Date |
Text |
2007-12-10 16:16:08 | 2004 FBC W/2007 REVISIONS |
| |
| DENIED BY BUILDING |
| |
| 1) IMPACT FEES MUST BE PAID TO PALM |
| BEACH COUNTY, PLANS STAMPED BY THEM AND |
| COPY OF RECEIPT SUBMITTED TO CITY OF |
| WEST PALM BEACH BUILDING DEPARTMENT, |
| BEFORE A BUILDING PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED. |
| |
| 2) SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH R302.1 EXTERIOR WALLS. EXTERIOR |
| WALLS SEPARATED BY LESS THAN 6 FEET (1828 MM) SHALL |
| HAVE NOT LESS THAN A ONE-HOUR FIRE-RESISTIVE RATING |
| WITH EXPOSURE FROM BOTH SIDES. PROJECTIONS SHALL NOT |
| EXTEND TO A POINT CLOSER THAN 4 FEET (1220 MM) FROM AN |
| ADJACENT PROJECTION OR WALL. ONE WALL OF THE STRUCTURE |
| IS LESS THAN 6 FEET FROM THE PROPERTY LINE. |
| |
| 3) THE PLANS ARE MISSING SHEET A-5.2. WHICH IS LISTED |
| IN THE DRAWING INDEX ON A-0. |
| |
| 4) SUBMIT FIREPLACE AND CHIMNEY DETAILS. SHOW |
| COMPLIANCE WITH R1003 FOR MASONRY FIREPLACES OR R1004 |
| FOR FACTORY BUILT FIREPLACES AND R1001 FOR MASONRY |
| CHIMNEYS OR R1002 FOR FACTORY BUILT CHIMNEYS. IF USING |
| FACTORY BUILT APPLIANCES SUBMIT MANUFACTURER'S |
| SPECIFICATIONS AND LISTING INFORMATION. |
| |
| 5) PROVIDE A WINDOW SCHEDULE ON THE PLANS. IDENTIFY THE |
| TYPES OF WINDOWS AND THEIR LOCATIONS. FBC 106.1.1* CITY |
| AMENDMENTS. |
| |
| 6) SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH R502.1.2 DRAFTSTOPPING |
| REQUIRED. |
| WHEN THERE IS USABLE SPACE BOTH ABOVE AND BELOW THE |
| CONCEALED SPACE OF A FLOOR/CEILING ASSEMBLY, DRAFTSTOPS |
| SHALL BE INSTALLED SO THAT THE AREA OF THE CONCEALED |
| SPACE DOES NOT EXCEED 1,000 SQUARE FEET (92.9 M 2 ). |
| DRAFTSTOPPING SHALL DIVIDE THE CONCEALED SPACE INTO |
| APPROXIMATELY EQUAL AREAS. WHERE THE ASSEMBLY IS |
| ENCLOSED BY A FLOOR MEMBRANE ABOVE AND A CEILING |
| MEMBRANE BELOW DRAFTSTOPPING SHALL BE PROVIDED IN |
| FLOOR/CEILING ASSEMBLIES UNDER THE FOLLOWING |
| CIRCUMSTANCES: |
| 1. CEILING IS SUSPENDED UNDER THE FLOOR FRAMING.2. |
| FLOOR FRAMING IS CONSTRUCTED OF TRUSS-TYPE OPEN-WEB OR |
| PERFORATED MEMBERS. |
| R502.1.2.1 MATERIALS. |
| DRAFTSTOPPING MATERIALS SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN ?-INCH |
| (12.7 MM) GYPSUM BOARD, 3 / 8 -INCH (9.5 MM) WOOD |
| STRUCTURAL PANELS, 3 / 8 -INCH (9.5 MM) TYPE 2-M-W |
| PARTICLEBOARD OR OTHER APPROVED MATERIALS ADEQUATELY |
| SUPPORTED. DRAFTSTOPPING SHALL BE INSTALLED PARALLEL TO |
| THE FLOOR FRAMING MEMBERS UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY |
| THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. THE INTEGRITY OF ALL DRAFTSTOPS |
| SHALL BE MAINTAINED. |
| |
| 7) PROVIDE A WINDOW SCHEDULE. SPECIFY THE WINDOW TYPE, |
| SIZE AND LOCATION. FBC 106.1.1* CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| |
| 8) THE WALL LEGEND ON A-1.1 AND A-1.2 SPECIFY WOOD |
| FRAME EXTERIOR WALLS. HOWEVER, WALL SECTION 3 ON A-5.1 |
| SPECIFIES METAL STUDS ON THE SECOND FLOOR AT THIS |
| LOCATION. PLEASE CORRECT. FBC 106.1.1* CITY |
| AMENDMENTS. |
| |
| 9) WALL TYPE B ON DETAIL 2 ON A-1.1 IS 3-5/8" 20 GA. |
| METAL STUDS AND THE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS SHOW WOOD FRAME |
| BEARING WALLS. PLEASE CLARIFY. FBC 106.1.1* CITY |
| AMENDMENTS. |
| |
| 10) ON SHEET A-3.2 THE MARK FOR SECTION 3/A-5.1 APPEARS |
| TO BE IN THE WRONG LOCATION. PLEASE CORRECT. FBC |
| 106.1.1* CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| |
| 11) SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH R602.1.2 FIREBLOCKING |
| REQUIRED. |
| FIREBLOCKING SHALL BE PROVIDED TO CUT OFF ALL CONCEALED |
| DRAFT OPENINGS (BOTH VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL) AND TO |
| FORM AN EFFECTIVE FIRE BARRIER BETWEEN STORIES, AND |
| BETWEEN A TOP STORY AND THE ROOF SPACE. FIREBLOCKING |
| SHALL BE PROVIDED IN WOOD-FRAME CONSTRUCTION IN THE |
| FOLLOWING LOCATIONS. |
| 3. IN CONCEALED SPACES BETWEEN STAIR STRINGERS AT THE |
| TOP AND BOTTOM OF THE RUN. |
| |
| 12) DETAIL 8 ON A-6.2 SHOWS INSULATION AT THE CEILING |
| AND THE WALL SECTION ON A-5.1 SPECIFIES ICYNENE |
| INSULATION. PLEASE CLARIFY.FBC 106.1.1* CITY |
| AMENDMENTS. |
| |
| 13) STRUCTURAL NOTE D-2 ON ON S-1 INCORRECTLY SPECIFIES |
| ASCE 7-05. ASCE 7-02 IS THE EDITION THAT IS REFERENCED |
| BY THE 2004 FBC. PLEASE CORRECT. SEE FBC R CHAPTER 43. |
| |
| 14) PROVIDE WINDOW AND DOOR BUCK DETAILS. SPECIFY THE |
| FASTENERS AND SPACING.FBC 106.1.2* CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| |
| 15) ON DETAIL 8 ON A-6.1, SPECIFY THE EMBED DEPTH OF |
| THE 1/2 " BOLTS FOR THE GARAGE DOOR BUCKS. FBC 106.1.1* |
| CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| |
| 16) THE BOTTOM PORTION OF THE FIRST FLOOR DOOR SCHEDULE |
| ON SHEET A-6.1 IS MISSING. |
| |
| 17) SUBMIT TWO COPIES OF THE SOIL REPORT WITH THE |
| EMBOSSED SEAL AND ORIGINAL SIGNATURE OF THE SOIL |
| ENGINEER. SEE FS 471 AND FAC 61G15-23.002. |
| |
| 18) THE A/C AREA ON THE ENERGY CALCULATION FORMS DO NOT |
| CORRESPOND WITH THE PLANS. THE OWNER/AGENT IS REQUIRED |
| TO SIGN AND DATE THE FORM. SEE FBC CHAPTER 13-6. |
| |
| 19) ON S-2 THE UPLIFT VALUE SPECIFIED FOR THE SIMPSON |
| H-1 IS INCORRECT. THE UPLIFT VALUE SHOULD BE 585# PER |
| THE 2007 SIMPSON CATALOG. |
| |
| 20) SPECIFY THE MAXIMUM SPACING OF THE VERTICAL WALL |
| REINFORCING ON THE PLANS. FBC 106.1.2* CITY |
| AMENDMENTS. |
| |
| 21) ON SHEET S-4 THE MARK FOR 3/S-7 IS LOCATED WHERE |
| THE FLOOR TRUSSES ARE PARALLEL TO THE CONCRETE BEAM AND |
| DETAIL 3 ON S-7 SHOWS THE TRUSSES PERPENDICULAR TO THE |
| CONCRETE BEAM. PLEASE CORRECT. |
| |
| 22) ON S-5 THE UPLIFT FOR THE TRUSSES AT THE REAR PORCH |
| ARE SPECIFIED AS 2237#, HOWEVER THE "C" CONNECTORS |
| SPECIFIED ARE RATED FOR AN UPLIFT OF 1260#. PLEASE |
| CORRECT. FBC 106.1.1* CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| |
| 23) SPECIFY THE CONNECTORS FOR THE 2 PLY GIRDERS AT THE |
| EXTERIOR MASONRY WALL AT THE REAR PORCH. FBC 106.1.2* |
| CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| |
| 24) SPECIFY THE CONNECTORS FOR THE 2 PLY GIRDERS AT THE |
| EXTERIOR WOOD FRAME WALL AT THE FRONT PORCH. FBC |
| 106.1.2* CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| |
| 25) SUBMIT MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE |
| ICYNENE INSULATION. FBC 106.1.1* CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| |
| 26)FBC 106.3* CITY AMENDMENTS PRODUCT APPROVALS. |
| THOSE PRODUCT WHICH ARE REGULATED BY DCA RULE 9B-72 |
| SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE |
| DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL FOR |
| JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. |
| |
| 27) THE SCHEDULE ON A-6.1 SPECIFIES A WOOD DOOR AT THE |
| SIDE OF THE GARAGE, BUT THE PRODUCT APPROVAL THAT WAS |
| SUBMITTED IS FOR A STEEL DOOR. PLEASE CORRECT. SEE FAC |
| RULE 9B-72. |
| |
| 28) THE NOTE ON THE DOOR SCHEDULE ON A-6 STATES THAT |
| ALL FRENCH DOORS ARE ALUMINUM AND THEN SPECIFIES WOOD |
| DOORS. PLEASE CLARIFY. |
| |
| 29) SUBMIT PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE SINGLE INSWING |
| FRENCH DOOR AS REQUIRED BY FAC RULE 9B-72. |
| |
| 30) PLEASE CLARIFY THE WINDOW TYPES ON THE PLANS. A |
| PRODUCT APPROVAL WAS SUBMITTED FOR CASEMENT WINDOWS AND |
| THERE DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE ANY ON THE PLANS. |
| |
| 31) ON SHEET A-6.1 ONE OF THE ELEVATIONS APPEARS TO |
| SHOW (2) FIXED WINDOWS MULLED TOGETHER. SUBMIT PRODUCT |
| APPROVALS FOR THEM AS REQUIRED BY FAC RULE 9B-72. |
| |
| 32) THE PRODUCT APPROVAL THAT WAS SUBMITTED FOR THE |
| FRONT ENTRY DOOR IS FOR AN OUTSWING DOOR, HOWEVER, THE |
| PLANS SHOW THIS DOOR AS AN INSWING DOOR. PLEASE |
| CORRECT. |
| |
| 33) THE MAXIMUM WIDTH LISTED IN THE PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| FOR THE FRENCH WOOD SIDELITES IS 18-13/16", WHICH DOES |
| NOT APPEAR TO BE WIDE ENOUGH TO WORK FOR THE FRONT |
| ENTRY ASSEMBLY DIMENSIONS ON THE PLANS. PLEASE REVIEW. |
| |
| NOTE: IN ORDER TO EXPEDITE PLAN REVIEW PLEASE RETURN |
| ONE SET OF THE OLD PLAN SHEETS AND A RESPONSE LETTER |
| INDICATING HOW THE PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS HAVE BEEN |
| ADDRESSED. |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |