Date |
Text |
2007-12-26 16:52:48 | 900 BRANDYWINE RD |
| UNITED METHODIST CHURCH |
| DEC.28, 2007 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| PERMIT: 07110731 |
| ADD: 900 BRANDYWINE RD |
| CONT: HEDRICK BROTHERS |
| TEL: (561)281-7530 |
| |
| FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE |
| W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS |
| * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS |
| |
| 1ST REVIEW |
| ACTION: DENIED |
| |
| 1A) --- VERY IMPORTANT STATEMENT --- |
| PLEASE DO NOT IGNORE! |
| WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE THE REVISION & |
| REMOVE & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL |
| LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH |
| A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE |
| SHEET OR SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE |
| FOUND WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR |
| YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. |
| |
| 1B)PLEASE SUBMIT 2 OF ALL SURVEYS, PLANS, REPORTS, |
| REVISIONS , PRODUCT APPROVALS AND OR SUBMITTALS FOR |
| REVIEW FOR PERMIT. IF YOUR PROJECT WILL REQUIRE A |
| RESIDENT INSPECTOR OR IF YOUR PROJECT IS A THRESHOLD |
| BUILDING REQUIRING A THRESHOLD INSPECTOR THEN (3) THREE |
| SETS OF ALL SAID DOCUMENTS WILL BE REQUIRED FOR PERMIT |
| ISSUANCE. 106.1* /2004 SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS WEST PALM |
| BEACH ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. |
| |
| 1C) 106.1.1* W.P.B. ADMINISTRATIVE CODE/2004 DRAWINGS & |
| SPECIFICATIONS SHALL CONTAIN INFORMATION, IN THE FORM |
| OF NOTES OR OTHERWISE, AS TO THE QUALITY OF MATERIALS, |
| WHERE QUALITY IS ESSENTIAL TO CONFORMITY WITH THE |
| TECHNICAL CODES. SUCH INFORMATION SHALL BE SPECIFIC TO |
| THE TECHNICAL CODES "SHALL NOT BE CITED AS A WHOLE OR |
| IN PART, NOR THE TERM "LEGAL" OR ITS EQUIVALENT BE USED |
| AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR SPECIFIC INFORMATION". CONSTRUCTION |
| DOCUMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENT CLARITY TO INDICATE THE |
| LOCATION, NATURE AND EXTENT OF THE WORK PROPOSED AND |
| SHOW IN DETAIL THAT IT WILL CONFORM TO THE PROVISIONS |
| OF THIS CODE AND RELEVANT LAWS, ORDINANCES, RULES AND |
| REGULATIONS, AS DETERMINED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. |
| |
| 1D ) FL S S 713.13 NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT, TO BE FILED |
| WITH THE CLERK OF THE COURT. NOTE: 713.13(2) IF THE |
| WORK DESCRIBED IN THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT IS NOT |
| ACTUALLY COMMENCED WITHIN 90 DAYS AFTER THE RECORDING |
| THEREOF, SUCH NOTICE IS NULL & VOID. NOTE: 713.13(6) |
| THE POSTING OF THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT AT THE |
| CONSTRUCTION SITE BEFORE THE FIRST INSPECTION. |
| |
| 1E) PLANS SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT (FIRST TIME REVIEW) |
| AFTER JULY 1ST, 2007 SHALL BE REVIEWED TO THE 2004 FBC |
| BUILDING WITH THE 2007 REVISIONS PLEASE REVISE YOUR |
| CODE SUMMARY FOUND ON SHEET A-0.1.1. |
| |
| 2( SHEET A-0.1.1: |
| 2A) THE PLANS APPEAR TO HAVE CODE TERMINOLOGY THAT IS |
| FOUND UNDER THE 2001 FBC THE BUILDING, (NEW) IS LABEL |
| BUILDING TYPE II SPRINKLED AND A-1 ASSEMBLY LARGE. |
| PLEASE SEE TABLE 503 FOR THE ALLOWABLE HEIGHT AND AREAS |
| FOR A A-3 OCCUPANCY (CHURCH) FOR AND DECLARE THE |
| MINIMUM BUILDING TYPE. 602.1.1 FOUND IN THE 2004 FBC. |
| IF AREA INCREASES ARE TO BE TAKEN PLEASE INDICATE THE |
| CALCULATIONS WHERE THESE INCREASES WERE TAKEN. PLEASE |
| SEE UNLIMITED AREA UNDER 507.5 IS FOR A SINGLE STORY |
| BUILDING, SHEET A-2.2.1 INDICATES A SECOND STORY |
| LOCATED WITHIN THE BUILDING. |
| |
| 2B) CODE SUMMARY STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS, THE HOUR RATINGS |
| AND FOOTNOTES FOUND IN THIS SECTION ARE ALSO TAKEN FROM |
| THE 2001 FBC, PLEASE REVIEW AND UPDATE TO THE 2004 FBC |
| SEE TABLE 601, TABLE 602 & TABLE 704.8. |
| |
| 2C) BUILDING INFORMATION MAKES IT UNCLEAR AS TO WHAT |
| BUILDING TYPE IS BEING INDICATED, THERE IS A EXISTING |
| BUILDING AND A NEW BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE PROVIDED, |
| THEN A TOTAL BUILDING FOOTPRINT. IF THIS TO BE TWO |
| SEPARATE BUILDINGS WITH A PROPOSED FIREWALL LEAVE OFF |
| THE TOTAL BUILDING FIGURE, THEY WOULD BE CONSIDERED TWO |
| SEPARATE BUILDINGS. IF DESIGNING TO THE MORE CRITICAL |
| TYPE I-B FOR THE TOTAL BUILDING THE AREA IS UNLIMITED. |
| 106.1.2 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS REQUIRED. |
| |
| 3) SHEET A-2.1.3: DISCREPANCY, PLEASE SEE DOOR NUMBER |
| A126 & C126 THE TWO DOORS HAVE A COMBINED OCCUPANT LOAD |
| OF 194 ALSO LOOK AT THE EGRESS PATH TO DOOR 126B AND |
| THE OCCUPANT LOAD REFLECTED ON THE PLAN IS ONLY159 THIS |
| IS LOWER THAN THE 194 REGRESSING THROUGH THE 2 PAIR OF |
| DOUBLE DOORS PLUS AN ADDITIONAL 5 FROM THE EXIT ACCESS |
| CORRIDOR HEADING TOWARDS THIS EXIT DOORWAY. THIS IS |
| CREATING A CONVERGING EXIT AT A DOORWAY THAT CAN ONLY |
| HANDLE 170 THROUGH THE DOOR. 1004.5 CONVERGING EXITS. |
| |
| 4A) SHEET A-2.1.3 & A2.1.1, THE CONTINUATION OF THE |
| EGRESS PATH FROM DOOR 126B LEADS TO A EXTERIOR SIDEWALK |
| INTO WHAT APPEARS TO BE A EGRESS COURT AND THROUGH THE |
| COVERED WALKWAY OF THE EXISTING BUILDING. 705.1 FIRE |
| WALLS SERVING TO CREATE SEPARATE BUILDINGS, THEREFORE |
| ALL PROVISIONS OF THE CODE INCLUDING HEIGHT AND AREA |
| LIMITATIONS, FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS AND MEANS OF |
| EGRESS ARE TO BE APPLIED INDIVIDUALLY TO EACH BUILDING. |
| IF THE COVERED WALKWAY FROM THE EXISTING BUILDING IS TO |
| BE CONSIDERED PART OF THE EGRESS PATH FROM THE COURT |
| AREA SOME ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WILL BE REQUIRED. 4B) |
| THE PLANS INDICATE THE EXISTING BUILDING TO BE A TYPE V |
| BUILDING, IS THIS A 2001 OR 2004 TYPE V? 4C) PLANS |
| INDICATE THIS EXTERIOR WALL NOT HAVING ANY WINDOWS |
| WITHIN THE COVERED WALKWAY WHICH WOULD CREATE A FIRE |
| HAZARD REQUIRING FIRE RATED OPENING PROTECTIVE? 4D) THE |
| OTHER ISSUE IS THE PLAN ALSO INDICATE THE EXISTING WALL |
| TO HAVE A WALL IDENTIFICATION TAG AS A 710, A 2HR RATED |
| WALL WITH CORE FILL 500, IS THIS WALL ALREADY |
| CONSTRUCTED THIS WAY? |
| |
| 1023.5.2 CONSTRUCTION AND OPENINGS OF EGRESS COURTS |
| WHERE AN EGRESS COURT SERVING A BUILDING OR PORTION |
| THEREOF IS LESS THAN 10 FEET (3048 MM) IN WIDTH, THE |
| EGRESS COURT WALLS SHALL BE NOT LESS THAN 1-HOUR |
| FIRE-RESISTANCE-RATED EXTERIOR WALLS COMPLYING WITH |
| SECTION 704 FOR A DISTANCE OF 10 FEET (3048 MM) ABOVE |
| THE FLOOR OF THE COURT , AND OPENINGS THEREIN SHALL BE |
| EQUIPPED WITH FIXED OR SELF-CLOSING, ?-HOUR OPENING |
| PROTECTIVE ASSEMBLIES. |
| |
| 4E) NOTE THE NEW FLAT DECKS CREATED ON THE EXISTING |
| BUILDING WILL CREATE ADDITIONAL ROOF CONTRIBUTIONS SEE |
| A-5.1.2 & A5.1.6 SEE PLUMBING COMMENTS FOR ADDITIONAL |
| INFORMATION FOR ROOF DRAINAGE. |
| |
| 4F) THE EXISTING TWO STORY CHAPEL, IS THERE OPENINGS |
| ABOVE THE SLOPED ROOF SECTIONS , THE NEW HORIZONTAL |
| ROOF DECKS? 705.6.1. |
| |
| 5) SHEET A-2.1.3 DISCREPANCY, PLEASE SEE CHOIR |
| REHEARSAL ROOM 153 AND SHEET A-2.1.1 ON THIS SHEET |
| CORRIDORS 152 & 157 ARE BLOCKED BY A WALL NOT SHOWN ON |
| SHEET A-2.1.3. 106.1.2 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION |
| REQUIRED. |
| |
| 6) PLEASE PROVIDE CODE COMPLIANCE WITH TABLE 1016.1FOR |
| ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCIES GREATER THAN 30 THE CORRIDORS ARE |
| TO BE FIRE RATED 1 HR EVEN WITH FIRE SPRINKLERS. |
| CORRIDORS, 111, 118 & 120 DO NOT INDICATE RATED WALLS |
| AND OPENING PROTECTIVE ON DOOR AND WINDOW OPENINGS |
| TABLE 715.3. PLEASE PROVIDE CODE COMPLIANCE WITH THIS |
| SITUATION. |
| |
| 7) PLEASE SEE M-2.1.0 WHERE MECHANICAL DUCTS CROSS |
| RATED WALLS WITHOUT THE INSTALLATION OF RATED DAMPERS, |
| 712.3.3 DUCTS AND AIR TRANSFER OPENINGS. |
| |
| 8) PLEASE PROVIDE ON LIFE SAFETY SHEET A-2.1.3 WHICH |
| DESIGN METHOD WAS USED 1024.6.1 WITHOUT SMOKE |
| PROTECTION OR 1024.6.2 SMOKE PROTECTED SEATING. |
| |
| 9) PLEASE SEE A-2.1.1 & A2.1.3 BOTH PLANS INDICATE THE |
| USE OF RAMPS 3/4" /12". SEE DEFINITION OF RAMP 11-3 A |
| WALKING SURFACE WHICH HAS A RUNNING SLOPE GREATER THAN |
| 1:20. SEE 11-4.8.5 WHERE HANDRAILS WILL BE REQUIRED, |
| HORIZONTAL PROJECTIONS GRATER THAN 72". |
| |
| 10) A-2.1.1 & A2.1.3 BOTH PLANS INDICATE THE USE OF AN |
| ELECTRIC LIFT, PLEASE PROVIDE CODE COMPLIANCE |
| INFORMATION ON LIFT11-4.1.3, EXCEPTION# 4. |
| |
| 11) A-2.1.1 & A-2.1.3 BOTH STAIRS BY DOORS A126 & A143 |
| BOTH HAVE F.E.C. THIS ABBREVIATION IS NOT LISTED ON |
| A-0.1.1 ARCHITECTURAL ABBREVIATIONS, 106.1.2 ADDITIONAL |
| INFORMATION REQUIRED. |
| |
| 12) SHEET A-2.1.1& A-2.1.3 BOTH INDICATE CLASSROOM 1 |
| ROOM# 1 AND DOOR# B172, THIS DOOR IS MISSING THE CLEAR |
| FLOOR SPACE (18") LATCH SIDE OF THE DOOR. 11-4.13.5 |
| DOORWAY MIN CLEAR WIDTH . DOORWAYS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM |
| CLEAR WIDTH OF 32" WITH THE DOOR OPEN 90-DEGREES, |
| MEASURED BETWEEN THE FACE OF THE DOOR AND OPPOSITE |
| STOP. |
| 11-4.13.6 MANEUVERING CLEARENCES AT DOORS. MINIMUM |
| MANEUVERING CLEARANCES AT DOORS THAT ARE NOT AUTOMATIC |
| OR POWER-ASSISTED SHALL BE AS SHOWN IN |
| FIG. 25. THE FLOOR OR GROUND AREA WITHIN THE REQUIRED |
| CLEARANCES SHALL BE CLEAR & LEVEL. |
| |
| 13) SHEET A-2.1.1 & A2.1.3 DISCREPANCY SHEET A-2.1.1 IS |
| MISSING OPENINGS INTO THE RESTROOMS 150 & 159 FROM THE |
| VESTIBULES, 106.1.2 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED. |
| |
| 14) SHEET A-2.11 & A-2.1.3 THERE APPEARS TO BE A |
| DISCREPANCY IN THE RAMP AT THE ENTRY POINT 146, |
| A-12.1.1 INDICATES A DIFFERENCE OF 5" BUT THE RAMP IS |
| NOT CLEARLY MARKED WHEREAS ON A-2.1.3 THE RAMP SHOWS |
| EXPANSION JOINTS SPREAD AT 14'-0" APART? 11.4.8.5. |
| HANDRAILS: IF A RAMP HAS A RISE GREATER THAN 6" OR A |
| HORIZONTAL PROJECTION GREATER THAN 72", THEN IT SHALL |
| HAVE HANDRAILS ON BOTH SIDES. |
| |
| 15) SHEET A-2.1.3 & A-2.2.3 THERE SEEMS TO BE A |
| DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE 1 HR FIRE RATING AND THE 2HR |
| FIRE RATING? 106.1.2 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED. |
| |
| 16) A-2.2.1 THIS SHEET INDICATES (3) AREAS WHERE ACCESS |
| TO THE ROOF WILL BE THROUGH A ROOF HATCH. PLEASE NOTE, |
| TO DATE THERE IS NO PRODUCT APPROVALS THAT COMPLY WITH |
| THE FLORIDA STATE STATUTE RULE 9B-72 |
| REQUIRING PRODUCT TESTING AND A THIRD PARTY QUALITY |
| ASSURANCE PROGRAM. THIS ITEM WILL BE A PROVISO AND IF |
| BY THE TIME A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY IS ASKED FOR THE |
| MANUFACTURER OF THE ROOF HATCH WILL NEED TO HAVE |
| RECEIVED EITHER A STATEWIDE APPROVAL, A ISSUED |
| MIAMI-DADE NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE(NOA) OR RECEIVED A |
| LOCAL APPROVAL FROM THIS JURISDICTION. |
| |
| 17) M-2.2.0 THE BLOWER ROOM WHICH IS PART OF THE FIRE |
| RATED ASSEMBLY INDICATES DUCT PENETRATION THROUGH THESE |
| WALLS WITHOUT DAMPERS. 712.3.3 DUCTS AND AIR TRANSFER |
| OPENINGS. |
| |
| 18) A-2.2.3 SPIRAL STAIR, STAIR# 201 TO CONTROL ROOM |
| PLEASE SEE 1009.9.1(6) THE TURN OF THE STAIRWAY SHALL |
| BE SUCH THAT DESCENDING USERS HAVE THE OUTER HANDRAIL |
| AT THEIR RIGHT SIDE. PLEASE INDICATE COMPLIANCE. |
| |
| 19) A-3.1.1 PLANS INDICATE THE USE OF EFIS TRIM ABOVE |
| 40'-0" PLEASE SEE 1406.2.2. ARCHITECTURAL TRIM THAT |
| EXCEEDS 40 FEET (12 192 MM) IN HEIGHT ABOVE GRADE PLANE |
| SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF APPROVED NONCOMBUSTIBLE |
| MATERIALS AND SHALL BE SECURED TO THE WALL WITH METAL |
| OR OTHER APPROVED NONCOMBUSTIBLE BRACKETS. PLEASE |
| PROVIDE THE ATTACHMENT DETAILS FOR THE EFIS OR EPS FOAM |
| PRODUCTS WHERE THIS PRODUCT CAN BE USED BELOW 40'-" IN |
| HEIGHT FROM GRADE. |
| |
| 20) A-6.1.3 DETAIL# 7INDICATES THE USE OF A HIP AND |
| RIDGE BOARD BUT NO METHOD OF ATTACHMENT HAS BEEN |
| INDICATED PLEASE SEE: |
| 1507.3.7 ATTACHMENT. CLAY AND CONCRETE ROOF TILES SHALL |
| BE FASTENED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 1609 OR IN |
| ACCORDANCE WITH FRSA/TRI 07320 INSTALLATION MANUAL. |
| |
| 1507.3.8 APPLICATION. TILE SHALL BE APPLIED ACCORDING |
| TO THE MANUFACTURER?S INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS OR |
| RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE FRSA/TRI 07320. |
| |
| PLEASE INDICAT ON THE PLANS WHICH TYPE OF STEEL ANGLE |
| PLACEMENT OF FASTENER AND SPACING OF BRACKET IN |
| ACCORDANCE WITH FRSA/ TRI 07320. |
| |
| 21) SHEET A-6.1.4 VARIOUS DETAILS INDICATE THE USE OF |
| 5/8 INCH CDX PLYWOOD ROOF DECKING, PLEASE SEE TABLE 601 |
| FOOTNOTE (C) (2) WHERE FIRE RETARDANT TREATED PLYWOOD |
| CAN AND CAN'T BE USED IN THE ROOF |
| ASSEMBLIES. IF FIRE TREATED PLYWOOD IS TO BE USED, ALSO |
| PROVIDE THE TYPE OF FASTENER AND TYPE OF METAL THE |
| FASTENER WILL BE MADE FROM. |
| |
| 22) SHEET A-6.1.4 DETAIL "6" INDICATES THE USE OF UL |
| SYSTEM P537, PLEASE REVIEW THIS SYSTEM VERSES WHAT IS |
| SHOWN ON THE SHEET. THE PLANS AGAIN INDICATE THE 5/8 " |
| CDX PLYWOOD ON THE ROOF DECK AS WELL AS BENEATH THE |
| BOTTOM CORD OF THE TRUSS AS A BACKER BOARD. PLEASE |
| REVIEW AND CORRECT. TABLE 601 FOOTNOTE (C)(2) AND |
| SECTION 603. |
| |
| 23) A-6.1.6 DETAIL OR ELEVATION 1 INDICATES THE USE OF |
| GILFORD FABRIC SCRIM STRETCHED AND STAPLED TO THE BACK |
| OF FACED WOOD, PLEASE PROVIDE THE FLAME SPREAD RATING |
| OF THIS FABRIC. |
| |
| 803.6.1 TEXTILE WALL COVERINGS. |
| TEXTILE WALL COVERINGS SHALL HAVE A CLASS A FLAME |
| SPREAD INDEX IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM E 84 AND BE |
| PROTECTED BY AUTOMATIC SPRINKLERS INSTALLED IN |
| ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 903.3.1.1 OR 903.3.1.2 OR THE |
| COVERING SHALL MEET THE CRITERIA OF SECTION 803.6.1.1 |
| OR 803.6.1.2 WHEN TESTED IN THE MANNER INTENDED FOR USE |
| IN ACCORDANCE WITH NFPA 265 USING THE PRODUCT MOUNTING |
| SYSTEM, INCLUDING ADHESIVE. |
| |
| 803.6.1.1 METHOD A TEST PROTOCOL. |
| DURING THE METHOD A PROTOCOL, FLAME SHALL NOT SPREAD TO |
| THE CEILING DURING THE 40 KW EXPOSURE. DURING THE 150 |
| KW EXPOSURE, THE TEXTILE WALL COVERING SHALL COMPLY |
| WITH ALL OF THE FOLLOWING: |
| 1. FLAME SHALL NOT SPREAD TO THE OUTER EXTREMITY OF THE |
| SAMPLE ON THE 8-FOOT BY 12-FOOT (203 MM BY 305 MM) |
| WALL. |
| 2. THE SPECIMEN SHALL NOT BURN TO THE OUTER EXTREMITY |
| OF THE 2-FOOT-WIDE (610 MM) SAMPLES MOUNTED IN THE |
| CORNER OF THE ROOM. |
| 3. BURNING DROPLETS DEEMED CAPABLE OF IGNITING TEXTILE |
| WALL COVERINGS OR THAT BURN FOR 30 SECONDS OR MORE |
| SHALL NOT FORM. |
| 4. FLASHOVER, AS DEFINED IN NFPA 265, SHALL NOT OCCUR. |
| 5. THE MAXIMUM NET INSTANTANEOUS PEAK HEAT RELEASE |
| RATE, DETERMINED BY SUBTRACTING THE BURNER OUTPUT FROM |
| THE MAXIMUM HEAT RELEASE RATE, DOES NOT EXCEED 300 KW. |
| |
| |
| 803.6.1.2 METHOD B TEST PROTOCOL. |
| DURING THE METHOD B PROTOCOL, FLAMES SHALL NOT SPREAD |
| TO THE CEILING AT ANY TIME DURING THE 40 KW EXPOSURE. |
| DURING THE 150 KW EXPOSURE, THE TEXTILE WALL COVERING |
| SHALL COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING: |
| 1. FLAME SHALL NOT SPREAD TO THE OUTER EXTREMITIES OF |
| THE SAMPLES ON THE 8-FOOT BY 12-FOOT (203 MM BY 305 MM) |
| WALLS. |
| 2. FLASHOVER, AS DESCRIBED IN NFPA 265, SHALL NOT |
| OCCUR. |
| |
| 24) A-7.2.3 DETAIL# 2 INDICATES THE USE OF A 3 HOUR |
| FUSED LINK DROP FIRE DOOR. PLEASE PROVIDE THE |
| MANUFACTURERS SPEC FOR THIS PRODUCT. 715.3/ 106.1.2. |
| |
| |
| 25) 1609.1.4 PROTECTION OF OPENINGS IN WIND-BORNE |
| DEBRIS REGIONS, EXTERIOR GLAZING THAT RECEIVES POSITIVE |
| PRESSURE IN THE LOWER 60 FEET (18.3 M) IN BUILDINGS |
| SHALL BE ASSUMED TO BE OPENINGS AND THE BALANCE OF |
| GLAZED OPENINGS IN THE REST OF THE BUILDING SHALL BE |
| ASSUMED TO BE ZERO UNLESS SUCH GLAZING THAT RECEIVES |
| POSITIVE PRESSURE IS IMPACT RESISTANT OR PROTECTED WITH |
| AN IMPACT RESISTANT COVERING MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS |
| OF SSTD 12, ASTM E 1886 AND ASTM E 1996, OR MIAMI-DADE |
| TAS 201, 202 AND 203 REFERENCED THEREIN AS FOLLOWS: 1. |
| GLAZED OPENINGS LOCATED WITHIN 30 FEET (9.1 M) OF GRADE |
| SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE LARGE MISSILE TEST. |
| 2. GLAZED OPENINGS LOCATED MORE THAN 30 FEET (9.1 M) |
| ABOVE GRADE SHALL MEET THE PROVISIONS OF THE SMALL |
| MISSILE TEST. |
| |
| 26) FL BLD CODE 1609.1.4: COMPONENTS & CLADDING, |
| PROVIDE 2 COPIES, |
| 3 IF THRESHOLD OR RESIDENT INSPECTOR OF PRODUCT TESTING |
| REPORTS, MISSING REPORTS ARE AS FOLLOWS: |
| A) GLAZED OPENINGS, FIXED |
| B) GLAZED OPENINGS, OPERABLE |
| C) MULLIONS |
| D) EXTERIOR GLAZED DOORS |
| E) EXTERIOR HOLLOW METAL DOORS |
| F) EXTERIOR ROLL UP DOORS |
| G) ROOF ACCESS HATCHES |
| H) PANEL WALL SYSTEMS : LOUVERS |
| I) PANEL WALL SYSTEMS: EFIS WALL SYSTEMS ( NOT TRIM) J) |
| ROOFING SYSTEMS BOTH FOR FLAT ROOF AND TILED SLOPED |
| SYSTEMS |
| |
| 27) PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED WITH PERMIT APPLICATION |
| AFTER OCTOBER 1, 2003 ARE REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THE |
| FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL SYSTEM. FOR INFORMATION PLEASE |
| SEE THE STATE WEBSITE AT WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG. |
| PRODUCTS WITH STATEWIDE APPROVAL ARE REQUIRED TO BE |
| SUBMITTED WITH A COVER SHEET THAT LISTS THE PRODUCT |
| IDENTITY NUMBER FROM THE STATE. IF THE PRODUCT DOES NOT |
| HAVE STATEWIDE APPROVAL, SUBMIT AN APPLICATION FOR |
| LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL OR SITE SPECIFIC FORM PER RULE |
| 9B-72. SEE ATTACHMENT. WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG |
| |
| 28) WPB ADMIN CODE 106.3* PRODUCT APPROVALS. THOSE |
| PRODUCT WHICH ARE REGULATED BY DCA RULE 9B-72 SHALL BE |
| REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF |
| RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. |
| |
| 29) 1714.5.5 MULLIONS OCCURRING BETWEEN INDIVIDUAL |
| WINDOW AND GLASS DOOR ASSEMBLIES. 1714.5.5.1 MULLIONS. |
| MULLIONS, OTHER THAN MULLIONS WHICH ARE AN INTEGRAL |
| PART OF A WINDOW OR GLASS DOOR ASSEMBLY TESTED AND |
| LABELED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 1714.5.2.1 , SHALL |
| BE TESTED BY AN APPROVED TESTING LABORATORY OR BE |
| ENGINEERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACCEPTED ENGINEERING |
| PRACTICE. BOTH METHODS SHALL USE PERFORMANCE CRITERIA |
| CITED IN SECTIONS 1714.5.5.2 , 1714.5.5.3 AND |
| 1714.5.5.4 . |
| |
| 30) 1714.5.5.2 LOAD TRANSFER. MULLIONS SHALL BE |
| DESIGNED TO TRANSFER THE DESIGN PRESSURE LOADS APPLIED |
| BY THE WINDOW AND DOOR ASSEMBLIES TO THE ROUGH OPENING |
| SUBSTRATE. |
| |
| 1714.5.5.4 STRUCTURAL SAFETY FACTOR. |
| MULLIONS SHALL BE CAPABLE OF RESISTING A LOAD OF |
| ONE-AND-ONE-HALF TIMES THE DESIGN PRESSURE LOADS |
| APPLIED BY THE WINDOW AND DOOR ASSEMBLIES TO BE |
| SUPPORTED WITHOUT EXCEEDING THE APPROPRIATE MATERIAL |
| STRESS LEVELS. IF TESTED BY AN APPROVED LABORATORY, THE |
| ONE AND ONE-HALF TIMES THE DESIGN PRESSURE LOAD SHALL |
| BE SUSTAINED FOR 10 SECONDS, AND THE PERMANENT |
| DEFORMATION SHALL NOT EXCEED 0.4 PERCENT OF THE MULLION |
| SPAN AFTER THE ONE-AND-ONE-HALF TIMES DESIGN PRESSURE |
| LOAD IS REMOVED. |
| |
| 31) PLEASE REVIEW THE CRITERIA FOR FLAT ROOF PRODUCT |
| APPROVAL SUBMITTALS, |
| 106.1.1.2 FOR ROOFING ASSEMBLIES REQUIRED BY THIS CODE, |
| THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS SHALL ILLUSTRATE, DESCRIBE, |
| AND DELINEATE THE TYPE OF ROOFING SYSTEMS, MATERIALS, |
| FASTENING REQUIREMENTS, FLASHING REQUIREMENTS AND WIND |
| RESISTANCE RATING THAT ARE REQUIRED TO BE INSTALLED. |
| FLAT ROOF: |
| ____ CONTRACTOR DID NOT PROVIDE THE MEAN ROOF HEIGHT. |
| |
| ___ CONTRACTOR DID NOT INDICATE THE ROOF PITCH. |
| |
| ___ CONTRACTOR FAILED TO INDICATE WHICH SUB-SYSTEM WILL |
| BE INSTALLED. |
| |
| ___ THE SYSTEM PROVIDED HAS A LOW PRESSURE FOR ZONE |
| _2&3__ . |
| |
| SINCE THE ROOFING REPORT DOESN?T HAVE THE SUBSYSTEM |
| HIGHLIGHTED THE NEXT 2 ITEMS ARE HIGHLIGHTED. |
| |
| ___ THE SYSTEM PROVIDED STATES LIMITATION# 7, SHOULD |
| THE FASTENER RESISTANCE BE LESS THAN THAT REQUIRED, AS |
| DETERMINED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL, A REVISED FASTENER |
| SPACING, PREPARED , SIGNED AND SEALED BY A FLORIDA |
| REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, REGISTERED ARCHITECT |
| OR REGISTERED ROOF CONSULTANT MAY BE SUBMITTED. |
| |
| ___ THE SYSTEM PROVIDED INDICATES LIMITATION# 9, NO |
| ENHANCED FASTENING ALLOWED. |
| |
| 102.1* WHERE, IN ANY SPECIFIC CASE, DIFFERENT SECTIONS |
| OF THIS CODE SPECIFY DIFFERENT MATERIALS, METHODS OF |
| CONSTRUCTION OR OTHER REQUIREMENTS, THE MOST |
| RESTRICTIVE SHALL GOVERN. WHERE THERE IS A CONFLICT |
| BETWEEN A GENERAL REQUIREMENT AND A SPECIFIC |
| REQUIREMENT, THE SPECIFIC |
| REQUIREMENT SHALL BE APPLICABLE. |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| JIM WITMER C. B. O. |
| BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II |
| |
| TEL: (561)805-6715 |
| FAX: (561)659-8026 |
| E-MAIL: [email protected] |
| |
| PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD PUBLIC RECORDS |
| LAW. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS |
| REGARDING CITY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORD, AVAILABLE TO |
| THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. YOUR E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS ARE |
| THEREFORE SUBJECT TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. |