Plan Review Notes
Plan Review Notes For Permit 06120402
Permit Number 06120402
Review Stop E
Sequence Number 2
Notes
Date Text
2007-03-09 19:00:58** UNSAT 2ND REVIEW **
  
  
 ** PLEASE SEE THERE ARE MANY COMMENTS FROM THE PREVIOUS
 REVIEW WHICH ARE STILL IN NEED OF ADDRESSING ALONG WITH
 SEVERAL NEW COMMENTS DUE TO CHANGES IN THE PLANS
 SUBMITTED.
  
 ** PLEASE KNOW A RESPONSE LETTER FROM THE DESIGN
 PROFESSIONAL IS MOST HELPFUL IN THE REVIEW PROCESS.
  
 *** PLEASE ALSO KNOW DUE TO THE PLANS NOT BEING
 COMPLETE AT THIS TIME AND THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS FOR
 PLANS SUBMITTED, THERE MAY BE COMMENTS ON NEXT REVIEW
 WHICH ARE NOT ON THIS REVIEW.
 **DUE TO THE EXTENT OF THE ELECTRICAL COMMENTS AND
 OTHER COMMENTS BASED ON LICENSING, ONE SET OF THE
 ELECTRICAL PLANS ARE ONCE AGAIN BEING RETAINED. PLEASE
 SEE NEW COMMENTS ADDED TO THIS REVIEW AND COMMENT WITH
 RESPECT TO FLORIDA STATUTES FOR REPEAT COMMENTS.
  
 1) NOTE:PLEASE SEE THIS MOSTLY THE SAME COMMENT. ONLY
 A NEW SEAL WAS USED WHEN PLANS WERE SIGNED AND SEALED.
 PLEASE SEE THAT THE MISSING CA # IS STILL NOT ON ANY
 TITLE BLOCKS. PLEASE SEE THE PRINTED NAME IS NOT THE
 SAME AS IN SEAL. PLEASE SEE NO LETTER FOR SIGNATURE
 VERIFICATION WAS SUBMITTED. PLEASE SEE FLORIDA
 ADMINISTRATIVE CODE 61G15-23.002 FOR MISSING LICENSING
 INFORMATION REQUIRED. PLEASE SEE MISSING CERTIFICATE OF
 AUTHORIZATION NUMBER AND SOME SHEETS ARE NOT COMPLETE
 WITH OTHER INFORMATION AS REQUIRED.
 FLORIDA STATUTES 471.023
 PLEASE SEE PLANS SEEM TO BE SIGNED WITH AN INITIAL OF
 SOME SORT. IF THIS IS INDEED THE LEGAL SIGNATURES OF
 THE DESIGNER OF RECORD PLEASE PROVIDE A SIGNED, DATED
 AND SEALED LETTER WITH STATEMENT OF LEGAL SIGNATURE.
 PLEASE BE SURE LETTER IS PROPERLY NOTARIZED UNDER
 FLORIDA STATUTES 117.05.
 PLEASE KNOW THIS LETTER WILL BE PLACED IN OUR SIGNATURE
 FILE FOR ANY FUTURE REFERENCE AS NEEDED AND WILL NOT BE
 NEED TO PROVIDE LETTER ON FUTURE PROJECTS.
 ** PLEASE KNOW, THIS IS REQUIRED FOR ALL SHEETS AND FOR
 ALL TRADE REVIEWS WHETHER OR NOT COMMENT IS MADE BY
 OTHER REVIEWER(S).
  
 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE ONLY THE 2005 NEC WAS ADDED TO
 PLANS. PLEASE SEE THE CODES WHICH WERE REQUESTED FOR
 OTHERS WERE NOT ADDED. PLEASE SEE THAT ALL PLANS SHALL
 STATE THE CODE IN WHICH THEY ARE DESIGNED UNDER. THIS
 IS SUBMITTED UNDER THE NEW CODES. 2004 FBC W/ THE 2006
 REVISIONS.
  
 PLEASE SEE THE FOLLOWING CODES SHALL BE STATED ON
 PLANS.
 NFPA-70 2005, 2002 NFPA-72
 PLEASE KNOW BASED ON THE FACT THAT THE PLANS WERE
 SUBMITTED FOR PERMITTING AFTER THE DATE OF DEC 8TH,
 2006, THE PLANS SHALL BE DESIGNED UNDER THE 2005 NEC.
  
 3) NOTE: PLEASE CORRELATE RISER AND PLANS SUBMITTED.
 PLEASE SEE PLANS DO NOT INDICATE GROUPING OF MAINS AS
 RISER SEEMS TO SHOW. PLEASE SEE MISSING SERVICE
 ENTRANCE CONDUCTORS FOR NEW RISER.
 PLEASE SEE THE RISER AS SHOWN IS NOT CODE COMPLIANT
 WITH SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE NEC. PLEASE SEE OTHER
 COMMENTS RELEVANT TO THE RISER.
 THIS IS ONE *BUILDING* BY DEFINITION IN THE FBC AND
 ONLY ONE SERVICE PER 230.2 WILL BE GRANTED. PLANS SHOW
 TWO DIFFERENT LOCATIONS/SERVICE METERS.
 230.70, 230.72, 240.4, 310.16, 310.15B6, ETC. PLEASE
 SEE THE SIZE OF THE METER CAN, CAN NOT BE VERIFIED AS
 NO LOAD CALCULATIONS WERE SUBMITTED. FBC 106.1.2,
 106.3.5.4(PARA 8) ADMIN SECTION. THERE ARE CURRENTLY
 MANY SECTIONS BESIDES THE ONES NOTED BELOW WHICH COULD
 NOT BE ALL TYPED IN THIS REVIEW.
  
 4) NOTE:THIS IS THE SAME COMMENT FROM PREVIOUS
 REVIEW.
 PLEASE SEE 250.6, 250.24B AS NO EQUIPMENT GROUNDING
 CONDUCTORS ARE PERMITTED BEFORE THE FIRST MEANS OF
 DISCONNECT.
  
 5) NOTE: THIS IS THE SAME COMMENT FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW.
 PLEASE SEE AS THE SERVICE IS NOT COMPLETE AND THE
 SERVICE ENTRANCE CONDUCTORS ARE NOT SHOWN REVIEW FOR
 CODE COMPLIANCE CAN NOT BE DONE. BASED ON THE SIZE OF
 THE GEC AS SHOWN IT DOES NOT MEET THE SECTION OF THE
 CODE PREVIOUSLY GIVEN.
 PLEASE SEE 250.66 AS THE SIZE OF SERVICE MAY CHANGE
 WHICH WILL DICTATE THE SIZE OF THE GROUNDING ELECTRODE
 CONDUCTOR.
  
 6) NOTE: NO, PLEASE SEE ONLY THE BRACE RATING AND
 BRANCH CIRCUIT RATING IS BEING SHOWN.
 PLEASE SUBMIT THE AIC RATINGS FOR SERVICE MAINS PER
 110.9.
 PLEASE SEE THE RATING AS SHOWN ON PANEL SCHEDULE WAS
 NOTED, HOWEVER NEEDED FOR MAIN(S).
  
 7) NOTE:THIS IS THE SAME COMMENT. PANEL SCHEDULE IS
 COMPLETELY BLANK FOR LOAD CALCULATIONS AND FOR LOAD ON
 SERVICE FOR EACH PANEL AND SERVICE AS SHOWN ON RISER.
 PLEASE COMPLETE AND SUBMIT A COMPLETE PANEL SCHEDULE
 WITH ALL MINIMUM REQUIRED DEDICATED LOADS AS WELL AS
 COMPLETED LOAD CALCULATIONS BASED ON MINIMUM
 REQUIREMENTS FROM THE NEC.
 PLEASE SEE 220.40, 220.82, 220.52, 220.54, 220.60, ETC,
 ETC.
 FBC ADMIN SECTION 106.3.5.4
  
 8) NOTE: THIS IS THE SAME COMMENT AS THE PANEL SCHEDULE
 STILL INDICATE THE DEDICATE BATH RECEPTACLE CIRCUIT ON
 WITH GARAGE RECEPTACLES. PLEASE SEE PLANS AS PLANS DO
 NOT INDICATE ANY KIND OF GARAGE??
 PLEASE SEE 210.52D, 210.11C3, AS NO OTHER LOADS ARE
 PERMITTED ON THE DEDICATED BATH CIRCUIT(S).
  
 9) NOTE: THIS IS THE SAME COMMENT.
 PLEASE SEE 210.52C1 FOR MISSING REQUIRED GFI'S ALONG
 KITCHEN COUNTER SPACE.
 MISSING MINIMUM VA 220.52
  
 10) NOTE:THIS IS THE SAME COMMENT.PLEASE SEE THAT
 THE PANEL SCHEDULE INDICATES THE DINING ROOM
 RECEPTACLES ON WITH LIGHTING AND MANY OTHER AREAS WHICH
 ARE NOT PERMITTED.
 NO INFORMATION WAS SUBMITTED.
 PLEASE SEE MISSING REQUIRED CIRCUITING FOR DINING ROOM
 RECEPTS PER 210.52B1, 210.11C1, AND 220. 52B.
  
 11) NOTE:THIS COMMENT WILL REMAIN AS NOTED ABOVE IN
 NOTE #9 THERE ARE RECEPTACLES ALONG KITCHEN COUNTER
 SPACE WHICH ARE STILL MISSING.
 PLEASE SEE 210.8A6, AS ALL RECEPTS ALONG KITCHEN
 COUNTER SPACE SHALL BE SHOWN AS GFI.
  
 12) NOTE: THIS COMMENT REMAINS AS THE MINIMUM
 CLEARANCES IN SOME OF THE CLOSETS ARE NOT MET. PLEASE
 SEE 410.8 AS THE PC LIGHTING IN CLOSETS ARE NOT
 PERMITTED AS SHOWN. THEY DO NOT MEET MINIMUM
 CLEARANCES.
  
 13) NOTE: PLEASE GO OVER PLANS AS SCALE STILL SEEMS TO
 SHOW SOME NOT SPACED PER 210.52
 PLEASE SEE MISSING RECEPTS PER 210.52 FOR WALL
 SPACES.
  
 14) NOTE:THIS COMMENT IS FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW. PLEASE
 SEE ALL SMOKE DEVICES ARE STILL BEING SHOWN AS *SMOKE
 DETECTORS* AND SYMBOL LEGEND EVENS STATES AND SHOWS
 THESE BEING 110V UNITS WHICH THESE WOULD BE *SMOKE
 ALARMS*
 PLEASE SEE ALL SMOKE DEVICES SHALL BE SHOWN AS DEFINED
 IN NFPA-72. PLEASE SEE IF THESE DEVICES AS SHOWN ARE
 PART OF A LOW VOLTAGE ALARM SYSTEM WHICH CONTAINS
 HORN/ALARM DEVICES THEN THE SD AS SHOWN FOR SMOKE
 DETECTOR IS OK. IF THESE DEVICES AS SHOWN ARE DETECT
 AND SOUND AN ALARM, THEN THEY SHALL BE SHOWN AS SA FOR
 SMOKE ALARMS.
 PLEASE ALSO SEE NFPA-72 11.5.1.1, 11.8.3 FOR LOCATIONS
 REQUIRED INSIDE AND OUTSIDE ALL SLEEPING ROOMS. PLEASE
 SEE SOME ROOMS DO NOT INDICATE THE DEVICE OUTSIDE THE
 SLEEPING ROOM, YET INDICATE TWO DEVICES INSIDE ROOM?
 PLEASE SEE OTHER ROOMS WHICH DO INDICATE A DEVICE
 OUTSIDE ROOM, BUT STILL INDICATE TWO OR MORE INSIDE??
  
 15) NOTE: THIS COMMENT IS THE SAME. NO CORRECTION WAS
 MADE.
 PLEASE SEE MISSING DISCONNECTS FOR ALL A/C EQUIPMENT.
 PLEASE SEE 440.11.
 PLEASE SEE AHU CLOSET APPEARS TO SHOW TWO RECEPTS.
 PLEASE KNOW AS PER 422.31, AHU'S SHALL NOT BE PLUGGED
 IN.
  
 16) NOTE: THIS IS THE SAME COMMENT.
 PLEASE SEE 422.31 FOR DISCONNECTING MEANS REQUIRED FOR
 WATER HEATER(S).
  
 17) NOTE: OK.
  
 18) NOTE: OK.
  
 ** NEW NOTES**
  
 19) NOTE: PLEASE SEE SEVERAL ELECTRICAL DEVICES ON
 PLANS WHICH ARE MISSING CIRCUITING. THERE ARE MANY
 ITEMS WHICH NEED CIRCUITING TO REVIEW FOR CODE
 COMPLIANCE.
 FBC 106.1.2, 106.3.5.4
  
 20) NOTE: PLEASE SEE MISSING ARC FAULT PROTECTION FOR
 ALL OUTLETS IN BEDROOMS. 210.12 THIS IS NOT ONLY
 REQUIRED FOR RECEPTACLES.
  
 21) NOTE: PLEASE SEE SOME RECEPTACLES ARE NOT BEING
 SHOWN SWITCHING THE ENTIRE RECEPTACLES WHICH IS OK,
 HOWEVER AS NOTED ABOVE PER 210.52, THEN RECEPTACLES
 WOULD BE REQUIRED IN ADDITION FOR GENERAL PURPOSE.
  
 22) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PLANS APPEAR TO NOW HAVE ONE NEW
 RECEPTACLE FOR WHAT APPEARS TO BE FOR THE DISHWASHER
 AND DISPOSAL BUT IT IS UNCLEAR AS ONE UNIT SHOWS THIS
 OUTLET AS GFI AND THE OTHER NOT GFI PROTECTED. PLEASE
 SEE 210.4, IF THESE ARE ON THE SAME YOKE/DEVICE THEN A
 2-POLE BREAKER IS REQUIRED.
 PLEASE ALSO SHOW AND IDENTIFY THE RECEPTACLE FOR THESE
 ON PLANS.
  
 23) NOTE: PLEASE SHOW ALL ROOM AND AREA DESIGNATIONS ON
 PLANS IN ORDER TO REVIEW SOME CIRCUITING FOR CODE
 COMPLIANCE.
 FBC 106.1.2 ADMIN SECTION.
  
 24) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FLORIDA STATUTES 553.80(2)(B) WITH
 RESPECT TO DESIGN PROFESSIONALS AND REPEAT COMMENTS FOR
 CODE COMPLIANCE.
 PLEASE KNOW THAT DUE TO THE AMOUNT OF ELECTRICAL
 COMMENTS PLANS WILL BE RETAINED BY THIS OFFICE. PLEASE
 KNOW PLANS WILL BE SUBMITTED TO THE FLORIDA BOARD OF
 PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS FOR REVIEW ITEMS ON PLANS AND
 MISSING LICENSE AS REQUIRED UNDER THE FLORIDA STATUTES
 AND FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE.
  
 * ** IMPORTANT**
 ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE
 PICKED UP FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE
 SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL OLD/VOIDED
 SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED
 SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW
 AND STAMPING. DO NOT LEAVE ANY
 OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS.
 PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE
 OLD/VOIDED SHEETS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED
 FOR REFERENCE.
 THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND
 AVOID ANY DELAYS.
  
 ** PLEASE BE SURE TO CALL IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS OR
 COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE TYPED COMMENTS ABOVE. IF
 THERE ARE ANY COMMENTS WHICH ARE NOT CLEAR IN ANY WAY,
 NOT UNDERSTOOD OR NOT TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR, PLEASE DO
 NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE AND THIS
 REVIEWER.
  
  
  
  
 DEWEY PALMER
 ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW
 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT.
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 561-805-6717
 [email protected]


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved