Date |
Text |
2007-05-03 13:44:41 | DENIED 2ND TIME |
| REFERENCE: |
| ** FBC-2004 SECTIONS 424.2 OR R4101 SWIMMING POOLS. |
| ** FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1, THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| AMENDMENTS. |
| |
| ** PLEASE SEE SOME NOTES FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW ARE STILL |
| IN NEED OF ADDRESSING ALONG WITH SOME NEW COMMENTS, |
| SOME BASED ON PLANS NOW SUBMITTED, NEW DOCUMENTS BEING |
| REVIEWED FOR THE FIRST TIME AND SOME NEW COMMENTS NOT |
| MADE ON PREVIOUS REVIEWS. |
| |
| ** PLEASE SEE THE NOTES BELOW ARE TAKEN DIRECTLY FROM |
| PREVIOUS REVIEW WITH A NO, OK OR A NO/OK. |
| THESE WILL BE FOR THE EXACT NUMERICAL NOTATION OF THE |
| PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTES. |
| |
| A NO IS IF THE COMMENT WAS NOT FULLY ADDRESSED AND/OR |
| FURTHER EXPLANATION OR CHANGES IN PLANS OR DOCUMENTS |
| ARE STILL NEEDED. THIS REVIEWER WILL TRY TO BETTER |
| EXPLAIN NOTE ABOVE PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT. |
| |
| AN OK WILL BE LABELED AS SUCH ON THE SAME NUMERICAL |
| COMMENT AND WILL HAVE OLD NOTE REMOVED FROM COMMENTS. |
| |
| A NO/OK MEANS PART OF THE COMMENT MAY HAVE BEEN |
| ADDRESSED, HOWEVER NOT ALL OF THE PREVIOUS REVIEW |
| COMMENT MAY HAVE BEEN FULLY ADDRESSED. |
| |
| ** PLEASE SEE ANY NEW NOTES WILL BE ADDED TO THE END OF |
| THE PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENTS AND NOTED AS SUCH. |
| |
| 1. **NO/OK** PER FBC-2004, CHAPTER 1, SECTION |
| 106.1.3, QUALITY OF BUILDING PLANS: THE |
| BUILDING OFFICIAL MAY ESTABLISH THROUGH DEPARTMENTAL |
| POLICY, STANDARDS FOR PLANS |
| AND SPECIFICATIONS, IN ORDER TO PROVIDE |
| CONFORMITY TO ITS RECORD RETENTION |
| PROGRAM. THIS POLICY MAY INCLUDE SUCH |
| THINGS AS MINIMUM SIZE, SHAPE, CONTRAST, |
| CLARITY, OR OTHER ITEMS RELATED TO |
| RECORDS MANAGEMENT. |
| NOTE: THE RESUBMITTED PLANS ARE STILL HARD TO READ. THE |
| WORDING IS NOT LEGIBLE DUE TO THE INK RUNNING TOGETHER. |
| PLEASE SUBMIT NEW SHEETS THAT ARE LEGIBLE. PLEASE |
| REFERENCE ALL CIRCLED AREAS IN RED INK THAT ARE NOT |
| LEGIBLE AND PLEASE CORRECT AND RESUBMIT. |
| |
| 2. **NO** PER R4101.6.6.4 THE HAND WRITTEN CHANGES |
| MADE FOR THE TWO SUCTION INLETS ON THE PIPING DIAGRAM |
| ARE WRONG. THE HAND WRITTEN CHANGES ARE INDICATING A |
| THREE FEET CENTER TO CENTER SEPERATION OF THE MAIN |
| DRAINS, WHICH IS WRONG. THE CORRECT INDICATION SHOULD |
| BE THAT THE TWO SUCTION INLETS PER PUMP SHOULD BE |
| SEPERATED A MINIMUM OF THREE FEET. PLEASE CORRECT AND |
| RESUBMIT. |
| |
| 3. **OK** |
| |
| 4. **OK** |
| |
| 5. **OK** |
| |
| 6. **OK** |
| |
| ********IMPORTANT INFORMATION******** |
| IN ORDER TO EXPIDITE PLAN REVIEW: WHEN RESUBMITTING, |
| PLEASE REPLACE ONLY SHEETS |
| WHICH HAVE CHANGED, PLEASE INCLUDE A |
| TRANSMITTAL LETTER INDICATING HOW EACH |
| ITEM WAS ADDRESSED AND PROVIDE ONE COPY |
| OF ALL OLD/VOIDED SHEETS FOR REFERENCE |
| ONLY. |
| NOTE: ONLY ONE CORRECTED DRAWING |
| IN RED INK FOR REFERENCE FOR |
| RESUBMITTAL. |
| |
| END OF COMMENTS: |
| |
| REVIEW BY MIKE PERSON |
| (561) 805-6730 |
| FAX (561) 805-6731 |
| E-MAIL [email protected] |
| UNDER SUPERVISION OF K.STEVENS |
| (561) 805-6721 |