| Date |
Text |
| 2007-06-28 13:40:45 | PREMIER PARK BUILDING #3 |
| | |
| | |
| | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | PERMIT: 06110349 |
| | ADD: 5720 PREMIER PARK DR. BLDG# 3 |
| | CONT:GLOBAL CONSTRUCTION ASSOCIATES LLC |
| | TEL: (954)444-8463 |
| | |
| | |
| | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE WITH 2006 |
| | REVISIONS |
| | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS ADMINISTRATIVE CODE |
| | |
| | 1STREVIEW- AS APERMIT APPLICATION! |
| | ACTION: DENIED |
| | |
| | |
| | 1)--- VERY IMPORTANT STATEMENT --- |
| | PLEASE DO NOT IGNORE! |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE REMOVE & REPLACE ANY |
| | PAGES AS NECESSARY. |
| | A TRANSMITTAL LETTERLISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW |
| | COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION |
| | MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE |
| | THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR |
| | PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. |
| | |
| | 2)FL S S 713.13 |
| | NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT, TO BE FILED WITH THE CLERK OF |
| | THE COURT BEFORE A PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED. NOTE: |
| | 713.13(2) IF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THE NOTICE OF |
| | COMMENCEMENT IS NOT ACTUALLY COMMENCED WITHIN 90 DAYS |
| | AFTER THE RECORDING THEREOF, SUCH NOTICE IS NULL & |
| | VOID. |
| | |
| | 3) 2ND REQUEST, STRUCTURAL SHEETS INDICATE A SOILS TEST |
| | WAS CONDUCTED BY NUTTING ENGINEERING, PROJECT# 14157.1, |
| | JULY 17, 2006. PLEASE PROVIDE 3 ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS |
| | SIGNED AND SEALED. |
| | FL BLD CODE 1804.2.2 QUESTIONABLE SOILS, WHERE THE |
| | BEARINGCAPACITY IS NOT DEFINETLY KNOWN OR IS IN |
| | QUESTION. WHERE THE BEARING CAPACITY OF THE SOIL IS NOT |
| | DEFINITLY KNOWN OR IS IN QUESTION THE BUILDING OFFICIAL |
| | MAY REQUIRE EXPLORATIONS, TEST OR OTHER ADEQUATE PROOF |
| | AS TO THE PERMISSIBLE SAFE BEARING |
| | CAPACITY. REQUIRED TEST AND RECOMMENDATIONS SUBMITTED |
| | TO VERIFY BEARING CAPACITY SHALL BE CERTIFIED BY A |
| | GEOTECHNICAL |
| | REPORT FROM A DESIGN PROFESSIONAL PROPERLY LICENSED IN |
| | THE STATE OF FLORIDA. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 4 A) FBC* 105.3RESIDENT INSPECTOR. SUBMIT INSPECTOR |
| | RESUME' AND LICENSE DOCUMENTS TO HAROLD PISKURA, |
| | DIRECTOR OF THE RESIDENT INSPECTOR PROGRAM.A RESIDENT |
| | INSPECTOR PROGRAM IS REQUIRED, ON THIS PROJECT, DUE TO |
| | ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING: |
| | - BUILDINGS/ADDITIONS OF TYPE I OR II |
| | CONSTRUCTION |
| | - ANY MAJOR STRUCTURAL ALTERATIONS |
| | - STRUCTURES IN WHICH THE CONCRETE |
| | DESIGN IS BASED ON COMPRESSIVE |
| | STRENGTH (F'C) IN EXCESS OF 3000 PSI |
| | - PILE DRIVING |
| | - BUILDINGS OVER 20,000 SQ FT IN AREA |
| | - BUILDINGS OVER 2 STORIES IN HEIGHT |
| | - BUILDING/STRUCTURES OF UNUSUAL DESIGN |
| | OR METHODS OF CONSTRUCTION |
| | |
| | 4B) SECOND REQUEST, SINCE THIS BUILDING WILL REQUIRE A |
| | RESIDENT INSPECTORSUBMITTALS(3) SETS OF PLANS, |
| | REPORTS, AND OR OTHER REQUIRED SUBMITTALS (PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS) WILL BE REQUIRED FOR REVIEW. |
| | |
| | 5) SHEET A-0 CODE ANALYSIS: |
| | |
| | 5A) SECOND REQUEST, CONSTRUCTION TYPE: PLANS INDICATE A |
| | BUILDING TYPE III-(UNPROTECTED) |
| | ( SPRINKLED) TO TAKE THE UNLIMITED AREA PROVISIONS IN |
| | 507.2THE CODE REQUIRES THE BUILDINGS TO ?FIRE |
| | SPRINKLED?, REQUIRING A FIRE SPRINKLER PLAN. |
| | |
| | 5B) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 5C) NEW COMMENT: CODE ANALYSIS BLDG# 1 SEE UNLIMITED |
| | BLDG AREA 507.2 CORRECT THE 60 YARDS TO 60 FEET. |
| | |
| | 5D) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 5E)COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 5F) SECOND REQUEST,507.2 REQUIRES THE FIRE SPRINKLER |
| | PLANS FOR THE UNLIMITED AREA INCREASE! THE CODE |
| | ANALYSIS ALSO INDICATED THAT THIS IS TO BE A FIRE |
| | SPRINKLED BUILDING BUT NO FIRE SPRINKLER PLANS , |
| | HYDRAULICS,FIRE PUMP OR FIRE PUMP CONTROLLER WERE |
| | SUBMITTED.FOR A BUILDING PERMIT TO BE ISSUED FOR |
| | MINIMUM PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA 106.3.51.1(4)* FIRE |
| | SPRINKLER PLANS ARE REQUIRED. 903.2.3 GROUP F-1.AN |
| | AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM SHALL BE PROVIDED THROUGHOUT |
| | ALL BUILDINGS CONTAINING A GROUP F-1 OCCUPANCY WHERE |
| | ONE OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS EXISTS: |
| | 1.WHERE A GROUP F-1 FIRE AREA EXCEEDS 12,000 SQUARE |
| | FEET (1115 M 2 ). |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 6)COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 7)SECOND REQUEST,FL BLD CODE 1609.1.4: COMPONENTS |
| | & CLADDING, PROVIDE 2 COPIES(3 IF THRESHOLD OR RESIDENT |
| | INSPECTOR) OF PRODUCT TESTING REPORTS ,MISSING REPORTS |
| | ARE AS FOLLOWS: |
| | A) STOREFRONT WINDOWS |
| | B) MULLIONS |
| | C) SKYLIGHTS |
| | D) EXTERIOR GLAZED DOORS |
| | E) EXTERIOR HOLLOW METAL DOORS |
| | F) ROLL UP DOORS |
| | G) LOUVERS |
| | H) ROOFING ASSEMBLIES |
| | |
| | 1609.1.4 PROTECTION OF OPENINGS IN WIND-BORNE DEBRIS |
| | REGIONS, EXTERIOR GLAZING THAT RECEIVES POSITIVE |
| | PRESSURE IN THE LOWER 60 FEET (18.3 M) IN BUILDINGS |
| | SHALL BE ASSUMED TO BE OPENINGS AND THE BALANCE OF |
| | GLAZED OPENINGS IN THE REST OF THE BUILDING SHALL BE |
| | ASSUMED TO BE ZERO UNLESS SUCH GLAZING THAT RECEIVES |
| | POSITIVE PRESSURE IS IMPACT RESISTANT OR PROTECTED WITH |
| | AN IMPACT RESISTANT COVERING MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS |
| | OF SSTD 12, ASTM E 1886 AND ASTM E 1996, OR MIAMI-DADE |
| | TAS 201, 202 AND 203 REFERENCED THEREIN AS FOLLOWS: 1. |
| | GLAZED OPENINGS LOCATED WITHIN 30 FEET (9.1 M) OF GRADE |
| | SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE LARGE MISSILE TEST. |
| | 2.GLAZED OPENINGS LOCATED MORE THAN 30 FEET (9.1 |
| | M) ABOVE GRADE SHALL MEET |
| | THE PROVISIONS OF THE SMALL MISSILE TEST. |
| | |
| | 8)PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED WITH PERMIT |
| | APPLICATION AFTER OCTOBER 1, 2003 ARE REQUIRED TO |
| | COMPLY WITH THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL SYSTEM. FOR |
| | INFORMATION |
| | PLEASE SEE THE STATE WEBSITE AT |
| | WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG. PRODUCTS WITH STATEWIDE |
| | APPROVAL ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED WITH A COVER |
| | SHEET THAT LISTS THE PRODUCT IDENTITY NUMBER FROM THE |
| | STATE. IF THE PRODUCT DOES NOT HAVE STATEWIDE APPROVAL, |
| | SUBMIT AN APPLICATION FOR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL OR |
| | SITE SPECIFIC FORM PER RULE 9B-72. SEE ATTACHMENT. |
| | WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG |
| | |
| | 9)WPB ADMIN CODE 106.3* PRODUCT APPROVALS. THOSE |
| | PRODUCT WHICH ARE REGULATED BY DCA RULE 9B-72 SHALL BE |
| | REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF |
| | RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | 10) THIS SUBMITTAL DOESN'T INCORPORATE ANY ROOFING |
| | PRODUCT APPROVALS, HERE IS A LIST OF COMMON ISSUES THAT |
| | WILL FAIL A ROOFING REPORT SUBMITTAL:THIS ROOF IS |
| | MISSING OR NOT INCOMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOW |
| | ITEMS: |
| | ___ CONTRACTOR DID NOT PROVIDE THE MEAN ROOF HEIGHT. |
| | ___ CONTRACTOR DID NOT INDICATE THE ROOF PITCH. ___ |
| | CONTRACTOR FAILED TO INDICATE WHICH SYSTEM OR SUBSYSTEM |
| | WILL BE USED. |
| | ___ THE SYSTEM PROVIDED HAS A LOWPRESSURE FOR ZONE |
| | ___ . |
| | ___ THE SYSTEM PROVIDED STATES LIMITATION# 7, SHOULD |
| | THE FASTENERRESISTANCE BE LESS THAN THATREQUIRED, |
| | AS DETERMINED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL, A REVISED |
| | FASTENER SPACING, PREPAREDSIGNEDAND SEALED BY A |
| | FLORIDA REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, REGISTERED |
| | ARCHITECT OR REGISTERED ROOF CONSULTANT MAY BE |
| | SUBMITTED. |
| | ___ THE SYSTEM PROVIDED INDICATES LIMITATION# 9, NO |
| | ENHANCED FASTENING ALLOWED. |
| | |
| | 11) 2ND REQUEST,SHEET A-8 PRECAST MOLDING DETAIL IS |
| | MISSING DETAIL REFERENCE NUMBER. |
| | FOUND ON SHEET A-15 DETAIL # 7. PLEASE PROVIDE |
| | CALCULATIONS WITH SAFETY FACTOR FOR THE SECURING THIS |
| | WEIGHT IN THIS MANNER.106.1.2*ADDITIONAL INFORMATION |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 12) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 13) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 14)SHEET A-14 DETAILS 8& 9 INDICATE THE USE OF WIRE |
| | LATH ON SOFFITS AND CEILING APPLICATIONS. THE PLAN NOW |
| | DECLARES THAT HIGH RIB LATH WILL BE FASTENED TO DENSE |
| | BOARD, HOW?NOTE,HI-RIB LATH 3/8? 3.4 LB/YD2 CAN |
| | SPAN 24?, EACH RIB WOULD REQUIRE FASTENING AS PER ASTM |
| | 1063C TABLE 3. |
| | |
| | 15) SECOND REQUEST, NOTE WITH THE PRODUCT APPROVALS NOT |
| | SUBMITTED THE ROLL UP DOORS MAY OR MAY NOT REQUIRE DOOR |
| | BUCKS AND ATTACHMENT. |
| | |
| | 16)BEFORE A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT, MAY BE ISSUED, |
| | IMPACT FEES MUST BE PAID TO PALM BEACH COUNTY. THE |
| | ACTUAL PERMIT SET OF PLANS MUST BE STAMPED BY THAT |
| | OFFICE, AND A COPY OF THE PAID RECEIPT ATTACHED TO THE |
| | PERMIT APPLICATION. PLEASE CALL (561)233-5025 FOR MORE |
| | INFORMATION. |
| | |
| | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | JIM WITMER |
| | TEL: (561)805-6715 |
| | FAX: (561)659-8026 |
| | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
| | |
| | PREMIER PK BLD 3 REVIEW 1.DOC |
