| Date |
Text |
| 2007-09-12 15:57:53 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | SEPT. 10, 2007 |
| | PERMIT: 07080049 |
| | ADD: 2345 OKEECHOBEE BLVD |
| | CONT: POPPER AND ASSOCIATES |
| | TEL: (561)719-7131 |
| | |
| | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE |
| | W/ 2006 FBC REVISIONS |
| | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS |
| | |
| | REVIEW |
| | ACTION: DENIED |
| | |
| | 1)--- VERY IMPORTANT STATEMENT --- |
| | PLEASE DO NOT IGNORE! |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE THE REVISION & |
| | REMOVE & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL |
| | LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH |
| | A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE |
| | SHEET OR SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE |
| | FOUND WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR |
| | YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. |
| | |
| | |
| | 2) FL S S 713.13NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT, TO BE FILED |
| | WITH THE CLERK OF THE COURT.NOTE: 713.13(2) IF THE |
| | WORK DESCRIBED IN THE NOTICE OFCOMMENCEMENT IS NOT |
| | ACTUALLYCOMMENCED WITHIN 90 DAYS AFTER THE RECORDING |
| | THEREOF, SUCH NOTICE IS NULL & VOID. NOTE: 713.13(6) |
| | THE POSTING OF THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT AT THE |
| | CONSTRUCTION SITE BEFORE THE FIRST INSPECTION. |
| | |
| | 3A) SHEET SP-1 CODE SUMMERY, THE PLANS FAIL TO INDICATE |
| | AS TO WHICH EDITION OF THE CODE THIS BUILDING IS BEING |
| | DESIGNED TO. 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE W/ 2006 |
| | AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 3B) THE PERMIT APPLICATION AND PLAN INDICATE THAT THE |
| | WORK TO BE COMPLETED UNDER THIS PERMIT IS A COMMERCIAL |
| | REMODEL. PLEASE SEE 2004 EXISTING BUILDING CODE- |
| | BUILDINGW/ 2006 AMENDMENTS. PLEASE INDICATE ON THE |
| | PLANS AS WELL AS THE LEVEL OF ALTERATIONS? |
| | |
| | 4A) SHEET A-102 THERE IS 2 NEW COLUMNS ON COLUMN LINE |
| | A-2 & COLUMN LINE A-6 PLEASE PROVIDE A CUT SECTION |
| | THROUGH THIS AREA, PLAN ARE NOT CLEAR AS TO THE |
| | ANCHORING TO SLAB AND OR MAIN RESISTING SYSTEM FROM THE |
| | ROOF THROUGH TO THE FOUNDATION. |
| | |
| | 4B) SHEET A-102 PLEASE PROVIDE A CUT SECTION THROUGH AT |
| | GRADE TO INDICATE HOW THE COMPONENTS WILL ENTER ACT AT |
| | GRADE OR IF SIDEWALK AT AIDE WALK. |
| | 2603.9.2 CLEARANCE BETWEEN EARTH AND FOAM PLASTICS |
| | APPLIED TO THE EXTERIOR WALL SHALL BE NOT LESS THAN 6 |
| | INCHES (152 MM). |
| | |
| | 5A) SHEET A-102 INDICATES THAT THE EXISTING STOREFRONT |
| | WILL BE REUSED, BUT THE PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED |
| | HAVE ALUMIGLASS CURTAIN WALL SYSTEM AS PART OF THE |
| | PACKAGE. |
| | NOTE: THIS REPORT IF TO BE USED WILL NEED TO DIVIDE THE |
| | PRESSURES BY 1.33 FOR HAVE A FLORIDA LICENSED P.E. |
| | RESEARCH THE FASTENING SYSTEM. BEFORE THE 2004 FBC |
| | MANUFACTURES TOOK STEEL INCREASES OF 1.33% ON THE |
| | FASTENING SYSTEM. |
| | |
| | 5B) SHEETS A-101 AND A-102 BOTH INDICATE THE USE OF |
| | EXTERIOR BI-FOLD DOORS, A 3?-0? |
| | WIDE EXTERIOR SWING DOOR AND A 6?-0? WIDE SWING DOOR. |
| | THE WERE NO PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED FOR THESE |
| | OPENINGS AT ALL. 1609.1.4. |
| | |
| | 5C) THERE ARE NO DETAIL SHEETS HOW THE BI-FOLD DOORS |
| | AND SWING DOORS WERE TESTED AS AN ASSEMBLY, NOTE IS |
| | THERE A DOOR JAMB ON THE LATCH SIDE OF THE SWING DOOR, |
| | DOES THE BI-FOLD DOOR HAVE WHAT TYPE OF LOCKING |
| | ASSEMBLY THAT ALLOWS THE SWING DOOR TO LOCK INTO ITS |
| | RAILS? 106.1.2* ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 5D) SUBMITTED ALSO ARE STORM SHUTTER PRODUCT APPROVALS |
| | BUT THERE IS NO KEY PLAN INDICATING TO WHICH OPENINGS |
| | THEY ARE TO BE PLACED? SHEET A-107 NOTE INDICATES NEW |
| | STOREFRONTS WITH BI-FOLD DOORS, ARE THE STOREFRONT |
| | WINDOWS GETTING REPLACED? |
| | |
| | 5E)EASTERN METAL ALSO WILL REQUIRE A FLORIDA COVER |
| | SHEET.PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED WITH PERMIT |
| | APPLICATION AFTER OCTOBER 1, 2003 ARE REQUIRED TO |
| | COMPLY WITH THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL SYSTEM. FOR |
| | INFORMATION PLEASE SEE THE STATE WEBSITE AT |
| | WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG. PRODUCTS WITH STATEWIDE |
| | APPROVAL ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED WITH A COVER |
| | SHEET THAT LISTS THE PRODUCT IDENTITY NUMBER FROM THE |
| | STATE. IF THE PRODUCT DOES NOT HAVE STATEWIDE APPROVAL, |
| | SUBMIT AN APPLICATION FOR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL OR |
| | SITE SPECIFIC FORM PER RULE 9B-72. |
| | |
| | 5F) SHEET A-102 ALSO INDICATES THE USE OF A NEW ROOF |
| | HATCH. RULE 9B-72 REQUIRES A PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR SUCH |
| | ROOF OPENINGS. CURRENTLY THERE ARE NONE AVAILABLE BUT |
| | THERE ARE MANUFACTURERS CURRENTLY UNDERGOING TESTING |
| | AND CERTIFICATION THROUGH MIAMI-DADE TESTING PROGRAM. |
| | THIS ISSUE WILL BE A PROVISO:THAT IF THE MANUFACTURER |
| | DOES NOT ACQUIRE A ACCEPTANCE REPORT THROUGH THE STATE |
| | OR MIAMI-DADE THEN THE |
| | MANUFACTURER WILL BE REQUIRED TO SUBMIT TO THE CITY AND |
| | ACQUIRE A LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL BEFORE A CERTIFICATE |
| | OF COMPLETION WILL BE ISSUED. RULE 9B-72, 106.3.3.* |
| | |
| | 6A) SHEET A-103 STAIR# A111 HAS A PASSAGEWAY TO THE |
| | EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDING,THIS STAIRWAY HAS 2 DOORS |
| | WHERE THE 18 ? IS MISSING ON THE PULL SIDE AT THE |
| | LATCH. |
| | 11-4.13.6 MANEUVERING CLEARENCES AT DOORS. MINIMUM |
| | MANEUVERING CLEARANCES AT DOORS THAT ARE NOT AUTOMATIC |
| | OR POWER-ASSISTED SHALL BE AS SHOWN IN |
| | FIG. 25. THE FLOOR OR GROUND AREA WITH IN THE REQUIRED |
| | CLEARANCES SHALL BE CLEAR & LEVEL. |
| | |
| | 6B) SHEET A-103 SERVICE TECH ROOM# 119 PLEASE SEE DOORS |
| | IN SERIES: 11-4.13.7 TWO DOORS IN SERIES.THE MINIMUM |
| | SPACE BETWEEN TWO HINGED OR PIVOTED DOORS IN SERIES |
| | SHALL BE 48 INCHES (1219 MM) PLUS THE WIDTH OF ANY DOOR |
| | SWINGING INTO THE SPACE. DOORS IN SERIES SHALL SWING |
| | EITHER IN THE SAME DIRECTION OR AWAY FROM THE SPACE |
| | BETWEEN THE DOORS [SEE FIGURE 26 (A)]. |
| | |
| | 6C) SHEET A-103 HAS SEVERAL COUNTER AREAS, RETAIL PARTS |
| | BOUTIQUE, SERVICE TECH AREA AND CASHIERS STATION. ALL |
| | SHOW VARIOUS DETAILS ON EITHER SHEET A-12 AND A-14. |
| | THESE SHEETS ARE NOT INCLUDED IN THESE PLANS OR |
| | INDEX.PLEASE REVIEW REQUIREMENTS FOR SERVICE COUNTERS |
| | FOR SALES OR DISTRIBUTION OF GOODS TO THE PUBLIC. |
| | 11-4.7.2. PROVIDE ELEVATIONS SHOWING COMPLIANCE. |
| | |
| | 6D) SHEET A-103 THE WOMEN?S RESTROOM A117 HAS 2 DOORS |
| | IN SERIES, 1A117B AND DOOR 2A117B THE SECOND DOOR DOES |
| | NOT INDICATE WHAT THE USAGE WILL BE? PLEASE REVIEW |
| | 11-4.13.7 TWO DOORS IN SERIES. |
| | |
| | 7)FL BLD CODE 1609.1.4: COMPONENTS & CLADDING, |
| | PROVIDE 2 COPIES(3 IF THRESHOLD OR RESIDENT INSPECTOR) |
| | OF PRODUCT TESTINGREPORTS, MISSING REPORTS ARE AS |
| | FOLLOWS: |
| | A) ROOF HATCH |
| | B) EFIS SYSTEMS |
| | C) ROOF ASSEMBLIES- WORK ON THE ROOF |
| | |
| | 8)PLEASE MAKE CORRECTION AS TO WORK THAT WILL BE |
| | COMPLETED ON THE 2ND FLOOR IS RELATED TO A/C. PERMIT |
| | APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 102.1* WHERE, IN ANY SPECIFIC CASE, DIFFERENT SECTIONS |
| | OF THIS CODE SPECIFY DIFFERENT MATERIALS, METHODS OF |
| | CONSTRUCTION OR OTHER REQUIREMENTS, THE MOST |
| | RESTRICTIVE SHALL GOVERN. WHERE THERE IS A CONFLICT |
| | BETWEEN A GENERAL REQUIREMENT AND A SPECIFIC |
| | REQUIREMENT, THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENT SHALL BE |
| | APPLICABLE. |
| | |
| | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | JIM WITMER C. B. O. |
| | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | TEL: (561)805-6715 |
| | FAX: (561)659-8026 |
| | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
