Date |
Text |
2007-02-01 18:30:50 | 2007-02-01 18:30:50 |
| |
| ******* UNSAT 2ND REVIEW ****** |
| |
| *** PLEASE SEE THERE ARE ITEMS FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW |
| WHICH STILL NEED TO BE ADDRESSED ALONG WITH NEW |
| COMMENTS BASED ON CHANGES IN PLANS AND NEW INFORMATION |
| AND/OR CHANGES MADE TO PLANS. |
| |
| **** IMPORTANT**** |
| |
| ** PLEASE SEE THE NOTES BELOW ARE TAKEN DIRECTLY FROM |
| THE PREVIOUS REVIEW WITH A *NO*, *OK* OR *NO/OK*. |
| |
| A) A, NO WILL CONTAIN A FURTHER EXPLANATION AS TO WHY |
| THE COMMENT MAY NOT HAVE BEEN FULLY ADDRESSED WITH THE |
| PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE BELOW WITH **PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE |
| #1** |
| |
| B) A, OK, WILL HAVE NO COMMENTS EXCEPT PERHAPS A |
| REFERENCE TO SEE ** NEW NOTES*. THE PREVIOUS REVIEW |
| NOTE WILL BE REMOVED. |
| |
| C) A, NO/OK, WILL HAVE FURTHER EXPLANATION AS PART OF |
| THE COMMENT MAY HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED, HOWEVER NOT ALL. |
| THE PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE WILL BE NOTED **PREVIOUS |
| REVIEW NOTE #1** |
| |
| D) NEW NOTES WILL BE ADDED TO THE END AND LABELED ** |
| NEW NOTES ** |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| 1) A) NOTE: NO, PLEASE SEE THE ADDRESS HAS NOT YET BEEN |
| CHANGED AND PLEASE SEE THIS IS NOT A SEPARATE BUILDING |
| BY DEFINITIONS OF THE FBC AND MAY OR MAY NOT CONTAIN A |
| NEW ADDRESS. THIS HAS BEEN SENT TO THE ADDRESSING |
| REVIEWER AS IT IS A CODE RELATED COMMENT. PLEASE SEE |
| POSSIBLE COMMENTS FROM BUILDING, AND FIRE REVIEWER(S). |
| THIS ADDRESS MAY OR MAY NOT BE OK, IT IS UNCERTIAN AT |
| THIS TIME. |
| |
| ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE REVIEW #1** |
| PLEASE SEE PERMIT APPLICATION AND PLANS MENTIONS AND |
| SHOWS "3021", HOWEVER THIS PROJECT IS LOCATED ON A |
| LEGAL ADDRESS IN OUR SYSTEM OF "3001". |
| PLEASE KNOW TITLE BLOCKS SHALL BE REVISED UPON |
| CORRECTING OF ADDRESS. |
| |
| 1) NOTE: OK. |
| |
| 2) NOTE: OK FOR MEP PLANS, SEE NEW COMMENTS FOR OTHER |
| SHEETS WHICH DO NOT APPLY TO TEELE & ASSC. |
| |
| 3) NOTE: NO/OK, NOTES ADDED FOR ITEMS BELOW 18INCHES, |
| HOWEVER PLEASE SEE ROOMS CONTAINING FUEL/LIQUIDS ETC |
| WHICH WILL BE A CLASS AND DIVISION LOCATION NEED TO BE |
| DESIGNATED. |
| |
| ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE REVIEW #1** |
| PLEASE NEC 511, AND PLEASE INDICATE ALL RELEVANT AREAS |
| AND LAYOUT ON PLANS. |
| |
| 4) NOTE:NO, PLEASE SEE SOME AREAS FOR STAIRS WERE |
| ADDED; HOWEVER PLEASE SEE THIS COMMENT IS BASED ON ALL |
| EGRESS PATHS WHICH MAY CONTAIN OCCUPANTS WHICH NEED TO |
| EGRESS FROM THE BUILDING. |
| PLEASE SEE THE EXIT CORRIDOR; PLEASE SEE AREAS OF |
| PARKING GARAGE WHICH DO NOT SEEM TO CONTAIN ANY |
| EMERGENCY LIGHTING. PLEASE SEE THE LIGHTING IS BEING |
| SHOWN ON THESE SAME UPPER LEVELS WITH OUT THE USE OF |
| ANY NIGHT LIGHTS OR PHOTO-CELL OVER RIDES EVEN FOR DAY |
| TIME OPERATIONS FOR MINIMUM LIGHTING.PLEASE SEE |
| COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO CONTACTORS AND CONTROLS. |
| PLEASE EXPLAIN HOW THE STAIRS ARE SHOWING ONE LEVEL OF |
| LIGHTING UNDER NORMAL AND ONE LEVEL OF LIGHTING UNDER |
| EMERGENCY WHEN THE FIXTURES ARE THE SAME TYPES AND ARE |
| BATTERY BACK UP. DO THESE CONTAIN A REDUCTION OF THE |
| LIGHTING LEVELS BUILT IN? |
| PLEASE ALSO SEE THAT THE STAIR LIGHTING IS BEING SHOWN |
| ON OCCUPANCY SENSOR TYPE DEVICES WHICH ARE OK, HOWEVER |
| PLEASE SEE DUE TO THE LAYOUT, THE FAILURE OF ONE DEVICE |
| WOULD LEAVE ANY ONE AREA IN THE MEANS OF EGRESS PATH IN |
| TOTAL WHICH WOULD NOT MEET THE MINIMUM LIGHTING FOR |
| LIFE SAFETY. PLEASE ADJUST DEVICES OR CALL TO GO OVER |
| OTHER POSSIBLE OPTIONS. |
| ** PLEASE SEE THE FOLLOWING SCENARIO:AN OCCUPANT IS |
| LOCATED IN THE PARKING GARAGE ON THE SECOND LEVEL (OR |
| OTHER LOCATIONS IN BUILDING) WHICH DO NOT CONTAIN OF |
| OVER RIDE(S) FOR LIGHTING WHEN THE LIGHTING SHUTS OFF |
| DUE TO THE TIME SET. PLEASE SEE THE AREA FOR MEANS OF |
| EGRESS WOULD BE A HAZARD AND SHOULD CONTAIN EITHER |
| SENOR DEVICES WHICH PROVIDE COVERAGE FOR OVER RIDE OR |
| OTHER MEANS OF LIGHT FOR THE OCCUPANT TO FIN THEIR WAY |
| TO THE MANUAL OVER RIDE DEVICE. |
| PLEASE PROVIDE TIMES OF SCHEDULING. |
| |
| ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE REVIEW #1** |
| PLEASE SEE NFPA-101 7.8.1.3, |
| 7.9.2.2. PLEASE SUBMIT AND SUPPLY ALL MIN PHOTO-METRICS |
| REQUIRED FOR STAIR TOWERS UNDER NORMAL AND EMERGENCY |
| POWER. |
| PLEASE ALSO INDICATE LIGHTING LEVELS (MIN) REQUIRED FOR |
| ALL OTHER AREAS OF EGRESS. PLEASE SEE THERE ARE AREAS |
| ON PLANS WHICH DO NOT SEEM TO MEET THIS. |
| 10FT CANDLES UNDER NORMAL AND 1FT CANDLE UNDER EM IN |
| STAIRS. |
| ALL OTHER AREAS 1FT MIN. |
| |
| 5) NOTE: OK. |
| |
| 6) NOTE: OK. |
| |
| 7) NOTE: OK. |
| |
| 8) NOTE: OK. |
| |
| 9) NOTE: OK. |
| |
| 10) NOTE: OK. |
| |
| 11) NOTE: OK. |
| |
| 12) NOTE: NO, NOTED ABOVE IN COMMENT #4. |
| |
| ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE FROM REVIEW #1** |
| PLEASE SEE FIRE REVIEW COMMENTS FOR GARAGE AREAS LTS, |
| REQ'D EM BACK UP. |
| AS PREVIOUSLY NOTED ABOVE FOR ELECTRICAL REVIEW ALSO. |
| LS101 7.9 |
| |
| 13) NOTE: NO/OK, PLEASE SEE SOME AREAS WHERE INGRESS |
| INTO SPACE ARE SHOWN INDICATE A *S* AS FOR A STANDARD |
| SWITCH. PLEASE SEE ANY OVER RIDE TYPE SHOWN THIS WAY |
| SHOULD BE CLARIFIED ON SYMBOL LEGEND. |
| PLEASE SEE SEPARATE AREAS (ELEVATOR PIT) WHICH WILL |
| REQUIRE AUTOMATIC MEANS OF SHUT OFF (TIMER). PLEASE SEE |
| THERE ARE OVER RIDES SHOWN ON CONTACTOR #1 WHICH DOES |
| NOT INDICATE TYPE AND AMOUNT OF TIME ON THE OVER RIDE. |
| PLEASE SEE OTHER AREAS WHICH A DEVICE WILL BE REQUIRED |
| AND MAXIMUM TIMES FOR ALL DEVICES SHOULD BE INDICATED. |
| PLEASE SEE 30MINS FOR OCCUPANCY SENSOR TYPE DEVICES AND |
| 4HRS MAX FOR TIMER TYPE. |
| PLEASE SEE INPUT DATA IS MISSING FROM THE ENERGY |
| CALCULATIONS. |
| PLEASE SEE METHOD USED WILL AFFECT THE INFORMATION. |
| THESE CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED ARE METHOD *B*. |
| ** PLEASE SEE NEW NOTES WITH RESPECT TO CONTACTORS, |
| CONTROLS AND CIRCUITING ON PLANS AND CONTACTORS. |
| |
| ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE FROM REVIEW #1** |
| PLEASE SEE 2004 FBC CHAPTER 13 FOR CONTROLS FOR ALL |
| LIGHTING. |
| PLEASE INDICATE AND SHOW THE SYSTEM BEING PROPOSED. |
| PLEASE PROVIDE SCHEDULING OF SYSTEMS. |
| PLEASE PROVIDE OVER RIDES, LOCATIONS, AND AREAS FOR |
| SEPARATE CONTROLS REQUIRED. PLEASE SEE FBC |
| 13-415.1.ABC.1.1, .1.2 AND .1.3. |
| PLEASE SEE SHOW AND INDICATE THE TYPE OF OVER RIDE |
| DEVICES, AND MAX ALLOWED TIMES. (NOTE: TIMER TYPE (4HRS |
| MAX), OCCUPANT SENSOR TYPE 30MINS MAX). |
| ALL AREAS WITH FLR TO CEILING HEIGHT PARTITIONS REQUIRE |
| SEPARATE CONTROLS. |
| PLEASE PROVIDE PERFORMANCE CALCULATIONS AND PLEASE SEE |
| THE MAXIMUM PERMITTED |
| "LIGHTING POWER DENSITIES" (LPD) ALLOWED FOR AREAS. |
| PLEASE SEE SPACES AND USE PERMITTED IN TABLES. |
| 13-415.2, 13-415.2.ABC.1, TABLES? 13-415.2.B. |
| ALL LPD'S ARE TO BE SHOWN. |
| |
| 14) NOTE: NO, PLEASE SEE PLANS THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS |
| DO NOT CORRELATE WITH THE MECHANICAL AND PLUMBING |
| SHEETS WITH RESPECT TO THE WALL(S) FROM THE SHOWROOM OF |
| THE EXISTING BUILDING AND THE ADDITION. |
| PLEASE SEE THAT A PARTIAL 2HR RATED WALL DOES NOT |
| CONSTITUTE A SEPARATE BUILDING BY DEFINITION IN THE |
| FBC. THIS WOULD BE REQUIRED TO BE A 4 HOUR RATED FIRE |
| WALL. PLEASE SEE THE DEFINITIONS OF A FIRE WALL IN THE |
| FBC. THE PLANS AS SUBMITTED DO NOT COMPLY WITH THIS. |
| PLEASE KNOW BASED ON THIS AND COORDINATION OF SHEETS A |
| SEPARATE SERVICE FOR THIS ADDITION TO AN EXISTING |
| BUILDING IS NOT GRANTED AS PREVIOUSLY STATED. PLEASE |
| ALSO SEE THE PLANS STILL INDICATE MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT |
| FOR THE NEW BUILDING BEING SHOWN INSTALLED ON THE |
| EXISTING SHOW ROOM PORTION OF THE BUILDING. |
| ** PLEASE BE SURE TO SEE NEW NOTES FOR COORDINATION |
| FROM ELECTRICAL PLANS TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. |
| |
| |
| ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE REVIEW #1** |
| PLEASE SEE THIS IS NOT BEING CONSIDERED A SEPARATE |
| "BUILDING" AND IS PART OF THE CURRENT STRUCTURE AS THIS |
| NEW STRUCTURE CONTAINS OPENINGS ETC FOR EGRESS ETC. |
| PLEASE SEE FBC DEFINITIONS. |
| PLEASE SEE NEC 230.2, AS THE NEW PROPOSED SEPARATE |
| SERVICE NOT BEING FED FROM THE EXISTING SERVICE |
| LOCATION GROUPED ETC IS NOT PERMITTED AS SHOWN. 230.2, |
| 230.72 ETC. |
| IN ORDER TO GRANT THE NEW SERVICE FOR A NEW "BUILDING", |
| THIS WOULD REQUIRE AND |
| "FIREWALL", 4 HR RATED, COLLAPSIBLE ON BOTH SIDES WITH |
| OUT AFFECTS ON THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF EITHER |
| STRUCTURE. BY THE PLANS SUBMITTED, THIS IS NOT ACHIEVED |
| AT THIS TIME. |
| |
| 15) NOTE: OK. |
| |
| 16) NOTE: OK.. |
| |
| 17) NOTE: OK. |
| |
| 18) NOTE: NO? RESPONSE LETTER MENTIONS TO SEE REVISED |
| ELECTRICAL PLANS FOR THIS HOWEVER THIS INFORMATION |
| COULD NOT BE LOCATED. |
| PLEASE KNOW PLANS ARE REQUIRED TO STATE THE MINIMUM, A |
| *PROVISO* MAY BE SET UP TO OBTAIN THE STRUCTURAL |
| CALCULATIONS LATER BEFORE ANY INSTALLATION OF BOLTS, |
| BASE, ETC FOR POLES. |
| |
| ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE REVIEW #1** |
| PLEASE SUBMIT ALL WIND LOAD CALCULATIONS FOR ROOF TOP |
| LT POLES WITH |
| EPA FIGURED FOR ALL LT FIXTURES PROPOSED. |
| THE CALCULATIONS AND SPEC FOR POLES WILL BE REVIEWED |
| FOR STRUCTURAL CONNECTIONS, WIND LOADS ETC BY THE |
| STRUCTURAL REVIEWER. |
| THEY MUST MEET FBC 2004 140MPH MIN, 3 SEC GUST. |
| |
| 19) NOTE: NO? RESPONSE MENTIONS TO SEE REVISED PLANS, |
| HOWEVER NO INFORMATION COULD BE FOUND FOR PREVIOUS |
| REQUEST. |
| |
| ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE REVIEW #1** |
| PLEASE SUBMIT THE MANUFACTURE SPECS /CUT SHEETS FOR |
| THE TANK LESS WATER HEATER. PLEASE BE SURE THEY |
| INDICATE THE |
| NRTL LISTING. |
| 110.3, 90.7. |
| |
| 20) NOTE:NO, SAME COMMENT. THIS IS NOTED AS THIS IS |
| BEING PROPOSED AS A SEPARATE BUILDING, YET THIS IS NOT |
| BEING MET AT THIS TIME. |
| |
| ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE REVIEW #1** |
| PLEASE SEE AS PLUMBING PLANS ALSO INDICATE BEING TIED |
| INTO THE EXISTING BUILDING, IT SEEMS THE PERMIT |
| APPLICATION WOULD BETTER DESCRIBE PROJECT AS AN |
| ADDITION. |
| THIS WILL BE DECIDED BY DESIGN FOR NOTES FROM ALL |
| REVIEWER(S). |
| |
| |
| ************ NEW NOTES ********* |
| |
| 21) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE *S* SHEETS SUBMITTED CONTAIN A |
| *RUBBER STAMP* FOR THE REQUIRED ORIGINAL SIGNATURE FROM |
| THE ENGINEER. PLEASE SEE THE FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE |
| CODE 61G15-23.002 AND FLORIDA STATUTES 471.025. THIS |
| COMMENT IS MADE AND REQUIRED WHETHER OR NOT COMMENT IS |
| MADE BY OTHER REVIEWER(S). |
| PLEASE KNOW ONE SET OF PLANS WILL BE RETAINED AS THIS |
| COMMENT HAS BEEN MADE TO THIS SAME ENGINEER ON OTHER |
| PROJECTS PREVIOUSLY. |
| |
| 22) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FIRE SPRINKLER PLANS DO NOT |
| CONTAIN ANY TITLE BLOCK FOR THE ENGINEER WHICH IS |
| SIGNING AND SEALING DOCUMENTS. |
| PLEASE ALSO SEE THAT THE SEAL IS NOT CLEAR AND VISIBLE |
| WITH INFORMATION ON SAID SEAL. |
| PLEASE SEE THAT EVEN SHADOWING DOES NOT PROVIDE |
| INFORMATION. |
| FAC 61G15-23.002 AND 61G15-23.001., |
| THIS COMMENT IS ALSO REQUIRED WHETHER OR NOT COMMENT IS |
| MADE BY ANY OTHER TRADE(S). |
| ONE SET IS BEING RETAINED. |
| ** PLEASE KNOW THAT THE FIRE SPRINKLERS EVEN THOUGH |
| REQUIRED TO BE SHOWN WITH THE BASE BUILDING PERMITTED |
| PLANS WILL STILL BE REQUIRED TO BE UNDER A SEPARATE |
| PERMIT, PLANS AND FEES AT A LATE DATE. |
| |
| 23) NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT COMPLETE DETAILS FOR FIRE ALARM |
| SYSTEM BEING PROPOSED AND HOW THIS SYSTEM WILL BE TIED |
| IN THE EXISTING SYSTEM. PLEASE KNOW THE BASE LOCATIONS |
| AND DEVICES ARE REQUIRED AT THIS TIME FOR BASE |
| BUILDING. |
| PLEASE SEE THAT ALL OF THE MINIMUM LEVELS TO MEET FBC |
| 11-4.28.1, .2 AND .3(4) IS REQUIRED TO BE STATED ON |
| PLANS. |
| THIS COMMENT WAS NOT MADE ON THE PREVIOUS PLAN REVIEW |
| BY THIS REVIEWER HOWEVER THIS IS NOW REQUIRED AS PART |
| OF THE ELECTRICAL REVIEW. |
| FBC 106.1.2 AND 106.3.5.1.2 |
| |
| ** PLEASE KNOW THAT THE FIRE ALARM SCOPE OF WORK WILL |
| STILL BE UNDER A SEPARATE PERMIT PLANS AND FEES ART A |
| LATER DATE. |
| |
| 24) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THERE ARE SEVERAL DIFFERENCES ON |
| THE ARCH SHEETS, FROM THE ELECTRICAL, MECHANICAL AND |
| PLUMBING SHEETS. |
| WALLS DO NOT CORRELATE. (DOORS ETC) |
| FBC 106.1, 106.1.2 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND |
| COORDINATION ANDFBC CHAPTER 11. |
| |
| |
| PLEASE SEE THE STAIRS AS THE ELECTRICAL PLANS SHOW |
| DOORS WHICH ARE OPPOSING WHICH DO NOT MEET THE MINIMUM |
| REQUIREMENTS FOR ADA. PLEASE SEE STAIRS/VESTIBULE |
| AREAS. THE A SHEETS DO NOT SHOW THIS SAME DOOR SWINGS. |
| PLEASE SEE CHAPTER 11 AND BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS FOR |
| THIS. THIS IS FOR INFORMATION AT THIS TIME AS |
| COORDINATION BETWEEN THE SHEETS IS IMPERATIVE. |
| |
| 25) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THAT THE CIRCUITS AS SHOWN ON THE |
| PLANS WHICH ARE NOTED TO THE LIGHTING CONTACTORS ARE |
| NOT COMPLETE ON THE LIGHTING CONTACTORS. |
| PLEASE SEE THE IDENTIFICATION OF THE CIRCUITS ON THE |
| SECOND FLOOR INDICATES TO LIGHTING CONTACTOR #2, |
| HOWEVER PLEASE SEE THE CONTACTOR DETAIL ON THAT SHEET |
| IS LABELED *CONTACTOR #1*. |
| PLEASE SEE LEVELS ANDFIXTURES WHICH MENTIONS LIGHTING |
| CONTACTOR #3, YET NO DETAIL FOR A LC #3 WAS SHOWN. |
| PLEASE COORDINATE. |
| PLEASE SEE NOTES ABOVE WITH RESPECT TO THE CONTACTORS |
| AND THE OVER RIDE DEVICES REQUIRES AND THE MAXIMUM |
| AMOUNT OF TIMES ON THESE OVER RIDES. |
| |
| 27) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 109.3.6.4.4 |
| PLANS WHICH ARE SIGNED, DATED AND SEALED BY AN |
| ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER SHALL CONTAIN A STATEMENT THAT: * |
| TO THE BEST OF THE ARCHITECT'S OR ENGINEER'S KNOWLEDGE, |
| THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS COMPLY WITH THE APPLICABLE |
| MINIMUM BUILDING CODES AND THE APPLICABLE FIRE-SAFETY |
| STANDARDS AS DETERMINED BY THE LOCAL AUTHORITY IN |
| ACCORDANCE WITH THIS SECTION AND CHAPTER (FLORIDA |
| STATUTES) 633. |
| THIS IS REQUIRED WHETHER OR NOT COMMENT IS MADE BY |
| OTHER TRADES FOR ALL TRADES/TITLE SHEETS FOR EACH TRADE |
| AND/OR TITLE BLOCKS. |
| |
| 28) NOTE: PLEASE PROVIDE A DETAIL/NOTE FOR ALL |
| EMERGENCY AND EXIT LIGHTS WHICH ARE REQUIRED TO BE |
| WIRED AHEAD OF ANY SWITCHING DEVICES. |
| PLEASE KNOW THIS IS NOT A NEW CODE, HOWEVER SINCE THE |
| IMPLEMENTATION OF CHAPTER 13 OF THE FBC. THIS |
| JURISDICTION HAS HAD NUMEROUS INSTANCES WHERE THE |
| EMERGENCY FIXTURES ARE BEING WIRED ON THE LOAD OF THE |
| NEW OCCUPANCY SENSORS, OVER RIDES, TIMERS ETC. THIS |
| SHOULD NOT HAVE TO BE MADE ON PLANS, HOWEVER PLEASE |
| PROVIDE A DETAIL CLOUDED OFF OF THE CONTACTOR OR ON A |
| SEPARATE DETAIL OF SOME KIND. |
| FBC 106.1.2, NEC 700.12E. |
| |
| 29) NOTE: PLEASE SEE COLOR CODING FOR CONDUCTORS FOR |
| 277/480V SHOULD BE BROWN, PURPLE , YELLOW. AS NO |
| 277/480V IS BEING SHOWN AS PART OF THIS BUILDING, THIS |
| COULD BE REDLINED ON PLANS. |
| |
| 30) NOTE: PLEASE SEE COPY OF FS 553.80(2)(B) WITH |
| RESPECT TO REPEAT CODE COMPLIANT COMMENTS. THIS IS ONLY |
| A NOTICE BEING GIVEN AT THIS TIME. |
| ** PLEASE KNOW BASED ON THE NOTES FOR ALL TRADES, ONE |
| COMPLETE SET OF PLANS IS BEING RETAINED BY THIS |
| OFFICE. |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| ** PLEASE BE AWARE OF COMMENTS FROM OTHER TRADES WHICH |
| MAY AFFECT ELECTRICAL PLANS. |
| |
| * ** IMPORTANT** |
| ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE |
| PICKED UP FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE |
| SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL OLD/VOIDED |
| SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED |
| SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW |
| AND STAMPING. DO NOT LEAVE ANY |
| OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. |
| PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE |
| OLD/VOIDED SHEETS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED |
| FOR REFERENCE. |
| THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND |
| AVOID ANY DELAYS. |
| |
| ** PLEASE BE SURE TO CALL IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS OR |
| COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE TYPED COMMENTS ABOVE. IF |
| THERE ARE ANY COMMENTS WHICH ARE NOT CLEAR IN ANY WAY, |
| NOT UNDERSTOOD OR NOT TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR, PLEASE DO |
| NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE AND THIS |
| REVIEWER. |
| |
| DEWEY PALMER |
| ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW |
| CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. |
| CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| 561-805-6717 |
| [email protected] |