Date |
Text |
2006-10-24 14:29:21 | WEST PALM BEACH |
| CITY CENTER- CITY HALL |
| PERMIT# 0610.0574 |
| ADDRESS: 401 CLEMATIS ST. |
| |
| FOURTHREVIEW OCT. 24TH, 2006 |
| FIRST UNDER PERMIT |
| ARCHITECT: SONG & ASSOCIATES |
| ENGINEER: MEINHART CONSULTING ENGINEERS |
| |
| NOTE: THIS REVIEW WILL BE COMPLETED UNDER 2004 FLORIDA |
| BUILDING CODE, |
| (*)MEANS CHAPTER 1 WEST PALM BEACH ADMINISTRATIVE |
| AMENDMENTS |
| |
| ***SHEET T-1 APPLICABLE CODEPLEASE CORRECT TO THE |
| 2004 FBC.***** |
| |
| 1) --- VERY IMPORTANT |
| STATEMENT --- |
| PLEASE DO NOT IGNORE! |
| WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE THE REVISION & |
| REMOVE & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL |
| LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH |
| A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE |
| SHEET OR SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE |
| FOUND WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR |
| YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. |
| |
| THIS COMMENT WAS IGNORED UNDER THE FIRST |
| REVIEW, THE DESIGN TEAM DIDN?T PROVIDE ANY TRANSMITTAL |
| LETTER, NOR WERE ANY OF THE CHANGES MADE HIGHLIGHTED |
| WITH A CLOUD OR DELTA AND THE REVISION BOX IN THE |
| HEADER STRIP WASN?T FILLED IN MAKING DIFFICULT TO FIND |
| THE REVISIONS MADE AND TIME CONSUMING!!!! |
| |
| |
| 2) PLANS INDICATE 100% COMPLETE BUT ARE ONLY A PARTIAL |
| ROLL,WHEN PLANS ARE TO BE SUBMITTED FOR PUBLIC RECORD |
| :PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS,REPORTS OR OTHER DOCUMENTS |
| PREPARED BY THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL AND BEING FILED FOR |
| PUBLIC RECORD SHALL HAVE THE SIGNATURE AND |
| SEAL OF THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL AFFIXED TO THE |
| DOCUMENT. |
| FL STATE STAT: 61G15-23.002 ENGINEERS |
| FL ATATE STAT: 61G16.003 ARCHITECTS |
| |
| 3) NOTE: PLANS ARE NOT SEALED THIS IS A COURTESY |
| REVIEW, WHEN PLANS ARE SUBMITTED FOR PUBLIC RECORD: NEW |
| ENGINEERING SEAL DESIGN. "LICENSE" A GRACE PERIOD RAN |
| THROUGH DEC. 31, 2005. |
| RULE 61G155-23.001(1) F.A.C. |
| THE FLORIDA BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS HAS |
| CLEANED UP THE APPEARANCE OF THE SEAL BY ELIMINATING |
| OBSOLETE CONTENT AND CHANGING THE WORD "CERTIFICATE" |
| TO |
| |
| COVERSHEET: |
| 3A) CIVIL ENGINEERS: CRAVEN THOMPSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. |
| IS MISSING THEIR CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION.) |
| 471.023 F.S.CERTIFICATE OF |
| AUTHORIZATION.THE TITLE BLOCK FOR ANY |
| SHEET BEARING THE NAME OF AN ENGINEER |
| PRACTICING UNDER A FICTITIOUS NAME, A |
| CORPORATION, OR A PARTNERSHIP, OFFERING ENGINEERING |
| SERVICES, SHALL INCLUDE THE CERTIFICATE OF |
| AUTHORIZATION NUMBER. |
| ADD THE NUMBER TO EACH SHEET.THIS MAY |
| BE ADDED BY HAND. |
| |
| 4)FOURTH REQUEST, STRUCTURAL SHEET TITLE BLOCK INDICATE |
| THAT THORNTON TOMASETTI A CONSULTING ENGINEER, FL DEPT |
| OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DOESN'T INDICATE LICENSURE |
| IN FLORIDA. |
| LICENSURE FL S. S. 471.015/471.023 F.S. CERTIFICATE |
| OF |
| AUTHORIZATION.THE TITLE BLOCK FOR ANY |
| SHEET BEARING THE NAME OF AN ENGINEER |
| PRACTICING UNDER A FICTITIOUS NAME, A |
| CORPORATION, OR A PARTNERSHIP, OFFERING ENGINEERING |
| SERVICES, SHALL INCLUDE THE CERTIFICATE OF |
| AUTHORIZATION NUMBER. |
| ADD THE NUMBER TO EACH SHEET.THIS MAY |
| BE ADDED BY HAND. |
| |
| 5) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 6) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 7) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 8) FOURTHREQUEST,PRODUCT APPROVAL HAVE BEEN |
| SUBMITTED AT THIS TIME. WPB ADMIN CODE 106.3* PRODUCT |
| APPROVALS.THOSE PRODUCTS WHICH ARE REGULATED BY DCA |
| RULE 9B-72 SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY |
| THE DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL FOR |
| JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. |
| |
| 9) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 10) COMPLIED. SHEET# S0-2.0 STRUCTURAL INSPECTION |
| PLAN. |
| |
| |
| 11) THIRDREQUEST,WPB AMENDMENT 105.13.6. W.P.B. |
| CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT REQUEST FOR THRESHOLD |
| BUILDINGS A SPECIAL INSPECTOR AS REQUIRED BY S. |
| 553.79(5) FLORIDA STATUTES TO THE MINIMUM INSPECTIONS |
| REQUIRED BY THIS CODE. CONTACT HAROLD PISKURA MANAGER |
| OF THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR PROGRAM AT (561) 805-6711 FOR |
| FURTHER INFORMATION BEFORE THE PERMIT MAY BE ISSUED. |
| SEE ATTACHED GUIDELINE. |
| |
| 12) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 13) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 14)THIRD REQUEST, IN REVIEWING THIS PLAN IT APPEARS |
| THAT THERE ARE VARIOUS DOORS THAT DO NOT MEET THE |
| REQUIREMENTS OF:11-4.13.6 MANEUVERING CLEARENCES AT |
| DOORS. MINIMUM MANEUVERING CLEARANCES AT DOORS THAT ARE |
| NOT AUTOMATIC OR POWER-ASSISTED SHALL BE AS SHOWN IN |
| FIG. 25. THE FLOOR OR GROUND AREA WITH IN THE REQUIRED |
| CLEARANCES SHALL BE CLEAR & LEVEL. SEE LIST :A1-302A & |
| A4-202A. PLEASE CLOUD OR DELTA THESE CHANGES. |
| |
| 15) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 16) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 17) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 18) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 19) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 20) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 21) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 22) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 23)4TH REQUEST,SHEET A1-D DETAILS 1.1 ? 2.2 |
| ILLUSTRATE THE USE OF GRANITE VENEER. DETAIL 1.1B |
| PROVIDES INFO FOR ATTACHMENT BUT DOES NOT MATCH TO |
| SECTION 1405.7 FOR SLAB TYPE <2?THICK (GRANITE).ALSO |
| PROVIDE MAXIMUM SQUARE FOOTAGE PER GRANITE. THE MAXIMUM |
| AREA PER SLAB STILL ISN'T INDICATED ON THE PLANS. |
| |
| 24) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 25) FOURTH REQUEST, PLANS INDICATE FIRST FLOOR FINISH |
| FLOOR TO BE 17.35 NGVD, BUT NO SITE PLAN PROVIDES THE |
| EXISTING CITY SIDEWALK ELEVATIONS. PROVIDE AT LEAST 1 |
| ACCESSIBLE ROUTE TO THE SITE. 11-4.1.2(1-4). IN |
| DISCUSSING THE SIDEWALKS AROUND THE PERIMETER WITH THE |
| DESIGN TEAM AT THE LAST MEETING THERE WILL BE CONCERNS |
| WITH CROSS SLOPE NOT TO EXCEED THE 2%. THE DESIGN TEAM |
| INDICATED THAT BETWEEN THE SIDEWALK AND STREET CURBING |
| THERE WILL BE PLANTERS FOR TREES, BUT BETWEEN THE TREE |
| PLANTERS THERE WILL ALSO BE A WALKING SURFACE ( BRICKS) |
| THAT WILL HAVE CROSS SLOPE GREATER THAN 2%. |
| IN DISCUSSING THIS ISSUE WITH THE BUILDING |
| OFFICIAL IF THE SLOPE OF THE BRICK IS GREATER THAN 2% |
| THEN SOME TYPE OF BARRIER NEEDS TO BE IN EFFECT, EITHER |
| EDGE PROTECTION OR A GUARD. 11-4.3.7 11-4.3.7 SLOPE. AN |
| ACCESSIBLE ROUTE WITH A RUNNING SLOPE GREATER THAN 1:20 |
| IS A RAMP AND SHALL COMPLY WITH SECTION 11-4.8 . |
| NOWHERE SHALL THE CROSS SLOPE OF AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE |
| EXCEED 1:50. |
| |
| 26) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 27) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 28) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 29) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 30) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 31) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 32) 2ND REVIEW,DOOR SCHEDULE DOESN?T PROVIDE |
| RATING FOR ALL THE VERTICAL EXIT ENCLOSURES (STAIRWELL |
| DOORS). FBC 1019. |
| 32A) IN CHECKING THE DOOR SCHEDULE FOR EXIT STAIRWAYS |
| LS1-1.1 AND A1-1.1 STAIRWELL & VESTIBULE 02 DOESN'T |
| MATCH IN CONFIGURATION. |
| 32B) MISSING DOOR RATINGS ON ALL ELECTRICAL, |
| MECHANICAL, ELEVATOR MECHANICAL ROOMS AND STORAGE |
| ROOMS, SEE A-8.01-.02 |
| NOTE : TABLE 715.3 FOOTNOTE "B". SEE 715.3.3 |
| FIRE DOOR ASSEMBLIES SHALL ALSO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS |
| FOR A SMOKE AND DRAFT- CONTROL DOOR ASSEMBLY TESTED IN |
| ACCORDANCE WITH UL 1784 WITH AN ARTIFICIAL BOTTOM SEAL |
| INSTALLED ACROSS THE FULL WIDTH OF THE BOTTOM OF THE |
| DOOR ASSEMBLY. |
| |
| 33) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 34) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 35) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 36) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 37) |
| |
| 38)A) EMPLYEES LOUNGE LS1-3.1& A-1.3.1 THE FLOOR PLAN |
| CALCULATES OUT TO BE BETWEEN 844 & 840 SQ FT /15= TO AN |
| OCCUPANT LOAD OF 56 REQUIRING 2 EXITS AND THE CORRIDORS |
| TO BE FIRE RATED 1 HR. |
| TABLE 1016.1. THIS WILL ALSO REQUIRE THE DOORS TO HAVE |
| THE FIRE RATING NOT SHOWN ON THE DOOR SCHEDULE. |
| |
| 38B) TRAINING ROOM LS1-4.1 THE TRAINING ROOM AND |
| VESTIBULE TOTAL 1495 SQ FT/20= 75 OCCUPANT LOAD. THE |
| DECUSSION AT LAST WEEKS MEETING WAS THAT WILLIAM |
| SWICHER HAD INDICATED THIS WAS TO BE FIXED SEATING, WE |
| HAVE E-MAILED MR. SWICHER TO VERIFY THIS ROOM WILL HAVE |
| FIXED SEATING BOLTED TO THE FLOOR. AT PRESENT NO REPLY |
| FROM MR. SWICHER.PLEASE PROVIDE THE1HR RATED |
| CORRIDOR AND OPENING PROTECTIVES REQUIRED BY TABLE |
| 1016.1. |
| |
| 38C) LS1-3.2 & A1-3.2 IS STILL MISSING THE 1 HR RATING |
| BETWEEN THE CORRIDOR THAT SEPERATES THE BUSINESS AND |
| ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCY. TABLE 1016.1. |
| |
| 39) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 40) SECOND REQUEST,THE OTHER ISSUE THAT WAS DISCUSSED |
| WITH THE DESIGN TEAM IS THE ?MECHANICAL MEZZANINE? , |
| SHEET LS1-1.2, THIS SHEET DOESN?T INDICATE THE |
| MEZZANINE LEVEL, OR SIZE. |
| |
| PROVIDE A FLOOR PLAN INDICATING THE SIZE OF ROOM AND |
| FLOOR AREA OF THE MEZZANINE. |
| INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT PLATFORM CAN ONLY BE USED IN |
| INDUSTRIAL OCCUPANCIES. 505.5. |
| THE SECOND ISSUE IS THE USE OF ALTERNATING STAIRS FOUND |
| ON SHEET A6-6.1. SECTION 1009.1 LIMITS THE USE OF |
| ALTERNATING TREAD STAIRS TOMEZZANINES OF 250 SQ FT |
| AND LESS. |
| |
| 40A) DOME AREA IS 480 SQ FT. |
| 40B) A2M101 IS 930 SQ FT. |
| 40C) A2M102 IS 960 SQ FT. |
| |
| 41) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 42) SHEET THAT STILL HAVE DETAIL MARKERS MISSING IS |
| A1-2.1( MISSING THE SHEET LOCATION) |
| |
| 43) COMPLIED, STILL NEEDS WALL AND DOOR RATING. |
| |
| 44) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 45)3RD REQUEST , PLANS ARE MISSING THE WALL RATING |
| TAGS ON SHEET A1-GA.FPL VAULT, MAIN ELECTRIC ROOM, FIRE |
| PUMP ROOM, DOORS ARE NOT LABELED ON THE |
| DOOR SCHEDULE . ALSO SEE LS).0 FIRE RESISTANCE |
| RATINGS. |
| |
| 46) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 47) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 48) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 49)COMPLIED. |
| |
| 50) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 51) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 52) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 53) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 54) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 55) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 56) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 57) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 58) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 59) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 60) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 61) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 62) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 63) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 64) LS1-GA.1- LS1-GA.3THE PARKING GARAGE EXITS DO NOT |
| HAVE THE REQUIRED EGRESS CAPACITY GRAPHICS FILLED IN. |
| 106.1.2* ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED. |
| LIFE SAFETY PLANS NOT SUBMITTED. |
| |
| 65) 3RDREQUEST, LS1-3.0/ A1-3.2 THERE ARE ISSUES WITH |
| 3 AREAS: |
| ELEVATOR LOBBY C3.201 |
| PREFUNCTION LOBBY C3.301 |
| LOBBY C3.303 |
| THE BUILDING OFFICIAL WAS MADE AWARE THAT THESE AREAS |
| INDICATED ON THE LIFE SAFETY PLAN DO NOT HAVE AN |
| OCCUPANT LOAD ASSIGNED TO THEM.NEIL INDICATED HE |
| WOULD LIKE |
| THESE AREAS TO BE TREATED JUST AS THE MALL AREA ON THE |
| FIRST FLOOR, SUBTRACT THE SQUAREFOOTAGE REQUIRED FOR |
| EXIT ACCESS CORRIDORS OUT OF THE GROSS AREA FOR EACH |
| AREA, THE NET SQUARE FOOTAGE WOULD BE TREATED AS |
| ADDITIONAL SQ FOOTAGE TO BE CONSIDERED AT 7 SQUARE FEET |
| PER PERSON.TABLE 1004.1.2. |
| |
| THIS ADDITIONAL OCCUPANT LOAD SHALL BE ADDED TO THE |
| LIFE SAFETY SHEETS, STAIRS AND DOORWAY MAY NEED TO BE |
| INCREASED IN SIZE DUE TO THE ADDITIONAL LOADING. |
| |
| 66)2ND REQUEST,THE OTHER ISSUE IN THIS AREA OF THE |
| LIBRARY THIRD FLOOR AND THE AMOUNT OF ASSEMBLY |
| OCCUPANCY, THE EXIT ACCESS CORRIDORS NOT BEING RATED |
| (NORTH SIDE OF ASSEMBLY AREA). STAIR# 8 VESTIBULE |
| MISSING FIRE RATING. PLEASE REVISE THE LIFE SAFETY PLAN |
| AND DOOR SCHEDULE TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF |
| TABLE 1016.1 FOR |
| ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCY, SPRINKLERED >30= 1 HR FIRE RATED |
| CORRIDORS. |
| |
| 67A) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 67B) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 68) SAME AS 38A AND 38 B. 3RD REQUEST,68)2ND REQUEST, |
| LS1-3.0 CITY HALL SIDE OF PLAN INDICATES (2) AREAS |
| WHERE THERE ARE ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCIES, ROOM A3.108 THE |
| EMPLOYEES LOUNGE, OCCUPANT LOAD OF 60 AND ROOM NUMBER |
| A3.110THE EXERCISE ROOM WITH AN OCCUPANT LOAD OF 19. |
| |
| |
| THE EMPLOYEE LOUNGE WILL REQUIRE 2 MEANS OF EGRESS, |
| PLANS DO INDICATE (2) DOORWAYS ONE TO AN EXIT ACCESS |
| CORRIDOR WHICH WILL REQUIRE A 1 HR FIRE RATING. SEE |
| TABLE 1016.1 |
| ASSEMBLY, OCCUPANT LOAD > THAN 30,SPRINKLERED = 1HR |
| RATED CORRIDORS. |
| |
| 69) 3RD REQUEST,THE OTHER ISSUE WITH THE EMPLOYEE |
| LOUNGE REQUIRING (2) MEANS OF EGRESS BEING A OCCUPANT |
| LOAD GREATER THAN 50 REQUIRING A SECOND EXIT. TABLE |
| 1014.1. |
| PAGE 8 |
| TO USE THE DOOR FROM THE EMPLOYEE LOUNGE TO THE |
| EXERCISE ROOM FBC 1013.2 STATES: |
| EGRESS FROM A ROOM OR SPACE SHALL NOT PASS THROUGH |
| ADJOINING OR INTERVENING ROOMS OR AREAS, EXCEPT WHERE |
| SUCH ADJOINING ROOMS OR AREAS ARE ACCESSORY TO THE AREA |
| SERVED. ALSO THE DOORS TO THE GYM MAY END UP BEING |
| LOCKED.AN EXIT ACCESS SHALL NOT PASS THROUGH A ROOM |
| THAT CAN BE LOCKED TO PREVENT EGRESS.1013.2. |
| |
| 70) 3RD REQUEST, LS1-3.0 EXIT ACCESS CORRIDOR |
| A3.012WILL HAVE TO BE 1 HR FIRE RATED, TO THE (2) |
| VERTICAL EXITS ENCLOSURES. TABLE 1014.1/ 1014.1.(1). |
| |
| 71) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 72) SAME AS 38B) ,LS1-4.0 / LS1-4.1/ A1-4.0& A1-4.1 |
| THESE SHEETS INDICATE TRAINING ROOM# A4.403 IS AN |
| ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCY WITH AN OCCUPANT LOAD OF 75@20 SQ FT |
| / PERSON, . |
| TABLE 1016.1 ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCIES >30 OCCUPANT LOAD |
| LOAD REQUIRES 1 HR FIRE SEPARATION IN THE ASSOCIATED |
| EXIT ACCESS CORRIDORS. THE 2 CORRIDORS THAT LEAD TO THE |
| VERTICAL EXIT ENCLOSURES WILL NEED TO BE FIRE RATED 1HR |
| WITH 20 MINUTE OPENING PROTECTIVES. |
| |
| 73) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 74) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 75) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 76) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 77) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 78)78-81 THE CONTRACTOR & DESIGN TEAM REMOVED THESE |
| ITEMS FOR FURTHER UPDATING AND REVIEW!!!! |
| FL BLD CODE 1609.1.4 |
| : COMPONENTS & CLADDING, PROVIDE 2 COPIES(3 IF |
| THRESHOLD OR RESIDENT INSPECTOR) OF PRODUCT TESTING |
| REPORTS, MISSING REPORTS ARE AS FOLLOWS: (NOTE NOT |
| REVIEWED BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD)PLEASE INDICATE |
| WHERE EACH OF THE PRODUCTS WILL BE USED, (EXAMPLE, |
| TRAINER, TCW 250P |
| ALUMINUM WINDOW WALL SYSTEM W/ UNREINFORCED MULLIONS |
| SMUVS. TRAINER TCW250P ALUMINUM WINDOW WALL SYSTEM W/ |
| UNREINFORCED MULLIONS LMU, |
| ALUMINUM WINDOW WALL) IT APPEARS THAT THESE UNITS WILL |
| BE ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE BUILDING SPANING BETWEEN THE |
| 2ND & 3RD FLOOR. THERE ARE NO WINDOW OR DOOR SCHEDULES |
| IN THIS PLAN, STRUCTURAL ELEVATION SHEET S0-3.0 |
| INDICATES NOT TO SCALE!!! |
| WITH THE IMPORTANCE FACTORS ON THIS BUILDING THE |
| PRESSURES ARE GREATER THAN USUAL, PLEASE HIGHLIGHT |
| WHICH UNIT WILL BE USED WHEN THE PRODUCT APPROVAL HAS |
| MORE THAN ONE IN THE NOA. ALSO WITH THE WINDOW UNITS |
| LISTED ABOVE ARE GOING TO BREAK AT THE |
| 30?-0? LINE LARGE MISSILE / SMALL MISSILEBREAK LINE, |
| HOW WILL THE MULLIONS AND OR WINDOW UNITS BREAK? |
| |
| |
| |
| A) FIXED WINDOWS |
| B) OPERABLE WINDOWS |
| C) MULLIONS NOT COVERED BY NOA |
| D) GLAZED DOORS, AUTOMATIC SLIDERS, SWING DOORS OR |
| PRE-ENGINEERED ROOF ACCESS |
| HATCHES |
| E) EXTERIOR METAL DOORS IF SINGLE OR PAIRS |
| F) ROLL-UP OR SECTIONAL DOORS |
| G) LOUVERS- WALL |
| H) PANEL WALLS: SOFFITS, EFIS, STOREFRONTS, CURTAIN |
| WALLS |
| I) SKYLIGHTS |
| J)PRE-ENGINEERED A/C STANDS |
| K) ROOFING PRODUCTS: BUILT UP, MODIFIED, SINGLE PLY |
| SYSTEMS, METAL ROOFING |
| SPRAY APPLIED POLYURETHANE, ROOF SYSTEM |
| FASTENERS, UNDERLAYMENTS AND |
| WATERPROOFING ,********** NO ROOFING PRODUCTS |
| SUBMITTED AT ALL!!!!!!************* |
| L) ACCESS ROOF HATCHES: SINCE THERE IS NO PRODUCTS THAT |
| ARE CURRENTLY LISTED WITH EITHER THE STATE WEB SITE OR |
| MIAMI-DADE THIS PRODUCT WILL REQUIRE LOCAL APPROVAL |
| FORMS WILL BE ATTACHED. |
| |
| 1609.1.4 PROTECTION OF OPENINGS. |
| IN WIND-BORNE DEBRIS REGIONS, EXTERIOR GLAZING THAT |
| RECEIVES POSITIVE PRESSURE IN THE LOWER 60 FEET (18.3 |
| M) IN BUILDINGS SHALL BE ASSUMED TO BE OPENINGS AND THE |
| BALANCE OF GLAZED OPENINGS IN THE REST OF THE BUILDING |
| SHALL BE ASSUMED TO BE ZERO UNLESS SUCH GLAZING THAT |
| RECEIVES POSITIVE PRESSURE IS IMPACT RESISTANT OR |
| PROTECTED WITH AN IMPACT RESISTANT COVERING MEETING THE |
| REQUIREMENTS OF SSTD 12, ASTM E 1886 AND ASTM E 1996, |
| OR MIAMI-DADE TAS 201, 202 AND 203 REFERENCED THEREIN |
| AS FOLLOWS: 1.GLAZED OPENINGS LOCATED WITHIN 30 |
| FEET (9.1 M) OF GRADE SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF |
| THE LARGE MISSILE TEST. 2.GLAZED OPENINGS LOCATED |
| MORE THAN 30 FEET (9.1 M) ABOVE GRADE SHALL MEET THE |
| PROVISIONS OF THE SMALL MISSILE TEST. |
| |
| 79) 2ND REQUEST, W P B ADMINISTRTIVE CODE 106.3.3* |
| PRODUCT APPROVALS. THOSE PRODUCTS WHICH ARE REGULATED |
| BY DCA RULE 9B-72 SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN |
| WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL |
| FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. |
| |
| 80) SAME REQUEST AS 79. W.P.B. ADMIN CODE 106.3* |
| PRODUCT APPROVALS. THOSE PRODUCT WHICH ARE REGULATED BY |
| DCA RULE 9B-72 SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN |
| WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL |
| FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. |
| |
| 81) 1714.5.3 EXTERIOR DOOR ASSEMBLIES. |
| EXTERIOR DOOR ASSEMBLIES NOT COVERED BY SECTION |
| 1715.4.2 OR SECTION 1714.5.3.1 SHALL BE TESTED FOR |
| STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM E 330 |
| PROCEDURE A, AT A LOAD OF 1.5 TIMES THE REQUIRED DESIGN |
| PRESSURE LOAD. THE LOAD SHALL BE SUSTAINED FOR 10 |
| SECONDS WITH NO PERMANENT DEFORMATION OF ANY MAIN FRAME |
| OR PANEL MEMBER IN EXCESS OF 0.4 PERCENT OF ITS SPAN |
| AFTER THE LOAD IS REMOVED. HIGH-VELOCITY HURRICANE |
| ZONES SHALL COMPLY WITH TAS 202. AFTER EACH SPECIFIED |
| LOADING, THERE SHALL BE NO GLASS BREAKAGE, PERMANENT |
| DAMAGE TO FASTENERS, HARDWARE PARTS, OR ANY OTHER |
| DAMAGE WHICH CAUSES THE DOOR TO BE INOPERABLE. |
| |
| 82) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 83) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 84)BEFORE A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT, MAY BE ISSUED, |
| IMPACT FEES MUST BE PAID TO PALM BEACH COUNTY. THE |
| ACTUAL PERMIT SET OF PLANS MUST BE STAMPED BY THAT |
| OFFICE, AND A COPY OF THE PAID RECEIPT ATTACHED TO THE |
| PERMIT APPLICATION. PLEASE CALL (561)233-5025 FOR MORE |
| INFORMATION. |
| |
| |
| |
| JIM WITMER |
| BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| WEST PALM BEACH CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT WEST |
| PALM BEACH, FL 33402 |
| TEL (561)805-6715 |
| FAX (561)805-6731 |
| |
| |