Date |
Text |
2008-02-14 16:57:20 | COMMERCIAL SIGN, BUILDING REVIEW CHECKLIST. |
| REVIEW UNDER FBC 2004 WITH 2007 REVISIONS. |
| |
| 1- DESIGN CRITERIA NEEDS TO BE UPDATED. USING ASCE |
| 7-98. NEED TO USE ASCE 7-02 AS ADOPTEDIN THE FBC |
| 2004. |
| ***NOTE: REVISE ORIGINAL DRAWINGS. HANDWRITTEN |
| REVISIONS OVER EXISTING NUMBERARE NOT ALLOWED. |
| |
| 2-MISSINGSTRUCTURAL INFORMATION (SEC. 106.1.2 CITY |
| AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004 TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE |
| WIND LOADS OF SEC. 1609 FBC 2004): |
| |
| A) THERE ARE NOT SPECS FOR TYPE AND SIZE OFANCHOR |
| TO BE USED TO HOLD LETTERS TO ALUMINUM RACEWAY. |
| |
| B) WHAT'S THE THICKNESS OF 2"X2" L BRACKET THAT |
| HOLDS ALUMINUM RACEWAY TO EXISTING STRUCTURE. |
| |
| C) "MOUNTING PLATES W/ HARDWARE APPROP. TO WALL |
| TYPE"ARE NOTSPECIFICATIONS.HOW CAN ENGINEER |
| DETERMINE THAT SIGN WILLWITHSTAND 140MPH WIND LOADS |
| IF SPECIFIC ANCHOR IS NOT SPECIFIED. |
| |
| D) WHAT'S THE SPACING FOR THE 3/8" THRU BOLT |
| W/LOCKNUT & WASHER SPECIFIED.COORDINATE WITH ITEM |
| 2(C) ABOVE. |
| |
| E)IT'S NOT CLEAR IF THE SIGN IS TO BE ATTACHED TO |
| THE "DRYVIT" FASCIA OR TO THE STRUCTURAL MEMBERS THAT |
| HOLD THE FASCIA.COORDINATE WITH ITEM 2(C) ABOVE. |
| NOTE: FASCIA ALONE MAY NOT BE USED AS A STRUCTURAL |
| SUPPORT OF THE SIGN. |
| |
| 3- VALUATION DECLARED INTHE PERMIT APPLICATION IS TOO |
| LOW.UPDATE VALUATION TO INCLUDE TOTAL COST FOR THE |
| INSTALLATION OF THE SIGN, INCLUDING THE ENGINEERING |
| FEES.ALSO,VALUATION TO INCLUDE REMOVAL OF EXISTING |
| AWNING AS INDICATED ON PLANS. IF SIGN COMPANY IS NOT |
| DOING THE REMOVAL, THEN A SEPARATE PERMIT IS REQUIRED. |
| SEC. 108.3 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| |
| 4- NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT IS REQUIRED BY SEC. 713.13 |
| FLORIDA STATUTE. |
| |
| NOTE: ONE SET OF PLANS WILL BE RETAINED IN THIS OFFICE |
| TO BE SEND TO THE BOARD OF ENGINEERS FOR REVIEW. |
| |
| JULIO GOMEZ |
| BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| (561)805-6712 |