Date |
Text |
2007-08-06 15:36:59 | |
| |
| |
| DENIED/INCOMPLETE INFORMATION |
| |
| PLEASE MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS FOR CODE |
| COMPLIANCE AND RESUBMIT FOR REVIEW. |
| |
| THESE COMMENTS ARE FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW AND HAVE |
| NOT BEEN ADDRESSED. RESPOND TO THESE COMMENTS IN |
| WRITING, REMOVE OLD OR VOIDED SHEETS, REPLACE WITH NEW |
| REVISED SHEETS. SUBMIT OLD SHEETS SEPARATELY TO |
| EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS. |
| |
| THE DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT IS UNCLEAR AND |
| INDISCERNIBLE. THERE IS NO MENTION OF REWIRING THE |
| UNIT(S). |
| |
| 1 } INDICATE IF THE SERVICE IS TO BE INSTALLED UNDER |
| THIS PERMIT OR EXISTING. |
| |
| 2} THE RISER IS SHOWN WITH A METER FEEDING A PIECE OF |
| EQUIPMENT, THEN TO ANOTHER METER, WHICH IS NOT ALLOWED |
| PER FPL. CONSULT WITH ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR ON THE |
| PROPERLAYOUT FOR THE RISER DIAGRAM. |
| |
| 3) THERE IS NO 6/0 CU THW MANUFACTURED FOR ELECTRICAL |
| USE AS SHOWN ON THE RISER. |
| |
| 4} SEE ARTICLE 250.50 FOR GEC INFORMATIION, ALSO |
| 250.53(D)(1) & (2). |
| |
| A FULL REVIEW CANNOT BE DONE WITHOUT KNOWING THE SCOPE |
| OF WORK. PLEASE INDICATE THE CODE CYCLES THIS PROJECT |
| WAS DESIGNED UNDER. 2004 FBC, 2005 NEC ETC. ADD TO |
| NOTES FOR CLARITY IN THE FIELD.REMOVE NOTES REGARDING |
| NON PERTINENT CODES, (SEE REFERENCE TO THE SFBC, |
| NOTE#2). |
| |
| THESE ARE NEW COMMENTS FOR THE 8/30/07 RESUBMITTAL: |
| |
| THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL OR OWNER MUST ELECT THE LEVEL |
| OF ALTERATION PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 303, 304 AND 305 OF |
| THE EXISTING BUILDING CODE. PLEASE DECLARE SAME ON THE |
| PLAN. |
| |
| THE ENGINEERSSEAL IS INDISCERNIBLE ON SEVERAL SHEETS, |
| A-2 THROUGH A-5 IN ONE SET, ALL SHEETS IN THE OTHER |
| SET. ALSO THE SEAL USED ON SHEET A-1 IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. |
| THE ENGINEER OF RECORD MUST SEAL THE DOCUMENTS WITH A |
| SEALACCEPTABLETO THE BOARD PER 61G15-23.001, AND |
| ILLUSTRATED IN SAME. |
| |
| BILL TROBAUGH |
| ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER |
| CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| 561/805-6718 |
| |
| |
| |
| |