| Date |
Text |
| 2007-07-12 12:03:16 | -------------DENIED---------------- |
| | |
| | FBC 2004 CODE FAMILY |
| | FBC CH.1 AS AMENDED BY THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | |
| | SEQUENCE OF OPERATIONS: |
| | |
| | 1. PG.1: WHY DOES THE SEQUENCE FOR AHU-1 STATE THAT |
| | AHU-2 WILL BE COMMANDED "ON" DURING THE UNOCCUPIED MODE |
| | FOR AHU-1? |
| | |
| | 2. PG.2: IS AHU-2 TO SHUT DOWN UPON SIGNAL FROM THE |
| | FIRE ALARM SYSTEM AS INDICATED ON M-510? |
| | |
| | 3. PP.2 & 3 EF 1-2 |
| | PART A: THE MOTORIZED DAMPERS ARE ASSOCIATED WITH |
| | LOUVERS L-5 AND L-6 AS SHOWN ON M-101, NOT L-4 AND L-5. |
| | PLEASE CORRECT. ALSO, L-7 AND L-8 DAMPERS ARE NOT |
| | MENTIONED IN THE SEQUENCE, BUT ARE SHOWN ON DRAWING 12. |
| | PLEASE COORDINATE SEQUENCE AND DRAWINGS. |
| | |
| | PART B: WHAT IS THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE MOTORIZED |
| | DAMPERS IN THE APPARATUS BAY AND EF-6, EF-7 AND EF-9? |
| | NOTE THAT ACCORDING TO THE SCHEDULE ON M-601, EF-7 AND |
| | EF-9 DO NOT EXIST. SHOULD THE FANS ASSOCIATED WITH THE |
| | DAMPERS BE EF-1 AND EF-2? |
| | |
| | 4. PG.3 EXHAUST FAN INTERLOCKS: EF-1 IS NOT TO BE |
| | INTERLOCKED WITH AHU-1, EF-6 IS TO BE INTERLOCKED WITH |
| | AHU-1 AS SHOWN ON M-601. EF-9 DOES NOT EXIST AS SHOWN |
| | ON M-601 WHICH MEANS IT CAN NOT BE INTERLOCKED WITH |
| | AHU-3. |
| | |
| | 5. DRAWING 11: FAN SCHEDULE ON M-601 INDICATES EF-9 IS |
| | NOT USED. PLEASE CLARIFY. |
| | |
| | 6. DRAWING 12: WHERE ARE THE CONTROLS FOR L-5 AND L-6 |
| | MOTORIZED DAMPERS? ALSO, L-7 ANDL-8 DAMPERS ARE NOT |
| | MENTIONED IN THE SEQUENCE OF OPERATIONS. PLEASE |
| | COORDINATE THE SEQUENCE WITH DRAWINGS. |
| | |
| | NOTE: SEQUENCE AND CONTROL DRAWINGS MAY HAVE BEEN |
| | DESIGNED BASED ON OUTDATED PLANS. THERE HAVE BEEN 3 |
| | REVISIONS TO THE MECHANICAL PLANS SINCE THE PLANS |
| | PROVIDED WITH THIS APPLICATION (FOR REFERENCE) WERE |
| | ISSUED. |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT: |
| | RONALD J REGUEIRO |
| | 561.805.6719 |
| | [email protected] |
