Date |
Text |
2007-12-28 16:30:41 | RESIDENTIAL ADDITION, BUILDING REVIEW SECOND |
| CHECKLIST. |
| REVIEW UNDER FBC 2004 WITH 2007 REVISIONS. |
| |
| 1-OWES $15.86 FOR NEW ADDITION RADON FEES. (REPEAT |
| COMMENT). |
| |
| 2-NEED RECORDED NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT AS REQUIRED BY |
| SEC. 713.13FLORIDA STATUTE.. |
| |
| 3-SHEET 1 OF 6: |
| A)THIS BUILDING IS NOT CONSTRUCTION TYPE 3.SEE |
| SEC.602.1 FBC 2004FOR CONSTRUCTION TYPES AND REVISE |
| AS REQUIRED. |
| |
| B) SPECIFY ALL LOADS AS REQUIRED BY TABLE R301.5 OF |
| 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE. MISSING THESLEEPING |
| AND NON SLEEPING ROOMS AND STAIRS UNIFORM DISTRIBUTED |
| LIVE LOADS. PROVIDE ALL THE REQUIRED INFORMATION FROM |
| TABLE R301.5. (REPEAT COMMENT). |
| |
| C) THIS IS NOT JUST AN ALTERATION TYPE II, BUT AN |
| ADDITION AS WELL. SEE CHAPTER 9 OF 2004 FLORIDA |
| EXISTING BUILDING CODE. AND REVISE INFORMATION AS |
| REQUIRED. |
| |
| 4- SOIL TEST REPORT SUBMITTED: |
| A) ENGINEERING FIRM NEEDS TO SHOWTHE FIRM'S |
| CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION NUMBER AS REQUIRED BY SEC. |
| 61G15-23.002 OF FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. |
| |
| B) REVISE PROPOSED ADDITION SQUARE FOOTAGE.IT'S |
| NOT 900 SF. SEE PLANS FOR CORRECT SQUARE FOOTAGE. |
| |
| 5- ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE TAKING THE CEILING FANS |
| CREDIT. THEREFORE NEED TO SPECIFY CEILING FAN SIZES TO |
| VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH TABLE 13-607.1.A.1 OF FBC 2004. |
| (REPEAT COMMENT).SIZE OF CEILING PLANS SHOWN ON PLANS |
| DON'T MEET THE MINIMUM SIZES SHOWN ON TABLE |
| 13-607.1.A.1 OF FBC 2004. AND, ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE |
| TAKEN FOR THE ENTIRE HOUSE. THEREFORE, NEED TO SPECIFY |
| CEILING FAN SIZE ON EACH ROOM OF THE HOUSE. SEEABOVE |
| TABLE FOR MIN.SIZE REQUIRED. |
| |
| 6-SHEET 3 OF 6:SIZE OF FOOTING SPECIFIED IN |
| FOUNDATION PLAN DOESN'T MATCHSIZE SHOWN ON TYPICAL |
| FOOTING ATTACHMENT. REVISE AS REQUIRED. (REPEAT |
| COMMENT). |
| |
| 7-SHEET 4 OF 6:STAIRWAY BEARING WALL IS SHOWN |
| INCORRECTLY ON 1ST FLOOR PLAN.PLAN SHOWS THE |
| GUARDRAIL AND NOT THE WALL. (REPEAT COMMENT). REVISE AS |
| REQUIRED. |
| |
| 8- SHEET5 OF 6: |
| A) REVISE RAILING HEIGHT SHOWN ON STAIRSECTION AND |
| STAIR PLAN.SEE SEC. R311.5.6 OF 2004 FLORIDA |
| RESIDENTIAL CODE. (REPEAT COMMENT). |
| |
| B) NUMBER OF RISERS SHOWN (14) ARE NOT ENOUGH. |
| REVISENUMBER OF RISERS AS REQUIRED AND REVISE FLOOR |
| PLANS AS REQUIRED ALSO. |
| |
| C) SPECIFY RISER HEIGHT IN INCHES.7.67" IS NOT A |
| CORRECT DIMENSION. HOW DO YOU MEASURE IT?. PROVIDE |
| CORRECT DIMENSION TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. |
| R311.5.3 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE. |
| |
| D) 9" TREAD REQUIRES MINIMUM 1" NOSING.2X10 TREADS |
| AS SPECIFIED ON DETAILS DON'T PROVIDE THE 1" NOSING. |
| SEE SEC. R311.5.3.3 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE |
| AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. COORDINATE WITHITEM 8(B) AND |
| 8(C) ABOVE. ALSO, PROVIDE SPECIFICATIONS FOR NOSING |
| PROFILE TO COMPLY WITHTHIS CODE SECTION. |
| |
| 9- SHEET 6 OF 6: |
| A) COORDINATEALLSTRUCTURALCONNECTORS SPECIFIED |
| ON WALL SECTIONS AND DETAILS WITH THOSE SPECIFIED ON |
| TRUSS ANCHOR SCHEDULE AND ROOF/FLOORFRAMING PLANS. |
| (REPEAT COMMENT). |
| |
| B) WALL SECTION B-B:SIMPSON LSTA24 STRAP SPECIFIED |
| TOTRANSFER LOAD TO THE EXISTING CONCRETE BLOCK WALL |
| IS TOO SHORT.ALSO, NEED TO SPECIFYA WOOD TO MASONRY |
| CONNECTOR. OTHERWISE PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAIL AND |
| ENGINEERINGSHOWING HOW PROPOSED STRAP WILL BE NAILED |
| TO RESIST THE CALCULATED LOADS.SEC. 106.1.2 CITY |
| AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004 TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH |
| CALCULATED LOADS OFSEC. R301 OF 2004 FLORIDA |
| RESIDENTIAL CODE. |
| |
| JULIO GOMEZ |
| BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| (561)805-6712 |