Date |
Text |
2008-02-27 07:59:37 | |
| THIS REVIEW WAS DONE UNDER THESE CURRENT CODE |
| CYCLES: |
| |
| THE 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 2007 REVISIONS, 2004 |
| RESIDENTIAL BUILDING CODE, 2005 NEC, NFPA-72 2002, 2004 |
| FBC AS AMENDED, CHAPTER 1.AND FOUND NONCOMPLIANT WITH |
| THE FOLLOWING: |
| |
| 1} THE ENGINEER WHOSE NAME APPEARS ON THE TITLE BLOCK |
| MUST SIGN, DATE AND SEAL THE DOCUMENT. 61G15-23.002 |
| FAC. |
| |
| 2} THE LOAD CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED DO NOT MEET THE |
| REQUIREMENTS OF THE NEC. PROVIDE LOAD CALCULATIONS PER |
| ARTICLE 220 PART III, STANDARD OR PART IV OPTIONAL, |
| INDICATE METHOD USED. SEE 220.1. |
| |
| 3}} PROVIDE PANEL SCHEDULES PER 408.4. INCLUDE OCP |
| AND CONDUCTOR SIZES. PLEASE SEE NEW VERBAGE FOR 2005 |
| NEC: "THE IDENTIFICATION SHALL INCLUDE SUFFICIENT |
| DETAIL TO ALLOW EACH CIRCUIT TO BE DISTINGUISHED FROM |
| ALL OTHERS." |
| |
| 4} THE RISER DIAGRAM INDICATES A METER/MAIN TYPE OF |
| SERVICE EQUIPMENT. INDICATE THE SIZE OF THE MAIN |
| BREAKER (DETERMINED BY THE LOAD CALCULATION) SO THE |
| CORRECT SIZE OF THE GROUNDING ELECTRODE MAY BE |
| DETERMINED PER 250.66. |
| |
| 5} AN EQUIPMENT GROUND PER 250.122 MUST BE RAN WITH THE |
| FEEDER CONDUCTOR TO THE PROPOSED PANEL. VERIFY THAT |
| NONE WERE RAN WITH THE EXISTING FEEDER RUNS AS THEY ARE |
| REQUIRED PER THAT ARTICLE. |
| |
| 6} THEDISCONNECTING MEANS FOR THE WATER HEATER DOES |
| NOT COMPLY WITH THE CLEARANCE REQUIREMENTS OF 110.26. |
| SEE 422.16 NEC FOR CORD AND PLUG RESTRICTIONS, AND |
| 422.31(B) FOR HARDWIRE REQUIREMENTS. |
| |
| 7}COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIRED DISCONNECT PER 440.14, |
| MUST ALSO COMPLY WITH 110.26 CLEARANCE REQUIREMENTS. A |
| RECEPTACLE(S) ARE SHOWN AT THE CONDENSER LOCATIONS. |
| |
| 8} THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE ADDITION IS LISTED AS |
| 1,375 ON SHEET E2 AND F1, THE SQUARE FOOTAGE ON THE |
| APPLICATION IS LISTED AS 750. CORRELATE SAME. |
| |
| IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL. |
| |
| BILL TROBAUGH |
| ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER |
| CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| 561/805-6718 |