Date |
Text |
2006-12-26 09:17:31 | WEST PALM BEACH |
| CITY CENTER- CITY HALL |
| PERMIT# 06100574 |
| 401 CLEMATIS ST. |
| FIFTH REVIEW DEC. 23/06 |
| |
| ARCHITECT: SONG & ASSOCIATES |
| ENGINEER: MEINHART CONSULTING ENGINEERS |
| |
| NOTE: THIS REVIEW WILL BE COMPLETED UNDER 2004 FLORIDA |
| BUILDING CODE, |
| (*)MEANS CHAPTER 1 WEST PALM BEACH ADMINISTRATIVE |
| AMENDMENTS |
| |
| 1) --- VERY IMPORTANT |
| STATEMENT --- |
| PLEASE DO NOT IGNORE! |
| WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE THE REVISION & |
| REMOVE & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL |
| LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH |
| A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE |
| SHEET OR SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE |
| FOUND WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR |
| YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. |
| |
| 2)COMPLIED. |
| |
| 3A)CIVIL ENGINEERS: CRAVEN THOMPSON & ASSOCIATES, |
| INC. IS MISSING THEIR CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION. |
| 471.023 F.S.CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION.THE TITLE |
| BLOCK FOR ANY SHEET BEARING THE NAME OF AN ENGINEER |
| PRACTICING UNDER A FICTITIOUS NAME, A CORPORATION, OR A |
| PARTNERSHIP, OFFERING ENGINEERING SERVICES, SHALL |
| INCLUDE THE CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION NUMBER. ADD |
| THE NUMBER TO EACH SHEET.THIS MAY |
| BE ADDED BY HAND. |
| |
| |
| 4) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 5) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 6) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 7) COMPLIED. |
| PAGE 1 |
| |
| 8)FIFTH REQUEST, THORNTON TOMASETTI HAS ATTEMPTED TO |
| COMPLY WITH THIS REQUIREMENT BY SUPPLYING A COVERSHEET |
| WITH THEIR SHOP DRAWING STAMP AND SIGNATURE BUTTHIS |
| DOCUMENT DOESN?T INDICATE WHAT PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| DOCUMENT IS REVIEWED AND APPROVED. |
| WPB ADMIN CODE 106.3* PRODUCT APPROVALS.THOSE |
| PRODUCTS WHICH ARE REGULATED BY DCA RULE 9B-72 SHALL BE |
| REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF |
| RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. |
| |
| |
| 9) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 10) IN REVIEWING THE THRESHOLD INSPECTION PLAN,THERE |
| IS NO COMMENT ON REQUIREMENTS FOR SHORING AND RESHORING |
| SHOP DRAWINGS AND INSPECTIONS FORFLOOR SLABS ABOVE |
| GRADE. |
| |
| FL S. S. 553.71(7) ?THRESHOLD BUILDING" MEANING ANY |
| BUILDING |
| WHICH IS GREATER THAN (3) STORIES OR 50 FT IN HEIGHT, |
| OR WHICH HAS AN ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION AS |
| DENIED IN THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE WHICH EXCEEDS 5,000 |
| SQ FT IN AREA AND AN OCCUPANT CONTENT OF GREATER THAN |
| 500 PERSONS. |
| 105.13.1 THE ENFORCING AGENCY SHALL REQUIRE A SPECIAL |
| INSPECTOR TO PERFORM |
| STRUCTURAL INSPECTIONS ON A THRESHOLD BUILDING PURSUANT |
| TO A STRUCTURAL |
| INSPECTION PLAN PREPARED BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD. THE |
| STRUCTURAL INSPECTION |
| PLAN MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE ENFORCING AGENCY PRIOR TO |
| THE ISSUANCE OF A |
| BUILDINGS PERMIT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A THRESHOLD |
| BUILDING. THE PURPOSE OF THE |
| STRUCTURAL INSPECTION PLAN IS TO PROVIDE SPECIFIC |
| INSPECTION PROCEDURES AND |
| SCHEDULES SO THAT THE BUILDING CAN BE ADEQUATELY |
| INSPECTED FOR COMPLIANCE WITH |
| THE PERMITTED DOCUMENTS. |
| |
| 11) 3RD REQUEST, RESPONSE SHEET INDICATES THE SPECIAL |
| INSPECTOR FORMS TO BE PART OF THE SUBMITTALS, WHERE? |
| WPB AMENDMENT 105.13.6. W.P.B. CONSTRUCTION SERVICES |
| DEPARTMENT REQUEST FOR THRESHOLD BUILDINGS A SPECIAL |
| INSPECTOR AS REQUIRED BY S. 553.79(5) FLORIDA STATUTES |
| TO THE MINIMUM INSPECTIONS REQUIRED BY THIS CODE. |
| CONTACT HAROLD PISKURA MANAGER OF THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR |
| PROGRAM AT (561) 805-6711 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION |
| BEFORE THE PERMIT MAY BE ISSUED. |
| SEE ATTACHED GUIDELINE. |
| |
| 12) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 13) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 14)5TH REQUEST, IN REVIEWING THIS PLAN IT APPEARS |
| THAT THERE ARE VARIOUS DOORS THAT DO NOT MEET THE |
| REQUIREMENTS OF:11-4.13.6 MANEUVERING CLEARENCES AT |
| DOORS. MINIMUM MANEUVERING CLEARANCES AT DOORS THAT ARE |
| NOT AUTOMATIC OR POWER-ASSISTED SHALL BE AS SHOWN IN |
| FIG. 25. THE FLOOR OR GROUND AREA WITH IN THE REQUIRED |
| CLEARANCES SHALL BE CLEAR & LEVEL. |
| SEE LIST OF DOORS:A1-302A. PLEASE CLOUD OR DELTA THESE |
| CHANGES. |
| PAGE2 |
| |
| 15)COMPLIED. |
| |
| 16) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 17) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 18) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 19) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 20) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 21) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 22) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 23) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 24) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 25) COMPLIED C-10. |
| |
| 26) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 27) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 28) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 29) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 30) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 32A) 3RD REQUEST, THE DOOR SCHEDULE NEEDS RATINGS FOR |
| SMOKEAND FIRE RATINGS DEPENDING ON FORTH COMING |
| DOCUMENTATION FROM SONG & ASSOCIATES. |
| |
| 32B) 2ND REQUEST, THE LIFE SAFETY PLAN AND THE ?A? |
| SHEETS DO NOT MATCH UP FOR SMOKE AND FIRE RATINGS OF |
| ALL ELECTRICAL ROOMS, STORAGE ROOMS, MECHANICAL ROOMS |
| AND ELEVATOR MECHANICAL ROOMS. THE ?A? SHEETS ARE |
| MISSING THE WALL DESIGNATIONS FOR EITHER SMOKE ORHR |
| RATINGS. |
| |
| 33) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 34) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 35) COMPLIED. |
| PAGE 3 |
| 36) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 37) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 38A) EMPLOYEE LOUNGE, MET WITH TOM KASTNER12-21-06 |
| ABOUT THE EMPLOYEE LOUNGE, |
| SONG & ASSOCIATES FOR A NET SQ FOOTAGE WERE |
| TAKING OUT CABINET SQ FT FOR NET NOT |
| WALL TO WALL. SONG & ASSOCIATES WILL CORRECT TO |
| REDUCE THE OCCUPANT LOAD TO LESS THAN 50. |
| |
| 38B) FOURTH FLOOR TRAINING ROOM, I RECEIVED A LETTER |
| FROM WILLIAM SWISHER THAT SATES: |
| 1) FIXED SEATING NOT TO EXCEED 49 STATIONS. 2) OCCUPANT |
| LOAD TO BE POSTED IN THE ROOM 49 PERSONS 3) ROOM IS NOT |
| TO BE ALTERED TO ALLOW GREATER THAN 49 PERSONS. |
| |
| 38C) LS1-3.2 & A1-3.2 BOTH SHEETS ARE MISSING THE 1 HR |
| RATED CORRIDOR WALL BETWEEN |
| THE ASSEMBLY AND BUSINESS OCCUPANCIES. TABLE 1016.1. |
| |
| 39) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 40) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 41) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 42) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 43) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 44) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 45A)SHEET LS0.0 CODE SUMMARY- FIRE RESISTANCE RATINGS |
| FOR SEPARATIONS, |
| THIS SHEET IDENTIFIES NUMEROUS CODE SECTIONS SIGHTING |
| NFPA OR FBC BUT IN THE DOOR SCHEDULE THE DOORS ARE NOT |
| RATED, ELECTRIC ROOM DOOR B1-111A, |
| MECHANICAL ROOM DOOR B1-102A. T-1016/ 708.3/ T-302.1.1 |
| & NFPA. |
| |
| 45B) THE ABOVE LISTED MISSING DOOR RATINGS THE |
| CORRELATING MISSING WALL RATINGS ARE THE MECHANICAL |
| ROOM B1-102 & THE NEW ELECTRIC ROOM B1-111, NOTE THE |
| NEW ELECTRIC ROOM IS MISSING ? OF THE WALL DESIGNATION, |
| SHEET |
| A1-GA.1. |
| |
| 46) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 47) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 48) COMPLIED. |
| |
| PAGE 4 |
| 49) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 50) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 51) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 52) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 53) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 54) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 55) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 56) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 57) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 58) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 59) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 60) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 61) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 62) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 63) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 64) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 65) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 66) (SAME AS 38C), MISSING CORRIDOR RATING BETWEEN |
| BUSINESS AND ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCY TABLE 1016. |
| |
| 67) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 68)COMPLIED. |
| |
| 69) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 70) COMPLIED. |
| |
| PAGE 5 |
| |
| 71) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 72) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 73) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 74) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 75) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 76) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 77) COMPLIED. |
| |
| NOTE ITEMS 78- 81 FIRST REVIEW!!!! |
| |
| 78)FL BLD CODE 1609.1.4 |
| : COMPONENTS & CLADDING, PROVIDE 2 COPIES (3 IF |
| THRESHOLD OR RESIDENT INSPECTOR) OF PRODUCT TESTING |
| REPORTS. |
| |
| BEFORE THE SUBMITTED REPORTS CAN BE FULLY REVIEWED |
| THERE ARE CONCERNS ABOUT WIND PRESSURES, CONCERNING |
| ELEVATIONS NOT SHOWN IN THE STRUCTURAL SHEETS. |
| |
| A) THE TUNNELING EFFECT WIND WILL HAVE BETWEEN THE |
| PORTION OF CITY HALL GARAGE AND THE EAST END OF THE |
| BUILDING THAT IS 5 STORIES TALL WITH THE DOME.THERE |
| IS NO ELEVATIONS INDICATING WHAT POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE |
| PRESSURES WILL OCCUR IN THIS AREA. |
| THE SECOND CONCERN IS THE INCREASED TUNNELING EFFECT |
| WILL OCCUR WITH THE |
| THE ENCLOSING OF THE GARAGE, TO BE AN ENCLOSED GARAGE. |
| |
| |
| B) THE SECOND AREA THAT IS NOT SHOWN IS THE PORTION OF |
| THE BUILDING THAT JOINS |
| THE LIBRARY TO THE 5 STORY SECTION OF THE |
| STRUCTURE. THIS AREA HAS A SERIES OF |
| STEPPED ROOFS CREATING A SAW TOOTHED EFFECT |
| WHICH WILL CREATE A SERIES OF |
| VORTEX ZONES AS THE WIND RUSHES OVER THE SERIES |
| OF STEPPED PARAPETS, AGAIN |
| THE PLANS DO NOT ADDRESS THESE AREAS FOR THE |
| PRESSURE ZONES OR THE |
| POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE PRESSURES FOR THESE |
| AREAS. |
| |
| |
| C) THE THIRD ITEM OF CONCERN IS THE SHOP DRAWINGS |
| CREATED BY TRAINER GLASS INDICATING THE DIFFERENT |
| WINDOW TYPES AND THEIR USE IN THE STRUCTURE AND |
| ASSOCIATED WIND ZONES. THEY HAVE INDICATED THE AREAS OF |
| CONCERN |
| (78 A& B). |
| D) AS INTERIOR ZONES AND NO MENTION OF POSSIBLE HIGHER |
| PRESSURE, NOR HAS THIS DOCUMENT BEEN SUBMITTED TO THE |
| STRUCTURAL ENGINEER FOR REVIEW OR APPROVAL. |
| |
| |
| PAGE 6 |
| |
| |
| REPORTS ARE AS FOLLOWS: |
| A) FIXED WINDOWS- |
| B) OPERABLE WINDOWS |
| C) MULLIONS NOT COVERED BY NOA THE REPORTS FOR THE |
| CURTAIN WALL SYSTEM HAVE A LIMITATION OF 171? ON THE |
| MULLIONS. |
| D) GLAZED DOORS, AUTOMATIC SLIDERS, SWING DOORS OR |
| PRE-ENGINEERED ROOF ACCESS HATCHES- THIS IS A PRODUCT |
| THAT IS REGULATED BY FLORIDA STATUTE RULE 9B-72- AT |
| THIS TIME IT APPEARS THERE IS NO PRODUCT THAT IS TESTED |
| THROUGH THE STATE OR THROUGH MIAMI-DADE?S NOA. THIS HAS |
| BEEN BROUGHT UP BY BUILDING OFFICIAL AT THE PALM BEACH |
| COUNTY BCAB BOARD IN NOVEMBER / 06 TO SEE HOW OTHER |
| JURISDICTIONS WERE HANDLING THIS ISSUE FURTHER |
| DISCUSSION TO BE ON THE JANUARY BOARD AGENDA. |
| |
| E) EXTERIOR METAL DOORS IF SINGLE OR PAIRS- COVERED |
| UNDER COMMENT# 81. |
| F) ROLL-UP OR SECTIONAL DOORS- MISSING FLORIDA COVER |
| SHEET, PROVIDE WIND |
| INFORMATION!!!!!!! |
| G) LOUVERS- WALL - OK |
| H) PANEL WALLS: SOFFITS, EFIS, STOREFRONTS, CURTAIN |
| WALLS- NO REPORT SUBMITTED |
| I) SKYLIGHTS- CANOPY ROOF PANELS-SEE A5.02 SECTION |
| 1 CHANGE DELTA(2) PROVIDE |
| MORE INFORMATION ON THIS SYSTEM |
| J)PRE-ENGINEERED A/C STANDS- PROVIDE TECHNICAL |
| SHEETS 1-3. PLEASE HIGHLIGHT WHICH FASTENING SYSTEM TO |
| THE STRUCTURAL DECK BELOW . |
| K) ROOFING PRODUCTS: BUILT UP, MODIFIED, SINGLE PLY |
| SYSTEMS, METAL ROOFING |
| SPRAY APPLIED POLYURETHANE, ROOF SYSTEM |
| FASTENERS, UNDERLAYMENTS AND |
| WATERPROOFING |
| |
| (K1) THE REPORT SUBMITTED BY ATLANTIC & CARIBBEAN ROOF |
| CONSULTANTS, IF REPORT IS SUBMITTED BY A REGISTERED |
| ROOFING CONSULTANT, THEN TO BE SEALED WITH THE |
| APPROPRIATE SEAL. THE WORDING TESTING AND ENGINEERING |
| SERVICES INDICATES AN ENGINEERING FIRM, WHICH IS A |
| LICENSED ENGINEERING FIRM, MISSING THEIR CERTIFICATE OF |
| AUTHORIZATION ON THIS REPORT, AND NOT SEALED BY THE |
| ENGINEER. |
| 471.023 F.S.CERTIFICATE OF |
| AUTHORIZATION.THE TITLE BLOCK FOR ANY |
| SHEET BEARING THE NAME OF AN ENGINEER |
| PRACTICING UNDER A FICTITIOUS NAME, A |
| CORPORATION, OR A PARTNERSHIP, OFFERING ENGINEERING |
| SERVICES, SHALL INCLUDE THE CERTIFICATE OF |
| AUTHORIZATION NUMBER. |
| |
| PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, REPORTS OR |
| OTHER DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL AND |
| BEING FILED FOR PUBLIC |
| RECORD SHALL HAVE THE SIGNATURE AND |
| SEAL OF THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL AFFIXED |
| TO THE DOCUMENT. |
| FL STATE STAT: 61G15-23.002 ENGINEERS |
| FL ATATE STAT: 61G16.003 ARCHITECTS |
| |
| (K2) THE SUBMITTED REPORT INDICATES VARIOUS ROOF DECKS |
| BY NUMBER BUT THERE IS NO KEY PLAN PROVIDING THE |
| LOCATION OF THE ROOF DECKS. |
| PAGE 7 |
| |
| |
| (K3) ROOF DECK NUMBER (2) INDICATES A HEIGHT OF 87? |
| WHERE IS THIS DECK LOCATED? |
| |
| (K4) LIGHTWEIGHT CONCRETE ROOF DECK- MIAMI-DADE NOA, |
| THE REPORT SUBMITTED DOES NOT HAVE THE SUB-SYSTEM |
| HIGHLIGHTED AS TO WHICH SUB-SYSTEM WILL BE INSTALLED. |
| |
| (K5) TRIODETIC PREFABRICATED METAL BUILDING SYSTEM- NO |
| SUBMITTALS EITHER STATE APPROVAL OR A MIAMI-DADE |
| APPROVAL. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY APPEAR ON FURTHER |
| REVIEWS. |
| |
| |
| 1609.1.4 PROTECTION OF OPENINGS. |
| IN WIND-BORNE DEBRIS REGIONS, EXTERIOR GLAZING THAT |
| RECEIVES POSITIVE PRESSURE IN THE LOWER 60 FEET (18.3 |
| M) IN BUILDINGS SHALL BE ASSUMED TO BE OPENINGS AND THE |
| BALANCE OF GLAZED OPENINGS IN THE REST OF THE BUILDING |
| SHALL BE ASSUMED TO BE ZERO UNLESS SUCH GLAZING THAT |
| RECEIVES POSITIVE PRESSURE IS IMPACT RESISTANT OR |
| PROTECTED WITH AN IMPACT RESISTANT COVERING MEETING THE |
| REQUIREMENTS OF SSTD 12, ASTM E 1886 AND ASTM E 1996, |
| OR MIAMI-DADE TAS 201, 202 AND 203 REFERENCED THEREIN |
| AS FOLLOWS: 1.GLAZED OPENINGS LOCATED WITHIN 30 |
| FEET (9.1 M) OF GRADE SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF |
| THE LARGE MISSILE TEST. 2.GLAZED OPENINGS LOCATED |
| MORE THAN 30 FEET (9.1 M) ABOVE GRADE SHALL MEET THE |
| PROVISIONS OF THE SMALL MISSILE TEST. |
| |
| |
| 79) SEE NEXT COMMENT. |
| |
| |
| 80)SAME REQUEST AS COMMENT# 8,W.P.B. ADMIN CODE |
| 106.3* PRODUCT APPROVALS. THOSE PRODUCT WHICH ARE |
| REGULATED BY DCA RULE 9B-72 SHALL BE REVIEWED AND |
| APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO |
| SUBMITTAL FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. THORNTON |
| TOMASETTI HAS ATTEMPTED TO COMPLY WITH THIS REQUIREMENT |
| BY SUPPLYING A COVERSHEET WITH THEIR SHOP DRAWING STAMP |
| AND SIGNATURE BUTTHIS DOCUMENT DOESN?T INDICATE WHAT |
| PRODUCT APPROVAL DOCUMENT IS REVIEWED AND APPROVED. |
| |
| |
| 81) 2ND REQUEST, THE SUBMITTAL FOR HOLLOW METAL DOORS |
| WILL WORK AT GROUND LEVEL BUT THE DOORS AT THE ROOF TOP |
| LEVEL WILL NOT THE REQUIRED HIGHER PRESSURE. 1714.5.3 |
| EXTERIOR DOOR ASSEMBLIES. |
| EXTERIOR DOOR ASSEMBLIES NOT COVERED BY SECTION |
| 1715.4.2 OR SECTION 1714.5.3.1 SHALL BE TESTED FOR |
| STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM E 330 |
| PROCEDURE A, AT A LOAD OF 1.5 TIMES THE REQUIRED DESIGN |
| PRESSURE LOAD. THE LOAD SHALL BE SUSTAINED FOR 10 |
| SECONDS WITH NO PERMANENT DEFORMATION OF ANY MAIN FRAME |
| OR PANEL MEMBER IN EXCESS OF 0.4 PERCENT OF ITS SPAN |
| AFTER THE LOAD IS REMOVED. HIGH-VELOCITY HURRICANE |
| ZONES SHALL COMPLY WITH TAS 202. AFTER EACH SPECIFIED |
| LOADING, THERE SHALL BE NO GLASS BREAKAGE, PERMANENT |
| DAMAGE TO FASTENERS, HARDWARE PARTS, OR ANY OTHER |
| DAMAGE WHICH CAUSES THE DOOR TO BE INOPERABLE. PAGE 8 |
| |
| 82) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 83) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 84) COMPLIED, EXEMPT A MUNICIPALITY. |
| |
| JIM WITMER |
| BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| WEST PALM BEACH CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT WEST |
| PALM BEACH, FL 33402 |
| TEL (561)805-6715 |
| FAX (561)805-6731 |
| E-MAIL: [email protected] |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| CITY HALL CENTER 5TH REVIEW .DOC |