Date |
Text |
2007-02-11 11:43:57 | **** UNSAT 3RD REVIEW **** |
| |
| *** PLEASE SEE SOME NOTES FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW WHICH |
| ARE IN NEED OF ADDRESSING AND SOME NEW NOTES DUE TO THE |
| PLANS SUBMITTED. |
| |
| 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE SCOPE OF WORK OR NOT CLEAR AT |
| THIS TIME. PLEASE SEE THE PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTES |
| MENTIONED TO SUPPLY A PANEL SCHEDULE FOR NEW OR |
| EXISTING CIRCUITS BEING DONE IN SCOPE OR EXISTING. |
| PLEASE SEE THE PANEL SCHEDULE WHICH IS NOW BEING |
| SUBMITTED MENTIONS ALL THE NEW CIRCUITS, HOWEVER PLEASE |
| SEE THE PLANS DO NOT INDICATE ANY CIRCUITS FOR THESE |
| NEW ITEMS. |
| PLEASE SEE NOTES ON PLANS MENTIONS ALL CEILING GRID AND |
| TILES BEING REMOVED, YET CEILING MOUNTED CEILING GRID |
| FIXTURES ARE TO REMAIN?? PLEASE CLARIFY HOW THESE |
| EXISTING FIXTURES ARE GOING TO BE USED. SOME ARE NOTED |
| AS BEING NEW INDUSTRIAL TYPE FIXTURES. |
| PLEASE SEE 700.12E FOR CIRCUITING OF EM/EXT LTS. |
| PLEASE CLARIFY THE NEW SCOPE. |
| PLEASE SEE ANY NEW ELECTRICAL WORK IS TO MEET THE NEW |
| CODES FOR THAT SCOPE OF WORK. THIS IS PERMITTED UNDER |
| THE 2002 NEC. |
| |
| |
| 2) NOTE: PLEASE STATE AND DESIGN TO ALL OF THE |
| FOLLOWING MINIMUM CODES AT A MINIMUM FOR ELECTRICAL |
| REVIEW. |
| NFPA-70 2002, 2003 NFPA-101, 2004 FBC. |
| |
| 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 600.5 AS THE AMPERAGE SHOWN FOR |
| SIGN CIRCUIT IS 6AMPS WHICH DOES NOT MEET THE MINIMUM |
| REQUIRED PER 600.5, AND 220.3(B)(6). |
| |
| 4) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE SEAL WHICH IS PLACED ON |
| ELECTRICAL PLANS IS NO LONGER VALID TO BE USED IN THE |
| STATE OF FLORIDA. |
| PLEASE SEE RULE 61G15-23.001 WHICH WAS CHANGED IN FEB |
| 2004 WHICH REQUIRED ALL SEALS BY ENGINEERS TO USE THE |
| NEW WORDING OF LICENSE. THE TIME WAS EXTENDED TO |
| DECEMBER 31ST, 2005, HOWEVER ANY AND ALL DOCUMENTS |
| AFTER THAT DATE MUST CONTAIN THE NEW SEALS WITH THE |
| WORDING OF *LICENSE* INSTEAD OF *CERTIFICATE*. PLEASE |
| KNOW THAT THIS REVIEW HAS SEEN UP DATED NEW SEALS FROM |
| THIS DESIGNER AND PERHAPS AN OLDER SEAL WAS USED |
| INSTEAD. |
| PLEASE KNOW THAT ANY OLD SEALS PERHAPS SHOULD BE |
| DISCARDED SO THIS WOULD NOT CREATE INADVERTENT USE. |
| |
| FS 471.025. |
| |
| 5) NOTE: PLEASE SEE SHEETS DO NOT CONTAIN THE REQUIRED |
| TITLE BLOCKS FOR THE ENGINEER OR FIRM OF RECORD AS |
| REQUIRED PER FAC 61G15-23.002, FS 471.023. |
| PLEASE INCLUDE AND COMPLETE. |
| THIS IS REQUIRED FOR ALL TRADES WHETHER OR NOT COMMENT |
| IS MADE BY OTHER REVIEWER(S). |
| |
| 6) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FBC 2004 CHAPTER 13, PREVIOUS |
| REVIEWS MENTIONS HOW COMPLIANCE IS MET AND RESPONSE |
| MENTIONS TO SEE REVISED PLANS, HOWEVER PLANS DID NOT |
| SEEM TO CONTAIN INFORMATION AS NEED. |
| 13-415.1.ABC.1.1, .1.2 AND .1.3. |
| 13-415.1.AB.1, 13-415.2 ETC?? |
| |
| 7) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FS 553.80(2)(B) WITH RESPECT TO |
| REPEAT COMMENTS FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. |
| |
| 8) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE RECORDED NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT |
| SUBMITTED IS NO LONGER VALID PER FS 713.13(2). |
| A NEW RECORDED NOC WILL BE REQUIRED BEFORE PICKING UP |
| PERMIT. |
| IF WORK NOTHAS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 90DAYS OF |
| RECORDING, SUCH NOC SHALL BECOME VOID. |
| *MAY RE-RECORD* |
| |
| |
| |
| ** IMPORTANT** |
| ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE |
| PICKED UP FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE |
| SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL OLD/VOIDED |
| SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED |
| SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW |
| AND STAMPING. DO NOT LEAVE ANY |
| OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. |
| PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE |
| OLD/VOIDED SHEETS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED |
| FOR REFERENCE. |
| THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND |
| AVOID ANY DELAYS. |
| |
| ** PLEASE BE SURE TO CALL IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS OR |
| COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE TYPED COMMENTS ABOVE. IF |
| THERE ARE ANY COMMENTS WHICH ARE NOT CLEAR IN ANY WAY, |
| NOT UNDERSTOOD OR NOT TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR, PLEASE DO |
| NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE AND THIS |
| REVIEWER. |
| |
| |
| DEWEY PALMER |
| ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW |
| CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. |
| CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| 561-805-6717 |
| [email protected] |