Date |
Text |
2007-03-19 19:03:03 | BUILDING REVIEW SECOND CHECKLIST: |
| 1- PROVIDE RECORDED NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT AS REQUIRED |
| BY SEC. 713.13 FLORIDA STATUTES. |
| |
| 2- PROVIDE DRAINAGE PLANS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R401.3 |
| 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE. |
| |
| 3- ENGINEER TO PROVIDE ALL HIS INFORMATION IN THE TITLE |
| BLOCK AS REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 471 FLORIDA STATUTES AND |
| FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE SEC. 61G15-23.002. |
| INCLUDING ENGINEERING FIRM'S CERTIFICATE OF |
| AUTHORIZATION NUMBER. |
| ***NOTE: ENGINEER'S NAME DOESN'T MATCH ENGINEER'S NAME |
| SHOWN ON EMBOSSED SEAL. |
| |
| 4- SHEET SP-1: |
| A) REVISE ALL DRIVEWAY AND APPROACH NOTES. CONTACT |
| CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AT |
| (561)494-1040 FOR CITY STANDARDS. |
| |
| B) REVISE SIZE OF PARKING SPACES.NUMBER AND SIZE |
| OF PARKING SPACES DON'T MATCHNOTES AT BOTTOM OF |
| SHEET. THERE IS NOT ENOUGH ROOM TO BACK UP.CHECK |
| SPECIFIED SIZES: 14'-0" X 18'-0"?. SEE ZONING |
| COMMENTS. |
| |
| C) SHOW ALL BUILDING SETBACKS TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE |
| WITH SEC. R302 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE AND TABLE |
| 704.8 2004 FBC. |
| |
| D) CLEARLY IDENTIFY PROPERTY LINES.SEC. 106.1.2 |
| CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| |
| 5- PROVIDE SOIL TEST REPORT (2 COPIES). |
| |
| 6- SHEET S-1: |
| A) COLUMN SCHEDULE AND TYPICAL NOTES IN FOUNDATION |
| PLANS DON'T MATCH.REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| |
| B) 4" DROP IS SHOWN ON MASTER BEDROOM WINDOW INSTEAD |
| OF BEING SHOWN FOR ENTRY DOOR. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| |
| C) FOUNDATION NOTES AND SPECIFICATIONS SHOWN ON |
| FOUNDATION PLAN FOR WIRE MESH SIZE DON'T MATCH. REVISE |
| AS REQUIRED. |
| |
| D) DETAIL F2 DOESN'T APPLY TO THIS PROJECT.THIS IS |
| NOT WOOD FRAMING. SEE TYPE OF INTERIOR BEARING WALL. |
| |
| E) FOOTING SCHEDULE SHOWS FOOTING F2 WITH 3 #5 BARS |
| AT THE BOTTOM, WHILE DETAIL F2 SHOWS 2 #5 AT BOTTOM AND |
| 1 #5 AT TOP. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| |
| F) CLARIFY FOOTING SIZE F2. FOOTING SCHEDULE CALLS |
| FOR 24"X12", WHILE INTERIOR BEARING WALL SECTION ON |
| SHEET A-4 CALLS FOR 12" X 24".WHICH DIMENSION IS THE |
| WIDTH AND WHICH IS THE DEPTH OF THE FOOTING. SEC. |
| 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| |
| G) PROVIDE ONLY THE DETAILS THAT APPLY TO THIS |
| PROJECT TO AVOID CONFUSIONS/CONFLICTS AND EXPEDITE |
| REVIEW PROCESS. |
| |
| H) DETAIL F1: SPECIFY FOOTING EMBEDMENT BELOW GRADE |
| TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. R403.1.4 2004 FLORIDA |
| RESIDENTIAL CODE. |
| |
| I) WINDOW DETAIL: |
| * WHY SHOWING SHUTTERS DETAILS IF WINDOW NOTES ON |
| SHEET A-1 CALLS FOR IMPACT GLASS?. |
| ** WHY SHUTTER DETAIL SHOWS ATTACHMENT OF SHUTTER |
| TRACK TO CONCRETE SLAB IF THIS IS A WINDOW DETAIL? *** |
| REVISE BUCK DETAIL. SEE SEC. R613.6.2 2004 FLORIDA |
| RESIDENTIAL CODE FOR PROPER WAY OF ATTACHING BUCKS. |
| |
| J) ENGINEER TO PROVIDE CALCULATIONS SHOWING HOW |
| VERTICAL REINFORCING SHOWN IN FOUNDATION PLAN WILL |
| PROVIDETHE REQUIRED LATERAL SUPPORT OF THIS BUILDING. |
| SEE PLANS FOR VERTICAL REINFORCEMENT SPACING. SEC. |
| 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004 AND SEC. 1609 FBC |
| 2004. |
| |
| K) DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON FOUNDATION PLANAND |
| LOCATIONS OF COLUMNS DON'T MATCH REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| |
| 7- SHEET A-1: |
| A) PROVIDEDIMENSIONSFOR ENTRY PORCH TO DETERMINE |
| TOTAL PORCH AREA.BUILDING PERMIT VALUATION WILL BE |
| ESTIMATED AFTER SQUARE FOOTAGE ISCLARIFIED. |
| |
| B) PROVIDE COMPLETE STRUCTURAL BUCK DETAIL. SPECIFY |
| ALL BUCK FASTENERS AND SEESEC. R613.6.2 2004 FLORIDA |
| RESIDENTIAL CODE FOR PROPER BUCK INSTALLATION. BUCK |
| NEEDS TO PROVIDE FULL SUPPORT TO THE WINDOW/DOOR. |
| |
| C) SOME ROOMS DON'T HAVE COMPLETE SPECS FOR SIZE OF |
| AND TYPE OF WINDOWS.PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION. |
| ALSO, SIZE OF WINDOWS ARE NOT DONE TO SCALE AND DON'T |
| MATCH EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS EITHER.REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| |
| 8- SHEET A-2: |
| A) CLARIFY NOTE REGARDING BAHAMA SHUTTERS ON 14TH |
| STREET ONLY. ALL ELEVATIONS SHOW COLONIAL SHUTTERS. |
| INFORMATION IS MISLEADING. |
| |
| C) ELEVATIONS DON'T MATCH FLOOR PLAN.SEE REVISED |
| FLOOR PLAN FOR SIZE OF WINDOWS. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| |
| D) PROVIDE COMPLETE STRUCTURAL INFORMATION FOR |
| OVERHANG ABOVE ENTRY AREA. PROVIDE COMPLETE STRUCTURAL |
| SECTION/DETAIL WITH COMPLETE SPECIFICATIONS, |
| DIMENSIONS, HEIGHT, ETC.SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS |
| TO FBC 2004. |
| |
| E) WINDOW SCHEDULE DOESN'T MATCH FLOOR PLAN. REVISE |
| AS REQUIRED. |
| |
| 9- SHEET A-3: |
| A) PROVIDE ONLY THE INFORMATION THAT IS RELEVANT TO |
| THIS PROJECT. THERE ARE A LOT OF NOTES AND TABLES THAT |
| DON'T APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. |
| |
| B) PIGGY BACK TRUSS DETAIL: |
| * IS THIS THE DETAIL FOR ENTRY PORCH? |
| ** WHERE ARE THE RIGHT HAND SIDE TRUSSES SUPPORTED |
| ON?. THERE IS NOT BEAM TO SUPPORT THEM.DETAIL IS |
| INCOMPLETE AND WRONG. PROVIDE COMPLETE SECTION DETAIL. |
| SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| |
| C) TRUSS CONNECTOR SCHEDULE AND CONNECTORS SPECIFIED |
| ON ROOF FRAMING PLAN DON'T MATCH. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| |
| D) REVISE NUMBER AND TYPE OF FASTENERS SPECIFIED ON |
| TRUSS CONNECTOR SCHEDULE. SEE CURRENT CATALOG FOR |
| UPDATED INFORMATION. OTHERWISE, ENGINEER TO PROVIDE |
| COMPLETE ENGINEERING ANALYSIS SHOWING WHY CONNECTORS |
| ARE DIFFERENT THAN THOSE TESTED AND PUBLISHED BY THE |
| MANUFACTURER. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC |
| 2004. |
| |
| E) MANUFACTURER FOR CONNECTORS SPECIFIED ON ROOF |
| FRAMING PLAN IS OUT OF BUSINESS. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| |
| F) CLEARLY IDENTIFY TRUSSES FOR WHICH UPLIFT |
| PRESSURES WERE CALCULATED. |
| |
| G) ENGINEER TO COORDINATE ALL NOTES AND CHARTS SHOWN |
| ON THIS DRAWINGS. THERE IS A LOT OF MIXED INFORMATION |
| THAT NEEDS TO BE COORDINATED.SEE 2004 FLORIDA |
| RESIDENTIAL CODE AND ALLINFORMATION SUBMITTED IN THIS |
| SHEET.PROVIDE ONLY THE REQUIRED INFORMATION.SEE |
| SECTIONS . R301 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE. ALSO, |
| SEE SEC. R803.2.3.1 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE |
| FOR MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR ROOF SHEATHING. REVISE AND |
| COORDINATE ALL INFORMATION IN SHEET A-3 TO MATCH. |
| |
| H) PNEUMATIC FASTENING SCHEDULE: PROVIDE ONLY THE |
| INFORMATION THAT APPLIES TO THIS PROJECT.CHECK/REVISE |
| SPACING FOR BUCK DETAILS FASTENING. INFORMATION DOESN'T |
| MATCH. ALSO, COORDINATE WITH PROVIDED BUCK DETAIL. |
| |
| I) ROOF FRAMING PLAN CALLS DWELLING SEPARATION WALL |
| A "FIRE WALL".SEEFBC 2004 FOR CORRECT DEFINITION |
| FOR "FIRE WALL" AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| |
| J) PROVIDE COMPLETE SECTION THRU DWELLING SEPARATION |
| WALL TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. R317.1 2004 FLORIDA |
| RESIDENTIAL CODE. |
| |
| K) REVISE ATTIC VENTILATION CALCULATIONS AND NOTES |
| SEE SEC. R806 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE FOR PROPER |
| INFORMATION. |
| |
| L) ROOF FRAMING PLAN DOESN'T MATCH EXTERIOR |
| ELEVATIONS. SEE ENTRY PORCH. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| |
| |
| 10- PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL TO THIS OFFICE BRING PLANS FOR |
| HISTORICAL APPROVAL AFTER CORRECTIONS ARE DONE TO THE |
| PLANS. |
| |
| 11- SHEET A-4: |
| A) REVISE INTERIOR BEARING WALL TO MATCH FLOOR PLAN. |
| REVISE SIZE OF FOOTING, WALL CONSTRUCTION, ETC. |
| * WHAT'S THE BEAM SHOWN ON TOP OF WALL? |
| ** HOW ARE TRUSSES RESTING ON THIS WALL. SEE ROOF |
| FRAMING PLAN. |
| *** WHAT'STHE HOOK SHOWN AT THE BOTTOM OF WALL |
| CONNECTING TO FOOTING. PROVIDECOMPLETE SPECS. SEC. |
| 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| |
| B) SPECIFY FIREBLOCKING ON INTERIOR BEARING WALL |
| SECTION AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R602.8 2004 FLORIDA |
| RESIDENTIAL CODE. |
| |
| C PROVIDE DETAIL/SPECS FOR DWELLING SEPARATION AT |
| ATTIC AREA. SEC. R317.1 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE. |
| |
| D) PROVIDE ALL DESIGN CRITERIA, INCLUDING ALL WIND |
| LOADS, AND LIVE AND DEAD LOADS. REFERENCE 2004 FLORIDA |
| RESIDENTIAL CODE,WHICH IS THE CODE THAT REGULATES |
| THIS BUILDING, NOT SECTIONS 1606 OF FBC 2004. SEE SEC. |
| R301 AND TABLE R301.5 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE. |
| REVISE AS REQUIRED. INCLUDE ALL ATTIC LIVE LOADS. |
| |
| E) PLYWOOD NAILING NOTES TO MATCH INFORMATION ON |
| SHEET A-3 AFTER APPROPRIATE REVISIONS ARE DONE. |
| |
| F) TYPICAL WALL SECTION: |
| *WHAT IS 2"X4" STRIP?. IS IT FIREBLOCKING?. ALSO, |
| VERIFY SIZE WITH SIZE OF FURRING STRIPS FOR DRYWALL |
| INSTALLATION. |
| **WHAT IS 325# SHINGLES? |
| *** ROOF SHEATHING SIZE AND TYPE TO MATCH |
| INFORMATION ON SHEET A-3 AFTER APPROPRIATE REVISIONS |
| ARE DONE. |
| **** TRUSS CONNECTOR TO MATCH INFORMATION ON SHEET |
| A-3 AFTER APPROPRIATE REVISIONS ARE DONE. |
| ***** SPECIFY FOOTING MIN. DEPTH AS REQUIRED BY SEC. |
| R 403.1.4 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE. |
| ****** SPECIFY MINIMUM FINISH FLOOR AS REQUIRED BY |
| SEC. R404.1.6 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIALCODE. |
| |
| G) TRUSS/ WOOD CONNECTOR SCHEDULE DOESN'T APPLY TO |
| THIS PROJECT AND IS USING CONNECTORS THAT NO LONGER |
| EXIST. COMPANY IS OUT OF BUSINESS. |
| ALSO, ROOFTILE INFORMATION DOESN'T APPLY. |
| |
| |
| 12- ENERGY CALCULATIONS: |
| A) PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION ON TOP OF FORM. |
| |
| B) THIS IS NOT A SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED BUILDING. |
| SEE CHAPTER 13 2004 FBC FOR PROPER TYPE OF BUILDING. |
| AND, NEED ENERGY CALCULATIONS FOR EACH DWELLING.SEE |
| DEFINITIONS ON SUBCHAPTER13-2 OF 2004 FBC. REVISE AS |
| REQUIRED.SEE SEC. 15-101.2.5.1 FBC 2004. |
| |
| C) IF CALCULATIONS ARE NOT DONE FOR WORST CASE |
| SCENARIO, THEN THEY SHALL BE DONE ON ACTUAL BUILDING |
| ORIENTATION.ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED ARE NOT FOR |
| WORST CASE SCENARIO AND BUILDING ORIENTATION DON'T |
| MATCH ACTUAL BUILDING ORIENTATION. SEE SURVEY AND |
| REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| |
| D) OVERHANG LENGTH AND HEIGHT ARE INCORRECT.THEY |
| CAN'T BE ZERO. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| |
| 13- ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE TAKINGTHE CEILING FAN |
| CREDIT. THEREFORE NEED TO SPECIFY CEILING FAN SIZE IN |
| ALL ROOMS AS REQUIRED BY TABLE 13-607.1.A.1 FBC 2004. |
| |
| 14- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY RULE 9B-72 |
| FOR: |
| A) SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS.TWO DIFFERENT PRODUCT |
| APPROVALS WERE SUBMITTED. ONLY THE ONE FOR LARGE |
| MISSILE IMPACT CAN BE USED FOR OPENINGS BELOW 30'-0" |
| HIGH. PROVIDE 2 COPIES. |
| |
| B) SHINGLES. |
| |
| C) BAHAMA SHUTTERS AND COLONIAL SHUTTERS SHOWN ON |
| EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS. AND PROVIDE COMPLETE INSTALLATION |
| SCHEDULE. SEE ATTACHED INSTALLATION SCHEDULE SAMPLE. |
| PROVIDE ALL REQUIRED INFORMATION. |
| |
| D) PRECAST LINTELS. |
| |
| E) ENTRY DOORS. |
| |
| F) REAR DOORS. |
| |
| G) ALL STRUCTURAL SIMPSON OR USP CONNECTORS |
| SPECIFIED ON PLANS ANDDETAILS. |
| |
| |
| 15- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING |
| (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS |
| REQUIRED BY SEC. 106.3.3 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| |
| 16- DUPLEX REQUIRES TWO SEPARATE ADDRESSESAND PLANS |
| NEED TO BE REVISED SHOWING CORRECT ADDRESS.PLEASE |
| CONTACT LILLY URSU AT (561)822-1239 TO GET CORRECT |
| ADDRESS. |
| |
| 17- PROVIDE SURVEYS (TWO) SHOWING REVISED PARKING |
| SPACES.NOTE: ORIGINAL SEAL AND SIGNATURE. |
| |
| 18- ENGINEER TO SEE ATTACHED COPY OF FLORIDA STATUTE |
| REGARDING REVIEW OF DESIGN PROFESSIONAL DOCUMENTS. |
| |
| |
| ***NOTE: |
| ONE COPY OF PLANS WILL BE SEND TO THE BOARD OF |
| ENGINEERS FOR THEIR REVIEW. |
| |
| |
| JULIO GOMEZ |
| BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| (561)805-6712 |