Plan Review Notes
Plan Review Notes For Permit 06110152
Permit Number 06110152
Review Stop E
Sequence Number 3
Notes
Date Text
2007-08-26 13:30:522007-08-26 13:30:52
  
 *** DENIED 3RD REVIEW***
  
  
 ROSARIAN ACADEMY
  
  
 ** PLEASE SEE THERE ARE STILL ITEMS FROM THE PREVIOUS
 TWO REVIEWS WHICH ARE IN NEED OF ADDRESSING. THERE ARE
 SOME NEW COMMENTS FOR COORDINATION AS SOME ITEMS HAVE
 BEEN REVISED ON PLANS OR ARE NOW SHOWN FOR REVIEW.
  
 ** PLEASE SEE THERE ARE TWO NEW COMMENTS WHICH WERE NOT
 ON PREVIOUS REVIEW. THESE ARE MINOR IN NATURE WHICH
 COULD BE REDLINED HOWEVER AS PLANS ARE GOING BACK FOR
 CORRECTIONS PLEASE ADJUST AT THIS TIME.
  
  
 1) NOTE: ** IMPORTANT**
 PLEASE SEE THAT ONE SET CONTAINS SOME REDLINES FOR
 AREAS FOR SOME OF THE NOTES BELOW. THIS REVIEWER IS
 REQUESTING FOR DESIGN PROFESSIONAL(S) RESPONSIBLE FOR
 ELECTRICAL PLANS AND DESIGN CALL TO SET UP A MEETING TO
 GO OVER COMMENTS AND PLANS BEFORE PLANS ARE
 RE-SUBMITTED. PLEASE KNOW IT MAY HELP TO DO THIS ONCE
 ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE. IF THERE ARE ANY COMMENTS FROM
 OTHER TRADES WHICH MAY AFFECT THE ELECTRICAL PLANS OR
 DESIGN THESE WOULD BENEFIT THE ELECTRICAL DESIGN TEAM
 TO OBTAIN ANY POSSIBLE COMMENTS BEFORE THE MEETING IS
 HELD.
  
 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE RESPONSE LETTER FROM DESIGN
 TEAM WHICH STATES THE REVIEWER'S COMMENTS AND THEN
 PLACES A RESPONSE FROM THE DESIGN TEAM DIRECTLY BELOW.
 PLEASE BE SURE WHEN *QUOTING* THE REVIEWER'S COMMENTS
 TO TRANSCRIBE AS THE NOTES WERE WRITTEN. ANY CHANGES IN
 THE REVIEWER'S COMMENTS MAY LEAD TO SOME CONFUSION OF
 PARTIES INVOLVED READING THESE NOTES AND RESPONSES.
 *PLEASE SEE FOR EXAMPLE COMMENT #4 WHICH WAS TYPED AND
 MIXED IN WITH WHAT APPEARS TO BE MECHANICAL REVIEW
 NOTES BEING STATED AS THIS REVIEWERS PREVIOUS REVIEW
 COMMENT.
 IT IS UNDERSTOOD BY THIS REVIEWER THAT THIS SEEMS TO BE
 A MISPRINT OF NOTES AND IS ONLY NOTED.
  
 3) NOTE:PLEASE SEE THE PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE #1 GAVE
 SPECIFICALLY THE RELATED CODES NEEDING TO BE STATED AND
 REFERENCED ON PLANS. PLEASE SEE THE LIFE SAFETY CODE IS
 STILL BEING SHOWN UNDER THE 2000 EDITION. THIS SHOULD
 BE THE 2003 NFPA-101 LIFE SAFETY CODE.
 IF THIS WERE ONE OF THE MINOR COMMENTS IT WOULD HAVE
 BEEN REDLINED ON PLANS HOWEVER AS THE PLANS ARE COMING
 BACK FOR OTHER CORRECTIONS, PLEASE ADJUST AT THIS
 TIME.
  
 4) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THAT COMPLIANCE WITH THE FBC
 CHAPTER 13 HAS NOT YET BEEN MET.
 PLEASE SEE THERE ARE SEVERAL ITEMS AND AREAS WHICH ARE
 STILL IN NEED OF ADDRESSING/CLARIFICATION/CORRECTIONS
 AND COORDINATION OF INFORMATION ON PLANS WITH THAT OF
 SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS. IT WILL BE THE ATTEMPT OF THIS
 REVIEWER TO TYPE AS MANY ITEMS IN DETAIL AS POSSIBLE
 HOWEVER MANY OF THESE ITEMS BEING NOTED BELOW WILL BE
 IN GENERAL AS THERE ARE SEVERAL LOCATIONS ON PLANS
 WHICH ARE IN QUESTION.THE DETAILS FOR EACH AND EVERY
 LOCATION WILL BE GONE OVER IN A MEETING AND WITH THE
 REDLINED PLANS.
  
 A) PLEASE SEE AS STATED IN THE TWO PREVIOUS REVIEWS:
 PLEASE BE SURE TO CORRELATE ALL LIGHTING ON PLANS WITH
 THE SUBMITTED ENERGY CALCULATIONS AS SUBMITTED. PLEASE
 SEE THERE ARE ITEMS ON PLANS WHICH ARE STILL NOT BEING
 ENTERED IN THE *INPUT DATA REPORT*. THE INPUT DATA
 REPORT IN NOTES WILL BE NOTED AS IDR IN THE REST OF THE
 COMMENTS;
 PLEASE SEE THE LC IN THE COMMENTS BELOW WILL BE
 ABBREVIATION FOR LIGHTING CONTACTOR:
  
 PLEASE SEE AS STATED ON THE PREVIOUS REVIEWS, NO
 EXTERIOR LIGHTING IS BEING ENTERED IN THE IDR. THE
 SUMMARY SHEETS DO NOT SHOW ANY EITHER. HOW IS THIS
 POSSIBLE WHEN THE PLANS CLEARLY SHOW A SUBSTANTIAL
 AMOUNT OF EXTERIOR LIGHTING? PLEASE SEE
 13-415.2.ABC.1.3, 13-415.0, 13-415.2, 13-415.1.A.
  
 B) PLEASE ALSO SEE THE METHOD OF CONTROL FOR EXTERIOR
 LIGHTING PER 13-415.1.ABC.1.4. THERE ARE SOME AREAS
 WHICH MAY FALL UNDER LIGHTING EXCEPTION FOR SECURITY
 HOWEVER MOST OF THESE ARE BEING SHOWN THROUGH A
 LIGHTING CONTACTOR (LC) OF SOME KIND WITH OUT ANY
 INFORMATION FOR PHOTO-SENSOR, ASTRONOMICAL TIME CLOCKS.
 MORE INFORMATION IS NEEDED AND WILL BE GONE OVER.
  
 C) PLEASE SEE WEST EXTERIOR LIGHTS ON SHEET E2.2.1,
 WHICH SHOWS 7 *D* FIXTURES IN SHADED NOTATION AND
 ANOTHER *D* FIXTURE WITHOUT BEING SHADED. PLEAS SEE
 THIS AREA FOR EXAMPLE IS BEING NOTED BY THE KEY NOTES
 TO BE WIRED THROUGH THE LIGHTING CONTACTOR. IF THE DARK
 SHADED FIXTURES ARE ACTUALLY *DE* FIXTURES AS SHOWN ON
 THE REST OF THE PLANS, THEN THIS WOULD PLACE ONLY ONE
 FIXTURE ON THE LC AND THE REST TO BE WIRED AHEAD OF THE
 LC. THIS WOULD LEAVE ALL OF THE FIXTURES ON ALL THE
 TIME. PLEASE SEE THAT IT IS KNOWN AND OK TO LEAVE SOME
 FIXTURES ON FOR *SECURITY* AND/OR 24HRSHOWEVER IT IS
 UNCLEAR WHAT IS BEING SHOWN IN THIS AREA OF DESIGN.
 THIS WILL NEED TO BE GONE OVER IN MEETING.
 (THIS WILL AFFECT THE EMERGENCY LIGHTING COMMENTS
 ALSO)
  
 D) PLEASE SEE MANY AREAS ON LIGHTING PLANS CONTAIN *KEY
 NOTES* (#2, #3 ETC) WHICH CALL FOR NOTES WHICH STATES
 LIGHTING TO BE CONTROLLED THROUGH LC YET WHEN LOOKING
 AT THE LC ON SHEETS THESE SPECIFY AN OVER RIDE SWITCH
 OF SOME KIND WHICH DOES NOT GIVE ANY INFORMATION ON THE
 REQUIRED OVER RIDE MAXIMUM TIMES. PLEASE SEE EACH OF
 THESE MOMENTARY SWITCHES ON THE LC IS NOTED WITH
 ANOTHER KEY NOTE #1. THIS NOTE AT THE BOTTOM OF EACH LC
 SCHEDULE MENTIONS TO SEE SHEET E2.1 FOR LOCATIONS OF
 ALL OF THESE OVER RIDE LOCATIONS.
  
 **(NOTE: THIS IS SPELLED AS *LWAATIONS* (MISPRINT) ON
 MANY OF THESE NOTES AND IS BEING ASSUMED THIS IS FOR
 *LOCATIONS*) PLEASE SEE FOR EXAMPLE LC-1A, LC-1B AND
 OTHERS ON LIGHTING SHEETS. THE FAILURE COMMENT IS NOT
 BASED ON THE SPELLING OF THIS WORD.)**
  
 PLEASE SEE THAT THE FIRST ITEM IS THAT THE REQUIREMENTS
 OF 13-415.1ABC.1.1 AND 13-415.1.ABC.1.2 IS THAT THE
 OVER RIDES ARE LOCATED SO THAT THE OCCUPANT CAN READILY
 SEE THE LIGHTING BEING CONTROLLED. THERE IS AN
 EXCEPTION FOR *PILOT LIGHTS* HOWEVER PLEASE SEE SOME
 AREAS CONTAIN KEY NOTES FOR LIGHTING TO BE THROUGH LC
 AND PLANS ALSO SHOWS A *SO*. HOW IS THE *SO* (OCCUPANCY
 SWITCH/DEVICE) GOING TO WIRED INTO THIS AS THE LC DOES
 NOT DETAIL THIS AND HOW WILL THE OCCUPANT BE ABLE TO
 OVER RIDE THE LIGHTING IN THE AREAS.
 PLEASE SEE HALLWAYS AND CORRIDORS E2.2.1, E2.1.2,
 E2.2.2 ETC.
 PLEASE SEE KEY NOTE #3 ON SHEETS E2.1.1 AND E2.1.2
 WHICH MENTIONS TO SEE LC-1C ON SHEET E2.1.1, YET THIS
 LC DETAIL IS ON E2.1.2. (MISPRINT)?
 PLEASE CLARIFY HOW THESE LC MOMENTARY SWITCHES AS NOTED
 WILL MEET THE SECTIONS AS NOTEDFOR OVER RIDES,
 MAXIMUM TIMES, AND LOCATIONS FOR CONTROLS.
 PLEASE CLARIFY THE OCCUPANCY TYPE DEVICES WHICH ARE
 BEING SHOWN IN HALL, CORRIDOR LOCATIONS WHICH IF A WALL
 TYPE OCCUPANCY SENSOR TYPE DEVICE WILL NOT COVER SOME
 AREAS FOR THE OCCUPANT IF THE LC IS TURNED TO THE OFF
 POSITION.
 PLEASE KNOW THERE ARE SEVERAL AREAS AND ITEMS WHICH ARE
 REDLINED ON PLANS AND WILL NEED TO BE GONE OVER IN A
 MEETING.
  
 E) PLEASE SEE CLASSROOM #4 WHICH INDICATES PER THE
 SYMBOLS ON PLANS AND SYMBOLS ON LEGEND THAT THESE
 DEVICES ARE STANDARD SWITCHES. PLEASE CLARIFY HOW THESE
 MEET 13-415.1.ABC.1.2, AND .1.1.
 PLEASE SEE THESE ARE REDLINED ON PLANS ON ONE SET. THIS
 IS ON SHEET E2.2.2
  
 F) PLEASE COORDINATE THE IDR WITH THE FIXTURE LEGEND
 FOR TYPES OF FIXTURES AND WATTAGES. SOME OF THE NUMBERS
 ON THE IDR AND THE PLANS/FIXTURE LEGEND DO NOT
 CORRELATE AT THIS TIME.
 13-415.1.A,
 FBC 106.1.2
  
 5) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE TWO PREVIOUS REVIEWS REQUESTED
 FOR COMPLETED PHOTO-METRICS FOR NORMAL AND EMERGENCY
 EGRESS PATHS OUT AND AWAY FROM BUILDING UNDER **NORMAL
 AND EMERGENCY* CONDITIONS.
 THE REVIEWS ALSO REQUESTED FOR THE LIGHT FIXTURES WHICH
 IS PLACED ON THE LIGHTING PLANS TO COORDINATE WITH THE
 LIGHT FIXTURES ON THE PHOTO-METRICS SHEETS.
 MOST OF THESE ARE DONE AND SUBMITTED HOWEVER NOT ALL.
  
 A) PLEASE SEE SHEET E1.2.1 WHICH SHOWS THE TABLE WHICH
 THE DESIGNATIONS FOR THE STAIRS 1, 2 AND WEST STAIRS
 ARE NOT SHOWN ON TABLES FOR NORMAL LEVELS AS REQUIRED.
 PLEASE SEE THE LEVELS UNDER NORMAL FOR STAIR 1 AND 2
 SEEM LOW AND THE STAIRS ON WEST SIDE DO NOT INDICATE
 ANY LEVELS UNDER NORMAL.
  
 B) PLEASE SEE SHEET E1.2.2 EAST SIDE FIRST FLOOR EXIT
 AREA AS NO LEVELS ARE SHOWN UNDER NORMAL?
  
 C) PLEASE SEE SHEET E1.2.1E AS THE WEST EXIT AREA FOR
 EM TYPE FIXTURES DOES NOT CORRELATE WITH THE FIXTURE
 DESIGNATIONS ON THE LIGHTING PLANS SHEET E2.2.1 FOR
 THIS SAME AREA.(CORRIDOR/OUTSIDE AREA).
  
 D) PLEASE SEE SHEET E1.3.1 FOR AREA ON WEST SIDE DOES
 NOT INCLUDE STAIRS EITHER. THE NORMAL LIGHTING LEVELS
 FOR EGRESS STAIRS NEEDS TO BE SHOWN ON THIS SHEET OR
 SHEET NOTED ABOVE IN PART *A* OF THIS COMMENT NUMBER
 5.
  
 ** PLEASE SEE AS WITH COMMENT ABOVE (#4) WITH RESPECT
 TO CONTROLS OF LIGHTING FOR CHAPTER 13 AND THOSE ITEMS
 REQUIRED IN THIS COMMENT FOR LIFE SAFETY CODE IS
 REDLINED ON PLANS AND WILL NEED TO BE GONE OVER IN
 MEETING TO BE HELD.
  
 6) NOTE: PLEASE BE SURE THE OWNER AGENT IS SIGNED ON
 THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS.
 13-103.1.1.1.
  
 7) NOTE: ( NEW NOTE)PLEASE SEE THE CLASSROOM #4 AND
 SOME OTHER REDLINED LOCATIONS ON PLANS WHICH A LIGHTING
 FIXTURE IS BEING SHOWN IN STORAGE CLOSETS WHICH DO NOT
 MEET 410.8 FOR MINIMUM CLEARANCES.
 PLEASE SEE THIS NOTE IS FOR THE SMALLER CLOSETS AND FOR
 MINIMUM AREAS FROM FIXTURES FROM COMBUSTIBLES AND
 EASILY IGNITABLE MATERIALS.
 THESE WERE REDLINED ON SHEETS.
 THIS COMMENT WAS NOT MADE ON PREVIOUS REVIEW AND MISSED
 BY THIS REVIEWER.
 THIS IS STILL A CODE RELATED AND SAFETY ISSUE AND
 SHOULD BE ADDRESSED AT THIS TIME AS PLANS ARE BEING
 REVISED FOR OTHER COMMENTS.
  
 8) NOTE: (NEW NOTE) PLEASE SEE THE DESIGNATIONS ON
 RISER FOR CIRCUITING OF PANELS DP3A, DP2A, DP1A, DP1B,
 DP2B WHICH ARE ALL DESIGNATED TO *SBA*, WHEN THE MAIN
 SWITCH BOARD DESIGNATION IS SSA.
 THIS WAS MISSING ON THE PREVIOUS REVIEW BY THIS REVIEW
 EVEN THOUGH THIS WAS SHOWN THE SAME.
 THESE LOCATIONS ARE REDLINED ON PLANS.
 IF SHEET DOES NOT NEED TO BE REVISED FOR ANY OTHER
 COMMENTS, THEN THIS ITEM CANE BE REDLINED ON SHEETS AS
 IS. (MISPRINT)
  
 9) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE PREVIOUS REVIEW GAVE NOTICE TO
 FS 553.80(2)(B) WITH RESPECT TO REPEAT COMMENTS FOR
 CODE COMPLIANCE.
 THESE WILL BE GONE OVER IN A PEER REVIEW WITH THE
 ASSISTANT BUILDING OFFICIAL AS ITEMS FROM THE FIRST AND
 SECOND REVIEW FOR CODE COMPLIANCE HAS NOT BEEN MET. THE
 PLANS HOWEVER HAVE BEEN REVISED EACH TIME TO PARTIALLY
 ADDRESS COMMENTS.
 THE 4X FEE FOR PLAN REVIEW HAS NOT BEEN ASSESSED AT
 THIS TIME. THIS WILL BE UNDER FURTHER REVIEW. **ONE
 COPY OF ELECTRICAL PLANS AND ENERGY CALCULATIONS WILL
 BE RETAINED BY THIS OFFICE.
  
 AS STATED IN THE TWO PREVIOUS REVIEWS:
 PLEASE BE SURE TO CALL IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS OR
 COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE TYPED COMMENTS ABOVE. IF
 THERE ARE ANY COMMENTS WHICH ARE NOT CLEAR IN ANY WAY,
 NOT UNDERSTOOD OR NOT TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR, PLEASE DO
 NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE AND THIS
 REVIEWER.
 TO DATE THIS PROJECT HAS NOT BEEN GONE OVER WITH THE
 DESIGN TEAM.
  
 DEWEY PALMER
 ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II
 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT.
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 561-805-6717
 [email protected]
2007-08-26 07:50:472007-08-26 07:50:47
 REVIEW IN PROGRESS
2007-08-25 20:01:332007-08-25 20:01:33
 PLANS IN ELECTRIC FOR REVIEW.
 REVIEW TO COMMENCE ON 8/26/07


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved