Date |
Text |
2007-01-09 07:34:30 | ** UNSAT ** |
| |
| 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE CODES SECTION REFERENCE ON |
| RISER FOR 310.15B6 DOES NOT APPLY FOR FEEDERS WHICH ARE |
| 120/208V SYSTEMS. PLEASE SEE THE SECTION AS GIVEN IS |
| FOR 120/240V ONLY. |
| |
| 2) NOTE: PLEASE KNOW THE VOLTAGE DROP INDICATED FOR THE |
| 4TH FLOOR UNIT SHOWN AT 4% IS STILL IN QUESTION. PLEASE |
| KNOW AS PER THE CONVERSATION WITH THE ENGINEER THE VD |
| WAS LOWER AND IT WAS THE UNDERSTANDING OF THIS OFFICE |
| THE CORRECTED VD WAS GOING TO BE SHOWN FOR THIS? |
| PLEASE SEE FBC 13-413.1.ABC.1.1. |
| |
| 3) NOTE: PLEASE KNOW THE VALUE FOR THE COMPLETE SCOPE |
| OF WORK WAS ADJUSTED FOR ALL UNITS EVEN THOUGH THE |
| CURRENT CONTRACTOR IS COMPLETING WORK. PLEASE KNOW THAT |
| THE PREVIOUS CONTRACTOR DID NOT HAVE PERMITS OR PLANS |
| TO RE-PULL FEEDERS TO THE UNITS ALREADY DONE NOR DID |
| THE CONTRACTOR PULL IN THE RIGHT SIZE EQUIPMENT |
| GROUNDING CONDUCTOR. |
| PLEASE KNOW BASED ON THE STOP WORK /RED-TAG CORRECTION |
| NOTICE GIVEN AND THE ADDITIONAL VALUE ADDED FOR SCOPE |
| THE ADDITIONAL FEE IS THAT OF $5081.70. |
| *** PLEASE KNOW THIS IS WRITTENNOTICE TO THE NEW |
| CONTRACTOR THAT AS THIS CONTRACTOR IS TAKING OVER THE |
| PROJECT FOR THE NEW UNITS, THIS NEW CONTRACTOR WILL |
| ALSO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL THE OTHER UNITS WHICH |
| FEEDERS WERE PULLED IN WITHOUT PERMITS. IT IS THE |
| RECOMMENDATION OF THIS OFFICE TO VERIFY ALL PREVIOUS |
| WORK BE REVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE AND INSTALLATION |
| OF SAID CONDUCTORS WHICH MAY HAVE BEEN DAMAGED IN THE |
| INSTALLATION PROCESS. |
| |
| 4) NOTE: PLEASE VERIFY LOADS SHOWN ON PANELS E, F& G |
| SPECIFICALLY TO THE LOADS SHOWN ON THE METER CENTERS, |
| THEN PLEASE VERIFY LOAD ON METER CENTERS 3 AND 4. |
| PLEASE SEE LOAD AFTER ALL DE-RATING IS BEING SHOWN IS A |
| MAXIMUM OF500AMPS WHICH THE RATING OF THE MAIN FUSES |
| FEEDING METER CENTER. THE METER CENTER IS RATED AT 600 |
| AMPS; HOWEVER THE MAIN OVER CURRENT PROTECTION IS THAT |
| OF 500AMPS WHICH LEAVES NO ROOM FOR EXPANSION OF FUTURE |
| LOADS OF ANY KIND. |
| 90.8, 220, 240, ETC. |
| FBC 106.1.2 ADMIN SECITON FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. |
| |
| 5) NOTE: PLEASE KNOW AS THIS WAS ONLY UNDER PLAN REVIEW |
| BEFORE THE DATE OF DECEMBER 8TH, 2006, THE CODE |
| SECTIONS ON PLANS ALL NEED TO BE REVISED TO SECTIONS |
| OUT OF THE 2005 NEC NFPA-70. PLEASE KNOW AS OF DATE |
| GIVEN, THE STATE OF FLORIDA ADOPTED THE NEW 2005 |
| EDITION AND SINCE THIS SCOPE OF WORK WAS NOT APPLIED |
| FOR PERMIT UNTIL AFTER THAT DATE THE ITEMS AS NOTED AND |
| ALL DESIGNS ARE REQUIRED TO BE UNDER THE NEW CODE. |
| |
| * ** IMPORTANT** |
| ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE |
| PICKED UP FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE |
| SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL OLD/VOIDED |
| SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED |
| SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW |
| AND STAMPING. DO NOT LEAVE ANY |
| OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. |
| PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE |
| OLD/VOIDED SHEETS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED |
| FOR REFERENCE. |
| THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND |
| AVOID ANY DELAYS. |
| |
| ** PLEASE BE SURE TO CALL IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS OR |
| COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE TYPED COMMENTS ABOVE. IF |
| THERE ARE ANY COMMENTS WHICH ARE NOT CLEAR IN ANY WAY, |
| NOT UNDERSTOOD OR NOT TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR, PLEASE DO |
| NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE AND THIS |
| REVIEWER. |
| |
| DEWEY PALMER |
| ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW |
| CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. |
| CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| 561-805-6717 |
| [email protected] |