| Date |
Text |
| 2007-10-17 11:55:20 | 2007-10-17 11:55:20 |
| | |
| | *** DENIED 3RD REVIEW ***** |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE SEE COMMENTS FROM PREVIOUS REVIEWS STILL NEED |
| | TO BE ADDRESSED ALONG WITH NEW COMMENTS AS PLANS/RISER |
| | HAS BEEN REVISED ONCE AGAIN. |
| | |
| | |
| | 1) NOTE: AS REQUESTED ON THE TWO PREVIOUS REVIEWS. |
| | PLEASE STATE AND SHOW ON PLANS THE RELEVANT CODE IN |
| | WHICH PROJECT IS DESIGNED UNDER. |
| | THE YEARS FOR CODES ARE REQUIRED. |
| | PLEASE ALSO SEE PALM BEACH COUNTY IS BEING NOTED ON |
| | SHEET E-1 WHEN PROJECT IS IN THE CITY OF WEST PALM |
| | BEACH. |
| | PLEASE BE SURE ALL PLANS REFLECT THE LATEST ADOPTED |
| | CODES PER THE STATE OF FLORIDA. PLEASE SEE THE |
| | FOLLOWING WHICH ARE CURRENTLY ADOPTED AS OF DECEMBER |
| | 8TH, 2006. |
| | 2004 FBC W/ 2006 REVISIONS. THIS WILL AFFECT PLANS |
| | SUBMITTED |
| | 2005 NFPA-70 (NEC). THIS WILL AFFECT PLANS SUBMITTED. |
| | 2002 NFPA-72 |
| | 2003 NFPA-101 |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE SEE COMMENTS FROM OTHER TRADES WHICH MAY |
| | INDICATE CODES NEEDED. |
| | |
| | 2) NOTE:PLEASE CORRELATE ELECTRICAL ON PLANS WITH |
| | THAT OF THE ARCHITECTURAL AND MECHANICAL PLANS. FOR |
| | EXAMPLE: PLEASE SEE THE LOCATION OF THE NEW SUB PANEL |
| | ON A AND M SHEETS ARE IN A COMPLETELY SEPARATE LOCATION |
| | AND THE SIZE OF THE PANEL IS NOT THE SAME AS THE |
| | ELECTRICAL PLANS. |
| | PLEASE LABEL ALL ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT ON PLANS FOR |
| | ELECTRICAL. * PANEL *A*, ETC. |
| | NEC 110.26, 240.4, 215.5, 230,ETC |
| | FBC 106.1.2, 106.3.5.1.2 |
| | |
| | 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE ELECTRICAL RISER DIAGRAM AS |
| | SUBMITTED ALONG WITH LOAD CALCULATIONS AND PLANS DO NOT |
| | CORRELATE WITH NUMEROUS ITEMS. THIS REVIEWER CAN ONLY |
| | GIVE A FEW EXAMPLES AS THERE ARE TOO MANY ITEMS WHICH |
| | DO NO MATCH AND DO NOT THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS OF THE |
| | ELECTRICAL CODE. |
| | |
| | FOR EXAMPLE: |
| | PLEASE SEE E-1 ABOVE ELECTRICAL LEGEND WHICH INDICATES |
| | A 400AMP MLO PANEL, YET THERE IS NO WHERE ON ELECTRICAL |
| | RISER WHICH INDICATES A 400MLO PANEL. |
| | PLEASE SEE LOAD CALCULATIONS WHICH INDICATE PANEL *C* |
| | AND *LP* AS EXISTING CHURCH AND NEW FELLOWSHIP HALL, |
| | YET THE PANEL SCHEDULES TO THE RIGHT DO NOT INDICATE |
| | THE SAME LOADS OR PANEL SIZES. |
| | PLEASE SEE RISER WHICH SHOWS PANEL *C* AS 125AMP, YET |
| | PANEL SCHEDULES SHOW BOTH *C* AND *LP* AS 200AMP. HOW |
| | CAN *C* AND *LP* PANEL SCHEDULE BE THE SAME WHEN THEY |
| | CLEARLY DO NOT HAVE THE SAME CIRCUITS? |
| | PLEASE SEE RISER SHOWS 3PHASE EQUIPMENT, PANELS SERVICE |
| | ETC INCLUDING AS NOTED FOR CONDUCTOR COLOR CODING YET |
| | THE RISER AND SEVERAL OTHER LOCATIONS ONLY INDICATE A |
| | SINGLE PHASE SERVICE. |
| | |
| | **THE ABOVE ARE ONLY SOME OF THE INCONSISTENCIES ON |
| | PLANS. THERE ARE SEVERAL OTHER ITEMS WHICH ARE TOO MANY |
| | TO LIST. |
| | ** PLEASE SUBMIT ELECTRICAL PLANS, LOAD CALCULATIONS, |
| | AND RISER DIAGRAM WHICH CORRELATE, ARE CODE COMPLIANT |
| | AND CAN BE REVIEWED AS AN ELECTRICAL INSTALLATION. MAY |
| | NOT HAVE A 40 SPACE MLO AS DISTRIBUTION PANEL. NEC, |
| | 100, 230.70,71,72,76,79, 215.5, 310.16, 240.4 ETC |
| | **2005 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE** |
| | FBC 106.3.5.1.2, 106.1.2 |
| | |
| | 4) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 700.12F AS ALL EXIT AND EMERGENCY |
| | LIGHTING FIXTURES AS NOTED ON THE PREVIOUS REVIEWS ARE |
| | REQUIRED TO BE CIRCUITED TO THE NORMAL BRANCH CIRCUIT |
| | LIGHTING IN THAT AREA. PLEASE SEE THAT PLANS HAVE |
| | REVISED AND CORRECTED MOST OF THESE BUT NOT ALL. (END |
| | OF FELLOWSHIP HALL) |
| | |
| | 5) NOTE:PLEASE KNOW THAT COMPLETE LOAD CALCULATIONS |
| | WHICH MEET THE MINIMUM REQUIRED BY CODE. THE SAME |
| | SECTIONS AS GIVEN IN THE PREVIOUS TWO REVIEWS REMAIN. |
| | THE CALCULATIONS ARE STILL SHOWING ONE CALCULATION FOR |
| | NEW PANELS WHICH ARE NOT THE SAME AS PANEL SCHEDULES OR |
| | PLANS. THIS WAS NOTED ABOVE FOR COORDINATION OF PLAN |
| | HOWEVER AS THIS WAS SPECIFICALLY NOTED ON PREVIOUS |
| | REVIEW, IT IS BEING NOTED ONCE AGAIN. |
| | PLEASE SUBMIT LOAD CALCULATIONS WHICH ARE CODE |
| | COMPLAINT, CORRELATE WITH PLANS, AND PANEL SCHEDULES. |
| | FOR EXAMPLE, PLEASE SEE SEVERAL BRANCH CIRCUITS WHICH |
| | ARE SHOWING LOADS WHICH EXCEED THE RATINGS FOR THE |
| | BRANCH CIRCUIT. SEE ONE SET OF PLANS ARE REDLINED FOR |
| | SOME OF THESE CIRCUITS SUCH AS CIRCUIT #15 ON *C*/LP*, |
| | WHICH SHOWS 3.6KW ON A SINGLE POLE 20AMP CIRCUIT. |
| | (3600VA DIVIDED BY 120V IS 30AMPS) THIS IS NOT |
| | PERMITTED ON THE BRANCH CIRCUIT. (TYPICAL MAXIMUM LOAD |
| | ON A 20AMP BRANCH CIRCUIT IS 1920VA). |
| | SEE CIRCUITS #6, #15, #24 ETC ON LP-A, #8, #15, #16, |
| | #17, #18 ETC ON *C* *LP*. |
| | PLEASE SEE NEC 220, 220.12, 220.14, 220.42, 220.44, |
| | ETC. |
| | 215.5, 215.3, 230.42 ETC |
| | 310.16, 240.4 ETC. |
| | 210.3, 210.20, 210.23 ETC. |
| | PLEASE KNOW THERE ARE SEVERAL AND TOO MANY SPECIFIC |
| | CODE SECTIONS TO STATE ON REVIEW NOTES. PLEASE SEE NEC |
| | 2005. |
| | FBC 106.1.2, 106.3.5.1.2 |
| | |
| | 6) NOTE: PLEASE SEE AS PANEL SCHEDULE AND LOAD |
| | CALCULATIONS FOR PANEL *C*/*LP* SHOWS A PANEL AS |
| | 200AMPS AND LOADS WHICH EXCEEDS THE 125AMP RATING OF |
| | PANEL ON RISER (AS SHOWN) PLEASE BE SURE TO SEE 250.122 |
| | FOR SIZING ADJUSTMENTS OF THE EQUIPMENT GROUNDING |
| | CONDUCTOR. PLEASE KNOW IN ANY CASE THE #8 AS SHOWN ON |
| | RISER FOR THE 125AMP PANEL IS TOO SMALL PER 250.122 ** |
| | THIS WILL BE REQUIRED TO BE COORDINATED WITH THE NOTED |
| | ABOVE WITH RESPECT TO RISER ETC. |
| | |
| | 7) NOTE: PLEASE VERIFY 250MCM FROM MAIN DISCONNECT TO |
| | PANEL *LP* ON RISER.. THIS IS BEING SHOWN AS A 200AMP |
| | PANEL. PLEASE VERIFY THAT THE LUGS ON THIS EQUIPMENT |
| | WILL ACCEPT THE 250MCM. |
| | 110.3, 90.7, 110.14 FOR LISTING OF EQUIPMENT. |
| | FBC 106.1.2 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. |
| | |
| | 8) NOTE: PLEASE SEE MISSING EQUIPMENT GROUNDING |
| | CONDUCTOR TO PANEL *LP*> |
| | 250.110, 250.24, 250.122 |
| | |
| | 9) NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT THE PANEL DESIGNATIONS AND PANEL |
| | SCHEDULES FOR EACH OF THE PANELS WHICH ARE SHOWN ON |
| | RISER. AS NOTED ABOVE IN NOTES #5 AND #2, THERE IS |
| | COORDINATION NEEDED. |
| | PLEASE SEE ONLY TWO PANEL SCHEDULES WERE SUBMITTED AND |
| | REVIEW FOR CODE COMPLIANCE COULD NOT BE COMPLETED. |
| | 408.4, 215.5,240.4, 310.16 ETC |
| | FBC 106.3.5.1.2, 106.1.2 |
| | |
| | 10) NOTE: PLEASE SEE NEW NOTE ADDED TO THE LOWER LEFT |
| | HAND SIDE OF E-2 WHICH STATES *PREVIOUS PERMIT |
| | #07020129 EXPIRED*. HOW IS THIS POSSIBLE WHEN THIS |
| | PERMIT WHICH IS CURRENTLY IN REVIEW IS STILL THE SAME |
| | PERMIT WHICH HAS NOT EXPIRED? |
| | PLEASE ADJUST PLANS. |
| | ** THE PREVIOUS PERMIT APPLICATION DID EXPIRE HOWEVER |
| | WAS NEVER ISSUED FOR PERMIT. THAT PERMIT NUMBER IS |
| | 05010378. |
| | THIS DOES NOT NEED TO BE ON PLANS AS IT WAS NEVER |
| | ISSUED AND WORK WAS NOT DONE UNDER THAT PERMIT. |
| | |
| | 11) NOTE: PLEASE SEE COMPLIANCE WITH FBC CHAPTER 13 HAS |
| | NOT YET BEEN ACHIEVED. |
| | A) PLEASE SEE THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS AS SUBMITTED DO |
| | NOT CORRELATE WITH PLANS. PLEASE BE SURE TO SEE |
| | MECHANICAL REVIEW FOR POSSIBLE METHOD OF CALCULATION |
| | COMMENT. |
| | PLEASE SEE THERE SEEMS TO BE TWO DIFFERENT TYPES OF |
| | LIGHTING FIXTURES ON PLANS AS E-1 SHOWS A COMPLETELY |
| | DIFFERENT TYPE OF LIGHT FIXTURE/SYMBOL THAN ON E-2. |
| | PLEASE SEE THE FIXTURE LEGEND DOES NOT CONTAIN THE |
| | COMPLETE WATTAGE INFORMATION FOR ALL LIGHT FIXTURES |
| | (EXAMPLE RECESSED FLUORESCENT LIGHT). PLEASE BE SURE |
| | THIS INFORMATION CORRELATES WITH THE INPUT DATA |
| | REPORT. |
| | PLEASE SEE THE EXTERIOR LIGHTS ON THE PLANS DO NOT |
| | CORRELATE WITH THE INPUT DATA REPORT OR THE FIXTURE |
| | LEGEND. ONE ITEM FOR EXAMPLE IS THAT THE WALL PACK |
| | FIXTURE WHICH IS ON LEGEND BUT *BLANK*? |
| | PLEASE SEE THE INPUT DATA REPORT SHOWS TWO TYPES OF |
| | FIXTURES, YET NEITHER OF THESE IS ON FIXTURE LEGEND. |
| | PLANS DO SHOW THREE TYPES OF LIGHTING FIXTURES |
| | OUTSIDE. |
| | PLEASE COMPLETE FIXTURE TYPE DESIGNATIONS ON PLANS AND |
| | FIXTURE LEGEND SO THESE CORRELATE. THEN PLEASE |
| | CORRELATE ALL LIGHTING INFORMATION ON PLANS WITH THAT |
| | OF THE INPUT DATA REPORT. |
| | PLEASE SEE 13-415.1.AB.1, 13-415.1.A, .B, .C, 13-415.2, |
| | 13-415.2.ABC.1.3 ETC. |
| | ** PLEASE SEE ONLY ONE COPY OF THE INPUT DATA REPORT |
| | WAS SUBMITTED. PLEASE SUBMIT TWO COPIES AS ONE WILL BE |
| | STAMPED FOR FILE AND THE OTHER IS STAMPED FOR FIELD SET |
| | OF PLANS. |
| | B) PLEASE SEE THE PLANS DO NOT INDICATE ANY METHOD OF |
| | CONTROLS FOR EXTERIOR LIGHTING WHICH COMPLIES WITH |
| | 13-415.1.ABC.1, 13-415.1.ABC.1.4 |
| | PLEASE SEE NO CONTROLS ARE SHOWN FOR 13-415.1.ABC.1, |
| | 13-415.1.ABC.1.2 |
| | |
| | 12) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS REVIEW GAVE NOTICE TO FS |
| | 553.80(2)(B) WITH RESPECT TO REPEAT COMMENTS FOR CODE |
| | COMPLIANCE. PLEASE SEE THERE ARE SEVERAL CODE SECTIONS |
| | WHICH WERE REPEATED AND THE FEE HAS BEEN ASSESSED AS |
| | REQUIRED BY THE FLORIDA STATUTES. |
| | THIS FEE IS DUE BEFORE PLANS CAN BE RE-SUBMITTED FOR |
| | THE NEXT REVIEW. THIS FEE IS NOT THE RESPONSIBILITY OF |
| | THE CONTRACTOR OR OWNER. THIS IS SET-FORTH BY THE |
| | BOARDS AND THE STATE FOR THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL. THE |
| | FEE IS $1860.00 |
| | ** PLEASE KNOW ONE COPY OF ELECTRICAL PLANS AND ENERGY |
| | CALCULATIONS WILL BE RETAINED BY THIS OFFICE. OTHER |
| | SHEETS MAY BE RETAINED BY OTHER TRADES. |
| | |
| | 13) NOTE: PLEASE SEE ONCE AGAIN THE ARCHITECT ON |
| | ELECTRICAL PLANS DID NOT DATE THE PLANS WHEN THEY WERE |
| | SIGNED AND SEALED. THIS WAS A NOTE GIVEN ON PREVIOUS |
| | REVIEWS AND IS STILL REQUIRED AS THIS IS A FLORIDA |
| | STATUTE. |
| | PLEASE SEE 481.221 |
| | |
| | ** AS STATED ON PREVIOUS REVIEW: |
| | ** PLEASE BE SURE TO CALL IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS |
| | OR COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE TYPED COMMENTS ABOVE. |
| | IF THERE ARE ANY COMMENTS WHICH ARE NOT CLEAR IN ANY |
| | WAY, NOT UNDERSTOOD OR NOT TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR, |
| | PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE AND |
| | THIS REVIEWER. |
| | |
| | |
| | * ** IMPORTANT** |
| | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP FOR |
| | CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL |
| | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED SHEETS |
| | INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. DO NOT |
| | LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. |
| | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS |
| | SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE. |
| | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID ANY |
| | DELAYS. |
| | |
| | DEWEY PALMER |
| | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II |
| | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | 561-805-6717 |
| | [email protected] |
| 2007-10-16 15:53:17 | 2007-10-17 15:53:17 |
| | |
| | PLANS REMOVED FROM INCOMING FOR REVIEW DUE TO DATE FOR |
| | WHICH ELECTRICAL REVIEWER IS UP TO. |
| | PLANS WILL BE RETURNED TO INCOMING WAITING FOR |
| | COMMERCIAL BOARD ONCE REVIEW IS COMPLETED. |
