Date |
Text |
2007-06-23 14:14:40 | |
| |
| DENIED |
| |
| THE FOLLOWING REVIEW COMMENTS WERE NOT COMPLETELY |
| ADDRESSED: |
| |
| 5)PROVIDE 2 COPIES OF CURRENT SURVEY SHOWING PROPOSED |
| WORK AND ALL REQUIRED SETBACKS. ****NOTE SURVEY AND |
| SITE PLAN DO NOT MATCH SEE ZONING REVIEW COMMENTS**** |
| |
| 6)SUBMIT ENERGY CALC'S PER 13-101.2.2 |
| FBC. BE SURE THAT THEY ARE SIGNED AND |
| DATED BY PREPARER AND OWNER/AGENT PRIOR |
| TO SUBMITTAL. ****REQUIRES CORRECTIONS SEE MECHANICAL |
| REVIEW COMMENTS, ALSO CLARIFY R11 ON ENERGY CALC'S AND |
| R4.7 ON DRAWINGS**** |
| |
| 9)THE FOLLOWING STRUCTURAL DETAILS REQUIRE |
| CORRECTION; |
| B) PLAN S-2 THE SECTIONS LABELED A/S7 SHOULD BE THE |
| TYPICAL TRUSS BEARING DETAIL A/S6. ****NOT |
| CORRECTED**** |
| E) PROVIDE SCHEDULE FOR PRE CAST LINTEL THAT WILL BE |
| USED AND OPENING SIZES TO COMPLY WITH 2104.1.5 FBC. |
| ****NOA # ON SCHEDULE IS OLD PLEASE USE THE REVISED # |
| FROM PRODUCT APPROVALS**** |
| |
| 15)THE FOLLOWING CORRECTION ARE REQUIRED FOR THE |
| PRODUCT APPROVALS: |
| B) PROVIDE THE ROOF SYSTEM FROM THE MODIFIED PRODUCT |
| APPROVAL THAT WILL BE USED. *****PROVIDE CALCULATIONS |
| FROM RAS 117 PER LIMITATION #7 OF THE NOA, PLEASE NOTE |
| THAT NOA USES 12" O/C AT THE 4" LAP AND 2 ROWS AT 12" |
| O/C IN MIDDLE. SEEMS EXTREME AT 4" O/C EACH WAY WITH 3" |
| PLATES**** |
| |
| NEW |
| |
| 1)TRUSS ENGINEERING IS INCOMPLETE, PROVIDE INDIVIDUAL |
| TRUSSES WITH UPLIFT VALUES AT CONNECTION POINTS, THESE |
| DO NOT REQUIRE INDIVIDUAL SIGN AND SEAL AS LONG AS |
| THERE IS A SIGNED AND SEALED COVER PAGE THAT LISTS THE |
| PAGES. ALSO THE WIND DESIGN IS INCORRECT AND DOES NOT |
| MATCH THE ARCHITECTURAL AND STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS AND TOP |
| AND BOTTOM DEAD LOADS SHALL ALSO MATCH STRUCTURAL |
| DRAWINGS. |
| |
| 2)REMOVE MULLION PRODUCT APPROVALS AS NONE ARE SHOWN |
| ON THE DRAWINGS. WINDOWS 2A & 2B AND 2L & 2M SHOW |
| STRUCTURAL STEEL BETWEEN AND DO NOT REQUIRE MULLIONS. |
| |
| 3)PROVIDE INDIVIDUAL WINDOW DESIGN PRESSURES, IF WE |
| USE THE CHART FOR THIS ON S/8, PLAN REVIEW DOES NOT |
| INTERPOLATE THEREFORE THE CASEMENT WINDOWS 5050 THAT |
| ARE IN THE END ZONE WILL NOT MEET THE DESIGN PRESSURE |
| OR A STRONGER GLAZING TYPE MUST BE USED FROM THE |
| CHOICES IN THE PRODUCT APPROVAL. |
| |
| 4)PER 713.13(2) F.S. |
| IF THE IMPROVEMENT DESCRIBED IN THE NOC HAS NOT |
| COMMENCED WITHIN 90 DAYS OF RECORDING THE NOTICE IS |
| VOID, PLEASE RE-RECORD THIS CAN BE DONE AT TIME OF |
| FINAL PERMIT PICKUP |
| |
| BLDG PLAN REVIEW |
| ADRIAN MORSE |
| 561-805-6716 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |