Date |
Text |
2007-06-11 13:47:28 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| |
| SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| 561-805-6724 [email protected] |
| |
| FBCFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 |
| FBC EBFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 EXISTING BUILDING |
| CODE |
| FBC RFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 RESIDENTIAL FBC* |
| CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 FAC |
| FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE |
| FSFLORIDA STATUTE |
| |
| FROM PREVIOUS LIST: |
| |
| 1.)BUILDING INFORMATION, ITEM 3, CONSTRUCTION TYPE |
| SHOULD INCLUDE A OR B, FBC 6, NOT "PROTECTED". |
| |
| 2ND REVIEW, NOW STATES "UNPROTECTED".INCLUDE A OR B. |
| |
| |
| 2-7.)ADDRESSED. |
| |
| 8.)THE APPLICAITON STATES THAT YOU ARE "REMOVING REAR |
| WINDOWS AND BLOCKING THEM UP."SHOW THIS ON THE PLAN, |
| PROVIDE A DETAIL.REQUIRED FIRE RESISTANCE IS TO BE |
| MAINTAINED; ALL REQUIREMENTS ARE TO BE SHOWN ON THE |
| PLAN AND DETAILS ARE TO BE EITHER A TESTED ASSEMBLY OR |
| CALCULATED FIRE RESISTANCE FBC9. |
| |
| 2ND REVIEW - PROVIDE A DETAIL FOR INFILL AS REQUESTED. |
| |
| |
| 9.)THE PLAN STATES THAT YOU ARE ADDING ONE REAR DOOR. |
| PROVIDE A PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR THE DOOR.PROVIDE A |
| DETAIL. |
| |
| 2ND REVIEW - PROVIDE A DETAIL AS REQUESTED.IS THE |
| STOREFRONT GOING TO BE USED IN THIS LOCATION? |
| |
| 10.)FLORIDA STATE OR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL REQUIRED |
| IN ADDITION TO THE NOA SUBMITTED, FAC9B72. |
| WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG |
| |
| 2ND REVIEW - NOT ADDRESSED. |
| |
| 11.)PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE TO BE APPROVED BY DESIGNER |
| OF RECORD, FBC*106.3.3. |
| |
| 2ND REVIEW - NOT ADDRESSED. |
| |
| 12.)A1 NOTES THAT BAHAMA SHUTTERS ARE TO BE INSTALLED |
| ON EACH NEW DOOR AND WINDOW.HOW FAR INTO THE PATH OF |
| TRAVEL WILL THIS SHUTTER EXTEND?SHOW THE LINE OF THE |
| BAHAMA SHUTTER AND SIDEWALK ON THE SITE PLAN.SHOW THE |
| SHUTTERS ON THE ELEVATIONS. |
| |
| 2ND REVIEW - SHOW THE HEIGHT OF THE BOTTOM OF THE |
| BAHAMA SHUTTER.SEE FBC11-4.4. |
| |
| 13.)THE WINDOW NOTES STATE THAT -176 PSF IS REQUIRED |
| FOR THE STOREFRONT, ELEVATIONS REQUIRE -36.4.WHERE |
| THERE IS A CONFLICT, THE MOST STRINGENT WILL APPLY. THE |
| PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED ARE NOT COMPLIANT WITH THIS |
| DESIGN PRESSURE REQUIREMENT (-176PSF). |
| |
| 14.)SEE ITEM 8 ABOVE. |
| |
| 15.)THE NEW SOUTH ELEVATION SHOWS NEW FIXED GLASS AND |
| A RECTANGLE AROUND THE WINDOW.WHAT IS THIS?THE |
| OPENING APPEARS LARGER.PROVIDE DETAILS AND CLARIFY |
| SCOPE OF WORK. |
| |
| 2ND REVIEW - WHAT ARE THE RECTANGLES?THERE IS AN |
| UNIDENTIFIED RECTANGULAR SHAPE AROUND ONE WINDOW IN 3RD |
| STREET ELEVATION, A LARGE RECTANGLE AND SMALLER |
| RECTANGLE AROUND A WINDOW (OR IS THIS A DOOR?) ON |
| EXISTING SOUTH ELEVATION.ALSO NOTE THAT THIS |
| ELEVATION IS LABELED 3RD STREET AND ALSO LABELED SOUTH, |
| SHOULD BE CONSISTENT WITH LABELING. |
| |
| NEW COMMENTS: |
| |
| 16.)THE PARKING SPACES ARE TO BE LOCATED ON AN |
| ACCESSIBLE ROUT NO LESS THAN 44" WIDE, FBC11-4.6(1). |
| |
| 17.)PROVIDE AN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE DETAIL. |
| |
| 18.)SIGNAGE REQUIRED IN COMPLIANCE WITH FBC11-4.6.4. |
| |
| 19.)WHAT ARE THE VARIOUS GRAPHICS ALONG THE BUILDING |
| ENTRY?IT IS NOT CLEAR IF THE DOORS MEET MANEUVERING |
| CLEARANCE REQUIREMENTS OF FBC11-4.13.6. |
| |
| 20.)UNIT F, UNIT G ENTRIES ARE NOT ON AN ACCESSIBLE |
| ROUTE.SEE FBC11-4.14.1. |
| |
| 21.)PROVIDE A DETAIL FOR THE STAIRS AND STAIR RAIL |
| FOR THE PROPOSED SITTING AREA, FBC11-4.9. |
| |
| 22.)VERTICAL ACCESSIBILITY REQUIRED TO THE PROPOSED |
| SITTING AREA, FBC11-4.1.2(2). |
| |
| 23.)SHOW STOOP HEIGHT AT UNIT ENTRANCES, SHOWN ON |
| ELEVATIONS, FBC11-4.3.8. |
| |
| 24.)SCOPE OF WORK, C1 STATES THAT NO STRUCTURAL WORK |
| IS TO BE DONE.CLARIFY THE PURPOSE OF THIS INCORRECT |
| STATEMENT ON THE PLAN. |
| |
| 25.)SEE ATTACHED FS553.80(2)(B).A 4X PLAN REVIEW |
| FEE WILL BE CHARGED IF COMMENTS ARE NOT PROPERLY |
| ADDRESSED A THIRD TIME.A SET HAS BEEN RETAINED. |