Date |
Text |
2007-02-01 17:06:58 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| PERMIT:07011255 |
| ADD: 700 S. ROSEMARY AVE |
| CONT: VENTURA ARCHITECTURE & DEV. |
| TEL: (561)856-6655 |
| FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE |
| W/ 2006 FBC REVISIONS |
| * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS |
| |
| REVIEW |
| ACTION: DENIED |
| |
| 1)--- VERY IMPORTANT STATEMENT --- |
| PLEASE DO NOT IGNORE! |
| WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE |
| THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY |
| PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER |
| LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUM- |
| BER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION |
| MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICA |
| TION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND |
| WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK |
| YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. |
| |
| 2 ) FL S S 713.13 |
| NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT, TO BE FILED WITH THE CLERK OF |
| THE COURT. |
| NOTE: 713.13(2) |
| IF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THE NOTICE OFCOMMENCEMENT IS |
| NOT ACTUALLYCOMMENCED WITHIN 90 DAYS AFTER THE |
| RECORDING THEREOF, SUCH NOTICE IS NULL & VOID. NOTE: |
| 713.13(6)THE POSTING OF THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT AT |
| THE CONSTRUCTION SITE BEFORE THE FIRST INSPECTION. |
| |
| 3)THE ADDRESS ON THE DRAWINGS HAS AN NEW YORK |
| ADDRESS. SHOW THE CORRECT FLORIDA ADDRESS FOR THIS |
| PROJECT ON DRAWINGS. SEE ALL SHEETS. |
| |
| 4)THE CURRENT BULDING CODE WHIC IS USED HERE IN THE |
| CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH IS THE 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING |
| CODE. THE ACI-318-99, HAS BEEN CHANGED TO ACI-318-02 |
| SEE FBC CH.35. THE LETTER SUMMARIXING THE STRUCTURAL |
| ANALYSIS FOR THE EXISTING TWO STORY STEEL FRAME |
| BUILDING NEEDS REVISING TO SHOW THE CORRECT CODE AND |
| CODE SECTIONS. |
| |
| 5) 1509.3 TANKS. |
| TANKS HAVING A CAPACITY OF MORE THAN 500 GALLONS (2 M 3 |
| ) PLACED IN OR ON A BUILDING SHALL BE SUPPORTED ON |
| MASONRY, REINFORCED CONCRETE, STEEL OR TYPE IV |
| CONSTRUCTION PROVIDED THAT, WHERE SUCH SUPPORTS ARE |
| LOCATED IN THE BUILDING ABOVE THE LOWEST STORY, THE |
| SUPPORT SHALL BE FIRE-RESISTANCE RATED AS REQUIRED FOR |
| TYPE IA CONSTRUCTION. |
| |
| 6)THE SIGNATURESON ONE SET OF THE DRAWINGS ARE |
| STAMPED. THE SIGNATURE OF BOTH SETS ARE DIFFERENT, |
| HOWEVER THE NAME AND SEAL IS THE SAME ON BOTH SETS OF |
| DRAWINGS. SUCH SIGNATURE, DATE, AND SEAL SHALL BE |
| EVIDENCE OF THE AUTHENTICITY. FLORIDA STATUTES |
| 471.025. |
| F.A.C. 61G15-23.002ENGINEERS SHALL LEGIBLY INDICATE |
| THEIR NAME, ADDRESS AND LICENSE NUMBER ON EACH SHEET. |
| IF PRACTICING THROUGH A DULYY AUTHORIZE ENGINEERING |
| BUSINESS, ENGINEERS SHALL LEGIBLY INDICATE THEIR NAME |
| AND LICENSE NUMBER, AS WELL AS, THE NAME, ADDRESS, AND |
| CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION NUMBER OF THE ENGINEERING |
| BUSINESS ON EACH SHEET. A TITLE BLOCK ON EACH SHEET |
| CONTAINING THE PRINTED NAME, ADDRESS, AND LICENSE |
| NUMBER OF THE ENGINEER OR IF APPLICABLE, |
| |
| 7) THE FLORIDA BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS AMENDED |
| ITS SEALS RULE EFFECTIVE FEBRUARY 5, 2004. THEY CLEANED |
| UP THE APPERANCE OF THE SEAL BY ELIMINATING OBSOLETE |
| CONTENT AND CHANGING THE WORD "CERTIFICATE" TO |
| "LICENSE". SEE F.A.C. 61G15-23.001(1) FOR MORE |
| INFORMATION ON THE NEW SEALS. |
| |
| 8)DID THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION |
| THE WEIGHT OF BOTH TANKS BEING ON THE ROOF AT THE SAME |
| TIME?THE ANALYSIS PROVIDED IS FOR THE 25000 LBS NEW |
| CHILLER. WHAT ABOUT THE EXISTING CHILLER? THE WEIGHT OF |
| BOTH CHILLER SHALL BE TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION SINCE |
| THEY WILL BE ON THE ROOF AT THE SAME TIME. |
| |
| MYRON JACOBS |
| BUILDING PLAN REVIEWER |
| 805-6726 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |