Date |
Text |
2007-08-26 13:30:52 | 2007-08-26 13:30:52 |
| |
| *** DENIED 3RD REVIEW*** |
| |
| |
| ROSARIAN ACADEMY |
| |
| |
| ** PLEASE SEE THERE ARE STILL ITEMS FROM THE PREVIOUS |
| TWO REVIEWS WHICH ARE IN NEED OF ADDRESSING. THERE ARE |
| SOME NEW COMMENTS FOR COORDINATION AS SOME ITEMS HAVE |
| BEEN REVISED ON PLANS OR ARE NOW SHOWN FOR REVIEW. |
| |
| ** PLEASE SEE THERE ARE TWO NEW COMMENTS WHICH WERE NOT |
| ON PREVIOUS REVIEW. THESE ARE MINOR IN NATURE WHICH |
| COULD BE REDLINED HOWEVER AS PLANS ARE GOING BACK FOR |
| CORRECTIONS PLEASE ADJUST AT THIS TIME. |
| |
| |
| 1) NOTE: ** IMPORTANT** |
| PLEASE SEE THAT ONE SET CONTAINS SOME REDLINES FOR |
| AREAS FOR SOME OF THE NOTES BELOW. THIS REVIEWER IS |
| REQUESTING FOR DESIGN PROFESSIONAL(S) RESPONSIBLE FOR |
| ELECTRICAL PLANS AND DESIGN CALL TO SET UP A MEETING TO |
| GO OVER COMMENTS AND PLANS BEFORE PLANS ARE |
| RE-SUBMITTED. PLEASE KNOW IT MAY HELP TO DO THIS ONCE |
| ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE. IF THERE ARE ANY COMMENTS FROM |
| OTHER TRADES WHICH MAY AFFECT THE ELECTRICAL PLANS OR |
| DESIGN THESE WOULD BENEFIT THE ELECTRICAL DESIGN TEAM |
| TO OBTAIN ANY POSSIBLE COMMENTS BEFORE THE MEETING IS |
| HELD. |
| |
| 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE RESPONSE LETTER FROM DESIGN |
| TEAM WHICH STATES THE REVIEWER'S COMMENTS AND THEN |
| PLACES A RESPONSE FROM THE DESIGN TEAM DIRECTLY BELOW. |
| PLEASE BE SURE WHEN *QUOTING* THE REVIEWER'S COMMENTS |
| TO TRANSCRIBE AS THE NOTES WERE WRITTEN. ANY CHANGES IN |
| THE REVIEWER'S COMMENTS MAY LEAD TO SOME CONFUSION OF |
| PARTIES INVOLVED READING THESE NOTES AND RESPONSES. |
| *PLEASE SEE FOR EXAMPLE COMMENT #4 WHICH WAS TYPED AND |
| MIXED IN WITH WHAT APPEARS TO BE MECHANICAL REVIEW |
| NOTES BEING STATED AS THIS REVIEWERS PREVIOUS REVIEW |
| COMMENT. |
| IT IS UNDERSTOOD BY THIS REVIEWER THAT THIS SEEMS TO BE |
| A MISPRINT OF NOTES AND IS ONLY NOTED. |
| |
| 3) NOTE:PLEASE SEE THE PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE #1 GAVE |
| SPECIFICALLY THE RELATED CODES NEEDING TO BE STATED AND |
| REFERENCED ON PLANS. PLEASE SEE THE LIFE SAFETY CODE IS |
| STILL BEING SHOWN UNDER THE 2000 EDITION. THIS SHOULD |
| BE THE 2003 NFPA-101 LIFE SAFETY CODE. |
| IF THIS WERE ONE OF THE MINOR COMMENTS IT WOULD HAVE |
| BEEN REDLINED ON PLANS HOWEVER AS THE PLANS ARE COMING |
| BACK FOR OTHER CORRECTIONS, PLEASE ADJUST AT THIS |
| TIME. |
| |
| 4) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THAT COMPLIANCE WITH THE FBC |
| CHAPTER 13 HAS NOT YET BEEN MET. |
| PLEASE SEE THERE ARE SEVERAL ITEMS AND AREAS WHICH ARE |
| STILL IN NEED OF ADDRESSING/CLARIFICATION/CORRECTIONS |
| AND COORDINATION OF INFORMATION ON PLANS WITH THAT OF |
| SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS. IT WILL BE THE ATTEMPT OF THIS |
| REVIEWER TO TYPE AS MANY ITEMS IN DETAIL AS POSSIBLE |
| HOWEVER MANY OF THESE ITEMS BEING NOTED BELOW WILL BE |
| IN GENERAL AS THERE ARE SEVERAL LOCATIONS ON PLANS |
| WHICH ARE IN QUESTION.THE DETAILS FOR EACH AND EVERY |
| LOCATION WILL BE GONE OVER IN A MEETING AND WITH THE |
| REDLINED PLANS. |
| |
| A) PLEASE SEE AS STATED IN THE TWO PREVIOUS REVIEWS: |
| PLEASE BE SURE TO CORRELATE ALL LIGHTING ON PLANS WITH |
| THE SUBMITTED ENERGY CALCULATIONS AS SUBMITTED. PLEASE |
| SEE THERE ARE ITEMS ON PLANS WHICH ARE STILL NOT BEING |
| ENTERED IN THE *INPUT DATA REPORT*. THE INPUT DATA |
| REPORT IN NOTES WILL BE NOTED AS IDR IN THE REST OF THE |
| COMMENTS; |
| PLEASE SEE THE LC IN THE COMMENTS BELOW WILL BE |
| ABBREVIATION FOR LIGHTING CONTACTOR: |
| |
| PLEASE SEE AS STATED ON THE PREVIOUS REVIEWS, NO |
| EXTERIOR LIGHTING IS BEING ENTERED IN THE IDR. THE |
| SUMMARY SHEETS DO NOT SHOW ANY EITHER. HOW IS THIS |
| POSSIBLE WHEN THE PLANS CLEARLY SHOW A SUBSTANTIAL |
| AMOUNT OF EXTERIOR LIGHTING? PLEASE SEE |
| 13-415.2.ABC.1.3, 13-415.0, 13-415.2, 13-415.1.A. |
| |
| B) PLEASE ALSO SEE THE METHOD OF CONTROL FOR EXTERIOR |
| LIGHTING PER 13-415.1.ABC.1.4. THERE ARE SOME AREAS |
| WHICH MAY FALL UNDER LIGHTING EXCEPTION FOR SECURITY |
| HOWEVER MOST OF THESE ARE BEING SHOWN THROUGH A |
| LIGHTING CONTACTOR (LC) OF SOME KIND WITH OUT ANY |
| INFORMATION FOR PHOTO-SENSOR, ASTRONOMICAL TIME CLOCKS. |
| MORE INFORMATION IS NEEDED AND WILL BE GONE OVER. |
| |
| C) PLEASE SEE WEST EXTERIOR LIGHTS ON SHEET E2.2.1, |
| WHICH SHOWS 7 *D* FIXTURES IN SHADED NOTATION AND |
| ANOTHER *D* FIXTURE WITHOUT BEING SHADED. PLEAS SEE |
| THIS AREA FOR EXAMPLE IS BEING NOTED BY THE KEY NOTES |
| TO BE WIRED THROUGH THE LIGHTING CONTACTOR. IF THE DARK |
| SHADED FIXTURES ARE ACTUALLY *DE* FIXTURES AS SHOWN ON |
| THE REST OF THE PLANS, THEN THIS WOULD PLACE ONLY ONE |
| FIXTURE ON THE LC AND THE REST TO BE WIRED AHEAD OF THE |
| LC. THIS WOULD LEAVE ALL OF THE FIXTURES ON ALL THE |
| TIME. PLEASE SEE THAT IT IS KNOWN AND OK TO LEAVE SOME |
| FIXTURES ON FOR *SECURITY* AND/OR 24HRSHOWEVER IT IS |
| UNCLEAR WHAT IS BEING SHOWN IN THIS AREA OF DESIGN. |
| THIS WILL NEED TO BE GONE OVER IN MEETING. |
| (THIS WILL AFFECT THE EMERGENCY LIGHTING COMMENTS |
| ALSO) |
| |
| D) PLEASE SEE MANY AREAS ON LIGHTING PLANS CONTAIN *KEY |
| NOTES* (#2, #3 ETC) WHICH CALL FOR NOTES WHICH STATES |
| LIGHTING TO BE CONTROLLED THROUGH LC YET WHEN LOOKING |
| AT THE LC ON SHEETS THESE SPECIFY AN OVER RIDE SWITCH |
| OF SOME KIND WHICH DOES NOT GIVE ANY INFORMATION ON THE |
| REQUIRED OVER RIDE MAXIMUM TIMES. PLEASE SEE EACH OF |
| THESE MOMENTARY SWITCHES ON THE LC IS NOTED WITH |
| ANOTHER KEY NOTE #1. THIS NOTE AT THE BOTTOM OF EACH LC |
| SCHEDULE MENTIONS TO SEE SHEET E2.1 FOR LOCATIONS OF |
| ALL OF THESE OVER RIDE LOCATIONS. |
| |
| **(NOTE: THIS IS SPELLED AS *LWAATIONS* (MISPRINT) ON |
| MANY OF THESE NOTES AND IS BEING ASSUMED THIS IS FOR |
| *LOCATIONS*) PLEASE SEE FOR EXAMPLE LC-1A, LC-1B AND |
| OTHERS ON LIGHTING SHEETS. THE FAILURE COMMENT IS NOT |
| BASED ON THE SPELLING OF THIS WORD.)** |
| |
| PLEASE SEE THAT THE FIRST ITEM IS THAT THE REQUIREMENTS |
| OF 13-415.1ABC.1.1 AND 13-415.1.ABC.1.2 IS THAT THE |
| OVER RIDES ARE LOCATED SO THAT THE OCCUPANT CAN READILY |
| SEE THE LIGHTING BEING CONTROLLED. THERE IS AN |
| EXCEPTION FOR *PILOT LIGHTS* HOWEVER PLEASE SEE SOME |
| AREAS CONTAIN KEY NOTES FOR LIGHTING TO BE THROUGH LC |
| AND PLANS ALSO SHOWS A *SO*. HOW IS THE *SO* (OCCUPANCY |
| SWITCH/DEVICE) GOING TO WIRED INTO THIS AS THE LC DOES |
| NOT DETAIL THIS AND HOW WILL THE OCCUPANT BE ABLE TO |
| OVER RIDE THE LIGHTING IN THE AREAS. |
| PLEASE SEE HALLWAYS AND CORRIDORS E2.2.1, E2.1.2, |
| E2.2.2 ETC. |
| PLEASE SEE KEY NOTE #3 ON SHEETS E2.1.1 AND E2.1.2 |
| WHICH MENTIONS TO SEE LC-1C ON SHEET E2.1.1, YET THIS |
| LC DETAIL IS ON E2.1.2. (MISPRINT)? |
| PLEASE CLARIFY HOW THESE LC MOMENTARY SWITCHES AS NOTED |
| WILL MEET THE SECTIONS AS NOTEDFOR OVER RIDES, |
| MAXIMUM TIMES, AND LOCATIONS FOR CONTROLS. |
| PLEASE CLARIFY THE OCCUPANCY TYPE DEVICES WHICH ARE |
| BEING SHOWN IN HALL, CORRIDOR LOCATIONS WHICH IF A WALL |
| TYPE OCCUPANCY SENSOR TYPE DEVICE WILL NOT COVER SOME |
| AREAS FOR THE OCCUPANT IF THE LC IS TURNED TO THE OFF |
| POSITION. |
| PLEASE KNOW THERE ARE SEVERAL AREAS AND ITEMS WHICH ARE |
| REDLINED ON PLANS AND WILL NEED TO BE GONE OVER IN A |
| MEETING. |
| |
| E) PLEASE SEE CLASSROOM #4 WHICH INDICATES PER THE |
| SYMBOLS ON PLANS AND SYMBOLS ON LEGEND THAT THESE |
| DEVICES ARE STANDARD SWITCHES. PLEASE CLARIFY HOW THESE |
| MEET 13-415.1.ABC.1.2, AND .1.1. |
| PLEASE SEE THESE ARE REDLINED ON PLANS ON ONE SET. THIS |
| IS ON SHEET E2.2.2 |
| |
| F) PLEASE COORDINATE THE IDR WITH THE FIXTURE LEGEND |
| FOR TYPES OF FIXTURES AND WATTAGES. SOME OF THE NUMBERS |
| ON THE IDR AND THE PLANS/FIXTURE LEGEND DO NOT |
| CORRELATE AT THIS TIME. |
| 13-415.1.A, |
| FBC 106.1.2 |
| |
| 5) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE TWO PREVIOUS REVIEWS REQUESTED |
| FOR COMPLETED PHOTO-METRICS FOR NORMAL AND EMERGENCY |
| EGRESS PATHS OUT AND AWAY FROM BUILDING UNDER **NORMAL |
| AND EMERGENCY* CONDITIONS. |
| THE REVIEWS ALSO REQUESTED FOR THE LIGHT FIXTURES WHICH |
| IS PLACED ON THE LIGHTING PLANS TO COORDINATE WITH THE |
| LIGHT FIXTURES ON THE PHOTO-METRICS SHEETS. |
| MOST OF THESE ARE DONE AND SUBMITTED HOWEVER NOT ALL. |
| |
| A) PLEASE SEE SHEET E1.2.1 WHICH SHOWS THE TABLE WHICH |
| THE DESIGNATIONS FOR THE STAIRS 1, 2 AND WEST STAIRS |
| ARE NOT SHOWN ON TABLES FOR NORMAL LEVELS AS REQUIRED. |
| PLEASE SEE THE LEVELS UNDER NORMAL FOR STAIR 1 AND 2 |
| SEEM LOW AND THE STAIRS ON WEST SIDE DO NOT INDICATE |
| ANY LEVELS UNDER NORMAL. |
| |
| B) PLEASE SEE SHEET E1.2.2 EAST SIDE FIRST FLOOR EXIT |
| AREA AS NO LEVELS ARE SHOWN UNDER NORMAL? |
| |
| C) PLEASE SEE SHEET E1.2.1E AS THE WEST EXIT AREA FOR |
| EM TYPE FIXTURES DOES NOT CORRELATE WITH THE FIXTURE |
| DESIGNATIONS ON THE LIGHTING PLANS SHEET E2.2.1 FOR |
| THIS SAME AREA.(CORRIDOR/OUTSIDE AREA). |
| |
| D) PLEASE SEE SHEET E1.3.1 FOR AREA ON WEST SIDE DOES |
| NOT INCLUDE STAIRS EITHER. THE NORMAL LIGHTING LEVELS |
| FOR EGRESS STAIRS NEEDS TO BE SHOWN ON THIS SHEET OR |
| SHEET NOTED ABOVE IN PART *A* OF THIS COMMENT NUMBER |
| 5. |
| |
| ** PLEASE SEE AS WITH COMMENT ABOVE (#4) WITH RESPECT |
| TO CONTROLS OF LIGHTING FOR CHAPTER 13 AND THOSE ITEMS |
| REQUIRED IN THIS COMMENT FOR LIFE SAFETY CODE IS |
| REDLINED ON PLANS AND WILL NEED TO BE GONE OVER IN |
| MEETING TO BE HELD. |
| |
| 6) NOTE: PLEASE BE SURE THE OWNER AGENT IS SIGNED ON |
| THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS. |
| 13-103.1.1.1. |
| |
| 7) NOTE: ( NEW NOTE)PLEASE SEE THE CLASSROOM #4 AND |
| SOME OTHER REDLINED LOCATIONS ON PLANS WHICH A LIGHTING |
| FIXTURE IS BEING SHOWN IN STORAGE CLOSETS WHICH DO NOT |
| MEET 410.8 FOR MINIMUM CLEARANCES. |
| PLEASE SEE THIS NOTE IS FOR THE SMALLER CLOSETS AND FOR |
| MINIMUM AREAS FROM FIXTURES FROM COMBUSTIBLES AND |
| EASILY IGNITABLE MATERIALS. |
| THESE WERE REDLINED ON SHEETS. |
| THIS COMMENT WAS NOT MADE ON PREVIOUS REVIEW AND MISSED |
| BY THIS REVIEWER. |
| THIS IS STILL A CODE RELATED AND SAFETY ISSUE AND |
| SHOULD BE ADDRESSED AT THIS TIME AS PLANS ARE BEING |
| REVISED FOR OTHER COMMENTS. |
| |
| 8) NOTE: (NEW NOTE) PLEASE SEE THE DESIGNATIONS ON |
| RISER FOR CIRCUITING OF PANELS DP3A, DP2A, DP1A, DP1B, |
| DP2B WHICH ARE ALL DESIGNATED TO *SBA*, WHEN THE MAIN |
| SWITCH BOARD DESIGNATION IS SSA. |
| THIS WAS MISSING ON THE PREVIOUS REVIEW BY THIS REVIEW |
| EVEN THOUGH THIS WAS SHOWN THE SAME. |
| THESE LOCATIONS ARE REDLINED ON PLANS. |
| IF SHEET DOES NOT NEED TO BE REVISED FOR ANY OTHER |
| COMMENTS, THEN THIS ITEM CANE BE REDLINED ON SHEETS AS |
| IS. (MISPRINT) |
| |
| 9) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE PREVIOUS REVIEW GAVE NOTICE TO |
| FS 553.80(2)(B) WITH RESPECT TO REPEAT COMMENTS FOR |
| CODE COMPLIANCE. |
| THESE WILL BE GONE OVER IN A PEER REVIEW WITH THE |
| ASSISTANT BUILDING OFFICIAL AS ITEMS FROM THE FIRST AND |
| SECOND REVIEW FOR CODE COMPLIANCE HAS NOT BEEN MET. THE |
| PLANS HOWEVER HAVE BEEN REVISED EACH TIME TO PARTIALLY |
| ADDRESS COMMENTS. |
| THE 4X FEE FOR PLAN REVIEW HAS NOT BEEN ASSESSED AT |
| THIS TIME. THIS WILL BE UNDER FURTHER REVIEW. **ONE |
| COPY OF ELECTRICAL PLANS AND ENERGY CALCULATIONS WILL |
| BE RETAINED BY THIS OFFICE. |
| |
| AS STATED IN THE TWO PREVIOUS REVIEWS: |
| PLEASE BE SURE TO CALL IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS OR |
| COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE TYPED COMMENTS ABOVE. IF |
| THERE ARE ANY COMMENTS WHICH ARE NOT CLEAR IN ANY WAY, |
| NOT UNDERSTOOD OR NOT TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR, PLEASE DO |
| NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE AND THIS |
| REVIEWER. |
| TO DATE THIS PROJECT HAS NOT BEEN GONE OVER WITH THE |
| DESIGN TEAM. |
| |
| DEWEY PALMER |
| ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II |
| CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. |
| CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| 561-805-6717 |
| [email protected] |
2007-08-26 07:50:47 | 2007-08-26 07:50:47 |
| REVIEW IN PROGRESS |
2007-08-25 20:01:33 | 2007-08-25 20:01:33 |
| PLANS IN ELECTRIC FOR REVIEW. |
| REVIEW TO COMMENCE ON 8/26/07 |