Date |
Text |
2007-01-30 11:14:52 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| |
| SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| 561-805-6724 [email protected] |
| |
| FBCFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 |
| FBC EBFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 EXISTING BUILDING |
| CODE |
| FBC RFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 RESIDENTIAL FBC* |
| CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 |
| |
| 1-8.) ADDRESSED. |
| |
| 9.)A SEPARATE PERMIT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE SIGN |
| SHOWN ON A-0.1.SEPARATE PLANS AND PERMIT APPLICATION |
| WILL BE REQUIRED.INFORMATIONAL ONLY; THIS IS NOT |
| REQUIRED TO BE ADDRESSED AT THIS TIME. |
| |
| 10.)ADDRESSED. |
| |
| 11.)ADDRESSED. |
| |
| 12.)S1 WAS DECLARED, BUT THE LIFE SAFETY PLAN SHOWS |
| S2.PLEASE ADDRESS. |
| |
| 13.)EXTRA FP1 SHEETS WERE SUBMITTED.PLEASE PROVIDE |
| THREE ORIGINALS, ONE PUT INTO EACH ROLLED PERMIT SET. |
| |
| |
| 14-15.) ADDRESSED. |
| |
| 16.)A LIFE SAFETY PLAN WAS PROVIDED IN RESPONSE TO |
| THE PREVIOUS COMMENT.PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING |
| ITEMS: |
| |
| A. THE PURPOSE OF THE OVERLAPPING CIRCLES ON THE PLAN |
| IS NOT CLEAR, AND NO PATH OF EGRESS TRAVEL WAS SHOWN. |
| TYPICALLY THE WORST CASE TRAVEL DISTANCE IS SHOWN FROM |
| EACH AREA TO THE REQUIRED EXITS.PLEASE REMOVE THE |
| CIRCLES AS THEY MAKE THE PLAN DIFFICULT TO READ, OR |
| CLARIFY THE PURPOSE. |
| |
| B. THE LIFE SAFETY PLAN STATES THAT TRAVEL DISTANCE IS |
| UNLIMITED FOR S2 OCCUPANCY, BUT YOU HAVE DECLARED S1 ON |
| SHEET A0.0.SEE FBC TABLE 1015.1, S1 HAS A MAXIMUM |
| TRAVEL DISTANCE OF 250FEET, FULLY SPRINKLED BUILDING. |
| ALSO SEE OTHER NOTES REGARDING ACCESSIBLE EXITS. |
| |
| C. OCCUPANT LOAD OF 63 HAS BEEN DECLARED FOR THE |
| WAREHOUSE AREA.A0.0 DECLARES 32,720 SF.SEE FBC |
| TABLE 1004.1.2, FBC 1004.1 STATES THAT OCCUPANT LOAD |
| CANNOT BE LESS THAN THE TABLE, SO SHOULD BE A MINIMUM |
| OF 65 BASED ON SF AREA. |
| |
| D. FBC1005.1, THE LOSS OF ANY ONE MEANS OF EGRESS SHALL |
| NOT REDUCE THE AVAILABLE CAPACITY TO LESS THAN 50 |
| PERCENT OF THE REQUIRED CAPACITY.BASED ON DESIGN |
| OCCUPANT LOAD FOR THE BUSINESS AREA, THE EXITING DOES |
| NOT COMPLY.PLEASE ADDRESS. |
| |
| E. THE SCALE APPEARS TO BE 1/16.NOTE THE SCALE ON THE |
| PLAN.PROVIDE OVERALL DIMENSIONS. |
| 17.)FBC11-4.1.3(9), ACCESSIBLE MEANS OF EGRESS SHALL |
| BE PROVIDED IN THE SAME NUMBER AS REQUIRED FOR EXITS BY |
| LOCAL BUILDING/LIFE SAFETY REGULATIONS. A RAMP IS SHOWN |
| AT THE BUILDING ENTRANCE, NO OTHER ACCESSIBLE EXITS |
| SHOWN. |
| |
| THE RESPONSE LETTER STATES THAT ALL EXITS ARE |
| ACCESSIBLE.SEE FBC11-3, DEFINITION OF EGRESS, MEANS |
| OF; DOES NOT INCLUDE STAIRS, STEPS, OR ESCALATORS. |
| |
| 18.)THIS BUILDING REQUIRES MORE THAN ONE EXIT, SEE |
| FBC1018.2.THIS WAS NOT ADDRESSED FOR ACCESSIBLE |
| EXITS; ONLY ONE SHOWN. |
| |
| 19.)A1.0 SHOWS A CHECK WRITING STAND, PLEASE NOTE ON |
| THE PLAN THAT THIS AREA IS NOT OPEN TO THE PUBLIC. |
| |
| 20-21.) ADDRESSED. |
| |
| 22.)FBC11-4.1.3(8)(A)(II), ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCES |
| REQUIRED AT LEAST EQUIVALENT TO THE NUMBER OF |
| ACCESSIBLE EXITS.SEE OTHER COMMENTS.ENTRANCES WITH |
| STAIRS DO NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF VERTICAL |
| ACCESSIBILITY. |
| |
| 23.)EXIT OR EXIT ACCESS DOORWAY ARRANGEMENT SHALL |
| COMPLY WITH FBC1014.2 OR FBC1014.2.2., SHOW DISTANCE |
| APART, SEE EXCEPTION 2.THERE ARE TO BE TWO ACCESSIBLE |
| EXITS WHICH ARE REMOTELY LOCATED.ONLY ONE SHOWN ON |
| THE PLAN (ALL OTHERS HAVE STAIRS). |
| |
| 24.)ADDRESSED. |
| |
| 25.)SIGN THE OWNER/AGENT LINE OF THE ENERGY CALC. |
| |
| 26.)THE COMMENT REGARDING REMOVABLE SHUTTERS WAS, I |
| BELIEVE, ADDRESSED WITH SUBMITTAL OF IMPACT DOOR |
| PRODUCT APPROVALS.IT APPEARS THAT IMPACT RATED |
| PRODUCTS WILL BE USED.PLEASE NOTE THAT IF NONIMPACT |
| PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE SUBMITTED ON THIRD REVIEW, A |
| SHUTTER INSTALLATION PLAN WILL BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO |
| PERMIT ISSUANCE.PLEASE CONTACT ME IF YOU WOULD LIKE |
| TO PROPOSE THE USE OF REMOVABLE SHUTTERS TO DISCUSS |
| THAT APPROVAL PROCESS.IF ALL PRODUCTS WILL BE IMPACT |
| RATED, DISREGARD THE COMMENT. |
| |
| 27.)PLEASE NOTE THAT PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR IMPACT |
| DOORS WERE SUBMITTED.PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE TO BE |
| REVIEWED BY DESIGNER OF RECORD, FBC*106.3.3.NO OTHER |
| PRODUCT APPROVALS WERE SUBMITTED.NOTE THAT ANY |
| PRODUCT APPROVALS NOT SUBMITTED AND REVIEWED PRIOR TO |
| PERMIT ISSUANCE WILL REQUIRE SEPARATE PERMITS WITH |
| SEPARATE FEES.FLORIDA STATE OR LOCAL PRODUCT |
| APPROVAL REQUIRED IN ADDITION TO THE EVALUATION REPORT |
| (MIAMIDADE NOA IN THIS CASE) PROVIDED, FAC9B72. |
| WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORGIF FLORIDA STATE PRODUCT |
| APPROVAL IS NOT AVAILABLE, PLEASE CONTACT ME TO |
| DISCUSS. |
| |
| NO ROOFING PRODUCT APPROVALS WERE SUBMITTED.THIS MAY |
| BE DONE WHEN THE ROOF PERMIT IS APPLIED FOR (WITH |
| SEPARATE FEES BASED ON VALUE), OR MAY BE DONE NOW. |
| CONTRACTOR OR DOR IS TO SELECT THE APPROVED ASSEMBLY. |
| |
| |
| FOR ALL OTHER PRODUCTS, INCLUDING THE STANDING SEAM |
| ROOF PANELS, IF THERE ARE DIFFERENT OPTIONS FOR |
| INSTALLATION AND NOT ALL OF THEM ARE COMPLIANT FOR |
| DESIGN PRESSURES FOR THIS BUILDING, CIRCLE THE |
| INSTALLATION OR PARTICULAR OPTION YOU ARE USING SO THAT |
| CODE COMPLIANCE CAN BE DETERMINED. |
| |
| 28.)SQUARE FOOT AREAS ON THE ENERGY CALCS DO NOT |
| MATCH THE PLAN. |
| |
| 29.)ADDRESSED. |
| |
| 30.)INCLUDE THE CORRECT JURISDICTION ON THE ENERGY |
| CALCS, 604700 FBC13. |
| |
| 31.)THE ENGINEER'S SIGNATURE IS A PHOTOCOPY, ORIGINAL |
| WET SIGNATURE REQUIRED.SEE PANEL SHEETS AND VP |
| SHEETS. |
| |
| NEW COMMENTS: |
| |
| 32.)A1.2, SPECIFY DESIGN CRITERIA FOR STAIR AND GUARD |
| RAIL RATHER THAN QUOTING A CODE SECTION.PROVIDE A |
| DETAIL FOR THE STAIR HANDRAIL, GUARD RAILS, AND RAMP |
| HANDRAIL.SEE FBC11-4.8.5, FBC11-4.9.4.WHEN SCALED, |
| STAIR HANDRAIL EXTENSIONS ARE NOT LONG ENOUGH. |
| |
| CLARIFY 5-A4.0 HANDRAIL.IT APPEARS ON THE BOTTOM HALF |
| OF THE RAMP BUT NOT THE TOP HALF. |
| |
| 33.)5-A4.0, SHOW THE MINIMUM DIMENSION WHERE THE RAMP |
| CHANGES DIRECTION.WHEN SCALED IT IS COMPLIANT AT |
| 60IN, FBC11-4.8.4(3). |
| |
| 34.)SOILS REPORTS NOT NECESSARY AS THEY WERE PROVIDED |
| WITH THE FOUNDATION PERMIT. |
| |
| 35.)THE PANEL CALCS STATES THAT THE PROJECT NAME IS |
| SEA HUNTER BOATS ON SOME PAGES. |
| |
| 36.)S2.1, ENGINEER HAS SPECIFIED 69PSF FOR THE FLAT |
| DECK ROOF, ZONES 2 AND 3.PROVIDE CALCULATIONS. |
| |
| 37.)SEE ATTACHED FS553.80(2)(B). |
| |
| |
| TO EXPEDITE PLAN REVIEW, INCLUDE A RESPONSE LETTER |
| INDICATING HOW EACH ITEM WAS ADDRESSED WHEN |
| RESUBMITTING. |