'S PLAN DOESN'T SHOW ANY SIDEWALKS.THE |
| LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S PLAN DOES NOT DIMENSION THE |
| SIDEWALK ALTHOUGH IT IS THE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE, AND THERE |
| IS A CONFLICT BETWEEN THE PARKING DETAIL AND THE |
| PARKING SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN, BOTH ON AB DESIGN PAGE |
| 1.THE PARKING DETAIL SHOWS A VEHICLE OVERHANG, PLAN |
| SHOWS A WHEEL STOP.SEE FBC11-4.6.3, VEHICLE OVERHANGS |
| CANNOT REDUCE THE CLEAR WIDTH. DESIGN INTENT IS NOT |
| CLEAR. |
| |
| 2ND REVIEW, ENGINEER REMOVED SIDEWALK FROM PLAN, |
| RESPONSE LETTER STATES THIS WILL BE ADDRESSED BY |
| CONTRACTOR.PLEASE REVISE SITE PLAN TO SHOW CODE |
| COMPLIANCE. |
| |
| 24-25.) ADDRESSED. |
| |
| 26.)SEE FIGURE 11-7(6), TURNS AROUND AN OBSTRUCTION, |
| AND DOOR 3 INTO THE GARAGE, FBC11-4.3.3. |
| |
| 27.)LABEL EACH ROOM AS TO USE, AREAS BEHIND THE |
| BIFOLD DOORS 9 AND 10. |
| |
| 28.)SHOW THE ELEVATION ON EACH SIDE OF THE EXTERIOR |
| DOORS, FBC11-4.13.8. |
| |
| 29.)IF 9 AND 10 ARE CLOSETS, THESE AREAS ARE TO BE |
| ACCESSIBLE, SEE FBC11-4.25. |
| |
| 2ND REVIEW, PLEASE NOTE REQUIREMENT OF ACCESSIBLE DOORS |
| AND HARDWARE ON THE PLAN. |
| |
| 30.)THE SHOWER IS TO COMPLY WITH FBC 11-4.23, |
| FBC11-4.1.2(6).PROVIDE A DETAIL AND SHOW TURNING |
| RADIUS. |
| |
| RESPONSE LETTER STATES THAT THE SHOWER IS ADAPTABLE AS |
| NOTED ON THE PLAN.THIS BATHROOM MUST BE FULLY |
| ACCESSIBLE FBC11-4.2(6); ADAPTABLE APPLIES ONLY TO |
| PRIVATE TOILET ROOM (SUCH AS PRIVATE BATHROOM IN AN |
| OFFICE), FBC11-4.1.3(11).PROVIDE A DETAIL FOR THE |
| SHOWER FBC11-4.21. |
| |
| 31.)PROVIDE DETAILS FOR THE TOILETS, LAVATORIES, GRAB |
| BARS, MIRRORS, FBC 11. |
| |
| SEE PLUMBING COMMENTS. |
| |
| 32.)ADDRESSED. |
| |
| 33.)PROVIDE A DETAIL FOR THE BREAK ROOM SINK SHOWING |
| COMPLIANCE WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS OF FBC11-4.24. |
| |
| I WAS UNABLE TO LOCATE A DETAIL.ALSO PLEASE NOTE THAT |
| THERE IS NOT ENOUGH SPACE FOR TURNING RADIUS |
| FBC11-4.2.3. |
| |
| 34-36.) ADDRESSED. |
| |
| 37.)BUILDING INFORMATION, C1, ITEM 8 NEW ADDITION |
| STATES NON RATED, TABLE 302.3.2.THIS CODE SECTION IS |
| FOR SEPARATED USE WHICH WOULD REQUIRE A FIRE RATED |
| SEPARATION.SEE FBC 302.3.1, CORRELATE INFORMATION AND |
| REVISE PLAN AS NECESSARY. |
| |
| NOT ADDRESSED; IF YOU ARE DESIGNING TO FBC 302.3.2 AS |
| INDICATED ON PROPOSED, OCCUPANCY SEPARATION, 3 HOUR |
| REQUIRED BETWEEN S1 AND B, FBC TABLE 302.3.2.NO |
| OCCUPANCY SEPARATION IS REQUIRED IF DESIGNING USING NON |
| SEPARATED USE FBC30.3.1 AND THE BUILDING COMPLIES WITH |
| THE MOST STRINGENT OCCUPANCY REQUIREMENT OF FBC TABLE |
| 501.A TENANT SEPARATION OF 1 HOUR WOULD STILL BE |
| REQUIRED, SEE OTHER COMMENTS.PLEASE CONTACT ME IF YOU |
| WOULD LIKE FURTHER CLARIFICATION. |
| |
| 38-39.) ADDRESSED. |
| |
| 40.)A NON IMPACT GLASS DOOR PRODUCT APPROVAL WAS |
| SUBMITTED.SEE FBC10 FBC1003.6, MEANS OF EGRESS |
| CONTINUITY.THE PATH OF EGRESS TRAVEL ALONG A MEANS OF |
| EGRESS SHALL NOT BE INTERRUPTED BY ANY BUILDING ELEMENT |
| OTHER THAN A MEANS OF EGRESS COMPONENT AS SPECIFIED IN |
| CHAPTER 10.YOU CANNOT BLOCK EXIT DOORS WITH A |
| HURRICANE PANELS. |
| |
| 2ND REVIEW, ENGINEER HAS SPECIFIED AN IMPACT GLASS DOOR |
| BUT THE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR IMPACT RATED GLASS DOOR |
| WAS NOT SUBMITTED. THE NON IMPACT GLASS DOORS CAN BE |
| USED WITH ACCORDION SHUTTERS FBC1008.1.3.6.AN |
| ACCORDION PRODUCT APPROVAL WAS SUBMITTED, BUT THE |
| INSTALLATION SCHEDULE WAS NOT COMPLETED SO IT CANNOT BE |
| DETERMINED WHERE THE ACCORDIONS ARE PROPOSED. |
| |
| 41.)FOR THE ROOF, SELECT THE APPROVED ASSEMBLY AND |
| SPECIFY ENHANCED FASTENING FOR ZONES 2 AND 3.THIS CAN |
| BE DONE AT THE TIME OF ROOF PERMIT APPLICATION. |
| |
| THE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR THE ROOF HAS BEEN REMOVED FROM |
| THE PACKAGE.THIS IS REQUIRED, REVIEWED BY DESIGNER OF |
| RECORD.OTHER INFORMATION (ASSEMBLY, ENHANCED |
| FASTENING) CAN BE SUBMITTED WITH THE ROOF PERMIT. |
| |
| 42.)SOME OF THE NOAS SUBMITTED ARE DIFFICULT TO READ. |
| PLEASE PROVIDE LEGIBLE COPIES.THEY MAY BE AVAILABLE |
| AT WWW.BUILDINGCODEONLINE.COM. |
| |
| PLEASE SEE THE ROLLUP DOOR PRODUCT APPROVAL.IT IS |
| ILLEGIBLE AND I CANNOT FIND/READ DESIGN PRESSURES. |
| PLEASE MARK ON THE FLORIDA STATE PRODUCT APPROVAL WHICH |
| PRODUCT YOU ARE USING AND SUBMIT COMPLETE, LEGIBLE |
| DOCUMENTS FOR THAT PRODUCT.THIS IS AVAILABLE AT |
| WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG |
| |
| 43.)ADDRESSED. |
| |
| 44.)SEE ATTACHED INSTALLATION SCHEDULE AND COMPLETE |
| THIS FORM (REQUIRED FOR HURRICANE SHUTTERS). |
| |
| 2ND REVIEW, RETURNED BLANK.UPON REQUEST, THIS |
| INFORMATION CAN BE PROVIDED WITH A SEPARATE PERMIT FOR |
| SHUTTERS.HOWEVER, THE PLAN IS REQUIRED TO ADDRESS |
| ITEM 40.EITHER SUBMIT AN IMPACT RATED PRODUCT |
| APPROVAL FOR THIS DOOR, OR NOTE ON THE PLAN THAT IT |
| WILL BE IMPACT WITH AN ACCORDION SHUTTER (CANNOT USE |
| PANELS FOR THIS OPENING). |
| |
| SEE OTHER COMMENTS.THIS CAN, UPON REQUEST, BE |
| PROVIDED WITH AN APPLICATION FOR SHUTTERS ON A SEPARATE |
| PERMIT IF OTHER ISSUES ARE ADDRESSED ? PRESTORM |
| PREPARATION PLAN (ITEM 45) AND EXITING ISSUE (ITEM |
| 40). |
| |
| 45.)USE OF REMOVABLE SHUTTERS ON COMMERCIAL |
| PROPERTIES REQUIRES APPROVAL FROM THE BUILDING |
| OFFICIAL.IF YOU ARE PROPOSING TO USE REMOVABLE |
| SHUTTERS, SUBMIT A PRE STORM PREPARATION PLAN, SEE |
| ATTACHED POLICY, ITEM 13.PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVALS |
| AND COMPLETE AN INSTALLATION SCHEDULE. |
| |
| THE INSTALLATION PLAN MAY BE SENT VIA EMAIL PRIOR TO |
| RESUBMITTAL OF THE PLANS.CONTRACTOR IS ENCOURAGED TO |
| GET THIS ISSUE RESOLVED PRIOR TO RESUBMITTAL TO AVOID |
| DELAYS IN PERMITTING. |
| |
| 2ND REVIEW, NOT ADDRESSED.THIS IS REQUIRED FOR |
| REMOVABLE PANELS BUT NOT FOR ACCORDIONS.BOTH PRODUCT |
| APPROVALS WERE SUBMITTED.PLEASE CLARIFY DESIGN |
| INTENT. |
| |
| 46-47.) ADDRESSED. |
| |
| NEW COMMENTS: |
| |
| 48.) SEE ENERGY CALCS SUBMITTED, SQUARE FOOT AREA IS TO |
| MATCH THE PLAN; CONDITIONED AND UNCONDITIONED AREA IS |
| TO BE INCLUDED. FBC13-101. |
| |
| 49.)WALL SECTIONS TO BE NOTED ON THE FLOOR PLAN.AN |
| INSULATED WALL IS REQUIRED BETWEEN THE GARAGE AND |
| CONDITIONED SPACE. |
| |
| 50.)ALL REQUIRED FIRE RESISTANCE IS TO BE SHOWN ON |
| THE PLAN AS PENETRATIONS WILL BE REQUIRED TO BE |
| PROTECTED.FOR INSTANCE, THE WALL BETWEEN BAY 2 AND |
| THE GARAGE IS TO HAVE A 1 HOUR FIRE RESISTIVE RATING, |
| FBC708.1(5).IF USING AN EXCEPTION, NOTE ON THE PLAN |
| AND SHOW FIRE AREA. |
| |
| 51.)PLEASE NOTE THAT SOME COMMENTS WOULD HAVE BEEN |
| REDLINE OR PROVISO ITEMS; HOWEVER, AS PLANS NEED TO BE |
| CHANGED DUE TO COMMENTS FROM OTHER REVIEWERS, PLEASE |
| REVISE AT THIS TIME. |