| Date |
Text |
| 2008-01-31 19:40:12 | ** DENIED 4TH REVIEW ** |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE SEE COMMENTS FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW ALONG WITH |
| | NEW COMMENTS NOW BASED ON ENERGY CALCULATIONS NOW ONLY |
| | BEING SUBMITTED FOR THE FIRST REVIEW. THESE WERE NOT |
| | SUBMITTED ON PREVIOUS REVIEW AS PREVIOUS REVIEWS HAD |
| | REQUESTED. |
| | |
| | *** IMPORTANT: PLEASE KNOW THIS IS THE 2ND REVIEW UNDER |
| | NEW DESIGN PROFESSIONALS. PLEASE SEE THE LAST COMMENT |
| | BELOW. |
| | |
| | 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FBC CHAPTER 13, 13-415.2, |
| | 13-101.1.3, 13-101.1.1, 13-400.3A, 13-400.3B |
| | PLEASE SEE NEW METHOD *A* IS NOW BEING SUBMITTED WHICH |
| | REQUIRES COMPLIANCE WITH WHOLE BUILDING. |
| | PLEASE SEE 13-103.1.1.1, FS 481.221, FAC 61G15-23.002, |
| | FS 471.025 AS THE CERTIFICATION SHEET IS NOT FILLED OUT |
| | WITH ALL INFORMATION AND CORRECT SIGNING, DATING AND |
| | SEALING OF DOCUMENTS. |
| | PLEASE SEE THIS IS BEING LEFT BLANK. THE ONLY SIGNATURE |
| | DONE CORRECTLY WAS THAT OF THE OWNER. |
| | PLEASE BE SURE THE DOCUMENTS ARE SIGNED, DATED AND |
| | SEALED BY THE RESPONSIBLE DESIGNER BASED ON SCOPE OF |
| | WORK. |
| | PLEASE CORRELATE ALL INFORMATION ON PLANS WITH THAT OF |
| | THE INFORMATION ON THE INPUT DATA REPORT WHICH IS PART |
| | OF THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS. |
| | FOR EXAMPLE: PLEASE SEE THE IDR DOES NOT SHOW ANY |
| | EXTERIOR LIGHTING ENTERED. HOW IS THIS POSSIBLE WHEN |
| | THE PLANS CLEARLY SHOW EXTERIOR LIGHTS? |
| | |
| | PLEASE SEE THE LIGHTING SHOWN ON PLANS ALONG WITH THE |
| | FIXTURE LEGEND AS SUBMITTED DOES NOT CORRELATE WITH THE |
| | INPUT DATA REPORT ON ENERGY CALCULATIONS. IN FACT THERE |
| | ARE NUMEROUS INCONSISTENCIES. PLEASE SEE SOME EXAMPLES |
| | GIVEN BELOW: |
| | FOR EXAMPLE: PLEASE SEE THE FIXTURES SHOWN IN BATHROOMS |
| | ARE NOTED WITH TWO-75WATT BULBSWHICH WOULD BE 150W |
| | YET THE FIXTURES ON THE IDR INDICATE ONLY ONE SINGLE |
| | 60W BULB. HOW IS THIS POSSIBLE? |
| | FOR EXAMPLE: PLEASE SEE THE FLUORESCENT FIXTURES WHICH |
| | ARE SHOWN ON THE FIXTURE LEGEND AS CONTAINING TWO 75W |
| | BULBS WHICH WOULD BE 150W, YET THE IDR ONLY SHOWS 80W |
| | FOR THE SAME FIXTURES. THE FIRST COMMENT FROM THIS |
| | REVIEWER IS THAT A 75W FLUORESCENT BULB IS NOT PART OF |
| | ANY KNOWN FIXTURE AS SHOWN. PLEASE CHECK THE BULB |
| | WATTAGES ON THE PROPOSED FLUORESCENT FIXTURES. |
| | PLEASE ALSO SEE THE AMOUNT OF FIXTURES ON PLANS AND |
| | WATTAGES AS SHOWN WAY EXCEED THAT OF THE INFORMATION |
| | AND FIXTURES ON PLANS. |
| | |
| | PLEASE SEE THE USE MAY NOT BE ENTERED AS |
| | SCHOOL/UNIVERSITY. THIS OCCUPANCY IS NOT EITHER OF |
| | THESE. |
| | ** THESE ARE ONLY A FEW EXAMPLES ON HOW THE ENERGY |
| | CALCULATIONS DO NOT MATCH OR CORRELATE WITH PLANS. |
| | |
| | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS THREE REVIEWS WHICH |
| | SPECIFICALLY STATED THAT THE LOAD CALCULATIONS BEING |
| | SUBMITTED WERE FOR A *RESIDENTIAL HOUSE*. THIS IS NOT A |
| | RESIDENTIAL HOUSE AND MAY NOT USE THE CALCULATIONS AS |
| | SUBMITTED. PLEASE SEE ALL PREVIOUS REVIEW GAVE THE |
| | SPECIFIC CODES ON COMMERCIAL USE/OCCUPANCY LOAD |
| | CALCULATIONS YET THEY ARE STILL SHOWN FOR RESIDENTIAL |
| | USE?????? |
| | PLEASE SEE 220.3, 220.12, 220.14, 220.42, 220.44, ETC, |
| | PLEASE SEE 215.3, 230.42 ETC FOR ALL CONTINUOUS LOADS |
| | WHICH ARE REQUIRED TO BE SHOWN AT 125%. |
| | |
| | 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE ONE OF THE NEW COMMENTS IS NOW THE |
| | WATER HEATER WHICH HAS NOW CHANGED FROM THE PREVIOUS |
| | REVIEWED PLANS. |
| | PLEASE SEE THE PREVIOUS ELECTRICAL PLANS LISTED ON THE |
| | PANEL SCHEDULE THE WH AT 4500VA AND YET NOW THE PANEL |
| | SCHEDULE LIST THIS UNIT AS 3500VA AND 6000VA. HOW IS |
| | THIS POSSIBLE? WHICH ONE IS IT? |
| | PLEASE CORRELATE AND SEE NOTES ABOVE WITH RESPECT TO |
| | LOAD CALCULATIONS. |
| | |
| | 4) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTED THAT AN |
| | *EQUIPMENT GROUNDING CONDUCTOR* WAS MISSING AFTER THE |
| | FIRST MEANS OF DISCONNECT AND NOW THE RISER SHOWS AN |
| | EQUIPMENT GROUNDING CONDUCTOR WHICH IS OK EXCEPT IT IS |
| | NOT IN THE CONDUIT ALONG WITH THE OTHER FEEDERS. PLEASE |
| | PLACE THIS CONDUCTOR INSIDE THE NOTE FOR THE |
| | CONDUCTORS. THIS CAN NOT BE RUN SEPARATELY BY ITSELF. |
| | 250.110, 250.122, ETC |
| | |
| | 5) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FS 553.80(2)(B) WITH RESPECT TO |
| | REPEAT COMMENTS FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. |
| | THIS IS ONLY A NOTICE GIVEN AT THIS TIME DUE TO THE |
| | FACT THIS IS ONLY THE SECOND REVIEW UNDER NEW DESIGNER. |
| | PLEASE KNOW IF ANY OF THE SAME CODE COMPLIANCE COMMENTS |
| | ARE REPEATED ON THE NEXT REVIEW THIS OFFICE WILL AS |
| | REQUIRED UNDER FLORIDA STATUTES HAVE NO CHOICE BUT TO |
| | ASSESS A 4X PLAN REVIEW FEE TO THE DESIGNER OF RECORD. |
| | ** AS STATED ON ALL PREVIOUS REVIEWS,,,,, IF THERE ARE |
| | ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CALL THIS OFFICE OR REVIEWER TO |
| | GO OVER THESE NOTES. |
| | ONE COPY OF EACH ELECTRICAL SHEET ALONG WITH ENERGY |
| | CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED ARE BEING RETAINED BY THIS |
| | OFFICE. |
| | |
| | ** ONCE AGAIN IF COMMENTS ARE NOT UNDERSTOOD OR TYPED |
| | IN ANY FASHION WHICH IS NOT CLEAR, PLEASE CONTACT THIS |
| | REVIEWER AT THE CONTACT INFORMATION BELOW. |
| | |
| | |
| | DEWEY PALMER |
| | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II |
| | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | 561-805-6717 |
| | [email protected] |
