Date |
Text |
2007-03-19 11:00:57 | DENIED BY BUILDING |
| |
| 1) A RECORDED COPY OF THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT |
| MUST BE SUBMITTED BEFORE A |
| PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED. |
| |
| 2) SUBMIT THE INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS WITH THE DESIGN |
| PRESSURES FOR THE IMPACT WINDOWS. PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION |
| THAT THE WINDOWS HAVE BEEN TESTED FOR LARGE MISSLE |
| IMPACT. (ITEM #6 FROM FIRST REVIEW.) |
| |
| 3)SUBMIT PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE STRUCTURAL |
| MULLIONS BETWEEN THE CASEMENT AND FIXED GLASS ARCHED |
| WINDOWS. (ITEM #7 FROM FIRST REVIEW.) |
| |
| 4) THE DEMOLITION PLAN ON SHEET D-1.1 IS STILL |
| INDICATING SIX WINDOW OPENINGS AND THE NEW ELEVATION ON |
| A-1.1 SHOWS FIVE NEW WINDOWS. PLEASE CLARIFY. |
| |
| 5)ON SHEETS A-1.1 AND A-1.2 THE FLORIDA PRODUCT |
| APPROVAL NUMBERS FOR THE WINDOWS ARE LISTED ON THE |
| PLANS PRECEDED BY FBC. THIS IS INCORRECT. THE NUMERALS |
| SHOULD BE PRECEDED BY FL #. PLEASE CORRECT. |
| |
| 6)HAVE A FLORIDA REGISTERED STRUCTURAL ENGINEER |
| PERFORM A STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF THE EXISTING AND |
| PROPOSED SOUTH WALL OF THE BUILDING AND EXISTING STUCCO |
| AND WIRE LATH ATTACHMENT TO THE WOOD FRAME WALL. SUBMIT |
| A SIGNED AND SEALED LETTER STATING THAT THE EXISTING |
| WOOD FRAME STUCCO WALLS AND PARAPET ARE CAPABLE OF |
| SAFELY SUPPORTING THE ADDITIONAL DEAD LOADS THAT WILL |
| BE IMPOSED BY THE ADDITION OF THE CULTURED BRICK AND |
| TRIM TO THE EXISTING FACADE AND RESIST THE LIVE LOADS |
| OF A 140 MPH WINDLOAD. |
| |
| 7) SPECIFY HOW THE CULTURED VENEER WILL BE ATTACHED TO |
| THE EXISTING WALL. SEE THE ENCLOSED INSTALLATION |
| INSTRUCTIONS. |
| |
| NOTE: INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS AND MSDS FOR THE |
| CULTURED BRICK HAVE BEEN DOWNLOADED AND INSERTED INTO |
| YOUR SUBMITTAL PACKAGE. |
| |
| ROBERT MCDOUGAL |
| BLDG. PLAN REVIEW |
| (561)805-6714 |
| |