Date |
Text |
2007-08-21 17:30:23 | |
| |
| |
| THIS REVIEW WAS DONE UNDER THESE CURRENT CODE CYCLES: |
| |
| THE 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 2006 REVISIONS, 2004 |
| RESIDENTIAL BUILDING CODE, 2005 NEC, NFPA-72 2002, |
| FLORIDA STATUTES 1/2007,2004 FBC AS AMENDED, CHAPTER |
| 1.AND FOUND NONCOMPLIANT WITH THE FOLLOWING: |
| |
| THESE COMMENTS REFER TO SHEET A7. |
| |
| 1} CIRCUIT # 40 IN PANEL "B" INDICATES A LOAD OF 3.6 |
| KW. IN VIOLATION OF 210.23, LIMITING THE CIRCUIT |
| AMPACITY TO 80% OF THE CIRCUIT RATING ( AT 20 AMPS). |
| LIST THE CIRCUIT RATING AND CONDUCTOR SIZE SO |
| COMPLIANCE WITH 310.16 MAY BE REVIEWED. NOTE: THE HIGH |
| HATS LISTED ON THOSE CIRCUITS ARE NOT REQUIRED TO BE ON |
| A SEPARATE CIRCUIT AND MAY BE PUT ON OTHER LIGHTING AND |
| RECEPTACLE CIRCUITS. |
| |
| 2} SHEET A2 ANDA7 INDICATES IN A NOTE THATAHU #2, |
| IN BEDROOM #2CLOSET, IS CEILING HUNG. SHEET M1 SYSTEM |
| SPECIFICATIONS INDICATE THERE IS A 30 AMP FUSE IN THE |
| AIR HANDLER. OVERCURRENT PROTECTION IN A CLOTHES CLOSET |
| IS IN VIOLATION OF 240.24(D). ALSO THERE IS A |
| DISCONNECT IN THE CLOSET AND IT IS UNCLEAR IF IT |
| CONTAINS OCP. IF THE INSTALLATION IS INTENDED TO BE IN |
| THE ATTIC RATHER THAN IN THE CLOSET, ARECEPTACLE PER |
| 210.63, IS REQUIRED. |
| |
| 3} RECEPTACLES ARE REQUIRED TO BE ADDED OR RELOCATED TO |
| COMPLY WITH 210.52(A) IN THE CLUB, LIVING AND MASTER |
| BEDROOMS. |
| |
| 4} SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH R313.1. FBC "OUTSIDE EACH |
| SEPARATE SLEEPING AREA IN THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY OF THE |
| BEDROOMS" AND NFPA-72, 11.5.1.1(2) "OUTSIDE OF EACH |
| SEPARATE SLEEPING AREA, IN THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY OF |
| THE SLEEPING ROOMS" FOR THE GUEST SUITE. |
| |
| 5} THE ENGINEERSNAME ON THE PLAN PROVIDER AFFIDAVIT |
| AND SEAL, IS DIFFERENT THAN THE ONE ON FILE WITH DBPR. |
| PLEASE CLARIFY. |
| |
| IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL. |
| |
| BILL TROBAUGH |
| ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER |
| CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| 561/805-6718 |
| [email protected] |