Date |
Text |
2007-08-03 19:11:03 | 2004 FBC EXISTING BUILDING |
| STRUCTURALS REPAIRS |
| SECOND REVIEW |
| |
| DENIED BY BUILDING |
| |
| 1) A RECORDED COPY OF THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT |
| MUST BE SUBMITTED BEFORE A |
| PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED. |
| |
| 2) THE ENERGY CALCULATION FORMS SPECIFIES R 8.9 FOR THE |
| WALLS AND THE PLANS SPECIFY R-11 ON S-1. PLEASE |
| COORDINATE. |
| |
| 3) SPECIFY THE REQUIRED LOAD BEARING CAPACITY OF THE |
| SOIL IN POUNDS PER SQUARE FOOT, BASED ON THE DESIGN OF |
| THE STRUCTURE. SEE NUMBER 12 FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW. SEE |
| FBC 106.1.2 AND R401. |
| |
| 4) SPECIFY THE SPACING OF THE ROOF TRUSS ON THE PLANS. |
| SEE NUMBER 16 FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW. FBC 106.1.2 |
| |
| 5) THE TRUSS DRAWINGS REQUIRE CONNECTIONS TO BEARING |
| FOR 2465 LBS. HORIZONTAL REACTION. PLEASE REVIEW THE |
| TRUSS DRAWINGS AND SPECIFY ADEQUATE CONNECTIONS ON THE |
| ROOF FRAMING PLAN. SEE COMMENT NUMBER 17 FROM LAST |
| REVIEW. |
| |
| 6) THE TRUSS DRAWINGS ARE REQUIRED TO HAVE THE ORIGINAL |
| SIGNATURE OF THE TRUSS ENGINEER. PHOTO COPIED |
| SIGNATURES OR STAMPS ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE. SEE FS471. SEE |
| # 18 ON LAST REVIEW. THE TRUSS LAYOUT DOES HAVE THE |
| TRUSS ENGINEER'S ORIGINAL SIGNATURE, HOWEVER, THE TRUSS |
| DRAWINGS HAVE PHOTO COPIED SIGNATURES. |
| |
| 7) THE APPROVED ROOFING SYSTEM AND FASTENING OPTION |
| SELECTED FOR THE GAF MODIFIED ROOF SYSTEM HAS A DESIGN |
| PRESSURE OF -45 PSF WHICH IS TOO LOW FOR THE PERIMETER |
| AND CORNER ROOF AREAS. SUBMIT RAS 117 CALCULATIONS FOR |
| ENHANCED FASTENING IN THESE AREAS AS ALLOWED BY |
| LIMITATION NUMBER 7 ON PAGE 32 OF THE NOA. SEE NUMBER |
| 20 ON LAST REVIEW. |
| |
| 8)WPB ADMIN CODE 106.3* PRODUCT |
| APPROVALS. THOSE PRODUCT WHICH ARE |
| REGULATED BY DCA RULE 9B-72 SHALL BE |
| REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE |
| DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL |
| FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. THE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR |
| THE ROOFING MATERIAL HAS NOT BEEN APPROVED IN WRITING |
| BY THE D.O.R. |
| |
| 9) THE PLANS SPECIFY THAT THE WINDOWS AND DOORS WILL BE |
| IMPACT RATED. THE PRODUCT APPROVALS THAT WERE SUBMITTED |
| FOR THE WINDOWS AND DOORS HAVE NO MISSLE IMPACT RATING. |
| PLEASE CORRECT. NOTE: IF NOT USING IMPACT RATED |
| PRODUCTS, SUBMIT PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR STORM PANELS |
| ALONG WITH A KEY PLAN AND INSTALLATION SCHEDULE. |
| |
| 10) THE INFORMATION SUBMITTED FROM INTERTEK IS NOT |
| ACCEPTABLE. THE PRODUCT ARE REQUIRED TO HAVE STATE |
| APPROVAL OR MIAMI-DADE APPROVAL. THE MANUFACTURER CAN |
| APPLY FOR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL IN COMPLIANCE WITH |
| RULE 9B-72. |
| |
| ROBERT MCDOUGAL |
| BLDG. PLAN REVIEW |
| (561)805-6714 |
| |
| |
| |
| |