Date |
Text |
2007-09-04 12:26:43 | 2007-09-04 12:26:43 |
| |
| ** DENIED2ND REVIEW** |
| |
| |
| ** PLEASE SEE THERE ARE COMMENTS FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW |
| WHICH ARE STILL IN NEED OF ADDRESSING. |
| ** PLEASE SEE THERE ARE ALSO NEW COMMENTS AS THERE WERE |
| SEVERAL CHANGES MADE TO PANEL SCHEDULES/RISER WHICH |
| HAVE CREATED NEW COMMENTS. AS THESE ITEMS WERE NOT ON |
| PREVIOUS PLANS THIS WAY, THESE NEW COMMENTS COULD NOT |
| HAVE BEEN MADE ON THE PREVIOUS REVIEW. |
| |
| 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS NOTE #1 WITH RESPECT TO |
| CODES REQUIRED. PLEASE SEE ARCHITECTURAL COVER SHEET |
| WHICH NOTES A 2005 NFPA-72. PLEASE KNOW THIS CODE |
| SHOULD BE THE 2002 NFPA-72. |
| PLEASE ADJUST. |
| |
| ** PLEASE SEE POSSIBLE COMMENTS FROM OTHER TRADES WHICH |
| MAY REQUIRE CERTAIN CODES. |
| |
| 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE NOTE #6 FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW WITH |
| RESPECT TO INFORMATION BEING NEEDED FOR MAXIMUM |
| LIGHTING POWER DENSITIES. PLEASE SEE 13-415.2, AND |
| 13-415.2.ABC.1.2 WITH RESPECT TO TRACK LIGHTING. THE |
| RESPONSE FROM THE DESIGNER MENTIONS LOADS FOR TRACK |
| LIGHTING BASED ON THE NEC MINIMUM LOADS FOR BRANCH |
| CIRCUITS AND SERVICE FEEDER LOADS. THIS SECTION OF THE |
| FBC AND CHAPTER 13 HAS TO DO WITH THE MAXIMUM ALLOWED |
| LIGHTING LEVELS AND WATTS PER SQ FT BASED ON USE OF THE |
| SPACE ETC. |
| PLEASE SEE THERE IS A MAXIMUM TIME OF 30 MINUTES FOR |
| OCCUPANCY TYPE DEVICES PER THE FBC AND SOME OC TYPE |
| DEVICES AS NOTED ON LEGEND MENTIONS 2HRS. |
| PLEASE SEE THAT THE COORDINATION OF LIGHTING, FIXTURES |
| AND LEVELS CAN NOT FULLY BE DONE AT THIS TIME. PLEASE |
| SEE 13-415.1.ABC.1.1, .1.2 AND .1.3. |
| |
| 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE #8 WITH |
| RESPECT TO MINIMUM LEVELS FOR ADA COMPLIANCE. THE |
| RESPONSE LETTER MENTIONS LEVELS AT 70DB, HOWEVER NO |
| INFORMATION OR LEVELS FOR CANDELA LEVELS COULD BE |
| LOCATED. |
| PLEASE SEE THE NOTE BELOW FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW*PLEASE |
| SEE FBC 2004 11-4.28.1, .2 AND .3(4) AND STATE THE |
| MINIMUM HORN, STROBE LEVELS ON PLANS FOR ADA REQUIRED |
| AREAS. DEVICES ARE BEING SHOWN ON PLANS/LEGEND. PLEASE |
| CORRELATE WITH PLANS, AND FA SHEETS SUBMITTED. |
| ** PLEASE KNOW THAT THE FIRE ALARM WILL BE UNDER A |
| SEPARATE PERMIT HOWEVER THE BASE LIFE SAFETY SYSTEM IS |
| REQUIRED ON BASE PLANS AS SHOWN. DO NOT REMOVE FROM |
| SETS. |
| FBC 106.3.5.1.2 |
| |
| 4) NOTE:PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS NOTE #10. RESPONSE |
| MENTIONS LOAD WAS ADJUSTED HOWEVER PLANS SHOW THE SAME |
| INFORMATION AS ON PREVIOUS CALCULATIONS. PLEASE SEE THE |
| NEC HANDBOOK AS WATER HEATERS ARE NOW CONSIDERED |
| *CONTINUOUS LOADS* WHICH REQUIRES THE 125% FOR LOAD. |
| THIS WAS A CHANGE FROM THE PREVIOUS CODE WHICH ONLY |
| REQUIRED THE BRANCH CIRCUIT CONDUCTORS AND OVER CURRENT |
| PROTECTION TO BE DONE AT 125%. |
| PLEASE ALSO INCLUDE THE WATER HEATER LOAD AT 125% FOR |
| CONTINUOUS LOAD. PLEASE SEE 422.13 OF THE 2005 NEC. |
| |
| 5) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE PREVIOUS NOTE #11 REQUESTED |
| COORDINATION AND CHANGES FOR CODE COMPLIANCE FOR |
| FEEDERS ON RISER AND PANEL SCHEDULES. PLEASE SEE SOME |
| OF THESE ITEMS WERE CHANGED AND CORRECT HOWEVER PLEASE |
| SEE SOME ITEMS WERE NOT CHANGED. |
| PLEASE SEE THE FEEDERS NOTED ON PANEL *H* ARE STILL |
| SHOWN AS 3/0 WHEN THE RISER AND NOTES TO RISER INDICATE |
| 1/0. |
| PLEASE SEE COMMENTS BELOW FOR OTHER ITEMS FOR |
| COORDINATION. |
| |
| 6) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE PREVIOUS NOTE #12 WHICH |
| REQUESTED FOR THE OVER CURRENT PROTECTION OF THE |
| TRANSFORMER AS LISTED ON THE PANEL *H* TO MEET 450.3. |
| THE RESPONSE LETTER MENTIONS THIS IS TO BE CHANGED TO |
| 70AMP HOWEVER PLEASE SEE PANEL *H* AS THIS NOW SHOW A |
| 3-POLE 20AMP BREAKER WITH #3 CONDUCTORS. |
| PLEASE SEE THE RISER SHOWS OTHER CONDUCTOR SIZES. |
| PLEASE KNOW THE #3 CONDUCTORS WILL NOT FIT INTO THIS |
| SIZE BREAKER. |
| PLEASE SEE THIS 20AMP OVER CURRENT PROTECTION DOES NOT |
| MEET THE MINIMUM LOADS ON THE TRANSFORMER FROM PANEL |
| *L1*. |
| 240.4, 310.16, 110.3,ETC. THERE ARE SEVERAL CODE |
| SECTIONS, TOO MANY TO LIST. |
| PLEASE COORDINATE. |
| |
| 7) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE LOAD FOR THE TRANSFORMER HAS |
| NOW BEEN REVISED AND INDICATES A LOAD OF .5 KVA. THIS |
| IS NOT POSSIBLE WHEN THE LOAD ON PANEL *L1* IS 42KVA AT |
| 120/208 VOLTS. THIS LOAD WAS CHANGED FROM PREVIOUS |
| PLANS. |
| PLEASE SEE THE TOTAL LOAD ON PANEL *H* HAS NOW GONE |
| DOWN WITH OUT THIS LOAD OF THE PANEL *L1*. |
| PLEASE COORDINATE AND ADJUST ALL OF THESE ITEMS. |
| 240,220, 408.4, 310.16, 215, ETC. |
| |
| 8) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS NOTE #14. PLEASE CLARIFY |
| RATING OF THE PANELS *H* AND *L1*ON RISER AND ON |
| SCHEDULE. |
| PANEL *L1* IS SHOWN AS A 225AMP RATED PANEL WITH A |
| 150AMP MCB, YET RISER SHOWS THIS AS 200AMPS? PLEASE SEE |
| PANEL *H* IS SHOWN ON SCHEDULE AS 225AMP RATED, WITH |
| 200AMP RATED MCB. THIS IS OK, HOWEVER THIS IS SHOWN AS |
| 200AMP ON RISER WITH A 150AMP FEED FROM THE BUS-TAP AND |
| DISCONNECT. |
| THE ABOVE NEEDS SOME COORDINATION. |
| FBC 106.1.2, 106.1.1, 106.3.5.1.2 |
| FAC 61G15-23.004 |
| |
| 9) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS NOTE #16 AS THIS REQUESTED |
| COORDINATION OF THE PANEL NUMBER OF POLES LISTED ON |
| PANEL AND SHOWN ON CIRCUITS. |
| PLEASE SEE PANEL *L1* WAS CORRECTED, HOWEVER PLEASE SEE |
| PANEL *H* IS STILL SHOWN AS 30 AND 42 CIRCUIT PANELS. |
| (225AMP RATED PANELS ARE MOST LIKELY NOT AVAILABLE AS |
| 30POLES) |
| FBC 106.1.2 |
| |
| 10) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS NOTE #17 FOR TRANSFORMER |
| GROUNDING. A CONDUCTOR SIZE WAS ADDED HOWEVER NO |
| ATTACHMENT LOCATIONS WERE SHOWN OR NOTED. |
| ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** |
| PLEASE INDICATE THE TRANSFORMER GROUNDING ELECTRODE |
| SYSTEM PER 250.20, 250.30, 250.66 ETC. PLEASE SHOW |
| ATTACHMENT WITH THE SIZE OF THE CONDUCTOR. FBC 106.1.2, |
| 106.3.5.1.2, FAC 61G15-33.004 |
| |
| 11) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FS 553.80(2)(B) WITH RESPECT TO |
| REPEAT COMMENTS FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. THIS IS ONLY A |
| NOTICE GIVEN AT THIS TIME. |
| PLEASE BE SURE TO CALL TO GO OVER COMMENTS. |
| |
| AS PREVIOUSLY STATED: |
| ** PLEASE BE SURE TO CALL IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS OR |
| COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE TYPED COMMENTS ABOVE. IF |
| THERE ARE ANY COMMENTS WHICH ARE NOT CLEAR IN ANY WAY, |
| NOT UNDERSTOOD OR NOT TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR, PLEASE DO |
| NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE AND THIS |
| REVIEWER. |
| |
| |
| * ** IMPORTANT** |
| ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE |
| PICKED UP FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE |
| SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL OLD/VOIDED |
| SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED |
| SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW |
| AND STAMPING. DO NOT LEAVE ANY |
| OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. |
| PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE |
| OLD/VOIDED SHEETS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED |
| FOR REFERENCE. |
| THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND |
| AVOID ANY DELAYS. |
| |
| |
| DEWEY PALMER |
| ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II |
| CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. |
| CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| 561-805-6717 |
| [email protected] |
2007-09-04 08:28:17 | 2007-09-04 08:28:17 |
| REVIEW IN PROGRESS |
2007-08-31 16:09:26 | IN ELEC, |