Date |
Text |
2007-06-14 12:47:55 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| PERMIT: 07010472 |
| ADD: 5205 GREENWOOD AVE |
| CONT: HEDRICK BROTHERS |
| TEL: (561)689-8880 |
| FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE |
| W/ 2006 FBC REVISIONS |
| * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS |
| |
| 1STREVIEW |
| ACTION: DENIED |
| |
| 1)--- VERY IMPORTANT STATEMENT --- |
| PLEASE DO NOT IGNORE! |
| WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE |
| THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY |
| PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER |
| LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUM- |
| BER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION |
| MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICA |
| TION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND |
| WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK |
| YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. |
| |
| 2 ) FL S S 713.13 |
| NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT, TO BE FILED WITH THE CLERK OF |
| THE COURT.NOTE: 713.13(2) IF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN |
| THE NOTICE OFCOMMENCEMENT IS NOT ACTUALLY COMMENCED |
| WITHIN 90 DAYS AFTER THE RECORDING THEREOF, SUCH NOTICE |
| IS NULL & VOID. NOTE: 713.13(6)THE POSTING OF THE |
| NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT AT THE CONSTRUCTION SITE BEFORE |
| THE FIRST INSPECTION. |
| |
| 3) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 4) 2ND REQUEST SHEET SS-002 LOADS AND DESIGN CRITERIA |
| NOTE (D) TO PROVIDE GEOTECHNICAL REPORTS.THE REPORTS |
| SUBMITTED ARE COPIES NOT THE ORIGINAL SIGNED AND SEALED |
| REPORTS. |
| PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, REPORTS OR OTHER DOCUMENTS |
| PREPARED BY THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL AND BEING FILED FOR |
| PUBLIC RECORD SHALL HAVE THE SIGNATURE AND SEAL OF THE |
| DESIGN PROFESSIONAL AFFIXED TO THE DOCUMENT. FL STATE |
| STAT: 61G15-23.002 ENGINEERS. |
| FBC 1802.2.1 QUESTIONABLE SOILS, |
| 1802.2.1 QUESTIONABLE SOIL.WHERE THE SAFE-SUSTAINING |
| POWER OF THE SOIL IS IN DOUBT, OR WHERE A LOAD-BEARING |
| VALUE SUPERIOR TO THAT SPECIFIED IN THIS CODE IS |
| CLAIMED, THE BUILDING OFFICIAL SHALL REQUIRE THAT THE |
| NECESSARY INVESTIGATION BE MADE. SUCH INVESTIGATION |
| SHALL COMPLY WITH THE PROVISIONS OF SECTIONS 1802.4 |
| THROUGH 1802.6 . |
| |
| 5-6A) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 6B) 2ND REQUEST,DETAIL # 2 INDICATES A MONOLITHIC |
| FOOTER GOING PAST THE STEEL FRAME WALL BY SEVERAL |
| INCHES, HOW WILL THIS BE WATERPROOFED SO WATER WILL NOT |
| OSMOSIS UNDER THE BOTTOM TRACK TO THE INTERIOR OF THE |
| BUILDING? SHEET DETAIL 8 /AF-510 INDICATES THE USE OF A |
| MEMBRANE FLASHING APPLIED TO THE 5/8" EXTERIOR |
| DENSEGLASSGOLD SHEATHING. |
| 1403.8 |
| IN ORDER TO PROVIDE FOR INSPECTION FOR TERMITE |
| INFESTATION, CLEARANCE BETWEEN EXTERIOR WALL COVERINGS |
| AND FINAL EARTH GRADE ON THE EXTERIOR OF A BUILDING |
| SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN 6 INCHES (152 MM). |
| |
| WITH THIS TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION OR ALTRATION TO THE |
| EXISTING BUILDING UNDER THE EXISTING CBS WITH STUCCO |
| DIRECTLY APPLIED TO THE BLOCK, THE CODE WAS NOT |
| CONCERNED WITH A 6" INSPECTION ZONE FOR TERMITES.WHEN |
| APPLYING THE VENEER TO THE EXTERTIORTHIS CHANGES THE |
| LEVEL OR GRADE ON THE EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDING. SHEET |
| SB-502 DETAIL# 1 INDICATES THE FOOTING AND SLAB TOTAL |
| 12" IN THE VERTICAL DIMENSION. WITH THE 6" INSPECTION |
| PANEL AND THE 12" MINIMUM REQUIREMENT FOR FOUNDATIONS |
| THE MINIMUM VERTICAL HEIGHT OF THE FOUNDATION IS 18", |
| PLEASE UPDATE THEA & S SHEETS. |
| |
| 6C) 2ND REQUEST, BOTH DETAILS 1& 2 BOTH INDICATE THE |
| USE OF STEEL NETWORKS VERTICLIP SLS & SLB , HOW ARE |
| THEY FASTENED TO THE EXISTING STEEL DECK, SINCE THEY |
| ARE PART OF CREATING THE EXTERIOR ENVELOPE (MAIN |
| WINDFORCE-RESISTING SYSTEM) DO THEY HAVE ANY PRODUCT |
| EVALUATION REPORTS?IF REPORTS ARE AVAILABLE HAVE |
| THEY TAKEN A 1.33% IN WINDLOADS? PLEASE SEE ICC |
| REPORT ERS 1903 FOR SL, SLB, SLS & SLT EXTERIOR CURTAIN |
| WALL SYSTEM. PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVALS. |
| |
| 6D) 2ND REQUEST, THIS SAME DETAIL IT WOULD APPEAR THAT |
| THERE IS A GAP BETWEEN THE EXISTING FLOOR SLAB AND THE |
| NEWLY CREATED CURTAIN WALL SYSTEM, WHAT WILL BE USED TO |
| STOP THE VOID IN THE WALL AT THE SLAB LEVEL, FIRE |
| PROOFING MATERIALS? SHEET AF-302 INDICATE & PROVIDE |
| DOCUMENTATION OFUL FIRE STOP SYSTEM? 717.2.3 |
| CONNECTIONS BETWEEN HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL SPACES. |
| FIREBLOCKING SHALL BE PROVIDED AT INTERCONNECTIONS |
| BETWEEN CONCEALED VERTICAL STUD WALL OR PARTITION |
| SPACES AND CONCEALED HORIZONTAL SPACES CREATED BY AN |
| ASSEMBLY OF FLOOR JOISTS OR TRUSSES, AND BETWEEN |
| CONCEALED VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL SPACES SUCH AS OCCUR |
| AT SOFFITS, DROP CEILINGS, COVE CEILINGS AND SIMILAR |
| LOCATIONS. |
| 717.2.1 FIREBLOCKING MATERIALS. |
| FIREBLOCKING SHALL CONSIST OF 2-INCH (51 MM) NOMINAL |
| LUMBER OR TWO THICKNESSES OF 1-INCH (25 MM) NOMINAL |
| LUMBER WITH BROKEN LAP JOINTS OR ONE THICKNESS OF |
| 0.719-INCH (18.3 MM) WOOD STRUCTURAL PANEL WITH JOINTS |
| BACKED BY 0.719-INCH (18.3 MM) WOOD STRUCTURAL PANEL OR |
| ONE THICKNESS OF 0.75-INCH (19 MM) PARTICLEBOARD WITH |
| JOINTS BACKED BY 0.75-INCH (19 MM) PARTICLEBOARD. |
| GYPSUM BOARD, CEMENT FIBER BOARD, BATTS OR BLANKETS OF |
| MINERAL WOOL OR GLASS FIBER OR OTHER APPROVED MATERIALS |
| INSTALLED IN SUCH A MANNER AS TO BE SECURELY RETAINED |
| IN PLACE SHALL BE PERMITTED AS AN ACCEPTABLE FIREBLOCK. |
| BATTS OR BLANKETS OF MINERAL OR GLASS FIBER OR OTHER |
| APPROVED NONRIGID MATERIALS SHALL BE PERMITTED FOR |
| COMPLIANCE WITH THE 10-FOOT (3048 MM) HORIZONTAL |
| FIREBLOCKING IN WALLS CONSTRUCTED USING PARALLEL ROWS |
| OF STUDS OR STAGGERED STUDS. LOOSE-FILL INSULATION |
| MATERIAL SHALL NOT BE USED AS A FIREBLOCK UNLESS |
| SPECIFICALLY TESTED IN THE FORM AND MANNER INTENDED FOR |
| USE TO DEMONSTRATE ITS ABILITY TO REMAIN IN PLACE AND |
| TO RETARD THE SPREAD OF FIRE AND HOT GASES. THE |
| INTEGRITY OF FIREBLOCKS SHALL BE MAINTAINED. |
| 717.2.1.1 DOUBLE STUD WALLS. BATTS OR BLANKETS OF |
| MINERAL OR GLASS FIBER OR OTHER APPROVED NONRIGID |
| MATERIALS SHALL BE ALLOWED AS FIREBLOCKING IN WALLS |
| CONSTRUCTED USING PARALLEL ROWS OF STUDS OR STAGGERED |
| STUDS. |
| |
| 6E) PROVISO: STEEL SHOP DRAWINGS TO BE REVIEWED BY |
| DESIGN PROFESSIONALBEFORE SUBMITTAL TO THE BUILDING |
| DEPARTMENT. |
| |
| 6F) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 7) SHEET AF-302 |
| 7A)(1) THE QUESTION ASKED WAS WHAT TYPE OF MATERIAL WAS |
| TO BE USED FOR THE EXTERIOR TRIM ON THE BUILDING. |
| RESPONSE COMMENTS ARE THIS IS TO BE A DRYVIT INFINITY |
| SYSTEM. SUBMITTED WASA |
| FLORIDA COVERSHEET 2030- R1, WHEN YOU LOOK INTO THE |
| REPORT THE BACK UP INFORMATION IS SUPPOSE TO BE A |
| MIAMI-DADE REPORT NOA 01-0614.14 SUCH REPORT WAS NOT |
| SUBMITTED. |
| 7A)(2) THERE ARE TWO ISSUE WITH THE USE OF EFIS WALL |
| SYSTEMS AND THE USE OF EFIS TO BE USED AS TRIM. |
| EFIS WALL SYSTEMS:2603.3 |
| SURFACE-BURNING CHARACTERISTICS. |
| UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED IN THIS SECTION, |
| FOAM PLASTIC INSULATION AND FOAM PLASTIC CORES OF |
| MANUFACTURED ASSEMBLIES SHALL HAVE A FLAME SPREAD INDEX |
| OF NOT MORE THAN 75 AND A |
| SMOKE-DEVELOPED INDEX OF NOT MORE THAN 450 |
| WHERE TESTED IN THE MAXIMUM THICKNESS INTENDED FOR USE |
| IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM E 84. LOOSE FILL-TYPE FOAM |
| PLASTIC INSULATION SHALL |
| BE TESTED AS BOARD STOCK FOR THE FLAME SPREAD |
| INDEX AND SMOKE-DEVELOPED INDEX. |
| EFIS EXTERIOR TRIM:2603.5.4 FLAME |
| SPREAD AND SMOKE-DEVELOPED INDEXES. FOAM PLASTIC |
| INSULATION, EXTERIOR COATINGS AND FACINGS SHALL BE |
| TESTED SEPARATELY IN THE THICKNESS |
| INTENDED FOR USE, BUT NOT TO EXCEED 4 INCHES |
| (102 MM), AND SHALL EACH HAVE A FLAME SPREAD INDEX OF |
| 25 OR LESS AND A SMOKE-DEVELOPED INDEX OF 450 OR LESS |
| AS DETERMINED IN |
| ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM E 84. |
| 2603.5 EXTERIOR WALLS OF BUILDINGS |
| OF ANY HEIGHT. |
| EXTERIOR WALLS OF BUILDINGS OF TYPE I, II, III |
| OR IV CONSTRUCTION OF ANY HEIGHT SHALL COMPLY WITH |
| SECTIONS 2603.5.1 THROUGH 2603.5.7 . EXTERIOR WALLS OF |
| COLD STORAGE BUILDINGS REQUIRED TO |
| BE CONSTRUCTED OF NONCOMBUSTIBLE MATERIALS, |
| WHERE THE BUILDING IS MORE THAN ONE STORY IN HEIGHT, |
| SHALL ALSO COMPLY WITH THE PROVISIONS OF SECTIONS |
| 2603.5.1 THROUGH 2603.5.7 . |
| EXTERIOR WALLS OF BUILDINGS OF TYPE V |
| CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH SECTIONS 2603.2 , 2603.3 |
| AND 2603.4 . |
| |
| 7B) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 8) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 9A) PARTIALLY COMPLIED WE ARE STILL MISSING PRODUCT |
| APPROVALS. ) 1609.1.4 PROTECTION OF OPENINGS. IN |
| WIND-BORNE DEBRIS REGIONS, EXTERIOR GLAZING THAT |
| RECEIVES POSITIVE PRESSURE IN THE LOWER 60 FEET (18.3 |
| M) IN BUILDINGS SHALL BE ASSUMED TO BEOPENINGS AND |
| THE BALANCE OF GLAZED OPENINGS IN THE REST OF THE |
| BUILDING SHALL BE ASSUMED TO BE ZERO UNLESS SUCH |
| GLAZING THAT RECEIVES POSITIVE PRESSURE IS IMPACT |
| RESISTANT OR PROTECTED WITH AN IMPACT RESISTANT |
| COVERING MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF SSTD 12, ASTM E |
| 1886 AND ASTM E 1996, OR MIAMI-DADE TAS 201, 202 |
| AND 203 REFERENCED THEREIN AS FOLLOWS: 1.GLAZED |
| OPENINGS LOCATED WITHIN 30 FEET (9.1 M) OF GRADE SHALL |
| MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE LARGE MISSILE TEST. 2. |
| GLAZED OPENINGS LOCATED MORE THAN 30 FEET (9.1 M) ABOVE |
| GRADE SHALL MEET THE PROVISIONS OF THE SMALL MISSILE |
| TEST. |
| |
| 9B) PARTIALLY COMPLIED.PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED |
| WITH PERMIT APPLICATION AFTER OCTOBER 1, 2003 ARE |
| REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| SYSTEM. FOR INFORMATION |
| PLEASE SEE THE STATE WEBSITE AT |
| WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG. PRODUCTS WITH STATEWIDE |
| APPROVAL ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED WITH A COVER |
| SHEET THAT LISTS THE PRODUCT IDENTITY NUMBER FROM THE |
| STATE. IF THE PRODUCT DOES NOT HAVE STATEWIDE APPROVAL, |
| SUBMIT AN APPLICA TION FOR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL OR |
| SITE SPECIFIC FORM PER RULE 9B-72. SEE ATTACHMENT. |
| WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG |
| |
| 9C) PARTIALLY COMPLIED.) WPB ADMIN CODE 106.3* |
| PRODUCT APPROVALS. THOSE PRODUCT WHICH ARE REGULATED BY |
| DCA RULE 9B-72 SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN |
| WRITING BY THE |
| DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL FOR |
| JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. |
| |
| 9D) FL BLD CODE 1609.1.4: COMPONENTS & |
| CLADDING, PROVIDE 2 COPIES(3 IF THRESHOLD OR RESIDENT |
| INSPECTOR) OF PRODUCT TESTING REPORTS ,MISSING REPORTS |
| ARE AS FOLLOWS: |
| 1. WINDOWS |
| A. FIXED -OK |
| B) STOREFRONT - NOT SUBMITTED |
| C) CIRCULAR FIXED FRAME- NOT SUBMITTED |
| D) CURTAIN WALL |
| 2) GLAZED DOORS |
| A) KANEER IR-350 NOT SUBMITTED |
| B) HOLLOW METAL DOOR- OK |
| 3) TRANSOM NOT SUBMITTED |
| 4) SIDELIGHTS- NOT SUBMITTED |
| 5) MULLIONS |
| 6) LOUVERS- STATED NONE IN BUILDING? |
| 7) EFIS SYSTEMS WRONG BACK UP REPORT |
| 8) ROOF ASSEMBLIES |
| A) MAIN ROOF FIRESTONE ULTRAPLY - NO ENHANCED |
| FASTENING REQUIRES ENGINEERS SEAL AND SIGNATURE |
| B) ROOF TILE OK |
| C) STANDING SEAM- OK |
| D) UNDERLAYMENTS- OK |
| E) ROOF INSULATION- OK |
| F) ROOF HATCH EXISTING |
| G) PRE-MANUFACTURED A/C STANDS NEW COMMENT |
| |
| 10) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 11) 2ND REQUEST,BEFORE A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT, MAY |
| BE ISSUED, IMPACT FEES MUST BE PAID TO |
| PALM BEACH COUNTY. THE ACTUAL PERMIT |
| SET OF PLANS MUST BE STAMPED BY THAT |
| OFFICE, AND A COPY OF THE PAID RECEIPT |
| ATTACHED TO THE PERMIT APPLICATION. |
| PLEASE CALL (561)233-5025 FOR MORE |
| INFORMATION. |
| |
| |
| BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| JIM WITMER C. B. O. |
| |
| TEL: (561)805-6715 |
| FAX: (561)659-8026 |
| E-MAIL: [email protected] |