Date |
Text |
2007-05-07 11:23:26 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| |
| SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| 561-805-6724 [email protected] |
| |
| FBCFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 |
| FBC EBFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 EXISTING BUILDING |
| CODE |
| FBC RFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 RESIDENTIAL FBC* |
| CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 FAC |
| FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE |
| FSFLORIDA STATUTE |
| |
| ***PLAN CHECK ONLY*** |
| |
| 1-5.)ADDRESSED. |
| |
| 6.)PLATFORM DETAIL EL X-1,2, V13, NO GUARDS SHOWN |
| FBC1012.THIS COMMENT APPLIES TO OTHER SHEETS SUCH AS |
| EL X-3,4.NOTE THAT THE "HANDRAIL" PLAN DOES NOT HAVE |
| CROSS SECTIONS REFERRING TO THESE ELEVATIONS SO I |
| CANNOT DETERMINE IF THE HANDRAIL (WHICH MAY ALSO SERVE |
| AS GUARDRAILS?) IS TO BE INSTALLED IN THIS LOCATION AND |
| WAS OMITTED FOR CLARITY, OR IF THE DESIGN INTENT IS FOR |
| THE PLATFORM OPEN SIDES.SEE FBC1012.1, FBC1028. |
| |
| 2ND REVIEW - A NOTE WAS ADDED STATING THAT PLATFORMS |
| OVER 48" IN HEIGHT WILL HAVE HANDDRAILS.SEE |
| FBC1012.1, GUARDS REQUIRED (IN ADDITION TO OTHER |
| LOCATIONS WHICH MAY BE APPLICABLE) ON INDUSTRIAL |
| EQUIPMENT PLATFORMS OVER 30 INCHES ABOVE THE FLOOR. |
| PLEASE NOTE THAT THERE IS A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A |
| HANDRAIL AND A GUARDRAIL FBC1002. FBC1015.2 |
| ADDRESSES MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT PLATFORMS SPECIFICALLY. |
| |
| 7.)SHOW ALL REQUIRED GUARDS ON THE PLAN.FOR |
| INSTANCE, SEE ELEVATIONS X-3,4.SEE FBC1012, 1028. |
| |
| 2ND REVIEW - A PLAN WAS PROVIDED BUT THE NOTE (48" HIGH |
| PLATFORMS) CONFLICTS WITH CODE REQUIREMENTS OF 30". |
| PLEASE REVISE THE NOTE AND REVISE HANDRAIL/GUARDRAIL |
| PLAN AS REQUIRED. |
| |
| 8.)1ST REVIEW - ARE ALL HANDRAILS SHOWN ON L1 TO ALSO |
| SERVE AS GUARDRAILS?THEY APPEAR TO BE AT PLATFORM |
| AREAS; HANDRAILS ARE NOT REQUIRED FOR PLATFORMS BUT |
| GUARDS (GUARDRAILS) ARE.SEE OTHER COMMENTS. |
| |
| 2ND REVIEW - THE RESPONSE, "THIS SAFETY RAIL IS FOR |
| MAINTENANCE PURPOSES OF THE CONVEYOR ONLY" DOES NOT |
| ADDRESS THE COMMENT.THE GUARDRAILS ARE REQUIRED, |
| HANDRAIL REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT CLEAR.SEE OTHER |
| COMMENTS. |
| |
| 9.)1ST REVIEW - SEE ELEVATIONS X-1,2, SECTION DETAIL |
| V7, 3.1. THIS DETAIL IS TOO SMALL TO READ.THE SHEETS |
| ARE LABELED BUT NOT NUMBERED.DOES THIS REFER TO SHEET |
| 3.1 (NO 3.1 IN THE SET)?ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS ARE |
| FOR DETAIL AND SECTION INDICATORS TO REFER TO DETAIL |
| AND PAGE, BUT THE DETAILS PROVIDED REFER TO SHEETS |
| WHICH ARE NOT IN THE PACKAGE.PLEASE EITHER PROVIDE |
| STANDARD DETAIL AND SECTION INDICATORS OR ADVISE AS TO |
| HOW I COULD BEST UNDERSTAND THE PLAN. |
| |
| 2ND REVIEW - THE SHEET PROVIDED DOES NOT HAVE A TITLE |
| BLOCK AND IS NOT SEALED.PLEASE INCORPORATE ALL |
| NECESSARY DETAILS INTO THE PLAN AND REMOVE UNNECESSARY |
| DETAILS.OTHER SHEETS HAVE SMALL ILLEGIBLE DETAILS. |
| EITHER REMOVE FROM THE PLAN OR ENLARGE SO THAT THEY ARE |
| LEGIBLE. |
| |
| 10.) ADDRESSED, BUT PLEASE SEE ELECTRIC COMMENTS. |
| |
| 11.) THE PREVIOUS COMMENT REQUESTED CLARIFICATION FOR |
| THE PURPOSE OF THE WALKS AND LANDINGS.THE PLAN NOW |
| STATES IN GENERAL NOTES THAT "ALL PLATFORMS ARE FOR |
| MAINTENANCE PURPOSES ONLY."PLEASE FURTHER DESCRIBE |
| THE USE OF THE LANDINGS AND WALKS."MAINTENANCE ONLY"; |
| IS THIS TO OCCUR ON OCCASION SUCH AS ONCE A MONTH, OR |
| SEVERAL TIMES IN THE DAY?COMPLIANCE WITH VERTICAL |
| ACCESSIBILITY (EXCEPTION) APPEARS TO BE CLEAR, BUT |
| EGRESS REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT CLEAR. |
| |
| PLEASE INCORPORATE THIS INFORMATION ON THE ISO SHEET |
| WHICH MAKES IT APPEAR THAT THE LANDINGS ARE WORK |
| AREAS. |
| |
| |
| NEW COMMENTS; |
| |
| 12.)CLEARLY INDICATE ALL CHANGES TO THE PLAN WITH |
| CLOUDS AND REVISION NUMBERS. SEVERAL SHEETS CHANGED |
| WITH NO REVISIONS SHOWN. |
| |
| 13.)SHEET A, ELEVATIONS X-1, 2 HAS A DETAIL V7 3.1 |
| WHICH IS TOO SMALL TO BE LEGIBLE.ALL INFORMATION ON |
| THE PLAN IS TO BE LEGIBLE.CHECK ALL SHEETS, ALL |
| DETAILS. |
| |
| 14.)THE GENERAL NOTES REFER TO THE CONVEYOR SAFETY |
| CABLE RAIL LOCATIONS.REQUIRED GUARDS ARE TO COMPLY |
| WITH FBC1012, FBC1607.7.PLEASE STATE STRUCTURAL |
| DESIGN CRITERIA ON THE PLAN AND PROVIDE A DETAIL |
| SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH FBC1012.THE DETAIL AS DRAWN |
| IS NOT TALL ENOUGH AND THE OPENINGS ARE TOO LARGE TO |
| REJECT A 21" OBJECT.CODE COMPLIANCE IS NOT CLEAR. |