Plan Review Notes
Plan Review Notes For Permit 06120129
Permit Number 06120129
Review Stop B
Sequence Number 2
Notes
Date Text
2007-04-29 13:47:47****CORRECTIONS****
  
 SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 561-805-6724 [email protected]
  
 FBCFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004
 FBC EBFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 EXISTING BUILDING
 CODE
 FBC*CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE
 FBC2004
  
 1.)A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO
 PERMIT PICKUP, FS713.13.
  
 2.)IMPACT FEES MUST BE PAID TO PALM BEACH COUNTY
 PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE, 2300 N JOG RD.THE PLANS
 MUST BE STAMPED AND THE RECEIPT ATTACHED TO THE
 APPLICATION.PLEASE CALL 561-233-5025 FOR MORE
 INFORMATION.
  
 3.)RADON FEES HAVE BEEN ADDED FS553.721.THIS MAY BE
 ADJUSTED AFTER EXACT BUILDING SIZE IS DETERMINED.
  
 4.) FBC* 109.3.7RESIDENT INSPECTOR. SUBMIT INSPECTOR
 RESUME' AND LICENSE DOCUMENTS TO HAROLD PISKURA,
 DIRECTOR OF THE RESIDENT INSPECTOR PROGRAM.A RESIDENT
 INSPECTOR PROGRAM IS REQUIRED, ON THIS PROJECT, DUE TO
 ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING:
 - BUILDINGS/ADDITIONS OF TYPE I OR II
 CONSTRUCTION
 - ANY MAJOR STRUCTURAL ALTERATIONS
 - STRUCTURES IN WHICH THE CONCRETE
 DESIGN IS BASED ON COMPRESSIVE
 STRENGTH (F'C) IN EXCESS OF 3000 PSI
 - PILE DRIVING
 - BUILDINGS OVER 20,000 SQFT IN AREA
 - BUILDINGS OVER 2 STORIES IN HEIGHT
 - BUILDING/STRUCTURES OF UNUSUAL DESIGN OR METHODS
 OF CONSTRUCTION
  
 ALSO, PLEASE ARRANGE WITH HAROLD PISKURA (INSPECTION
 SERVICES MANAGER - TEL:
 561 805 6711), A MEETING INVOLVING THE OWNER, RESIDENT
 INSPECTOR, JOB INSPECTOR, CONTRACTOR AND ENGINEER. THIS
 MUST BE DONE PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE.THREE ORIGINAL
 SETS OF ALL DOCUMENTS ARE REQUIRED FOR PERMITTING.
  
 2ND REVIEW ? THREE SETS OF PLANS SUBMITTED, ONLY TWO
 SETS OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION SUBMITTED.THREE SETS
 OF ALL DOCUMENTS REQUIRED, SEE FIRST REVIEW.
  
 5.)ADDRESSED.
  
 6.)ALL INFORMATION REQUIRED BY FAC61G16-23.002 IS
 REQUIRED TO BE ON EACH SHEET SEALED BY THE ENGINEER
 (CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION).
  
 2ND REVIEW - THIS WAS DONE ON THE PLANS BUT NOT ON THE
 CALCS.
 7-8.)ADDRESSED.
  
 9.)DECLARE MEAN ROOF HEIGHT, FBC CHAPTER 5..NOTE
 THAT THE SHINGLE PRODUCT APPROVAL IS LIMITED TO A MRH
 OF LESS THAN 33 FEET.PLEASE CONTACT ME TO DISCUSS IF
 THIS IS AN ISSUE.
  
 2ND REVIEW ? MRH IS GREATER THAN 33?.SUBMIT COMPLIANT
 PRODUCT APPROVALS.
  
 10.)ADDRESSED.
  
 11.)SHEET A1.0 REFERS TO OCCUPANCY SEPARATION; IS
 THIS REFERRING TO TENANT SEPARATION?
  
 2ND REVIEW ? OCCUPANCY SEPARATION ALSO REQUIRED, AS
 WELL AS EXTERIOR WALL FIRE RATING REQUIREMENT.SEE
 OTHER COMMENTS AND INCLUDE ON A1.0.
  
 12-13.)ADDRESSED.
  
 14.)SEE FBC406, FBC311.3.THE GARAGES AND ACCESS TO
 THE INDIVIDUAL GARAGE SPACES ACT AS A PARKING GARAGE.
 OCCUPANCY SEPARATION REQUIRED FBC302.3.2, BOTH
 HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL.PENETRATIONS AND DUCTS TO BE
 PROTECTED, FBC716, FBC712.
  
 2ND REVIEW ? THE RESPONSE LETTER STATES THAT ?ALTERNATE
 METHOD? IS TO BE USED.WHAT ALTERNATE METHOD?WHERE
 IN THE CODE IS THIS ALLOWED?THIS COMMENT WAS NOT
 PROPERLY ADDRESSED ON THE PLAN.
  
 15.)ADDRESSED.
  
 16.)THE PARKING GARAGE VENTILATION TO BE IN
 COMPLIANCE WITH FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, MECHANICAL.
  
 16.)NFPA 13 SYSTEM REQUIRED AS PARKING GARAGE IS NOT
 A RESIDENTIAL OCCUPANCY, SEE NFPA 13R 1.1, NFPA 101.
 ALSO SEE FBC504.2, NFPA 13 SYSTEM REQUIRED IF YOU ARE
 USING AREA MODIFICATIONS FOR SPRINKLED BUILDINGS.
  
 2ND REVIEW ? THE RESPONSE LETTER STATES THIS IS NOT
 NEEDED.HOWEVER, NFPA 13 SYSTEM WILL BE REQUIRED IF
 YOU USE SPRINKLERS FOR AREA INCREASES.SEE OTHER
 COMMENTS.
  
 17.)A5.2, DESIGNER HAS NOT PROVIDED CALCULATIONS IN
 REGARDS TO OPENINGS FOR THE REAR ELEVATION FBC704.8.
 NOTE THAT DISTANCE IS TO BE MEASURED TO THE CENTER OF
 THE ALLEY FOR DISTANCE TO ASSUMED PROPERTY LINE.
  
 2ND REVIEW ? NOT PROPERLY ADDRESSED.ARCHITECT STATES
 THAT 75% IS ALLOWED, 26.28% PROVIDED.THIS IS FOR
 PROTECTED OPENINGS.UNPROTECTED OPENINGS ARE LIMITED
 TO 26.28%.DISTANCE TO PROPERTY LINE IS 11?, SHOULD BE
 USING DISTANCE TO ASSUMED PROPERTY LINE WHICH APPEARS
 TO BE APPROX 26?.
  
 RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION, A1.2, APPEARS TO BE 35? TO
 ASSUMED PROPERTY LINE.UNLIMITED OPENINGS ALLOWED.IT
 IS NOT CLEAR WHY YOU HAVE INCLUDED THIS CALCULATION.
  
 18-23.) ADDRESSED.
  
 23.)DECLARE TOTAL BUILDING SIZE.SHOW COMPLIANCE
 WITH FBC TABLE 503.SHOW AREA INCREASE CALCULATIONS ON
 THE PLAN.PLEASE SEE DEFINITION OF BUILDING AREA, TO
 INCLUDE AREA INCLUDED WITHIN THE HORIZONTAL PROJECTION
 OF THE FLOOR ABOVE (FIRST FLOOR AREA COVERED BY
 BALCONIES ON SECOND FLOOR TO BE INCLUDED).DECLARE
 TOTAL SQUARE FOOT AREA FOR EACH OCCUPANCY
 CLASSIFICATION.
  
 2ND REVIEW ? OVERALL DIMENSIONS S1.1 ARE 228?7X104?4,
 WHICH WOULD BE OVER 23,000 SF, BUT YOU DECLARED MUCH
 LESS FOR EACH FLOOR.SEE DEFINITION OF BUILDING AREA,
 FBC 502. ALSO ARCHITECT STATES IN THE CALCULATIONS THAT
 AREA INCREASE IS 28000 SF WITHOUT SPRINKLERS, BUT
 STATES THAT 48,000 IS ALLOWED.AREA INCREASES FOR
 SPRINKLERS REQUIRES NFPA13 SYSTEM, FBC 504.2.
  
 24.)ADDRESSED.
  
 25.)WIND DESIGN CRITERIA ON CALCULATIONS PREPARED BY
 RICARDO DIAZ, PE STATES EXPOSURE C BUT THE CALCULATIONS
 WERE RUN USING EXPOSURE B.SHEET S1.0 ALSO DECLARES
 EXPOSURE B.
  
 2ND REVIEW ? REMOVE OLD SHEETS AND REPLACE WITH NEW
 SHEETS.
  
 26.)CALCULATIONS WERE DONE USING ASCE7-05.SEE
 FBC35, ASCE7-02 IS THE CORRECT STANDARD.
  
 2ND REVIEW ? REMOVE OLD SHEETS AND REPLACE WITH NEW
 SHEETS.
  
 27.)THE AGREEMENT FOR UNITY OF TITLE IS NOT SIGNED BY
 ALL PARTIES AND OWNER ON THE UNITY OF TITLE IS NOT THE
 OWNER OF RECORD (CLERK?S OFFICE).THIS ISSUE IS
 REQUIRED TO BE RESOLVED PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE.THE
 PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT CROSSES THE PROPERTY LINE WHICH
 WOULD NOT BE ALLOWED WITHOUT A FIREWALL, FBC CHAPTER
 6.
  
 28.)ADDRESSED.
  
 29.)STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS ARE TO COMPLY WITH FBC TABLE
 601.SHOW CALCULATED FIRE RESISTANCE OR LISTED
 ASSEMBLY.
  
 2ND REVIEW ? 2 HOUR WALL REQUIRED FOR EXTERIOR WALLS,
 BUT THIS IS NOT NOTED ANYWHERE ON THE PLAN OTHER THAN
 THE DETAIL.PLEASE NOTE ON THE SITE PLAN,
 ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS.
  
 30-36.) ADDESSED.
  
 37.)PROVIDE A DETAIL FOR U301, A7.1.
  
 2ND REVIEW ? I BELIEVE THIS WAS ADDRESSED, BUT THE NEW
 DETAIL IS NOT LABELED WITH ASSEMBLY NUMBER OR FIRE
 RATING.
  
 38-44.) ADDRESSED.
  
 NEW COMMENTS:
  
 45.)S1.0, 3 N REFERS TO FBC 2001.OTHER ASTM AND ACI
 REFERENCES ARE EXPIRED.CHECK ALL.
  
 46.)THERE ARE THREE CONFLICTS/INCONSISTENCIES BETWEEN
 THE SOILS (WHICH ENGINEER REFERS TO ON S1.0) AND THE
 SOILS ENGINEER RECOMMENDATIONS.THEY ARE AS FOLLOWS:
  
 A. S1.1 SPECS 6ML VAPOR BARRIER, SOILS RECOMMENDS 10ML
 MINIMUM.
  
 B. S5, WF16 IS 16INCH FOOTING, SOILS RECOMMENDS 24INCH
 MINIMUM.THE DESIGN OF COLUMNS ON EITHER SIDE OF THIS
 VERY SHORT FOOTING UNDER THE GARAGE DOOR IS NOTED.
  
 C. ENGINEER REFERS TO THE FOUNDATION CONDITIONS.
 NOWHERE ON THE PLAN DOES IT MENTION THE EXCAVATION
 REQUIREMENT.PLEASE CONFIRM THAT THIS REPORT HAS BEEN
 ADDRESSED.
  
 47.)A1.2, TRASH COMPACTOR GATES SWING OVER THE PUBLIC
 WAY, FBC3202.2.
  
 48.)A5.2, ?LEFT ELEVATION? IS ON THE RIGHT ON A1.
 THE LONG SIDES ARE LABELED ?FRONT? AND ?REAR? BUT BOTH
 HAVE UNIT ENTRANCES AND FACE STREETS.
  
 49.)PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE TO BE REVIEWED BY DESIGNER
 OF RECORD, FBC*106.3.3.
  
  


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved