Date |
Text |
2007-11-06 07:44:09 | |
| |
| |
| THIS REVIEW WAS DONE UNDER THESE CURRENT CODE CYCLES: |
| |
| THE 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 2006 REVISIONS, 2004 |
| RESIDENTIAL BUILDING CODE, 2005 NEC, NFPA-72 2002, |
| NFPA-101 2003, 2004 FBC AS AMENDED, CHAPTER 1, AND |
| FOUND NONCOMPLIANT WITH THE FOLLOWING: |
| ALL COMMENTS RELATE TO SHEET 3 3, UNLESS OTHERWISE |
| NOTED. ALL CODE ARTICLES REFERENCED ARE 2005 NEC UNLESS |
| OTHERWISE NOTED. |
| |
| THESE COMMENTS WERE NOT CORRECTLY ADDRESSED TO INDICATE |
| COMPLIANCE WITH THE CODE; |
| |
| 2} THE SCOPE OF THE ELECTRICAL WORK IS NOT CLEAR ON |
| THE PLAN. INDICATE IF THE SERVICE IS NEW OR EXISTING IN |
| WHOLE OR IN PART. HAND DRAWN CHANGES TO THE PLAN ARE |
| NOT ACCEPTABLE FOR RECORD RETENTION OR CLARITY IN THE |
| FIELD. 106.1.3 FBC AS AMENDED. * THERE IS STILL NO |
| INDICATION REGARDING IF THE SERVICE IS NEW OR |
| EXISTING. |
| |
| 4} IF THE SERVICE IS NEW, PER 110.9 AND 110.10: OBTAIN |
| THE AVAILABLE FAULT CURRENT AT THE UTILITY AND |
| CALCULATE THE SAME AT THE EQUIPMENT. INDICATE THE AIC |
| RATING FOR THE EQUIPMENT IS EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN |
| THE AVAILABLE FAULT. * NOT ADDRESSED. |
| |
| 5} THE GROUNDING ELECTRODE CONDUCTOR MUST COMPLY WITH |
| 250.66, AND 250.50. INDICATE SAME ON THE RISER |
| DIAGRAM.* NO SIZING GIVEN.SEE ARTICLE. |
| |
| 7} RECEPTACLE SPACING MUST COMPLY WITH 210.52(A)(1) AND |
| 210.52(A)(2). 2005 NEC. SEE REVIEWED PLAN FOR |
| DEFICIENCIES. * SEE KITCHEN |
| |
| 8} LOCATE AND INDICATE A DISCONNECTING MEANS FOR THE |
| WATER HEATER. SEE 422.16 NEC FOR CORD AND PLUG |
| RESTRICTIONS, AND 422.31(B) FOR HARDWIRE |
| REQUIREMENTS.*WATER HEATERS INDICATE THEY ARE CORD |
| CONNECTED TO A 120 VOLT RECEPTACLE. VERIFY. |
| |
| 9} EGRESS LIGHTING IS REQUIRED PER 210.70(A)(2)(B). THE |
| FRONT DOES NOT COMPLY. |
| |
| 13} THERE IS APPARENTLY IS AN APARTMENT ATTACHED TO THE |
| MAIN HOUSE, BUT THE LOAD CALCULATION FOR THE SERVICE |
| DID NOT INCLUDE ANY EQUIPMENT OR BRANCH CIRCUITS |
| REQUIRED FOR AN APARTMENT. SHOW ALL CALCULATIONS PER |
| 220 NEC IF CHANGING THE SERVICE, AND ALL PANEL |
| SCHEDULES PER 408.4 NEC. * THE TOTAL LOAD WAS NOT |
| CALCULATED FOR THE SERVICE PER 220.83, BUT RATHER PER |
| PANEL. THE CONDUIT AND CONDUTOR SIZES FOR THE RISER |
| DIAGRAM ARE NOT INDICATED, THEREFORE THE SIZE OF THE |
| SERVICE CANNOT BE DETERMINED. |
| |
| NEW COMMENTS THIS REVIEWDUE TO CHANGES IN THE PLAN, |
| SPECIFICALLY THE RISER NOW BEING SHOWN AS PART OF THE |
| SCOPE; |
| |
| 1} THE RISER SHOWS TWO PANELS. THE FLOOR PLAN SHOWS TWO |
| PANELS AT THE METERS AND ONE PANEL IN THE MAIN HOUSE, |
| PLEASE CORRELATE. |
| |
| 2} THERE IS NO BATH RECEPTACLE SHOWN IN PANEL "B" PER |
| 210.11(C)(3) |
| |
| TO EXPEDITE REVIEW AND CLARIFY THE DESIGNERS INTENT ON |
| THE ABOVE ISSUES, SUBMIT WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE |
| COMMENTS MADE IN THIS REVIEW. |
| |
| IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL. |
| |
| BILL TROBAUGH |
| ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER |
| CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| 561/805-6718 |
| [email protected] |