Date |
Text |
2007-04-29 13:47:47 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| |
| SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| 561-805-6724 [email protected] |
| |
| FBCFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 |
| FBC EBFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 EXISTING BUILDING |
| CODE |
| FBC*CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE |
| FBC2004 |
| |
| 1.)A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO |
| PERMIT PICKUP, FS713.13. |
| |
| 2.)IMPACT FEES MUST BE PAID TO PALM BEACH COUNTY |
| PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE, 2300 N JOG RD.THE PLANS |
| MUST BE STAMPED AND THE RECEIPT ATTACHED TO THE |
| APPLICATION.PLEASE CALL 561-233-5025 FOR MORE |
| INFORMATION. |
| |
| 3.)RADON FEES HAVE BEEN ADDED FS553.721.THIS MAY BE |
| ADJUSTED AFTER EXACT BUILDING SIZE IS DETERMINED. |
| |
| 4.) FBC* 109.3.7RESIDENT INSPECTOR. SUBMIT INSPECTOR |
| RESUME' AND LICENSE DOCUMENTS TO HAROLD PISKURA, |
| DIRECTOR OF THE RESIDENT INSPECTOR PROGRAM.A RESIDENT |
| INSPECTOR PROGRAM IS REQUIRED, ON THIS PROJECT, DUE TO |
| ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING: |
| - BUILDINGS/ADDITIONS OF TYPE I OR II |
| CONSTRUCTION |
| - ANY MAJOR STRUCTURAL ALTERATIONS |
| - STRUCTURES IN WHICH THE CONCRETE |
| DESIGN IS BASED ON COMPRESSIVE |
| STRENGTH (F'C) IN EXCESS OF 3000 PSI |
| - PILE DRIVING |
| - BUILDINGS OVER 20,000 SQFT IN AREA |
| - BUILDINGS OVER 2 STORIES IN HEIGHT |
| - BUILDING/STRUCTURES OF UNUSUAL DESIGN OR METHODS |
| OF CONSTRUCTION |
| |
| ALSO, PLEASE ARRANGE WITH HAROLD PISKURA (INSPECTION |
| SERVICES MANAGER - TEL: |
| 561 805 6711), A MEETING INVOLVING THE OWNER, RESIDENT |
| INSPECTOR, JOB INSPECTOR, CONTRACTOR AND ENGINEER. THIS |
| MUST BE DONE PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE.THREE ORIGINAL |
| SETS OF ALL DOCUMENTS ARE REQUIRED FOR PERMITTING. |
| |
| 2ND REVIEW ? THREE SETS OF PLANS SUBMITTED, ONLY TWO |
| SETS OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION SUBMITTED.THREE SETS |
| OF ALL DOCUMENTS REQUIRED, SEE FIRST REVIEW. |
| |
| 5.)ADDRESSED. |
| |
| 6.)ALL INFORMATION REQUIRED BY FAC61G16-23.002 IS |
| REQUIRED TO BE ON EACH SHEET SEALED BY THE ENGINEER |
| (CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION). |
| |
| 2ND REVIEW - THIS WAS DONE ON THE PLANS BUT NOT ON THE |
| CALCS. |
| 7-8.)ADDRESSED. |
| |
| 9.)DECLARE MEAN ROOF HEIGHT, FBC CHAPTER 5..NOTE |
| THAT THE SHINGLE PRODUCT APPROVAL IS LIMITED TO A MRH |
| OF LESS THAN 33 FEET.PLEASE CONTACT ME TO DISCUSS IF |
| THIS IS AN ISSUE. |
| |
| 2ND REVIEW ? MRH IS GREATER THAN 33?.SUBMIT COMPLIANT |
| PRODUCT APPROVALS. |
| |
| 10.)ADDRESSED. |
| |
| 11.)SHEET A1.0 REFERS TO OCCUPANCY SEPARATION; IS |
| THIS REFERRING TO TENANT SEPARATION? |
| |
| 2ND REVIEW ? OCCUPANCY SEPARATION ALSO REQUIRED, AS |
| WELL AS EXTERIOR WALL FIRE RATING REQUIREMENT.SEE |
| OTHER COMMENTS AND INCLUDE ON A1.0. |
| |
| 12-13.)ADDRESSED. |
| |
| 14.)SEE FBC406, FBC311.3.THE GARAGES AND ACCESS TO |
| THE INDIVIDUAL GARAGE SPACES ACT AS A PARKING GARAGE. |
| OCCUPANCY SEPARATION REQUIRED FBC302.3.2, BOTH |
| HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL.PENETRATIONS AND DUCTS TO BE |
| PROTECTED, FBC716, FBC712. |
| |
| 2ND REVIEW ? THE RESPONSE LETTER STATES THAT ?ALTERNATE |
| METHOD? IS TO BE USED.WHAT ALTERNATE METHOD?WHERE |
| IN THE CODE IS THIS ALLOWED?THIS COMMENT WAS NOT |
| PROPERLY ADDRESSED ON THE PLAN. |
| |
| 15.)ADDRESSED. |
| |
| 16.)THE PARKING GARAGE VENTILATION TO BE IN |
| COMPLIANCE WITH FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, MECHANICAL. |
| |
| 16.)NFPA 13 SYSTEM REQUIRED AS PARKING GARAGE IS NOT |
| A RESIDENTIAL OCCUPANCY, SEE NFPA 13R 1.1, NFPA 101. |
| ALSO SEE FBC504.2, NFPA 13 SYSTEM REQUIRED IF YOU ARE |
| USING AREA MODIFICATIONS FOR SPRINKLED BUILDINGS. |
| |
| 2ND REVIEW ? THE RESPONSE LETTER STATES THIS IS NOT |
| NEEDED.HOWEVER, NFPA 13 SYSTEM WILL BE REQUIRED IF |
| YOU USE SPRINKLERS FOR AREA INCREASES.SEE OTHER |
| COMMENTS. |
| |
| 17.)A5.2, DESIGNER HAS NOT PROVIDED CALCULATIONS IN |
| REGARDS TO OPENINGS FOR THE REAR ELEVATION FBC704.8. |
| NOTE THAT DISTANCE IS TO BE MEASURED TO THE CENTER OF |
| THE ALLEY FOR DISTANCE TO ASSUMED PROPERTY LINE. |
| |
| 2ND REVIEW ? NOT PROPERLY ADDRESSED.ARCHITECT STATES |
| THAT 75% IS ALLOWED, 26.28% PROVIDED.THIS IS FOR |
| PROTECTED OPENINGS.UNPROTECTED OPENINGS ARE LIMITED |
| TO 26.28%.DISTANCE TO PROPERTY LINE IS 11?, SHOULD BE |
| USING DISTANCE TO ASSUMED PROPERTY LINE WHICH APPEARS |
| TO BE APPROX 26?. |
| |
| RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION, A1.2, APPEARS TO BE 35? TO |
| ASSUMED PROPERTY LINE.UNLIMITED OPENINGS ALLOWED.IT |
| IS NOT CLEAR WHY YOU HAVE INCLUDED THIS CALCULATION. |
| |
| 18-23.) ADDRESSED. |
| |
| 23.)DECLARE TOTAL BUILDING SIZE.SHOW COMPLIANCE |
| WITH FBC TABLE 503.SHOW AREA INCREASE CALCULATIONS ON |
| THE PLAN.PLEASE SEE DEFINITION OF BUILDING AREA, TO |
| INCLUDE AREA INCLUDED WITHIN THE HORIZONTAL PROJECTION |
| OF THE FLOOR ABOVE (FIRST FLOOR AREA COVERED BY |
| BALCONIES ON SECOND FLOOR TO BE INCLUDED).DECLARE |
| TOTAL SQUARE FOOT AREA FOR EACH OCCUPANCY |
| CLASSIFICATION. |
| |
| 2ND REVIEW ? OVERALL DIMENSIONS S1.1 ARE 228?7X104?4, |
| WHICH WOULD BE OVER 23,000 SF, BUT YOU DECLARED MUCH |
| LESS FOR EACH FLOOR.SEE DEFINITION OF BUILDING AREA, |
| FBC 502. ALSO ARCHITECT STATES IN THE CALCULATIONS THAT |
| AREA INCREASE IS 28000 SF WITHOUT SPRINKLERS, BUT |
| STATES THAT 48,000 IS ALLOWED.AREA INCREASES FOR |
| SPRINKLERS REQUIRES NFPA13 SYSTEM, FBC 504.2. |
| |
| 24.)ADDRESSED. |
| |
| 25.)WIND DESIGN CRITERIA ON CALCULATIONS PREPARED BY |
| RICARDO DIAZ, PE STATES EXPOSURE C BUT THE CALCULATIONS |
| WERE RUN USING EXPOSURE B.SHEET S1.0 ALSO DECLARES |
| EXPOSURE B. |
| |
| 2ND REVIEW ? REMOVE OLD SHEETS AND REPLACE WITH NEW |
| SHEETS. |
| |
| 26.)CALCULATIONS WERE DONE USING ASCE7-05.SEE |
| FBC35, ASCE7-02 IS THE CORRECT STANDARD. |
| |
| 2ND REVIEW ? REMOVE OLD SHEETS AND REPLACE WITH NEW |
| SHEETS. |
| |
| 27.)THE AGREEMENT FOR UNITY OF TITLE IS NOT SIGNED BY |
| ALL PARTIES AND OWNER ON THE UNITY OF TITLE IS NOT THE |
| OWNER OF RECORD (CLERK?S OFFICE).THIS ISSUE IS |
| REQUIRED TO BE RESOLVED PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE.THE |
| PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT CROSSES THE PROPERTY LINE WHICH |
| WOULD NOT BE ALLOWED WITHOUT A FIREWALL, FBC CHAPTER |
| 6. |
| |
| 28.)ADDRESSED. |
| |
| 29.)STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS ARE TO COMPLY WITH FBC TABLE |
| 601.SHOW CALCULATED FIRE RESISTANCE OR LISTED |
| ASSEMBLY. |
| |
| 2ND REVIEW ? 2 HOUR WALL REQUIRED FOR EXTERIOR WALLS, |
| BUT THIS IS NOT NOTED ANYWHERE ON THE PLAN OTHER THAN |
| THE DETAIL.PLEASE NOTE ON THE SITE PLAN, |
| ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS. |
| |
| 30-36.) ADDESSED. |
| |
| 37.)PROVIDE A DETAIL FOR U301, A7.1. |
| |
| 2ND REVIEW ? I BELIEVE THIS WAS ADDRESSED, BUT THE NEW |
| DETAIL IS NOT LABELED WITH ASSEMBLY NUMBER OR FIRE |
| RATING. |
| |
| 38-44.) ADDRESSED. |
| |
| NEW COMMENTS: |
| |
| 45.)S1.0, 3 N REFERS TO FBC 2001.OTHER ASTM AND ACI |
| REFERENCES ARE EXPIRED.CHECK ALL. |
| |
| 46.)THERE ARE THREE CONFLICTS/INCONSISTENCIES BETWEEN |
| THE SOILS (WHICH ENGINEER REFERS TO ON S1.0) AND THE |
| SOILS ENGINEER RECOMMENDATIONS.THEY ARE AS FOLLOWS: |
| |
| A. S1.1 SPECS 6ML VAPOR BARRIER, SOILS RECOMMENDS 10ML |
| MINIMUM. |
| |
| B. S5, WF16 IS 16INCH FOOTING, SOILS RECOMMENDS 24INCH |
| MINIMUM.THE DESIGN OF COLUMNS ON EITHER SIDE OF THIS |
| VERY SHORT FOOTING UNDER THE GARAGE DOOR IS NOTED. |
| |
| C. ENGINEER REFERS TO THE FOUNDATION CONDITIONS. |
| NOWHERE ON THE PLAN DOES IT MENTION THE EXCAVATION |
| REQUIREMENT.PLEASE CONFIRM THAT THIS REPORT HAS BEEN |
| ADDRESSED. |
| |
| 47.)A1.2, TRASH COMPACTOR GATES SWING OVER THE PUBLIC |
| WAY, FBC3202.2. |
| |
| 48.)A5.2, ?LEFT ELEVATION? IS ON THE RIGHT ON A1. |
| THE LONG SIDES ARE LABELED ?FRONT? AND ?REAR? BUT BOTH |
| HAVE UNIT ENTRANCES AND FACE STREETS. |
| |
| 49.)PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE TO BE REVIEWED BY DESIGNER |
| OF RECORD, FBC*106.3.3. |
| |
| |