Date |
Text |
2007-03-05 13:31:40 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| PERMIT: 07010773 |
| ADD: 326 FERN ST |
| CONT: ALONSO & ASSOCIATES, INC |
| TEL: (561)253-5350 |
| FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE |
| W/ 2006 FBC REVISIONS |
| * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS |
| |
| REVIEW |
| ACTION: DENIED |
| |
| |
| 1)--- VERY IMPORTANT STATEMENT --- |
| PLEASE DO NOT IGNORE! |
| WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE |
| THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY |
| PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER |
| LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUM- |
| BER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION |
| MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICA |
| TION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND |
| WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK |
| YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. |
| |
| 2) FL S S 713.13 |
| NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT, TO BE FILED WITH THE CLERK OF |
| THE COURT. |
| NOTE: 713.13(2) |
| IF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THE NOTICE OFCOMMENCEMENT IS |
| NOT ACTUALLYCOMMENCED |
| WITHIN 90 DAYS AFTER THE RECORDING THEREOF, SUCH NOTICE |
| IS NULL & VOID. NOTE: 713.13(6) |
| THE POSTING OF THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT AT THE |
| CONSTRUCTION SITE BEFORE THE FIRST INSPECTION. |
| |
| 3) FL S. S. 553.71(7) " THRESHOLD BUILDING" MEANING ANY |
| BUILDING WHICH IS |
| GREATER THAN (3) STORIES OR 50 FT IN |
| HEIGHT, OR WHICH HAS AN ASSEMBLY OCCUPAN |
| CY CLASSIFICATION AS DEINED IN THE |
| FLORIDA BUILDING CODE WHICH EXCEEDS |
| 5,000 SQ FT IN AREA AND AN OCCUPANT |
| CONTENT OF GREATER THAN 500 PERSONS. |
| 105.13.1 THE ENFORCING AGENCY SHALL |
| REQUIRE A SPECIAL INSPECTOR TO PERFORM |
| STRUCTURAL INSPECTIONS ON A THRESHOLD |
| BUILDING PURSUANT TO A STRUCTURAL |
| INSPECTION PLAN PREPARED BY THE |
| ENGINEER OF RECORD. THE STRUCTURAL |
| INSPECTION PLAN MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE |
| ENFORCING AGENCY PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE |
| OF A BUILDING PERMIT FOR THE |
| CONSTRUCTION OF A THRESHOLD BUILDING. |
| THE PURPOSE OF THE STRUCTURL INSPECTION |
| PLAN IS TO PROVIDE SPECIFIC INSPECTION |
| PROCEDURES AND SCHEDULES SO THAT THE |
| BUILDING CAN BE ADEQUATELY INSPECTED FORCOMPLIANCE |
| WITH THE PERMITTED DOCUMENTS. |
| |
| 4)WPB AMENDMENT 105.13.6. W.P.B. |
| CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| REQUEST FOR THRESHOLD BUILDINGS A |
| SPECIAL INSPECTOR AS REQUIRED BY S. |
| 553.79(5) FLORIDA STATUTES TO THE MIN- |
| IMUM INSPECTIONS REQUIRED BY THIS CODE. |
| CONTACT HAROLD PISKURA MANAGER OF THE |
| SPECIAL INSPECTOR PROGRAM AT (561) |
| 805-6711 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION BEFORE |
| THE PERMIT MAY BE ISSUED. |
| |
| 5)W.P.B. AMENDMENT 105.13.4.4 ALL |
| PLANS FOR THE BUILDING WHICH ARE |
| REQUIRED TO BE SIGNED AND SEALED BY THE |
| ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER OF RECORD CON- |
| TAIN A STATEMENT THAT, TO THE BEST OF |
| THE ARCHITECT'S PR ENGINEER'S KNOWLEDGE, |
| THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS COMPLY WITH |
| THE APPLICABLE FIRE-SAFETY STANDARDS AS |
| DETERMINED BY THE LOCAL AUTHORITY IN |
| ACCORDANCE WITH THIS SECTION AND 633 |
| FLORIDA STATUTE. |
| |
| 6) SHEET A-1.0.0 EXIT REQUIREMENTS ARE ONLY REFRENCED |
| UNDER THE NFPA NOT THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE 2006 |
| FBC-BUILDING AND THE 2006 EXISTING BUILDING CODE. |
| 102.1* WHERE, IN ANY SPECIFIC CASE, DIFFERENT SECTIONS |
| OF THIS CODE SPECIFY DIFFERENT MATERIALS, METHODS OF |
| CONSTRUCTION OR OTHER REQUIEMENTS, THE MOST RESTRICTIVE |
| SHALL GOVERN. |
| WHERE THERE IS A CONFLICT BETWEEN A GENERAL REQUIEMENT |
| AND A SPECIFIC REQUIREMENT, THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENT |
| SHALL BE APPLICABLE. |
| |
| 7) A-1.0.0 PLANS INDICATE A TYPE I BUILDING, NO |
| INDICATION AS TO THE FIRE RESISTANCY "AOR B". |
| |
| 8) THIS REVIEW WILL ALSO ENCORPORATE THE 2004 EXISTING |
| BUILDING CODE CHAPTER 8 CHANGE OF OCCUPANCY. |
| THE PLANS REFLECT A CHANGE IN OCCUPANCY ENVOKING |
| CHAPTER 8SECTION 812.4.1 MEANS OF EGRESSHAZARD |
| CATEGORIES IN REGAARDS TO LIFE SAFETY AND MEANS OF |
| EGRESS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH TABLE 812.4.1. THE |
| BUILDING IS GOING TO A MORE RESTRICITVE HAZARD |
| CATEGORY. SEE 812.4.1.1. |
| 812.4.1.1 WHEN A CHANGE OF OCCUPANCY GROUP IS MADE TO A |
| HIGHER HAZARD CATEGORY (LOWER NUMBER) AS SHOWN IN TABLE |
| 812.4.1 THE MEANS OF EGRESS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE |
| REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTER 10 OF THE FBC-BUILDING. TABLE |
| 1016.1 REQUIRES THE EXIT ACCESS CORRIDORS TO BE 1HR |
| RATED WHEN AN OCCUPANT LOAD OF GREATER THAN 10. |
| |
| 8A) THE ISSUE OF FIRE RATED CORRIDORS NEEDS TO BE |
| ADDRESSED, THE INDEX INDICATES SHEET A-4.2.8 WALL TYPES |
| NO SUCH DETAILS ARE FOUND ON THIS SHEET. |
| |
| 8B) THIS BUILDING BEING A 6 STORY BUILDING DOES REQUIRE |
| ELEVATOR LOBBIES FOUND IN 707.14.1. |
| 707.14.1 ELEVATOR LOBBY. |
| ELEVATORS OPENING INTO A FIRE-RESISTANCE-RATED CORRIDOR |
| AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 1016.1 SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH AN |
| ELEVATOR LOBBY AT EACH FLOOR CONTAINING SUCH A |
| CORRIDOR. THE LOBBY SHALL SEPARATE THE ELEVATORS FROM |
| THE CORRIDOR BY FIRE PARTITIONS AND THE REQUIRED |
| OPENING PROTECTION. ELEVATOR LOBBIES SHALL HAVE AT |
| LEAST ONE MEANS OF EGRESS COMPLYING WITH CHAPTER 10 AND |
| OTHER PROVISIONS WITHIN THIS CODE. |
| |
| 9A) SHEET A-1.1.1 PLANS INDICATE AN ACCESSIBLE DOOR AS |
| 32" SEE FIGURE 24(B) AS TO WHERE THE MEASUREMENT FOR |
| THE 32" IS TO TAKE PLACE, FROM THE FACE OF THE DOOR TO |
| THE OTHER DOOR JAMB OR DOOR STOP. |
| |
| 9B) SHEET A-1.1.1 PLANS INDICATE FLORIDA ACCESSIBILTY |
| CODE- LATEST EDITION, PLEASE CORRECT TO THE 2004 WITH |
| 2005, 2006 REVISIONS.THE SECOND LINE IN ON THE |
| ACCESSIBILTY NOTES INDICATES THE 2002 ACCESSIBILITY |
| CODE. |
| |
| 9C) SHEET A-2.2.1 THIS IS A PLAN OF THE ADDITIONAL |
| PARKING ACROSS THE STREET FOR THE CONDOMINIUMS, THERE |
| QRE AN ADDITIONAL 90 PARKING SPACES LOCATED IN THE LOT |
| ACROSS FROM THE BUILDING ITSELF BUT ONLY ONE ACCESSIBLE |
| PARKING SPACE, AN ADDITIONAL 3 ACCESSIBLE SPACES ARE |
| REQUIRED. 11-4.1.2(5)(A). |
| |
| 10) THE EXISTING SITE PLAN AND PLANS FOR THE 3RD, 4TH & |
| 5TH FLOOR INDICATE A SKYBRIDGE, PLANS ALSO INDICATE |
| THAT THE WALL WIL BE BLOCKED UP, BLOCKING ACCESS FROM |
| THE OTHER BUILDING. IS THIS BRIDGE TO BE REMOVED? IF |
| NOT, WHO WILL MAINTAIN THE BRIDGE TO KEEP UP THE |
| MAINTENANCE? |
| |
| 11) SHEET A-4.1.1 PLEASE PROVIDE WHERE THE NORTH |
| PROPERTY LINE WOULD BE IN REGARDS TO THE BUILDING FOR |
| THE NORTH WALL. TABLE 704.8 FBC-B. THE EXTERIOR DOORS |
| CAN NOT SWING OVER THE PROPERTY LINE. 3202.2DOORS AND |
| WINDOWS SHALL NOT PROJECT OVER THE PROPERTY LINE INTO |
| THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. |
| |
| 12) SHEET A-4.1.2 IT APPEARS TO BE A TYPO THE EAST SIDE |
| OF THE BUILDING APPEARS TO HAVE WORK ON THE WINDOWS |
| MARKER# 14 BUT IN THE KEY NOTES THERE IS NO NUMBER 14 |
| BUT (2) NUMBER 13'S. |
| |
| 13) SHEET A-1.0.0 INDICATES THIS IS A FULLY FIRE |
| SPRINKLERED BUILDING, BUT NO FIRE SPRINKLER PLANS WERE |
| SUBMITTED FOR TABLE 601 AND TABLE 704.8 FL BUILDING |
| CODE. EXISTING BUILDING CODE 812.4.3.3EXCEPTION# 3 |
| WHERE EXTERIOR OPENING PROTECTIVES ARE REQUIRED, AN |
| AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM THROUGHOUT MAY BE |
| SUBSTITUTED FOR OPENING PROTECTIVES. PLEASE PROVIDE THE |
| FIRRE SPRINKLER PLANS WITH CALCULATIONS. |
| |
| 14)THERE APPEARS TO BE A DESCREPANCY BETWEEN A-3.1.1 |
| AND A-4.2.1. IT WOULD APPEAR THE TRASH ROOM WOULD BE ON |
| THE GRADE LEVEL FLOOR, ALTHOUGH THE GRADE LEVEL PLAN |
| A-4.2.1 STATES THE TRASH ROOM BELOW. PLEASE CLARIFY. |
| |
| 15) SHEET A-4.2.1 |
| |
| 15A) THE STAIR TOWER# 2 INDICATES AN EXTENSION OF THE |
| STAIRWELL TO THE EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDING. THIS |
| EXTENSION OR EXIT PASSAGE WAY REQUIRES A 2HRFIRE |
| RATING JUST AS THE REMAINDER OF THE STAIRWELL, BEING |
| OVER 4 STORIES IN HEIGTH. LEASE SEE 812.4.4.EBC |
| ENCLOSURES FOR VERTICAL SHAFTS, DOORS WILL REQUIRE 1 |
| 1/2 HR PROTECTIVES.THEREDOESN'T APPEAR TO BE A DOOR |
| SCHEDULE , PLEASE PROVIDE ADOOR SHCEDULE . |
| |
| 15B) STAIR TOWER# 1 ALSO WILL NEED TO INDICATE WALL AND |
| DOOR RATINGS, 812.4.4EXISTING BUILDING CODE. |
| |
| 15C) THE FRENCH DOORS AT STAIR TOWER # 1 APPEAR TO BE A |
| PAIR OF 30" DOORS, EBC 812.5 EXISTING BUILDINGS OR |
| PORTIONS THERE OF THAT UNDER GO A CHANGE OF OCCUPANCY |
| CLASSIFICATION SHALL COMPLY WITH CHAPTER 11 OF THE FBC, |
| BUILDING. |
| |
| 15D)TO THE NORTH OF THE MAIN LOBBY THERE IS A MENS |
| RESTROOM AND NORTH OF THE TOLIETS A EXISTING STAIR |
| GOING NOWHERE A WALL BLOCKS THEM OFF? |
| |
| 15E) TRASH ROOM IS INDICATED WITH A DOOR 7-A LOUVERED |
| DOORS, FIRST CAN'T CROSS THE PROPERTY LINE AND SECOND |
| REQUIRE FIRE RATED DOORS. SEE EBC 812.4.4.1. |
| VERTICAL SHAFTS SHALL BE DESIGNED TO THE FL BUILD |
| CODE. |
| |
| 15F) NEW STAIRWELL TO THE BASEMENT AT THE NORTH END OF |
| THE BUILDING, NOTE# 18 INDICATES NEW 1 HR RATED BLOCK |
| WALL, PROVIDE INFORMATION FOR THE BLOCK WALL TO FLOOR |
| SLAB TRANSITION. FBC 713.1. |
| |
| 16) A-4.2.2 |
| |
| 16A) TRASH CHUTE REQUIRES A VESTIBULE,707.13.3 REFUSE |
| AND LAUNDRY CHUTE ACCESS ROOMS. |
| ACCESS OPENINGS FOR REFUSE AND LAUNDRY CHUTES SHALL BE |
| LOCATED IN ROOMS OR COMPARTMENTS COMPLETELY ENCLOSED BY |
| CONSTRUCTION THAT HAS A FIRE-RESISTANCE RATING OF NOT |
| LESS THAN 1 HOUR AND OPENINGS INTO THE ACCESS ROOMS |
| SHALL BE PROTECTED BY OPENING PROTECTIVES HAVING A FIRE |
| PROTECTION RATING OF NOT LESS THAN ? HOUR AND SHALL BE |
| SELF-CLOSING OR AUTOMATIC-CLOSING UPON THE DETECTION OF |
| SMOKE. |
| |
| 16B) REFUSE CHUTE ENCLOSURES EBC 812.4.4.3 OTHER |
| VERTICAL SHAFTSSHALL BE ENCLOSED AS REQUIRED BY THE |
| FBC, BUILDINGFBC 707.4 SHAFT ENCLOSURES 2HR FOR FOUR |
| STORIES OR MORE. |
| |
| 16C) 707.13.1 REFUSE AND LAUNDRY CHUTE ENCLOSURES. |
| A SHAFT ENCLOSURE CONTAINING A REFUSE OR LAUNDRY CHUTE |
| SHALL NOT BE USED FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE AND SHALL BE |
| ENCLOSED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 707.4 . OPENINGS |
| INTO THE SHAFT, INCLUDING THOSE FROM ACCESS ROOMS AND |
| TERMINATION ROOMS, SHALL BE PROTECTED IN ACCORDANCE |
| WITH THIS SECTION AND SECTION 715 . OPENINGS INTO |
| CHUTES SHALL NOT BE LOCATED IN EXIT ACCESS CORRIDORS. |
| OPENING PROTECTIVES SHALL BE SELF-CLOSING OR |
| AUTOMATIC-CLOSING UPON THE ACTUATION OF A SMOKE |
| DETECTOR INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 907.10 , |
| EXCEPT THAT HEAT-ACTIVATED CLOSING DEVICES SHALL BE |
| PERMITTED BETWEEN THE SHAFT AND THE TERMINATION ROOM. |
| |
| 16D) PROVIDE INFORMATION ON THE PRE-ENGINEERED METAL |
| BALCONIES, ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED 106.1.2* |
| |
| 16E) PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR:1607.7.1.1 CONCENTRATED |
| LOAD. |
| HANDRAIL ASSEMBLIES AND GUARDS SHALL BE ABLE TO RESIST |
| A SINGLE CONCENTRATED LOAD OF 200 POUNDS (0.89 KN), |
| APPLIED IN ANY DIRECTION AT ANY POINT ALONG THE TOP, |
| AND HAVE ATTACHMENT DEVICES AND SUPPORTING STRUCTURE TO |
| TRANSFER THIS LOADING TO APPROPRIATE STRUCTURAL |
| ELEMENTS OF THE BUILDING. THIS LOAD NEED NOT BE ASSUMED |
| TO ACT CONCURRENTLY WITH THE LOADS SPECIFIED IN THE |
| PRECEDING PARAGRAPH. |
| |
| 17)2004 FL. BLD CODE 1603.1.4 THE |
| FOLLOWING INFORMATION RELATED TO WIND |
| SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE CONSTRUCTION |
| DRAWINGS, |
| 1)- BASIC WIND SPEED, MPH |
| 2)- WIND IMPORTANCE FACTOR, & BUILDING |
| CATEGORY |
| 3)- WIND EXPOSURE |
| 4)- INTERNAL PRESSURE COEFFICIENT, |
| 5)- COMPONENTS & CLADDING, THE DESIGN |
| WIND PRESSURES IN TERMS OF PSF. |
| |
| 18)FL BLD CODE 1609.1.4: COMPONENTS & |
| CLADDING, PROVIDE 2 COPIES(3 IF THRESH- |
| OLD OR RESIDENT INSPECTOR) OF PRODUCT |
| TESTING REPORTS,MISSING REPORTS ARE AS |
| FOLLOWS: |
| A) WINDOWS ,FIXED, STOREFRONT |
| B) WINDOWS, OPERTABLE |
| C) MULLIONS |
| D) GLAZED DOORS SWING, SLIDING |
| E)DOORS HOLLOW CORE METAL |
| F) ROOFING ASSEMBLIES |
| PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED WITH |
| PERMIT APPLICATION AFTER OCTOBER 1, 2003 |
| ARE REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THE FLORIDA |
| PRODUCT APPROVAL SYSTEM. FOR INFORMATION |
| PLEASE SEE THE STATE WEBSITE AT |
| WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG. PRODUCTS WITH |
| STATEWIDE APPROVAL ARE REQUIRED TO BE |
| SUBMITTED WITH A COVER SHEET THAT LISTS |
| THE PRODUCT IDENTITY NUMBER FROM THE |
| STATE. IF THE PRODUCT DOES NOT HAVE |
| STATEWIDE APPROVAL, SUBMIT AN APPLICA- |
| TION FOR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL OR SITE |
| SPECIFIC FORM PER RULE 9B-72. SEE |
| ATTACHMENT. WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG |
| |
| 19)WPB ADMIN CODE 106.3* PRODUCT |
| APPROVALS. THOSE PRODUCT WHICH ARE |
| REGULATED BY DCA RULE 9B-72 SHALL BE |
| REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE |
| DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL |
| FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. |
| |
| 20)PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION FOR FLAT |
| ROOF |
| SYSTEMS BEING REPLACED., NOT INCOMPLIANCE WITH THE |
| FOLLOW ITEMS: |
| |
| _X__ CONTRACTOR DID NOT PROVIDE THE MEAN |
| |
| ROOF HEIGHT. |
| |
| ___ CONTRACTOR DID NOT INDICATE THE ROOF |
| PITCH. |
| |
| __X_ CONTRACTOR FAILED TO INDICATE WHICH |
| SYSTEM TO BE USED. |
| |
| ___ THE SYSTEM PROVIDED HAS A LOW |
| PRESSURE FOR ZONE ___ . |
| |
| _X__ THE SYSTEM PROVIDED STATES |
| LIMITATION# 7, SHOULD THE FASTENER |
| RESISTANCE BE LESS THAN THAT |
| REQUIRED, AS DETERMINED BY THE |
| BUILDING OFFICIAL, A REVISED |
| FASTENER SPACING, PREPARED , SIGNED |
| AND SEALED BY A FLORIDA REGISTERED |
| PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, REGISTERED |
| ARCHITECT OR REGISTERED ROOF |
| CONSULTANT MAY BE SUBMITTED. |
| |
| _X__THE SYSTEM PROVIDED INDICATES |
| LIMITATION# 9, NO ENHANCED |
| FASTENING ALLOWED. |
| |
| 21)BEFORE A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT, MAY |
| BE ISSUED, IMPACT FEES MUST BE PAID TO |
| PALM BEACH COUNTY. THE ACTUAL PERMIT |
| SET OF PLANS MUST BE STAMPED BY THAT |
| OFFICE, AND A COPY OF THE PAID RECEIPT |
| ATTACHED TO THE PERMIT APPLICATION. |
| PLEASE CALL (561)233-5025 FOR MORE |
| INFORMATION. |
| |
| BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| JIM WITMER C. B. O. |
| |
| TEL: (561)805-6715 |
| FAX: (561)659-8026 |
| E-MAIL: [email protected] |
| |