Date |
Text |
2008-02-25 12:23:54 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| PERMIT: 08010249 |
| ADD: 295 LAKEVIEW AVE. |
| CONT: KAST CONSTRUCTION |
| TEL: (561)718-6141 |
| E-MAIL: [email protected] |
| |
| FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE |
| W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS |
| * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS |
| |
| REVIEW |
| ACTION: DENIED |
| |
| 1A)--- VERY IMPORTANT STATEMENT --- |
| PLEASE DO NOT IGNORE! |
| WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE THE REVISION & |
| REMOVE & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL |
| LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH |
| A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE |
| SHEET OR SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE |
| FOUND WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR |
| YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. |
| |
| 1B) INFORMATIONAL. PLEASE SUBMIT 2 OF ALL SURVEYS, |
| PLANS, REPORTS, REVISIONS , PRODUCT APPROVALS AND OR |
| SUBMITTALS FOR REVIEW FOR PERMIT. IF YOUR PROJECT WILL |
| REQUIRE A RESIDENT INSPECTOR OR IF YOUR PROJECT IS A |
| THRESHOLD BUILDING REQUIRING A THRESHOLD INSPECTOR THEN |
| (3) THREE SETS OF ALL SAID DOCUMENTS WILL BE REQUIRED |
| FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE. 106.1* /2004 SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS |
| WEST PALM BEACH ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. |
| |
| 1C)INFORMATIONAL.106.1.1* W.P.B. ADMINISTRATIVE |
| CODE/2004 DRAWINGS & SPECIFICATIONS SHALL CONTAIN |
| INFORMATION, IN THE FORM OF NOTES OR OTHERWISE, AS TO |
| THE QUALITY OF MATERIALS, WHERE QUALITY IS ESSENTIAL TO |
| CONFORMITY WITH THE TECHNICAL CODES. SUCH INFORMATION |
| SHALL BE SPECIFIC TO THE TECHNICAL CODES "SHALL NOT BE |
| CITED AS A WHOLE OR IN PART, NOR THE TERM "LEGAL" OR |
| ITS EQUIVALENT BE USED AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR SPECIFIC |
| INFORMATION". CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS SHALL BE |
| SUFFICIENT CLARITY TO INDICATE THE LOCATION, NATURE AND |
| EXTENT OF THE WORK PROPOSED AND SHOW IN DETAIL THAT IT |
| WILL CONFORM TO THE PROVISIONS OF THIS CODE AND |
| RELEVANT LAWS, ORDINANCES, RULES AND REGULATIONS, AS |
| DETERMINED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. |
| |
| 1D) INFORMATIONAL. PLANS SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT (FIRST |
| TIME REVIEW) AFTER JULY 1ST, 2007 SHALL BE REVIEWED TO |
| THE 2004 FBC BUILDING WITH THE 2007 SUPPLEMENTS. |
| |
| 2) W P B ADMINISTRATIVE CODE 108.2 SCHEDULE OF PERMIT |
| FEES. ON BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES, ELECTRICAL, GAS, |
| MECHANICAL, AND PLUMBING SYSTEMS OR ALTERATIONS |
| REQUIRING A PERMIT, A FEE FOR EACH PERMIT SHALL BE PAID |
| AS REQUIRED, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SCHEDULE |
| ESTABLISHED BY THE APPLICABLE GOVERNING AUTHORITY. |
| |
| 108.3*BUILDING PERMIT VALUATION. |
| IF, IN THE OPINION OF THE BUILDING OFFICIAL, THE |
| CLAIMED VALUATION OF BUILDING, ALTERATION, STRUCTURE, |
| ELECTRICAL, GAS, MECHANICAL, OR PLUMBING SYSTEMS |
| APPEARS TO BE UNDER ESTIMATED ON THE APPLICATION, THE |
| PERMIT SHALL BE DENIED.FOR PERMITTINGPURPOSES, |
| VALUATION OF BUILDINGS AND SYSTEMS SHALL BE TOTAL |
| REPLACEMENT PURPOSES, VALUATION OF BUILDINGS AND |
| SYSTEMS SHALL BE THE TOTAL REPLACEMENT VALUE TO INCLUDE |
| STRUCTURAL, ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, MECHANICAL, INTERIOR |
| FINISHES, NORMAL SITE WORK (EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL FOR |
| BUILDINGS), ARCHITECTURAL AND DESIGN FEES, MARKETING |
| COST, OVERHEAD AND PROFIT; EXCLUDING ONLY LAND VALUE. |
| VALUATION REFERENCES MAY INCLUDE THE LATEST PUBLISHED |
| DATA OF NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION COST ANALYSIS SERVICES |
| (MARSHALL-SWIFT, MEANS, ETC) WITH REGIONAL ADJUSTMENTS |
| FOR LOCATION AS PUBLISHED BY THE INTERNATIONAL CODE |
| CONGRESS. |
| |
| ICC TOTAL VALUATION FOR PROJECT IS $18,616,066.00 |
| |
| MINUS VIBRO-FLOTATION& STRUCTURAL-3,941,840.00 |
| VALUATION FOR THIS PERMIT $ |
| 14,674,226.00 |
| |
| FEES DUE THIS PERMIT |
| $163,439.36 |
| PAID TO DATE |
| $45,493.17 |
| FEE BALANCE |
| $117,946.19 |
| SEE FEE BALANCE SHEET ATTACHMENT. |
| |
| 3) SHEET A-101A: |
| 3A) WHEN THE CONFERENCE ROOMS 110, 111 & 117 ARE OPENED |
| INTO ONE LARGE CONFERENCE ROOM THE OCCUPANT LOAD WOULD |
| BE 68 REQUIRING 2 EXITS. WHEN AN ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCY IS |
| OVER 30 OCCUPANTS THE EXIT ACCESS CORRIDORS ARE |
| REQUIRED TO BE FIRE RATED 1 HOUR EVEN WITH FIRE |
| SPRINKLERS PLEASE SEE TABLE 1016.1. |
| |
| 3B) THE OTHER CONCERN IS WITH THE RATING OF THE |
| CORRIDOR, PLEASE REVIEW 1016.5 CONTINUITY OF CORRIDORS |
| AND THE FIRE RATING INTO THE LOBBY AND RECEPTION AREAS. |
| THIS WILL ALSO EFFECT THE DOOR RATINGS IN TABLE 715.3, |
| PROTECTION OF OPENINGS. |
| |
| 3C) THE FIRST FLOORDOORS CAN NOT BE CHECKED IN THE |
| DOOR SCHEDULE SHEET A-611, THE NUMBERING SEQUENCE IS SO |
| FAR OVER INTO THE LEFT MARGIN OF THE SHEET THAT THE |
| NUMBERING SEQUENCE COLUMN IS BOUND BY THE STAPLES, |
| PLEASE REPRINT THIS SHEET AND ALLOW FOR BINDING OF |
| PLANS TOGETHER. 106.1.1 INFORMATION ON CONSTRUCTION |
| DOCUMENTS SHALL BE OF SUFFICIENT CLARITY TO INDICATE |
| THE LOCATION, NATURE AND EXTENT OF WORK PROPOSED AND |
| SHOW IN DETAIL THAT IT CONFORMS TO THE PROVISIONS OF |
| THIS CODE. |
| |
| 3D) THE EXTERIOR NORTH WALL OF THE BUILDING INDICATES |
| WALL TAGS OF 1 HOUR RATING, PLEASE REVIEW TABLE 602 , < |
| 5?-0? REQUIRES A 3 HR RATED WALL FOR THESE |
| OCCUPANCIES: |
| ASSEMBLY, BUSINESS OR RESIDENCE. PLEASE CORRECT PLAN. |
| |
| 3E) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED, 106.1.2. OCCUPANCY |
| SEPARATION, WALL TAGS ARE MISSING ON THE COMMON PARKING |
| GARAGE AND THE OTHER OCCUPANCIES, PLEASE SEE |
| TABLE302.3.2. |
| |
| 3F) PLEASE REVIEW THE ELEVATOR WALLS FOR WALL |
| IDENTIFICATION TAGS INDICATING THE RATING FOR SHAFTS, |
| SEE 707.4. |
| |
| 3G) THE MAIN ENTRY DOOR 131 APPEARS TO BE A PASSENGER |
| LOADING ZONE WITH A VALET SERVICE AND LUGGAGE AREA. THE |
| PLANS DO NOT INDICATE A DROPPED CURB NOR A PASSENGER |
| LOADING ZONE. |
| 11-4.1.2(5)?. ALSO SEE 11-4.2.9.5 DETECTABLE WARNING |
| DEVISES. |
| |
| 3H) THE DISABLED PARKING SPACE, WEST END OF, INDICATES |
| A RAMP NO INFORMATION ON HEIGHT OF RAMP, CHANGE IN |
| GRADE SEE 11-4.8(1-6). |
| |
| 3I) RESTROOMS 112 & 113 ARE INDICATED AS DETAIL# 2 |
| SHEET A-403, PLEASE CORRECT TO A-402. |
| |
| 3J) RESTROOMS 112 & 113 PLEASE PROVIDE IN DETAIL THE |
| CLEAR WIDTH OF THE ACCESSIBLE STALL DOOR, PLEASE SEE |
| FIGURE 30E. |
| |
| 3K) 106.1.2 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED, WHAT IS |
| THE PURPOSE OF THE E-ROOM? |
| |
| 3L) PLEASE PROVIDE STAIR IDENTIFICATION 1009.5.3 |
| |
| 3M) PLEASE REVIEW STAIR ACCESS TO ROOF BUILDINGS IN |
| BUILDINGS 4 STORIES AND MORE, 1009.12.. |
| |
| 3N) THERE APPEARS TO BE A RAMP IN FRONT OF DOOR# 114, |
| THIS RAMP DOES NOT PROVIDE THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE SLOPE |
| INFORMATION, HANDRAILS OR BOTTOM LANDING INFORMATION, |
| PLEASE SEE 11-4.8. |
| |
| 3O)THIS PLAN INDICATES THE USE OF AN EMERGENCY |
| GENERATOR PLEASE PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON THE |
| GENERATOR AND FUEL SUPPLY TANK. QUANTITY OF FUEL THAT |
| IS TO BE STORED ON SITE AND TYPE OF VAULT. DOES THIS |
| FUEL TANK HAVESECONDARY CONTAINMENT? |
| |
| 4) SHEET A-101B |
| 4A) THE NORTH AND EAST PROPERTY LINE WALLS HAVE WALL |
| IDENTIFICATION TAGS 1-B, PLEASE SEE |
| TABLE 602 FOR WALLS LOCATED LESS THAN 5?-0? FROM THE |
| PROPERTY LINE. TABLE 602 INDICATES |
| A 3HOUR WALL. |
| |
| 4B) PLEASE LOOK AT THE DOOR # 149 IN THE DOOR SCHEDULE, |
| SCHEDULE INDICATES NO FIRE RATING, |
| 1016.1 ANDTABLE 302.3.2 OCCUPANCY SEPARATION, OPENING |
| PROTECTIVE TABLE 715.3 . |
| |
| 4C) RAMP FROM DOOR# 149 TO THE EXTERIOR, THE PLANS ARE |
| MISSING THE TOP TURNING RADIUS. |
| PLEASE SEE 11-4.8.4(3). |
| |
| 4D) RAMP FROM DOOR # 149 IS MISSING THE HANDRAILS |
| REQUIRED BOTH SIDES11-4.8.5. |
| |
| 4E) RAMP BY DOOR 149 DOES NOT INDICATE THE BOTTOM |
| LANDING, 11-4.8.4(2). |
| |
| 4F) RAMP BY DOOR# 149 PLEASE PROVIDE THE CLEAR |
| DIMENSION AT THE BOTTOM OF THE RAMP FROM COLUMN TO |
| COLUMN. 11-4.8.3 WHEN PART OF A MEANS OF EGRESS MINIMUM |
| OF44? CLEAR. |
| |
| 4G) RAMP BY DOOR# 149 INDICATES A SLOPE OF 8% PLEASE |
| SEE 11-4.8.2 THE MAXIMUM SLOPE OF A RAMP IN NEW |
| CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE 1 TO 12. |
| |
| 4H)EAST SIDE OF THE BUILDING ROOM 103 THE EMERGENCY |
| GENERATOR ROOM INDICATES OPENINGS IN THE WALL, PLEASE |
| SEE TABLE 602 LESS THAN FIVE FOOT FROM THE PROPERTY |
| LINE, NO OPENINGS. |
| |
| 4I) COMPACTOR DETAIL FOUND ON SHEET AC-102 DETAIL 9 |
| INDICATES THE USE OF A SCISSOR LIFT, PLEASE PROVIDE |
| ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.106.1.2. |
| |
| 4J) PLEASE PROVIDE STAIR IDENTIFICATION 1009.5.3 |
| |
| 4K) PLEASE REVIEW STAIR ACCESS TO ROOF BUILDINGS IN |
| BUILDINGS 4 STORIES AND MORE, 1009.12.. |
| |
| |
| 5)SHEET A-102A |
| 5A) PLEASE PROVIDE AREA CALCULATIONS HOW THIS LEVEL |
| CLASSIFIES AS A MEZZANINE?505.2 AREA LIMITATION.THE |
| AGGREGATE AREA OF A MEZZANINE OR MEZZANINES WITHIN A |
| ROOM SHALL NOT EXCEED ONE-THIRD OF THE AREA OF THAT |
| ROOM OR SPACE IN WHICH THEY ARE LOCATED. |
| |
| 5B)DOORS ON THE A-102A & A-102B FLOOR PLANS DO NOT |
| SHOW UP ON THE DOOR SCHEDULE |
| SHEET A-611, PLEASE CORRECT, THIS SHEET CAN NOT BE |
| CHECKED FOR OPENING PROTECTIVES |
| TABLE 715.3. |
| |
| 5C) THIS COMMENT WILL NOT BE REPEATED FOR EVERY CASE |
| BOTH SHEET A-102A AND A-102B THE NORTH AND EAST |
| PROPERTY LINES ARE LESS THAN 5?-0? FROM THE PROPERTY |
| LINE REQUIRING 3 HR FIRE RATING. SEE TABLE 602. |
| |
| 5D) THERE IS A ROOM NOT IDENTIFIED, DOOR 155A LEADS |
| INTO THIS AREA. PLEASE PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION |
| 106.1.2. |
| |
| 5E) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED 106.1.2. ON SHEET |
| A-101A THERE ARE ROOMS 118-123 |
| THE NEXT LEVEL UP (SHEET A-102A) THE PLAN INDICATES |
| CEILING BELOW BUT THERE IS NO CUT SECTIONS OF THIS AREA |
| INDICATING HEIGHT OF THE CEILING OR MATERIAL. PLEASE |
| PROVIDE HEIGHT OF THE CEILING AND STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS |
| OF THIS SYSTEM. |
| |
| 6) A-102B |
| 6A) THE ROOMS BELOW (105-108) ARE INDICATED AS CEILING |
| BELOW, PLEASE PROVIDE A CUT SECTION THROUGH INDICATING |
| TYPE OF CEILING, HEIGHT OF CEILING AND TYPE OF |
| STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS. 106.1.2. |
| |
| 6B) IN THE SAME ROOMS MENTIONED ABOVE THE PLANS APPEAR |
| TO HAVE (3) CHASES IN THE CENTER OF THIS AREA? PROVIDE |
| MORE DETAILS AND FIRE RATINGS. 106.1.2. ? 712.4. |
| |
| 6C) THERE IS A CONCRETE WALL ON GRID LINE B.4 BETWEEN |
| COLUMN LINE 2-3. THIS SHOULD BE A GUARD RAIL AS WELL AS |
| VEHICLE BARRIER, PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLIANCE WITH |
| 1607.7.3 |
| |
| 6D) THE OTHER AREA OF CONCERNS WITH GUARDS WOULD BE THE |
| DROP OFF EDGE WHERE THE RAMP RISES AND OR FALLS TO THE |
| NEXT LEVEL. PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLIANCE WITH 1607.7.3. |
| |
| 6E) THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE GARAGE THERE APPEARS TO |
| BE A SHAFT BUT NO WALL TAGS. |
| 707.4. |
| |
| 6F) CORRIDOR M114 IS INDICATED AS A 1 HR RATED WALL |
| WITH NO DOORS SEPARATING THE GARAGE FROM THE CORRIDOR. |
| 106.1.2. |
| |
| 7) SHEET A-103A: |
| 7A) EXIT WAY# 230 IS INDICATED AS NON RATED WALLS, THE |
| MECHANICAL SHEETS INDICATE FIRE DAMPERS, SEE TABLE |
| 1016.1 FOR FIRE RATINGS. |
| |
| 8) SHEET A-103A |
| 8A) ELEVATOR LOBBY 240, THIS COMMENT WILL STAND FOR ALL |
| FLOORS WITH R1 TYPE OCCUPANCY. |
| PLEASE SEE REQUIRED 1 HOUR RATING & OPENING PROTECTION, |
| 707.14.1, TABLE 1016.1 AND THE CODE COMMENTARY FOR |
| REQUIREMENTS FOR A 1 HR FIRE RATING, THIS COMMENT WILL |
| STAND FOR ALL COMMON FLOORS. |
| |
| 8B)STAIR TOWER# 2 INDICATES TWO METAL STUD WALLS IN |
| THE INTERIOR OF THE STAIR TOWER ONE SEPARATES THE |
| STAIRS FROM THE ELECTRIC ROOM PLEASE IDENTIFY WALL TYPE |
| AND HOURLY RATING, 707.4 THIS COMMENT WILL STAND FOR |
| THE COMMON FLOORS. |
| |
| 8C) STAIR TOWER# 2 INDICATES TWO METAL STUD WALLS IN |
| THE INTERIOR OF THE STAIR TOWER ONE SEPARATES THE |
| STAIRS FROM WHAT APPEARS TO BE A SHAFT WITHIN THE STAIR |
| TOWER, PLEASE IDENTIFY WALL TYPE AND HOURLY RATING, |
| 707.4. THIS COMMENT WILL STAND FOR ALL COMMON FLOORS. |
| |
| 8D) LAUNDRY ROOM 235 DOES NOT HAVE A TERMINATION ROOM |
| AS REQUIRED IN 707.13.4.THE TERMINATION ROOM SHALL |
| HAVE OPENING PROTECTION NOT LESS THAN ? HOURS AND BE |
| SELF-CLOSING OR AUTOMATIC-CLOSING UPON THE DETECTION OF |
| SMOKE. |
| |
| 8E) LAUNDRY ROOM ITSELF WOULD NORMALLY ONLY REQUIRE THE |
| WALLS TO BE SMOKE RATED, AS THE WALLS THAT ARE SHARED |
| BY THE TRAINING AND HOUSE KEEPING ROOMS, PLEASE NOTE |
| THAT NON OF THE NON-RATED WALL TYPES ARE SPECIFIED AS |
| SMOKE PARTITIONS SEE SECTION 710. IN THIS CASE THE |
| LAUNDRY ROOM WALLS THAT ARE COMMON TO THE EXIT ACCESS |
| CORRIDOR WILL NEED TO BE 1 HR FIRE RATING BECAUSE OF |
| THE R1 OCCUPANCY, TABLE 1016.1. |
| |
| 8F) DOOR 230A IS STILL PART OF THE 1 HR RATED EXIT |
| ACCESS CORRIDOR THAT LEADS TO THE VERTICAL EXIT |
| STAIRWELL, THE DOOR SCHEDULE INDICATES THIS DOOR NOT |
| RATED, PLEASE CORRECT, TABLE 1016.1/ TABLE 715.3 |
| OPENING PROTECTIVE. |
| |
| 8G) DOOR 230A APPEARS TO BE MISSING THE REQUIRED 18? ON |
| THE PULL, LATCH SIDE OF THE DOOR. |
| 11-4.13.6 MANEUVERING CLEARENCES AT DOORS. MINIMUM |
| MANEUVERING CLEARANCES AT DOORS THAT ARE NOT AUTOMATIC |
| OR POWER-ASSISTED SHALL BE AS SHOWN IN FIG. 25. THE |
| FLOOR OR GROUND AREA WITH IN THE REQUIRED CLEARANCES |
| SHALL BE CLEAR & LEVEL. |
| |
| 8H) LAUNDRY ROOM PLAN IS MISSING THE THROUGH |
| PENETRATIONS (2-LOUVERS) IN THE RATED WALL |
| COMMON WITH THE GARAGE. OPENING PROTECTION IS REQUIRED, |
| SEE TABLE 715.3. |
| |
| 8I) BETWEEN UNITS THERE ARE QUITE A FEW WALLS THAT DO |
| NOT HAVE WALL IDENTIFICATION TAGS, |
| SEE 1207.2. THIS COMMENT WILL STAND FOR ALL |
| SHEETS. |
| |
| 9) SHEET A-103B: |
| 9A) DOOR# 237APPEARS TO BE MISSING THE REQUIRED 18? |
| ON THE PULL, LATCH SIDE OF THE DOOR. |
| 11-4.13.6 MANEUVERING CLEARENCES AT DOORS. MINIMUM |
| MANEUVERING CLEARANCES AT DOORS THAT ARE NOT AUTOMATIC |
| OR POWER-ASSISTED SHALL BE AS SHOWN IN FIG. 25. THE |
| FLOOR OR GROUND AREA WITH IN THE REQUIRED CLEARANCES |
| SHALL BE CLEAR & LEVEL. |
| |
| 9B) LAUNDRY ROOM 238 INDICATES ON THE MECHANICAL SHEETS |
| DRYER EXHAUST PENETRATINGA 1HR FIRE RATED WALL |
| INDICATE OPENING PROTECTION, TABLE 715.3. |
| |
| |
| |
| 10) A-104A COMMON TO THE 3RD, 4TH & 5TH FLOORS. |
| 10A) ROOM# 450 VENDING / ICEAND ROOM 451LINEN ROOM |
| THIS COMMON WALL IS PART OF THE |
| 1 HR RATED CORRIDOR IS MISSING WALL TAG, TABLE 715.3. |
| |
| 10B) THE LAUNDRY ROOM DOOR IS ALSO THE LAUNDRY CHUTE |
| ACCESS DOOR REQUIRING A ? HR OPENING PROTECTIVE AND BE |
| SELF-CLOSING OR AUTOMATIC-CLOSING UPON THE DETECTION OF |
| SMOKE. |
| IS FOR ALL COMMON FLOORS. NOT 20 MINUTE AS INDICATED IN |
| THE DOOR SCHEDULE, PLEASE CORRECT& SEE 707.13.4. THIS |
| COMMENT IS FOR ALL COMMON FLOORS. |
| |
| 10C)THE LAUNDRY ROOM ACCESS ROOM ALSO IS MISSING THE |
| WALL RATINGS OF BOTH SHAFT ENCLOSURES IN THIS ROOM. |
| 707.4. SHAFTS. THIS COMMENT IS FOR ALL COMMON FLOORS. |
| |
| 10D)BETWEEN UNITS 433 & 436 AT THE SHOWER LOCATIONS |
| THE PLANS INDICATE A WALL TAG |
| ?OC? NON-RATED WALL. 708.1(2) , 708.3 & 708.4. |
| |
| 10E) THE UNIDENTIFIED ROOM JUST LEFT OF STAIR TOWER# 2 |
| HAS A 25X45 MECHANICAL CHASE, THE SHAFT WALLS ARE NOT |
| IDENTIFIED WITH WALL TAGS. SEE 707.4. |
| |
| 10F) PLEASE IDENTIFY THE USAGE OF ROOM LISTED ABOVE. |
| 106.1.2. |
| |
| 11) SHEET A-104B COMMON TO 3RD, 4TH & 5TH FLOORS. |
| 11A) THIS SHEET THERE ARE NO WALL TAGS IDENTIFYING WALL |
| RATINGS. TABLE 1016.1, 708.1(2), 708.3 & 708.4. |
| |
| 11B) STAIR TOWER# 1 INDICATES A SHAFT LOCATED WITHIN |
| THE STAIR TOWER, SEE 707.4 & 1019.1.2. |
| |
| 11C) PLANS INDICATE A CHASE OR SHAFT IN THE ELECTRIC |
| ROOM 402, PLEASE SEE 707.4. |
| |
| 11D)THE EAST ELECTRICAL ROOM AND STORAGE ROOM DOORS |
| AND HALLWAY DOOR DO NOT HAVE IDENTIFICATION TAGS, FIRE |
| RATINGS? THIS IS A 1HR FIRE RATED CORRIDOR. TABLE |
| 1016.1. THE CORRIDOR WIDTH IN THE UPPER DETAIL IS NOT |
| PROVIDED?CONSIDER DOOR WIDTH VERSES CORRIDOR WIDTH. |
| 1005.2DOOR ENCROACHMENT. |
| |
| 12) SHEET A-105A: |
| 12A) NO ROOF ACCESS SEE COMMENT (3M) FOR STAIR ACCESS |
| TO ROOF. 1009.12. |
| |
| 13) SHEET A-105B: |
| |
| 13A) THE STAIRWELL# 2 IS NOT DEPICTED AS GOING THROUGH |
| TO THE ROOF LEVEL,SEE 1009.12. |
| |
| |
| 13B) THERE IS NO ROOF PLAN OF STAIR# 2 INDICATING THAT |
| DOES GO TO THE ROOF AND DOOR TO THE |
| ROOF LEVEL, THE DOOR SCHEDULE ALSO WILL NEED TO REFLECT |
| THIS DOOR AND FIRE RATING, 106.1.2, |
| & TABLE 715.3 OPENINGPROTECTION. |
| |
| 14) SHEET A-202, A-203 & A-204 ALL FAIL TO INDICATE THE |
| STAIRWELL# 2 CONTINUING THROUGH TO THE ROOF LEVEL. |
| ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED, 106.1.2 & 1009.12. |
| |
| 15) SHEET A-307 DETAIL# 2 ON THE MEZZANINE AND 2ND |
| FLOOR LEVELS INDICATE WHAT APPEARS TO BE CONCRETE KNEE |
| WALLS WHERE IS THIS CUT SECTION TAKEN, SHEETS A-102A, |
| A-102B, A-103A |
| & A103B ALL INDICATE A 1HOUR RATED BLOCK WALL? |
| ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED 106.1.2. |
| |
| 16)SHEET A-402 BUFFET PLEASE INDICATE COMPLIANCE WITH |
| 11-5.2, 11-5.4&11.5.5. |
| |
| 17)SHEET A-428 INDICATES THE USE OF A FIRE SHUTTER AT |
| THE ELEVATOR LOBBYPLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION ON THE |
| RATING OF FIRE SHUTTER AND COMPLIANCE WITH 715.3.9. |
| |
| 18) SHEET A-429, A-430 &A-431 BOTH FAIL TO INDICATE |
| OPENING PROTECTION AT THE ELEVATOR LOBBY.PLEASE SEE |
| 707.14.1. |
| |
| 19) SHEET AR 401 DETAIL 3 INDICATES THE USE OF ACRYLIC |
| PANELS PLEASE PROVIDE THE AREA WHERE THIS CEILING WILL |
| TAKE PLACE AND HOW IT WILL BE HUNG? PLEASE PROVIDE THE |
| SMOKE DEVELOPMENT AND FLAME SPREAD FOR THIS PRODUCT IN |
| THIS APPLICATION. TABLE 803.5 & 803.1. |
| |
| 20)PROVISO: EXTERIOR LIGHT GAUGE METAL FRAMING TO BE |
| SUBMITTED AS SHOP DRAWINGS AFTER BEING REVIEWED BY THE |
| DESIGNER OF RECORD REVIEW AND APPROVAL. |
| |
| 21)A-511 FIN WALL DETAIL# 9 INDICATES THAT THE |
| FINWALL FRAME IS TO BE ATTACHED TO THE STRUCTURE PER |
| NOA REQUIREMENTS,THERE IS NO FIN WALL LISTED UNDER |
| EITHER MIAMI-DADE OR |
| THE FLORIDA STATE WEB SITE.THE PRODUCT TESTING REPORT |
| WILL NEED TO HAVE THIS TYPE WINDOW APPLICATION TESTED |
| AND SHOW THE REQUIRED ANCHORAGE. |
| 1714.5.4.1. WINDOW AND DOOR ASSEMBLIES SHALL BE |
| ANCHORED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PUBLISHED |
| MANUFACTURER?S RECOMMENDATIONS TO ACHIEVE THE DESIGN |
| PRESSURE SPECIFIED. SUBSTITUTE ANCHORING SYSTEMS USED |
| FOR SUBSTRATES NOT SPECIFIED BY THE FENESTRATION |
| MANUFACTURER SHALL PROVIDE EQUAL OR GREATER ANCHORING |
| PERFORMANCE AS DEMONSTRATED BY ACCEPTED ENGINEERING |
| PRACTICE. |
| |
| 22)1609.1.4 PROTECTION OF OPENINGS IN WIND-BORNE |
| DEBRIS REGIONS, EXTERIOR GLAZING THAT RECEIVES POSITIVE |
| PRESSURE IN THE LOWER 60 FEET (18.3 M) IN BUILDINGS |
| SHALL BE ASSUMED TO BE OPENINGS AND THE BALANCE OF |
| GLAZED OPENINGS IN THE REST OF THE BUILDING SHALL BE |
| ASSUMED TO BE ZERO UNLESS SUCH GLAZING THAT RECEIVES |
| POSITIVE PRESSURE IS IMPACT RESISTANT OR PROTECTED WITH |
| AN IMPACT RESISTANT COVERING MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS |
| OF SSTD 12, ASTM E 1886 ANDASTM E 1996, OR MIAMI-DADE |
| TAS 201, 202 AND 203 REFERENCED THEREIN AS FOLLOWS: 1. |
| GLAZED OPENINGS LOCATED WITHIN 30 FEET (9.1 M) OF GRADE |
| SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE LARGE MISSILE TEST. |
| 2.GLAZED OPENINGS LOCATED MORE THAN 30 FEET (9.1 |
| M) ABOVE GRADE SHALL MEET THE PROVISIONS OF THE SMALL |
| MISSILE TEST. |
| |
| |
| FL BLD CODE 1609.1.4: COMPONENTS & CLADDING, |
| PROVIDE 2 COPIES, |
| 3 IF THRESHOLD OR RESIDENT INSPECTOR OF PRODUCT TESTING |
| REPORTS, MISSING REPORTS ARE AS FOLLOWS: |
| 22A) STOREFRONT UNITS- OK COMPLIED |
| 22B) FIXED WINDOWS- TRACO WINDOWS DID NOT MEET THE -89 |
| IN END ZONES |
| 22B) HORIZONTAL SLIDING UNITS TRACO- CIRCLE GLAZING |
| TYPE FOR PRESSUES |
| 22C) FINWALL WINDOW SYSTEMS- NO REPORT SUBMITTED |
| 22D) MULLIONS- PGT MULLIONS CIRCLE MULLION LENGTHS TO |
| BE USED/ FOR PRESSURES |
| 22E) WALL LOUVERS- OK REVIEWED |
| 22F)EXTERIOR HOLLOW METAL DOORS, SINGLE & PAIR OF |
| DOORS |
| 22G) EXTERIOR AUTOMATIC SLIDING DOORS- OK REVIEWED |
| 22H) EXTERIOR GLAZED SWING DOORS- OK COMPLIED |
| 22I)PRE-ENGINEERED A/C STANDS- NO REPORT SUBMITTED |
| 22J) ROOFING ASSEMBLIES- CARLISLE REPORT, REQUIRES |
| SHOP DRAWINGS AND AN APPROVED ROOFING |
| CONTRACTOR TO BE SIGNED ON. |
| |
| 23) FOR FLAT ROOF THESE ARE THE MOST COMMON MISTAKES IN |
| SUBMITTING ROOFING REPORTS |
| _XX__ THE SUB-SYSTEM PROVIDED IN THE REPORT IS NOT |
| HIGHLIGHTED. |
| __XX__ THE SUB-SYSTEM PICKEDHAS A LOWPRESSURE FOR |
| ZONE _2&3__ . |
| __XX_ THE SYSTEM PROVIDED STATES LIMITATION# 7, SHOULD |
| THE FASTENER RESISTANCE BE LESS THAN THATREQUIRED, AS |
| DETERMINED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL, A REVISED FASTENER |
| SPACING, PREPARED , SIGNED AND SEALED BY A FLORIDA |
| REGISTEREDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, REGISTERED |
| ARCHITECT OR REGISTERED ROOFCONSULTANT MAY BE |
| SUBMITTED. |
| __XX_ THE SYSTEM PROVIDED INDICATES LIMITATION# 9, NO |
| ENHANCED FASTENING ALLOWED. |
| |
| 24)PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED WITH PERMIT |
| APPLICATION AFTER OCTOBER 1, 2003 ARE REQUIRED TO |
| COMPLY WITH THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL SYSTEM. FOR |
| INFORMATION PLEASE SEE THE STATE WEBSITE AT |
| WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG. PRODUCTS WITH STATEWIDE |
| APPROVAL ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED WITH A COVER |
| SHEET THAT LISTS THE PRODUCT IDENTITY NUMBER FROM THE |
| STATE. IF THE PRODUCT DOES NOT HAVE STATEWIDE APPROVAL, |
| SUBMIT AN APPLICATION FOR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL OR |
| SITE SPECIFIC FORM PER RULE 9B-72. SEE ATTACHMENT. |
| WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG |
| |
| 25) WPB ADMIN CODE 106.3* PRODUCT APPROVALS. THOSE |
| PRODUCT WHICH ARE REGULATED BY DCA RULE 9B-72 SHALL BE |
| REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF |
| RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. |
| |
| 26) S-207 EAST ELEVATION PRESSURES ARE NOT PROVIDED FOR |
| WALL LOUVER AT EAST LOWER LEFT |
| ELEVATION. |
| |
| 27) NOTE: AWNINGS REQUIRE A SEPARATE PERMIT. WILL NOT |
| BE PART OF THIS REVIEW. |
| |
| 28)SHEET A-711/ ELEVATORS: |
| 28A)BUILDINGS 4 STORIES IN HEIGHT, AT LEAST ONE |
| ELEVATOR SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| EMERGENCY ACCESS TO ALL FLOORS. SUCH ELEVATOR CARS |
| SHALL BE OF SUCH SIZE AND ARRANGEMENT TO ACCOMMODATE A |
| 24-INCH BY 76-INCH AMBULANCE STRETCHER IN THE |
| HORIZONTAL, OPEN POSITION AND SHALL BE IDENTIFIED BY |
| THE INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL FOR EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES |
| (STAR OF LIFE). |
| |
| 28B)THERE IS NO FIRE ALARM PLANS AND THE ELECTRICAL |
| PLANS DO NOT INDICATE THE USE OF SMOKE DETECTORS IN |
| EACH LEVEL OF THE ELEVATOR LOBBIES NOR IN THE MACHINE |
| ROOM. PLEASE SEE 3002.8. |
| ALSO SEE THE REQUIREMENTS FOR IF HOIST-WAY IS OR IS NOT |
| FIRESPRINKLED. |
| |
| 28C)PLEASE SEE REQUIREMENTS FOR ELEVATOR VENTING FOR |
| R! OCCUPANCIES 3 STORIES AND GREATER.3004.2 LOCATION |
| OF VENTS |
| 3004.3 AREA OF VENTS |
| |
| 29) SHEET A-513: |
| 29A) PLANS FAIL TO INDICATE THE USE OF FIRE SPRINKLERS |
| AS REQUIRED IN 707.13.6 & 903.2.10.2. |
| |
| 29B) PLANS INDICATE 2 SHAFTS IN THIS PLAN BOTH |
| INDICATING THEY ARE 2 HR CONSTRUCTION, PLEASE PROVIDE |
| AN ASSEMBLY NUMBER FORTHESE SHAFTS. 707.4. |
| |
| 30) FP-205: |
| 30A) FP-205A IS THE FIRE SPRINKLER PLAN FOR THE ROOF |
| LEVEL WEST PORTION OF THE BUILDING, NO INFORMATION IF |
| FIRE SPRINKLERS WILL BE IN THE ELEVATOR SHAFT. |
| |
| 30B) FP-205B THIS SHEET IS MISSING TOTALLY, STAIRWELL |
| AND STANDPIPE THAT PROVIDES ROOF ACCESS. |
| |
| 31) PLEASE COORDINATE PLANS BETWEEN A-101A AND FP-201 A |
| DOOR 114 ON THE FP SWINGS AGAINST THE EGRESS FLOW, SEE |
| 1008.1.2. |
| |
| 32) PLEASE PROVIDE FIRE ALARM INFORMATION 907.2.10.1.1. |
| / 106.3.5.1.1(5) & (6) EARLY WARNING SYSTEMS. WILL ALSO |
| REQUIRE A SEPARATE PERMIT AND REVIEW NOT UNDER THIS |
| PERMIT. |
| |
| A THOROUGH REVIEW CAN NOT BE MADE AT THIS TIME, AS A |
| RESULT OF THE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED |
| ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY APPEAR THAT WERE NOT PART OF |
| THIS REVIEW. |
| |
| 102.1* WHERE, IN ANY SPECIFIC CASE, DIFFERENT SECTIONS |
| OF THIS CODE SPECIFY DIFFERENT MATERIALS, METHODS OF |
| CONSTRUCTION OR OTHER REQUIREMENTS, THE MOST |
| RESTRICTIVE SHALL GOVERN. WHERE THERE IS A CONFLICT |
| BETWEEN A GENERAL REQUIREMENT AND A SPECIFIC |
| REQUIREMENT, THE SPECIFIC |
| REQUIREMENT SHALL BE APPLICABLE. |
| |
| |
| JIM WITMER C. B. O. |
| BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II |
| |
| TEL: (561)805-6715 |
| FAX: (561)659-8026 |
| E-MAIL: [email protected] |
| |
| PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD PUBLIC RECORDS |
| LAW. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS |
| REGARDING CITY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORD, AVAILABLE TO |
| THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. YOUR E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS ARE |
| THEREFORE SUBJECT TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. |
| |
| |
| |
| |