Date |
Text |
2008-06-30 15:23:07 | ** DENIED THIRD REVIEW ** |
| |
| PLEASE SEE SOME COMMENTS FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEWS ARE |
| IN NEED OF ADDRESSING. |
| PLEASE SEE SOME COORDINATION OF OTHER COMMENTS BELOW |
| WITH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS. |
| |
| 1) NOTE: THE PREVIOUS REVIEWS REQUESTED FOR SUBMITTALS |
| OF MANUFACTURES SPECS/CUT SHEETS FOR THE ATS, |
| GENERATOR, FIRE PUMP AND FIRE PUMP CONTROLLER. |
| THE RESPONSE MENTIONS TO SEE SPECS IN THE SUBMITTAL |
| BOOKS. PLEASE BE SURE TO COORDINATE SUBMITTALS. FOR |
| EXAMPLE: |
| PLEASE SEE THERE ARE TWO SUBMITTALS FOR FIRE PUMP: ONE |
| SHOWS AURORA, THE OTHER SHOWS MORSE FAIRBANKS. PLEASE |
| SEE THERE ARE TWO SUBMITTALS FOR THE FIRE PUMP |
| CONTROLLER: ONE SHOWS METRON WHICH DOES NOT INDICATE |
| ANY LISTING AND THE OTHER IS A HUBBELL FOR FIRE PUMP |
| AND JOCKEY PUMP WHICH DOES SHOW LISTING. |
| PLEASE SEE THE ATS SPECS: ONE SHOWS AN ASCO AND THE |
| OTHER A CATERPILLAR. |
| PLEASE SEE THE GENERATOR SPACES: ONE SHOWS AN ONAN AND |
| THE OTHER A CATERPILLAR. |
| |
| ** PLEASE REMOVE THE DOCUMENTS FORREVIEW AND RECORD |
| PLANS. PLEASE BE SURE THE FINAL SPECS DO CONTAIN THE |
| LISTING. IF THIS WERE THE ONLY COMMENT A REPRESENTATIVE |
| WOULD BE ABLE TO CORRECT IN OFFICE. |
| 110.3, 90.7, 695 OF NFPA-70, CHAPTER 9 AND 10. |
| FBC 106.1.1 FOR CLARITY OF CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS. |
| |
| 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE SUBMITTED COORDINATION STUDY |
| WHICH WAS PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED. THE INFORMATION ON THE |
| STUDY DOES NOT COORDINATE WITH THE SUBMITTED ELECTRICAL |
| PLANS. PLEASE SEE SOME EXAMPLES GIVEN. |
| |
| FOR EXAMPLE: |
| PLEASE SEE THE RISER WHICH SHOWS 1-SET OF 3/0 FROM |
| GENERATOR TO FIRE PUMP YET THE COORDINATION STUDY SHOWS |
| 2-SETS OF 4/0. |
| |
| FOR EXAMPLE: |
| PLEASE SEE THE RISER SHOWS 225 FOR ATS-LS, YET THE |
| COORDINATION STUDY SHOWS 250AMPS. |
| |
| FOR EXAMPLE: |
| PLEASE SEE THERE IS NO NORMAL FEED TO THE FIRE PUMP. |
| |
| FOR EXAMPLE: |
| PLEASE SEE THE BREAKER OR RISER FOR FIRE PUMP ON THE |
| GENERATOR IS SHOWN AS 450AMPS, YET THE COORDINATION |
| STUDY SHOWS BREAKER AT 600AMPS. |
| |
| ** THESE ARE SOME EXAMPLES. |
| |
| ** PLEASE BE AWARE THAT THESE MUST BE SIGNED, DATED AND |
| SEALED BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD. THESE WERE NOT |
| SIGNED, DATED OR SEALED. |
| FAC61G15-23.002, 61G15-33.0002, FS 471.025 |
| NEC 240.12 |
| |
| 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS NOTES WITH RESPECT TO |
| *MINIMUM* LIGHTING REQUIRED FOR LIFE SAFETY. PLEASE SEE |
| NFPA-101 7.8.1.3, 7.8, 7.9, 7.9.2 |
| AS THE MINIMUM LEVELS FOR WALK AREAS (NOT STAIRS) IS |
| REQUIRED TO BE 1FT CANDLE UNDER NORMAL AS WELL AS 1FT |
| CANDLE UNDER EMERGENCY. THERE ARE SOME EXAMPLES GIVEN |
| WHICH THE LIGHTING LEVELS ARE AS LOW HALF THE *MINIMUM* |
| REQUIRED BY THE LIFE SAFETY CODE. |
| |
| FOR EXAMPLE: |
| PLEASE SEE E-101C AND E-101D CORRIDOR #149 WHICH SHOWS |
| .04 FT CANDLES YET THE MINIMUM NEEDS TO BE A MINIMUM OF |
| 1FT CANDLE. |
| |
| FOR EXAMPLE: |
| PLEASE SEE 603C, 603DAS THE LIGHTING IN AREAS 237, |
| 242 AND 230 ARE ALL BELOW THE 1FT CANDLE MINIMUM FOR |
| EMERGENCY EGRESS. THESE LEVELS ARE SHOWN AS .5 IN |
| CORRIDOR 237, .5 IN CORRIDOR 242 AND .6 INEGRESS PATH |
| 230. |
| |
| ** THESE ARE EXAMPLES GIVEN AS A BENEFIT TO DESIGN |
| TEAM. |
| |
| 4) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENTS WITH |
| RESPECT TO ALL LIGHTING ON PLANS AND THE NEED FOR |
| COORDINATION WITH THE SUBMITTED FLA-COM ENERGY |
| CALCULATIONS. |
| PLEASE SEE SECTIONS, 13-415.2, 13-415.2.ABC.1.1, .1.2 |
| AND .1.3. |
| THIS IS TO INCLUDE ALL INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR LIGHTING. |
| SOME EXAMPLES WILL BE GIVEN BELOW. THESE ARE GIVEN AS A |
| BENEFIT ONLY. |
| |
| FOR EXAMPLE: |
| PLEASE SEE THE EXTERIOR LIGHTS SUCH AS THE *M* FIXTURES |
| SHOWN ON PLANS ON THE SOUTH SIDEWALK YET THESE ARE NOT |
| IN ANY EXTERIOR OR INTERIOR LIGHTING IN THE INPUT DATA |
| REPORTS. |
| |
| FOR EXAMPLE: |
| PLEASE SEE THE INTERIOR ELEVATOR LOBBY MISSING THE SAS |
| FIXTURE IN THE IDR. PLEASE ALSO SEE THE SAME ARE FOR |
| THE *SP* FIXTURE COUNT. |
| ** THIS SAME AREA ON THE METHOD OF CONTROLS INDICATES |
| OCCUPANCY SENSORS YET NO OCCUPANCY SENSORS ARE SHOWN ON |
| PLANS. THIS APPEARS TO BE AN ERROR IN THE CHOICE OF |
| LIGHTING CONTROLS OPTION. |
| |
| FOR EXAMPLE: |
| PLEASE SEE THE INTERIOR LIGHTING IN THE GUEST ROOMS |
| NEED TO COORDINATE WITH THE INPUT DATA REPORT. THE |
| LIGHTING PLANS ON E-201 AND E-205 ARE NOT THE SAME. IN |
| FACT SOME EXAMPLES OF THIS WILL BE GIVEN. |
| |
| FOR EXAMPLE: |
| PLEASE SEE THE KING SUITES.E-201 SHOWS A TOTAL OF 11 |
| FIXTURES YET THE OTHER LIGHTING PLANS FOR CONTROLS ON |
| E-205 SHOW ONLY 8 FIXTURES. |
| IN EITHER CASE THE IDR OF THE SUBMITTED ENERGY |
| CALCULATIONS ONLY SHOW 7 FIXTURES. |
| ** PLEASE LOOK AT LIGHTING PLANS FOR TYPES OF FIXTURES |
| AS THERE IS THE DIFFERENCE OF 4 FIXTURES IN EACH OF |
| THESE ALONE. |
| COORDINATE TYPES OF FIXTURES. (WALL SCONCES ETC) |
| |
| FOR EXAMPLE: |
| PLEASE SEE THE ENLARGED KING ACCESSIBLE UNIT: THIS |
| SHOWS DIFFERENT FIXTURES ON E-201 COMPARED TO FIXTURES |
| ON E-205. ALL OF THESE UNITS ALSO SHOW A LOWER NUMBER |
| OF FIXTURES ON THE IDR. IT IS NOT JUST ONE FIXTURE |
| TOTAL, IT IS ONE FIXTURE FOR EACH UNIT. |
| ** PLEASE ALSO COORDINATE TYPES OF FIXTURES. (WALL |
| SCONCES) |
| |
| ** THESE WERE S FEW EXAMPLES GIVEN AS A BENEFIT TO |
| DESIGN TEAM. THIS IS NOT ALL FIXTURES AS THERE ARE |
| OTHERS FOR OTHER UNITS WHICH E201 DOES NOT COORDINATE |
| WITH E-205. |
| |
| 5) NOTE: PLEASE BE AWARE OF NEW FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE |
| CODE RULE 9B-3.0472. THIS REQUIRES ALL BUILDING PERMITS |
| ISSUED AFTER JULY 1ST TO CONTAIN CO SENSORS WHEN |
| MEETING THE PROVISIONS AND DEFINITIONS AS FOLLOWS. |
| PLEASE SEE THIS RULING BECAME IN AFFECT AFTER ADOPTION |
| OF FS 553.885. |
| ** THIS CAN BE A PROVISO TO ADJUST ALL DEVICES ON PLANS |
| HOWEVER PLANS ARE GOING BACK FOR CORRECTIONS AT THIS |
| TIME. |
| |
| |
| ********** |
| |
| (1) DEFINITIONS: FORPURPOSES OF THIS RULE, THE |
| FOLLOWING DEFINITIONS SHALL APPLY: |
| (A) CARBON MONOXIDE ALARM. A DEVICE FOR THEPURPOSE OF |
| DETECTING CARBON MONOXIDE, THAT PRODUCES A DISTINCT |
| AUDIBLE ALARM,AND IS LISTED OR LABELED WITH THE |
| APPROPRIATE STANDARD, EITHER ANSI/UL 2034 -96, |
| STANDARD FOR SINGLE AND MULTIPLE STATION CO ALARMS, |
| INCORPORATED HEREIN BYREFERENCE, OR UL 2075 - 04, GAS |
| AND VAPOR DETECTOR SENSOR, INCORPORATED HEREINBY |
| REFERENCE, IN ACCORDANCE WITH ITS APPLICATION. BOTH |
| DOCUMENTS MAY BE OBTAINEDBY WRITING TO: CODES AND |
| STANDARDS SECTION, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS, |
| 2555 SHUMARD OAK BOULEVARD, TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA |
| 32399-2100. |
| |
| (B) FOSSIL FUEL. COAL, KEROSENE,OIL, FUEL GASES, OR |
| OTHER PETROLEUM OR HYDROCARBON PRODUCT THAT EMITS |
| CARBONMONOXIDE AS A BY-PRODUCT OF COMBUSTION. |
| |
| (2) EVERY BUILDING FOR WHICH A PERMIT FOR NEW |
| CONSTRUCTION IS ISSUED ON OR AFTER 7/1/08 AND HAVING A |
| FOSSIL-FUEL-BURNINGHEATER OR APPLIANCE, A FIREPLACE, |
| OR AN ATTACHED GARAGE SHALL HAVE ANOPERATIONAL CARBON |
| MONOXIDE ALARM INSTALLED WITHIN 10 FEET OF EACH ROOM |
| USED FORSLEEPING PURPOSES. |
| |
| (3) IN NEWCONSTRUCTION, ALARMS SHALL RECEIVE THEIR |
| PRIMARY POWER FROM THE BUILDING WIRINGWHEN SUCH |
| WIRING IS SERVED FROM THE LOCAL POWER UTILITY. SUCH |
| ALARMS SHALL HAVEBATTERY BACK UP. |
| |
| (4)COMBINATION SMOKE/CARBON MONOXIDE ALARMS SHALL BE |
| LISTED OR LABELED BY ANATIONALLY RECOGNIZED TESTING |
| LABORATORY. |
| SPECIFIC AUTHORITY 553.885(2) FS. LAW IMPLEMENTED |
| 553.72, 553.73(2), (3), (7), (9), 553.885(2) FS. |
| HISTORY,NEW 11-18-07. |
| |
| |
| |
| ** IMPORTANT** |
| ONCE AUDIT/REVIEWS ARE COMPLETE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP |
| FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE |
| ALL OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED |
| SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. |
| DO NOT LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. |
| PLEASE DO NOT ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO PLANS. ANY |
| ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION SUCH AS PRODUCT APPROVALS, |
| SPEC/CUT SHEETS, CALCULATIONS ETC SHOULD BE PLACED INTO |
| TWO SETS/FOLDERS/BINDERS ETC. |
| PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS |
| SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE. |
| THIS WILL HELP IN THE AUDIT/REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID |
| ANY DELAYS. |
| |
| DEWEY PALMER |
| ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II |
| CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| 561-805-6717 |
| [email protected] |