Date |
Text |
2008-02-15 11:22:31 | REVIEW #: 1ST |
| ACTION: DENIED |
| |
| FBC 2004 CODE FAMILY W/ 2007 SUPPLEMENTS |
| FBC CH.1 AS AMENDED BY THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| |
| 1. M200: THERE ARE SEVERAL LOCATIONS THROUGHOUT THIS |
| FLOOR PLAN WHERE DUCTS ARE SHOWN PENETRATING FIRE |
| RESISTANCE RATED WALL ASSEMBLIES WITHOUT ANY OPENING |
| PROTECTIVE. EXAMPLE: FAN ROOM 14-312 IS FULLY ENCLOSED |
| IN TYPE 2A WALLS, WHICH CARRY A 1-HOUR RATING AS SHOWN |
| ON PG A1002. THERE ARE AT LEAST TWO DUCTS EXITING THIS |
| ROOM WITHOUT FIRE DAMPERS AT THE WALL PENETRATIONS. |
| THERE ARE MULTIPLE OTHER INSTANCES. PLEASE COORDINATE |
| FLOOR PLANS FOR ARCHITECTURAL AND MECHANICAL, SHOWING |
| OPENING PROTECTIVES WHERE REQUIRED IN ACCORDANCE WITH |
| FBC, M 607.5. |
| |
| 2. M200: CONVERSELY, THERE IS A FIRE DAMPER SHOWN IN A |
| 24X10 DUCT PENETRATING A TYPE 6 WALL (NON RATED |
| ACCORDING TO PG A1002) NEAR COLUMN LINE F. A FIRE |
| DAMPER IS SHOWN AT THIS LOCATION. FIRE DAMPERS ARE TO |
| BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR LISTING PER FBC, |
| M 607.2. THE SPECIFIC BRAND OF FIRE DAMPER IS NOT KNOWN |
| AT THIS TIME BUT THE LISTING LIKELY REQUIRES THAT IT BE |
| INSTALLED IN A RATED ASSEMBLY. AGAIN, PLEASE COORDINATE |
| MECHANICAL AND ARCHITECTURAL FLOOR PLANS ACCORDINGLY. |
| |
| 3. M200: EF-1 AND SF-1 SHOW NEW LOUVERS TO BE INSTALLED |
| IN EXTERIOR WALLS. LOUVERS ARE CLASSIFIED AS PANEL |
| WALLS PER FAC RULE 9B-72 AND AS SUCH, PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| IS REQUIRED. PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR BUILDING PLAN |
| REVIEW. PRODUCT APPROVALS SHALL BE APPROVED IN WRITING |
| BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL TO THIS |
| OFFICE FOR REVIEW IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBC 106.3.3. |
| |
| 4. M200: THE LOUVER OPENING FOR EF-1 MAY BE IN A 2-HOUR |
| RATED EXTERIOR WALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBC TABLE 602. |
| BASED ON THE DOCUMENTATION PROVIDED, IT IS UNCLEAR AS |
| TO THE ALLOWABLE PERCENTAGE OF UNPROTECTED OPENINGS IN |
| THIS WALL. OUTDOOR AIR EXHAUST AND INTAKE OPENINGS |
| LOCATED IN EXTERIOR WALLS SHALL MEET THE PROVISIONS FOR |
| EXTERIOR WALL OPENING PROTECTIVES IN ACCORDANCE WITH |
| THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING PER FBC, M 401.6. |
| IF A CLAIM FOR ALLOWED UNPROTECTED OPENINGS IS MADE, |
| PLEASE PROVIDE ALL NECESSARY INFORMATION AND |
| CALCULATIONS FOR BUILDING PLAN REVIEW. |
| |
| 5. M200: A 44X12 ?SMOKE CONTROL TRANSFER OPENING IN |
| WALL W/ SMOKE DAMPER? IS SHOWN IN WALL ON NORTH SIDE OF |
| SPACE. THERE IS NOT INDICATION THAT THIS IS ALSO A FIRE |
| DAMPER. A FIRE DAMPER IS REQUIRED AT THIS LOCATION AS |
| IT IS LOCATED IN A 1-HOUR RATED WALL AS INDICATED ON |
| ARCHITECTURAL FLOOR PLAN. ALSO, BY WHAT MEANS WILL THIS |
| SMOKE DAMPER BE CONTROLLED? SMOKE DAMPERS SHALL BE |
| ACTUATED BY ONE OF THE METHODS LISTED IN FBC, M |
| 607.3.2.1. THIS DAMPER IS NOT PART OF THE BASE BUILDING |
| SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEM. WILL THE BASE BUILDING DESIGN BE |
| REVISED TO INCORPORATE THIS NEW SMOKE DAMPER? |
| |
| 6. M200: RELATED TO COMMENT #5 ABOVE, SPECIFIC NOTE #6 |
| ON PLAN CALLS FOR SMOKE DAMPERS TO BE INSTALLED IN |
| DUCTS IN VARIOUS LOCATIONS THROUGHOUT THE FLOOR PLAN, |
| INCLUDING SUPPLY AND RETURN DUCTS WHICH ARE PART OF A |
| ?SMOKE REMOVAL SYSTEM IN DUCT.? |
| A) EXISTING PAC-1 SUPPLY AND RETURN DUCT IS BEING SHOWN |
| AS PART OF A SMOKE REMOVAL SYSTEM. PAC-1 HAS NO ROLE IN |
| THIS BUILDING?S SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEM OTHER THAN IT WILL |
| BE SHUT DOWN DURING SMOKE CONTROL MODE. |
| B) A RATIONAL ANALYSIS OF THIS BUILDING?S SMOKE CONTROL |
| SYSTEM HAS BEEN PERFORMED AND SUBMITTED AS PART OF THE |
| BASE BUILDING?S PERMIT RECORD. ANY MODIFICATIONS TO THE |
| SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEM (AS PROPOSED BY THIS TENANT) MUST |
| BE INCORPORATED INTO THE RATIONAL ANALYSIS, INCLUDING |
| ANY ADDITIONAL DAMPERS WHICH NEED TO BE CONTROLLED BY |
| THE SYSTEM IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBC, M 513.4. |
| C) ITD ROOM 14-121 IS SHOWN ON FLOOR PLAN TO 1-HOUR |
| RATED WITH TYPE 2A WALLS EXTENDING TO THE UNDERSIDE OF |
| THE DECK ABOVE ON THREE SIDES. ONE OF THESE WALLS IS |
| SHOWN ON FLOOR PLAN BISECTING THE 60X20 OUTLET OF THE |
| SUPPLY DUCT FOR THE BUILDING SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEM. THIS |
| WOULD BE AN IMPEDIMENT TO MOST OF THE AIR, TRAPPING IT |
| IN THE ITD ROOM AND PREVENTING THE AIR FROM |
| PRESSURIZING THE ENTIRE FLOOR, WHICH IS ITS PURPOSE. |
| PLEASE SHOW HOW THE RATING OF THIS ROOM IS TO BE |
| ACHIEVED WITHOUT DEFEATING THE BUILDING SMOKE CONTROL |
| SYSTEM. ADDITIONALLY, THE REQUIRED RATING OF THE TYPE |
| 2A WALL CAN NOT BE MAINTAINED AS IT CROSSES THE OPEN |
| END OF THE 60X20 DUCT. |
| D) WEST OF THE SERVICE ELEVATOR THERE IS AN |
| UNIDENTIFIED ENCLOSED AREA SURROUNDED BY TEMPORARY |
| CORRIDOR 14-036. THIS AREA ENCLOSES THE EXHAUST INLET |
| FOR THE BUILDING SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEM. THIS ENCLOSURE |
| CREATES A PLENUM SPACE TO BE USED BY THE EXHAUST |
| PORTION OF THE BUILDING SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEM. THIS |
| SPACE IS NOT PART OF THE BASE BUILDING DESIGN AS IT IS |
| NOT SHOWN ON THE BASE BUILDING PLANS. THE WALL TYPES |
| AND FINISHES ARE NOT KNOWN AS THEY ARE NOT IDENTIFIED |
| ON THE ARCHITECTURAL FLOOR PLAN FOR THE TENANT SPACE. |
| THERE ARE TRANSFER DUCTS AND SMOKE DAMPERS SHOWN |
| FEEDING THIS PLENUM SPACE WHICH ARE ALSO NOT PART OF |
| THE CURRENT SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEM DESIGN. PLEASE CLARIFY |
| THE INTENT, IDENTIFY IF THESE WALLS CARRY ANY SORT OF |
| RATING AND DETERMINE IF THIS DESIGN WILL BE |
| INCORPORATED INTO THE BASE BUILDING DESIGN. FBC, M |
| 513.2 AND 513.4 |
| |
| 7. M200: SHOW MEANS AND LOCATION OF CONDENSATE DISPOSAL |
| FOR PROPOSED NEW AC-1 IN ITD ROOM IN COMPLIANCE WITH |
| FBC, M 307.2.2. |
| |
| 8. PROVIDE DETAIL FOR A LISTED THROUGH-PENETRATION |
| FIRESTOP SYSTEM TO BE USED WHERE CONDENSER AND/OR |
| CONDENSATE PIPING IS TO PENETRATE FIRE RESISTANCE RATED |
| WALL ASSEMBLIES IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBC 712.3. |
| |
| 9. M500: FIRE DAMPER DETAILS, THESE DETAILS ARE LIKELY |
| TO BE IN CONFLICT WITH FIRE DAMPER MANUFACTURER?S |
| INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS. FIRE DAMPERS, SMOKE DAMPERS |
| AND COMBINATION FIRE/SMOKE DAMPERS LOCATED WITHIN AIR |
| DISTRIBUTION AND SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEMS SHALL BE |
| INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS |
| SECTION, AND THE MANUFACTURER?S INSTALLATION |
| INSTRUCTIONS AND LISTING PER FBC, M 607.2. COORDINATE |
| DETAIL ON PLANS WITH MANUFACTURER?S INSTALLATION |
| INSTRUCTIONS OR PROVIDE A NOTE ON PLANS INDICATING THAT |
| IN THE EVENT OF A CONFLICT THE MANUFACTURER?S |
| INSTRUCTIONS SHALL PREVAIL. |
| |
| 10. M200 AND M701: SF2 SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH A DUCT |
| SMOKE DETECTOR. SMOKE DETECTORS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN |
| SUPPLY AIR SYSTEMS WITH A DESIGN CAPACITY GREATER THAN |
| 2,000 CFM IN THE SUPPLY AIR DUCT IN ACCORDANCE WITH |
| FBC, M 606.2.1. |
| |
| 11. M701: SEQUENCE OF OPERATION DOES NOT HAVE ANY |
| INDICATION THAT SMOKE DETECTORS IN THE SUPPLY DUCT HAVE |
| BEEN TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT AS ONLY THE RETURN SMOKE |
| DETECTORS ARE SHOWN IN THE SEQUENCE AND DIAGRAMS. NOTE: |
| FBC, M 606.2.1 REQUIRES DETECTORS AT A MINIMUM IN THE |
| SUPPLY DUCT AND 606.2.2 REQUIRES THEM ADDITIONALLY IN |
| THE RETURN DUCT. THE SUPPLY DETECTORS SHALL ALSO |
| INITIATE A FAN SHUT-DOWN AND INITIATE AN ALARM SIGNAL |
| IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS SECTION. |
| |
| 12. THESE PLANS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED AND SUBMITTED UNDER |
| THE PRIVATE PROVIDER SYSTEM AS ESTABLISHED UNDER FS |
| 553.791. THIS STATUTE REQUIRES AN AFFIDAVIT FROM THE |
| FEE OWNER ACKNOWLEDGING THE DECISION TO USE PRIVATE |
| PROVIDERS UNDER FS 533.791(4)(C). NO SUCH INFORMATION |
| COULD BE FOUND IN THE PACKAGE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT. |
| PROVIDE ALL REQUIRED DOCUMENTATION PURSUANT TO THIS |
| STATUTE. |
| |
| NOTE: PLEASE RESPOND TO EACH COMMENT IN WRITING, WITH A |
| DESCRIPTION OF HOW THE COMMENT HAS BEEN ADDRESSED (OR |
| WHY IT HAS NOT) AS WELL AS WHERE THE RELEVANT |
| INFORMATION CAN BE FOUND. ALSO, PLEASE RETURN ONE SET |
| OF OLD/VOIDED PLANS FOR REFERENCE. THESE STEPS WILL |
| HELP TO ENSURE A TIMELY REVIEW UPON RESUBMISSION. |
| |
| IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT: |
| RONALD J. REGUEIRO |
| 561.805.6719 |
| [email protected] |