Date |
Text |
2007-01-12 17:10:50 | *****UNSAT 2ND REVIEW ****** |
| |
| FED-EX GROUND. |
| |
| ** PLEASE ADDRESSING ON PLANS SHALL BE REQUIRED TO |
| CORRELATE. PLEASE SEE PERMIT APPLICATION, THE ASSIGNED |
| ADDRESS AND PLANS DO NOT MATCH. PLEASE SEE THE ADDRESS |
| SHALL APPEAR ON ALL SHEETS TITLE BLOCKS. FAC 61G1, |
| 61G15 |
| |
| ** PLEASE SEE SOME COMMENTS FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEWS |
| WHICH ARE STILL IN NEED OF ADDRESSING. |
| COMMENTS WILL BE IDENTIFIED AS FOLLOWS IN THE SAME |
| NUMERICAL ORDER FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW. ANY NEW NOTES |
| WILL BE ADDED TO THE END OF THE REVIEW. |
| |
| A) NO, MEANS THE COMMENT IS STILL IN NEED OF FURTHER OR |
| CORRECTED INFORMATION. IT WILL BE FOLLOWED BY FURTHER |
| EXPLANATION FOR MORE INFORMATION OR TO TRY AND BETTER |
| EXPLAIN THE COMMENT. |
| B) OK, IS COMMENT IS ADDRESSED AND THE PREVIOUS NOTE |
| WILL BE REMOVED. |
| C) NO/OK IS THAT PART OF THE COMMENT MAY HAVE BEEN |
| ADDRESSED BUT NOT ALL. A FURTHER EXPLANATION WILL BE |
| TYPED TO PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION FOR WHAT IS NEED. |
| |
| |
| 1) NOTE:NO, PLEASE SEE THERE ARE NUMEROUS SHEETS IN |
| ONE SET WHICH ARE NOT SIGNED, DATED OR SEALED AT ALL. |
| PLEASE SEE YET ANOTHER SET ONLY CONTAINS ONE ELECTRICAL |
| SHEET WHICH IS SIGNED, DATED AND SEALED.PLEASE SEE |
| THE THIRD SETS ALSO. |
| PLEASE SEE THE SAME SETS CONTAINS MANY MECHANICAL AND |
| PLUMBING SHEETS WHICH ARE NOT SIGNED, DATED OR SEALED |
| EITHER? |
| PLEASE SEE OTHER SETS WHICH SOME SHEETS ARE SIGNED, |
| DATED AND SEALED AND MANY OTHER SHEETS ARE NOT? |
| PLEASE SEE OTHER DOCUMENTS WHICH ARE IN FACT |
| PHOTO-COPIES OF SIGNED AND SEALED DOCUMENTS. |
| AS PREVIOUSLY MENTIONED, ALL THREE SETS, ALL DOCUMENTS |
| PREPARED BY THE DESIGNERS OF RECORD ARE REQUIRED TO |
| CONTAIN AN ORIGINAL SIGNATURE, DATED AND A RAISED |
| EMBOSSED SEALED AS REQUIRED IN THE SECTIONS OF THE |
| FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE AND FLORIDA STATUTES GIVEN |
| ON PREVIOUS REVIEW. |
| ** PLEASE KNOW, SETS OF PLANS MAY BE RETAINED BY THIS |
| OFFICE. |
| ** PLEASE ALSO KNOW THAT THIS COMMENT IS REQUIRED FOR |
| ALL TRADES AND FOR ALL SHEETS WHETHER OR NOT COMMENT IS |
| MADE BY ANY OTHER REVIEWER(S). |
| |
| ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** |
| PLEASE SEE ALL MEP SHEETS SHALL CONTAIN THE RAISED |
| EMBOSSED SEAL FOR THE ENGINEER OF RECORD. PLEASE SEE |
| FAC 61G15-23.001,FS 471.025 |
| PLEASE ALSO SEE THE SEAL WHICH IS BEING INDICATED ON |
| SAID MEP'S IS NO LONGER VALID WITH THE STATE OF |
| FLORIDA. PLEASE SEE FAC 61G15-23.001, WHICH PASSED A |
| RULING IN FEB 04" WHICH REQUIRED THE SEAL WORDING TO |
| CHANGE FROM "CERTIFICATE" TO "LICENSE". PLEASE KNOW AN |
| EXTENSION WAS GIVEN TO 12/31/05. |
| |
| 2) NOTE: OK. |
| |
| 3) NOTE: NO, THIS IS STILL REQUIRED AND IT HAS COME TO |
| OUR ATTENTION THAT THE FIRM DOES NOT CONTAIN THE |
| LICENSE NUMBER AS NEEDED AND AS REQUIRED PER SECTIONS |
| GIVEN BELOW IN THE PREVIOUS REVIEW. PLEASE SEE RESPONSE |
| MENTIONS THE ENGINEER WAS ADDED TO THE TITLE BLOCKS, |
| HOWEVER THIS IS NOT THE ONLY REQUIRED INFORMATION. |
| PLEASE ALSO KNOW THAT EVEN THOUGH THE ENGINEERING FIRM |
| AS SHOWN IS LOCATED OUT OF STATE, THIS HAS NO BEARING |
| ON THE REQUIREMENT. |
| ** THE TITLE BLOCKS WERE REVISED FOR THE FOUNDATION |
| PERMIT. IF THIS IS DONE, ADDRESS AND COMPLETED |
| INFORMATION FOR THE INDIVIDUAL ENGINEER OF EACH TRADE |
| IS REQUIRED TO BE COMPLETED. |
| |
| ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** |
| PLEASE SEE MISSING REQUIRED INFORMATION ON TITLE |
| BLOCKS. PLEASE SEE MISSING THE PRINTED LICENSE # OF |
| ARCHITECT ON A SHEETS. PLEASE SEE THE MISSING |
| INFORMATION AS REQUIRED ON ENGINEERING FIRM. PLEASE SEE |
| MISSING CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION NUMBER. PLEASE SEE |
| ALL TITLE BLOCKS FOR ALL SHEETS ARE REQUIRED TO MEET |
| FAC 61G1-16.004, 61G15-23.002 AND FS 481.219, 471.023. |
| ** REQUIRED FOR ALL WHETHER OR NOT COMMENT IS MADE BY |
| OTHER REVIEWER(S). |
| |
| 4) NOTE: OK. |
| |
| 5) NOTE: NO, PLEASE SEE THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS |
| SUBMITTED DO NOT COMPLY OR SUPPLY THE INFORMATION AS |
| NEEDED UNDER 13-415.1AB.1 OR 13-415.2. PLEASE SEE THE |
| SHEETS SUBMITTED, SOME ARE SIGNED AND SEALED AND SOME |
| ARE NOT. |
| PLEASE SEE LIGHTING PERFORMANCE ON PLANS INDICATES THE |
| 2003 ICC WHICH IS NOT ADOPTED INTO THE STATE OF |
| FLORIDA. |
| PLEASE ALSO SEE THE ENTIRE BUILDING IS BEING DESIGNATED |
| AS ONE USE? |
| PLEASE SEE THE PREVIOUS NOTE AS THE COMPLIANCE |
| BREAKDOWN REQUIRED FOR METHOD A SHOULD BE SUBMITTED |
| SHOWING ALL INFORMATION AS NEEDED. |
| THIS MAY NOT BE CONSIDERED INDUSTRIAL WORK. A CALL TO |
| GO OVER USAGE MAY HELP. |
| |
| **PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE** |
| PLEASE SEE FBC 2004 FOR REQUIRED ENERGY CALCULATIONS. |
| PLEASE SEE 1993 ASHAE/ ETC IS BEING REFLECTED ON SAID |
| DOCUMENTS. PLEASE SEE FBC 2004 CHAPTER 13. |
| 13-415.1.AB.1 |
| PLEASE KNOW THESE WILL ALSO BE REQUIRED TO BE SIGNED, |
| DATED AND SEALED AS REQUIRED ON NOTES ABOVE. PLEASE SEE |
| THESE ARE ALSO STAMPED WITH A "RUBBER STAMP" FOR SAID |
| SEAL AND CONTAINS "CERTIFICATE" IN SEAL. |
| |
| 6) NOTE:OK/NO. PLEASE SEE RESPONSE LETTER MENTIONS |
| THAT THE ENTIRE BUILDING WILL BE OPERATING 24/7. THIS |
| EXCEPTION SHALL BE NOTED AND STATED ON THE PLANS. |
| PLEASE SEE NO INFORMATION FOR THE WORST CASE VOLTAGE |
| DROP CALCULATIONS OR SCENARIOS COULD BE LOCATED ON |
| PLANS. |
| |
| ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** |
| PLEASE SEE CHAPTER 13 13-415.1.ABC.1.1, .1.2 AND .1.3 |
| FOR MINIMUM LIGHTING CONTROLS REQUIRED. PLEASE PROVIDE |
| PERFORMANCE CALCULATIONS PER 13-415.2, 13-415.2.ABC.1. |
| PLEASE SEE TABLES AND SPACE BY SPACE METHODS. |
| PLEASE PROVIDE SCHEDULING. |
| PLEASE SEE ALL OF CHAPTER 13, BASED ON THE 2004 FBC. |
| PLEASE PROVIDE ALL WORST CASE SCENARIO'S FOR VOLTAGE |
| DROP CALCULATIONS PER13-413.1ABC.1 FOR BOTH BRANCH |
| CIRCUIT AND FEEDERS. |
| |
| 7) NOTE:NO, THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS DO NOT PROVIDE THE |
| WIND LOAD INFORMATION, DO NOT SUPPLE THE MAXIMUM EPA, |
| AND IF SUBMITTING SHOP/PRODUCTS, FOR COMPLIANCE AND |
| SHOWING AND STATING THE INFORMATION ON PLANS, THEN ALL |
| OF THESE DOCUMENTS FOR POLES, WIND LOAD INFORMATION AND |
| EPA'S SHALL BE REVIEWED AND STAMPED/SIGNED BY THE |
| ENGINEER OF RECORD. |
| |
| ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** |
| PLEASE PROVIDE WIND LOAD CALCULATIONS FOR SITE LIGHTING |
| POLES. PLEASE KNOW, THE BUILDING/STRUCTURAL REVIEWER |
| WILL REVIEW SAID DOCUMENTS FOR ACTUAL WIND LOADS WHICH |
| WILL BE REQUIRED TO SHOW EPA FOR PROPOSED FIXTURES. |
| FBC 2004 140MPH. ETC. |
| |
| 8) NOTE:NO, PLEASE SEE RESPONSE MENTIONS DESIGN WILL |
| MEET THIS; HOWEVER NO REVIEW FOR COMPLIANCE CAN BE DONE |
| UNTIL PHOTO-METRICS ARE SHOWN FOR COMPLIANCE. THE |
| LEVELS ARE BEING SUBMITTED FOR WAREHOUSE UNDER NORMAL, |
| HOWEVER NO INFORMATION FOR CONDITIONS UNDER EMERGENCY |
| OR OFFICE EGRESS AREAS IS SHOWN. |
| |
| ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE** |
| PLEASE PROVIDE MINIMUM PHOTO-METRICS FOR EGRESS |
| LIGHTING PER NFPA-101 7.8, 7.9 |
| PLEASE SEE NORMAL IS SHOWN, HOWEVER NEED TO SEE MIN |
| UNDER EMERGENCY CONDITIONS. |
| |
| 9) NOTE: OK, AS NOTED HOWEVER SEE OTHER NEW COMMENTS AS |
| THE PLANS WERE REVIEWED AS THIS MAIN DIST PANEL |
| CONTAINING A SINGLE MCB RATED AT THE 1600AMPS. |
| SEE NEW NOTES. |
| |
| 10) NOTE: OK. |
| |
| 11) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 110.9, 240.13 AND PROVIDE ALL |
| MINIMUM REQUIRED AIC RATINGS AND SELECTIVE COORDINATION |
| FOR EQUIPMENT AS SHOWN. PLEASE SHOW DETAIL FOR |
| EQUIPMENT. |
| |
| 12) NOTE: NO, PLEASE SEE RESPONSE SAYS THE EGC IS |
| AFTER; HOWEVER PLEASE SEE RISER NOTE WHICH SHOWS ALL |
| PHASE CONDUCTORS AND AN EGC FROM THE FPL(LOCAL POWER |
| COMPANY ) TRANSFORMER. |
| PLEASE SEE RISER. |
| |
| ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** |
| PLEASE SEE 250.6, 250.24B AS AN "EQUIPMENT GROUNDING |
| CONDUCTOR" IS BEING SHOWN BEFORE THE FIRST MEANS OF |
| DISCONNECT ON THE LINE SIDE OF THE MAIN. PLEASE KNOW |
| THE EGC IS ONLY INSTALLED AFTER THE FIRST MEANS OF |
| DISCONNECT. |
| |
| 13) NOTE: OK. |
| |
| 14) NOTE: NO, RESPONSE MENTIONS WHAT TO DO, HOWEVER |
| WHERE IS THIS DETAIL ON PLANS AS PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED? |
| |
| ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** |
| PLEASE PROVIDE A STRUCTURAL SUPPORT DETAIL FOR BOTH |
| TRANSFORMERS. |
| PLEASE KNOW THIS STRUCTURAL DETAIL WILL BE REVIEWED BY |
| BUILDING REVIEWER. |
| FBC 106.1.2 |
| |
| 15) NOTE: OK. |
| |
| 16) NOTE:NO. PLEASE SEE RESPONSE MENTIONS THE MINIMUM |
| LEVELS WHICH ARE REQUIRED PER ADA UNDER THE FBC AS |
| EXCESSIVE. THESE ARE MINIMUM LEVELS. PLEASE SEE THE FBC |
| DICTATES THE LEVELS WHICH ARE MORE RESTRICTIVE THAN |
| THAT OF THE LEVELS IN NFPA-72. PLEASE SEE THAT THERE |
| ARE MAXIMUM LEVELS WHICH ARE 1000 CD. |
| THE LEVELS FOR THESE AREAS WHICH ARE TAKEN DIRECTLY |
| FROM THE SECTIONS GIVEN MUST MEET THESE LEVELS AT A |
| MINIMUM. |
| AS REVIEWING THE RESPONSE IT HAS BEEN NOTED, HOWEVER |
| THESE ARE STATED IN THE CODE THERE IS NO MENTION FOR |
| EXCEPTIONS DUE TO MEDICAL CONDITIONS AS MENTIONED. |
| PLEASE PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION FOR THESE LEVELS FROM |
| THE FBC IF SECTIONS WRE INF THE CODE WHICH WILL SUPPORT |
| THESE LESSER LEVELS. |
| |
| ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTES** |
| PLEASE SEE FBC 11-4.28, 11-4.28.2 AND .3(4) WHICH |
| REQUIRE A MIN OF 75 CANDELAS AT ALL AREAS AS STATED FOR |
| ADA. PLEASE SEE MIN LEVELS STATED FOR ADA ON PLANS |
| MENTIONS 15CD? |
| PLEASE KNOW ALL OF THESE AREAS WILL BE TESTED FOR |
| MINIMUM LEVELS, PLEASE BE SURE THE DEVICES AS SHOWN AND |
| INSTALLED WILL MEET TESTED LEVELS. PLEASE ADJUST NOTES |
| ON PLANS AT THIS TIME. |
| |
| 17) NOTE: OK. |
| |
| 18) NOTE: OK/NO, PLEASE SEE RESPONSE MENTIONS THAT ALL |
| CONVEYOR SYSTEMS AND ELECTRICAL WORK WILL BE UNDER A |
| SEPARATE PERMIT PLANS AND FEES. PLEASE SEE THE MDP |
| SHOWS CONDUCTORS AND CONDUITS BEING INSTALLED AT THIS |
| TIME YET THE RISER DOES NOT SHOW THESE CONDUITS BEING |
| DONE AT THIS TIME. PLEASE ALSO SEE NEW NOTE WITH |
| RESPECT TO THE AMOUNT OF MAINS. |
| PLEASE ADJUST MDP IF THIS WORK IS NOT BEING DONE AT |
| THIS TIME AS SHOWN ON RISER AS FUTURE. |
| |
| ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** |
| PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION FOR CONVEYOR SYSTEM, PLEASE |
| PROVIDE INFORMATION ON ALL LISTINGS FOR EQUIPMENT BRING |
| INSTALLED. |
| PLEASE PROVIDE SPECS ON THE MCC. |
| 110.3, 90.7. |
| FBC 106.1.2 |
| |
| 19) NOTE: OK. |
| |
| 20) NOTE:OK, THIS WAS ONLY NOTED A |
| |
| 21) NOTE: NO, PLEASE SEE RESPONSE MENTIONS THAT THE |
| LOCK ON/OFF DEVICE WILL PART OF THE BREAKER, HOWEVER |
| THIS IS ONLY BEING NOTED IN RESPONSE LETTER, PLEASE |
| PLACE THIS NOTE ON PLANS RELEVANT TO THE PANEL |
| SCHEDULES AND BREAKERS BEING INSTALLED. |
| |
| ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** |
| PLEASE SEE PANEL NOTES MENTIONS "LOCK-OFF" BREAKERS, |
| PLEASE KNOW THESE TYPE OF LOCK OFF DEVICES SHALL BE AN |
| INTEGRAL PART OF THE BREAKER AND SHALL NOT BE REMOVABLE |
| WITHOUT THE REMOVAL OF SAID BREAKER. 90.7, 110.3, 90.4 |
| |
| 22) NOTE: OK, FUELING STATION WILL NOT BE PART OF THIS |
| PERMIT. |
| |
| ** NEW NOTES THIS REVIEW ** |
| |
| 23) NOTE: PLEASE SEE AS THE MDP CONTAINS MORE THAN SIX |
| SPACES AND THEY ARE NOT BEING COMPLETED AND SPACES ARE |
| NOT FILLED AT THIS TIME, A MCB WILL BE REQUIRED. OTHER |
| OPTIONS WOULD BE TO INSTALL THE 3-POLE BREAKERS AS |
| SPARES AT THIS TIME AND WILL BE REQUIRED TO BE SHOWN, |
| OR THE PLANS SHALL BE NOTED THAT THE DEAD-FRONT FROM |
| THE MANUFACTURE SHALL CONTAIN A PERMANENT FACTORY |
| INSTALLED FILLER FOR THIS SECTION FOR 2D. |
| 230.70, 230.71 90.4. |
| PLEASE KNOW, THE OTHER OPTION WOULD BE TO INSTALL A |
| 1600AMP MCB WITH GF PROTECTION. |
| |
| 24) NOTE: PLEASE SEE MDP WHICH SHOWS 1/0'S FOR THE |
| FEEDERS TO THE TRANSFORMER FOR PP1, HOWEVER RISER SHOWS |
| #1'S. PLEASE CORRELATE. |
| PLEASE KEEP IN MIND THE VOLTAGE DROP AS PREVIOUSLY |
| NOTED. |
| |
| 25) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FLORIDA STATUTES 553.80(2)(B) IS |
| BEING GIVEN AS A NOTICE AT THIS TIME WITH RESPECT TO |
| REPEAT COMMENTS FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. THIS IS ONLY A |
| NOTICE; HOWEVER ONE SET OF PLANS MAY BE RETAINED. |
| |
| ** PLEASE KNOW AS THERE IS INFORMATION WHICH HAS NOT |
| YET BEEN SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW, THERE MAY BE COMMENTS ON |
| NEXT REVIEW WHICH ARE NOT STATED IN THESE REVIEW |
| NOTES. |
| |
| |
| *** IMPORTANT** |
| ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE |
| PICKED UP FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE |
| SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL OLD/VOIDED |
| SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED |
| SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW |
| AND STAMPING. DO NOT LEAVE ANY |
| OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. |
| PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE |
| OLD/VOIDED SHEETS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED |
| FOR REFERENCE. |
| THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND |
| AVOID ANY DELAYS. |
| |
| ** PLEASE BE SURE TO CALL IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS OR |
| COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE TYPED COMMENTS ABOVE. IF |
| THERE ARE ANY COMMENTS WHICH ARE NOT CLEAR IN ANY WAY, |
| NOT UNDERSTOOD OR NOT TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR, PLEASE DO |
| NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE AND THIS |
| REVIEWER. |
| |
| DEWEY PALMER |
| ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW |
| CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. |
| CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| 561-805-6717 |
| [email protected] ND IF IT IS AN ISSUE THEN RELOCATION |
| WILL BE REQUIRED. |