Plan Review Notes
Plan Review Notes For Permit 07011175
Permit Number 07011175
Review Stop E
Sequence Number 4
Notes
Date Text
2008-01-31 19:40:12** DENIED 4TH REVIEW **
  
 ** PLEASE SEE COMMENTS FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW ALONG WITH
 NEW COMMENTS NOW BASED ON ENERGY CALCULATIONS NOW ONLY
 BEING SUBMITTED FOR THE FIRST REVIEW. THESE WERE NOT
 SUBMITTED ON PREVIOUS REVIEW AS PREVIOUS REVIEWS HAD
 REQUESTED.
  
 *** IMPORTANT: PLEASE KNOW THIS IS THE 2ND REVIEW UNDER
 NEW DESIGN PROFESSIONALS. PLEASE SEE THE LAST COMMENT
 BELOW.
  
 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FBC CHAPTER 13, 13-415.2,
 13-101.1.3, 13-101.1.1, 13-400.3A, 13-400.3B
 PLEASE SEE NEW METHOD *A* IS NOW BEING SUBMITTED WHICH
 REQUIRES COMPLIANCE WITH WHOLE BUILDING.
 PLEASE SEE 13-103.1.1.1, FS 481.221, FAC 61G15-23.002,
 FS 471.025 AS THE CERTIFICATION SHEET IS NOT FILLED OUT
 WITH ALL INFORMATION AND CORRECT SIGNING, DATING AND
 SEALING OF DOCUMENTS.
 PLEASE SEE THIS IS BEING LEFT BLANK. THE ONLY SIGNATURE
 DONE CORRECTLY WAS THAT OF THE OWNER.
 PLEASE BE SURE THE DOCUMENTS ARE SIGNED, DATED AND
 SEALED BY THE RESPONSIBLE DESIGNER BASED ON SCOPE OF
 WORK.
 PLEASE CORRELATE ALL INFORMATION ON PLANS WITH THAT OF
 THE INFORMATION ON THE INPUT DATA REPORT WHICH IS PART
 OF THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS.
 FOR EXAMPLE: PLEASE SEE THE IDR DOES NOT SHOW ANY
 EXTERIOR LIGHTING ENTERED. HOW IS THIS POSSIBLE WHEN
 THE PLANS CLEARLY SHOW EXTERIOR LIGHTS?
  
 PLEASE SEE THE LIGHTING SHOWN ON PLANS ALONG WITH THE
 FIXTURE LEGEND AS SUBMITTED DOES NOT CORRELATE WITH THE
 INPUT DATA REPORT ON ENERGY CALCULATIONS. IN FACT THERE
 ARE NUMEROUS INCONSISTENCIES. PLEASE SEE SOME EXAMPLES
 GIVEN BELOW:
 FOR EXAMPLE: PLEASE SEE THE FIXTURES SHOWN IN BATHROOMS
 ARE NOTED WITH TWO-75WATT BULBSWHICH WOULD BE 150W
 YET THE FIXTURES ON THE IDR INDICATE ONLY ONE SINGLE
 60W BULB. HOW IS THIS POSSIBLE?
 FOR EXAMPLE: PLEASE SEE THE FLUORESCENT FIXTURES WHICH
 ARE SHOWN ON THE FIXTURE LEGEND AS CONTAINING TWO 75W
 BULBS WHICH WOULD BE 150W, YET THE IDR ONLY SHOWS 80W
 FOR THE SAME FIXTURES. THE FIRST COMMENT FROM THIS
 REVIEWER IS THAT A 75W FLUORESCENT BULB IS NOT PART OF
 ANY KNOWN FIXTURE AS SHOWN. PLEASE CHECK THE BULB
 WATTAGES ON THE PROPOSED FLUORESCENT FIXTURES.
 PLEASE ALSO SEE THE AMOUNT OF FIXTURES ON PLANS AND
 WATTAGES AS SHOWN WAY EXCEED THAT OF THE INFORMATION
 AND FIXTURES ON PLANS.
  
 PLEASE SEE THE USE MAY NOT BE ENTERED AS
 SCHOOL/UNIVERSITY. THIS OCCUPANCY IS NOT EITHER OF
 THESE.
 ** THESE ARE ONLY A FEW EXAMPLES ON HOW THE ENERGY
 CALCULATIONS DO NOT MATCH OR CORRELATE WITH PLANS.
  
 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS THREE REVIEWS WHICH
 SPECIFICALLY STATED THAT THE LOAD CALCULATIONS BEING
 SUBMITTED WERE FOR A *RESIDENTIAL HOUSE*. THIS IS NOT A
 RESIDENTIAL HOUSE AND MAY NOT USE THE CALCULATIONS AS
 SUBMITTED. PLEASE SEE ALL PREVIOUS REVIEW GAVE THE
 SPECIFIC CODES ON COMMERCIAL USE/OCCUPANCY LOAD
 CALCULATIONS YET THEY ARE STILL SHOWN FOR RESIDENTIAL
 USE??????
 PLEASE SEE 220.3, 220.12, 220.14, 220.42, 220.44, ETC,
 PLEASE SEE 215.3, 230.42 ETC FOR ALL CONTINUOUS LOADS
 WHICH ARE REQUIRED TO BE SHOWN AT 125%.
  
 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE ONE OF THE NEW COMMENTS IS NOW THE
 WATER HEATER WHICH HAS NOW CHANGED FROM THE PREVIOUS
 REVIEWED PLANS.
 PLEASE SEE THE PREVIOUS ELECTRICAL PLANS LISTED ON THE
 PANEL SCHEDULE THE WH AT 4500VA AND YET NOW THE PANEL
 SCHEDULE LIST THIS UNIT AS 3500VA AND 6000VA. HOW IS
 THIS POSSIBLE? WHICH ONE IS IT?
 PLEASE CORRELATE AND SEE NOTES ABOVE WITH RESPECT TO
 LOAD CALCULATIONS.
  
 4) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTED THAT AN
 *EQUIPMENT GROUNDING CONDUCTOR* WAS MISSING AFTER THE
 FIRST MEANS OF DISCONNECT AND NOW THE RISER SHOWS AN
 EQUIPMENT GROUNDING CONDUCTOR WHICH IS OK EXCEPT IT IS
 NOT IN THE CONDUIT ALONG WITH THE OTHER FEEDERS. PLEASE
 PLACE THIS CONDUCTOR INSIDE THE NOTE FOR THE
 CONDUCTORS. THIS CAN NOT BE RUN SEPARATELY BY ITSELF.
 250.110, 250.122, ETC
  
 5) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FS 553.80(2)(B) WITH RESPECT TO
 REPEAT COMMENTS FOR CODE COMPLIANCE.
 THIS IS ONLY A NOTICE GIVEN AT THIS TIME DUE TO THE
 FACT THIS IS ONLY THE SECOND REVIEW UNDER NEW DESIGNER.
 PLEASE KNOW IF ANY OF THE SAME CODE COMPLIANCE COMMENTS
 ARE REPEATED ON THE NEXT REVIEW THIS OFFICE WILL AS
 REQUIRED UNDER FLORIDA STATUTES HAVE NO CHOICE BUT TO
 ASSESS A 4X PLAN REVIEW FEE TO THE DESIGNER OF RECORD.
 ** AS STATED ON ALL PREVIOUS REVIEWS,,,,, IF THERE ARE
 ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CALL THIS OFFICE OR REVIEWER TO
 GO OVER THESE NOTES.
 ONE COPY OF EACH ELECTRICAL SHEET ALONG WITH ENERGY
 CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED ARE BEING RETAINED BY THIS
 OFFICE.
  
 ** ONCE AGAIN IF COMMENTS ARE NOT UNDERSTOOD OR TYPED
 IN ANY FASHION WHICH IS NOT CLEAR, PLEASE CONTACT THIS
 REVIEWER AT THE CONTACT INFORMATION BELOW.
  
  
 DEWEY PALMER
 ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II
 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 561-805-6717
 [email protected]


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved