Plan Review Notes
Plan Review Notes For Permit 06090410
Permit Number 06090410
Review Stop E
Sequence Number 2
Notes
Date Text
2007-02-01 18:30:502007-02-01 18:30:50
  
 ******* UNSAT 2ND REVIEW ******
  
 *** PLEASE SEE THERE ARE ITEMS FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW
 WHICH STILL NEED TO BE ADDRESSED ALONG WITH NEW
 COMMENTS BASED ON CHANGES IN PLANS AND NEW INFORMATION
 AND/OR CHANGES MADE TO PLANS.
  
 **** IMPORTANT****
  
 ** PLEASE SEE THE NOTES BELOW ARE TAKEN DIRECTLY FROM
 THE PREVIOUS REVIEW WITH A *NO*, *OK* OR *NO/OK*.
  
 A) A, NO WILL CONTAIN A FURTHER EXPLANATION AS TO WHY
 THE COMMENT MAY NOT HAVE BEEN FULLY ADDRESSED WITH THE
 PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE BELOW WITH **PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE
 #1**
  
 B) A, OK, WILL HAVE NO COMMENTS EXCEPT PERHAPS A
 REFERENCE TO SEE ** NEW NOTES*. THE PREVIOUS REVIEW
 NOTE WILL BE REMOVED.
  
 C) A, NO/OK, WILL HAVE FURTHER EXPLANATION AS PART OF
 THE COMMENT MAY HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED, HOWEVER NOT ALL.
 THE PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE WILL BE NOTED **PREVIOUS
 REVIEW NOTE #1**
  
 D) NEW NOTES WILL BE ADDED TO THE END AND LABELED **
 NEW NOTES **
  
  
  
  
 1) A) NOTE: NO, PLEASE SEE THE ADDRESS HAS NOT YET BEEN
 CHANGED AND PLEASE SEE THIS IS NOT A SEPARATE BUILDING
 BY DEFINITIONS OF THE FBC AND MAY OR MAY NOT CONTAIN A
 NEW ADDRESS. THIS HAS BEEN SENT TO THE ADDRESSING
 REVIEWER AS IT IS A CODE RELATED COMMENT. PLEASE SEE
 POSSIBLE COMMENTS FROM BUILDING, AND FIRE REVIEWER(S).
 THIS ADDRESS MAY OR MAY NOT BE OK, IT IS UNCERTIAN AT
 THIS TIME.
  
 ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE REVIEW #1**
 PLEASE SEE PERMIT APPLICATION AND PLANS MENTIONS AND
 SHOWS "3021", HOWEVER THIS PROJECT IS LOCATED ON A
 LEGAL ADDRESS IN OUR SYSTEM OF "3001".
 PLEASE KNOW TITLE BLOCKS SHALL BE REVISED UPON
 CORRECTING OF ADDRESS.
  
 1) NOTE: OK.
  
 2) NOTE: OK FOR MEP PLANS, SEE NEW COMMENTS FOR OTHER
 SHEETS WHICH DO NOT APPLY TO TEELE & ASSC.
  
 3) NOTE: NO/OK, NOTES ADDED FOR ITEMS BELOW 18INCHES,
 HOWEVER PLEASE SEE ROOMS CONTAINING FUEL/LIQUIDS ETC
 WHICH WILL BE A CLASS AND DIVISION LOCATION NEED TO BE
 DESIGNATED.
  
 ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE REVIEW #1**
 PLEASE NEC 511, AND PLEASE INDICATE ALL RELEVANT AREAS
 AND LAYOUT ON PLANS.
  
 4) NOTE:NO, PLEASE SEE SOME AREAS FOR STAIRS WERE
 ADDED; HOWEVER PLEASE SEE THIS COMMENT IS BASED ON ALL
 EGRESS PATHS WHICH MAY CONTAIN OCCUPANTS WHICH NEED TO
 EGRESS FROM THE BUILDING.
 PLEASE SEE THE EXIT CORRIDOR; PLEASE SEE AREAS OF
 PARKING GARAGE WHICH DO NOT SEEM TO CONTAIN ANY
 EMERGENCY LIGHTING. PLEASE SEE THE LIGHTING IS BEING
 SHOWN ON THESE SAME UPPER LEVELS WITH OUT THE USE OF
 ANY NIGHT LIGHTS OR PHOTO-CELL OVER RIDES EVEN FOR DAY
 TIME OPERATIONS FOR MINIMUM LIGHTING.PLEASE SEE
 COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO CONTACTORS AND CONTROLS.
 PLEASE EXPLAIN HOW THE STAIRS ARE SHOWING ONE LEVEL OF
 LIGHTING UNDER NORMAL AND ONE LEVEL OF LIGHTING UNDER
 EMERGENCY WHEN THE FIXTURES ARE THE SAME TYPES AND ARE
 BATTERY BACK UP. DO THESE CONTAIN A REDUCTION OF THE
 LIGHTING LEVELS BUILT IN?
 PLEASE ALSO SEE THAT THE STAIR LIGHTING IS BEING SHOWN
 ON OCCUPANCY SENSOR TYPE DEVICES WHICH ARE OK, HOWEVER
 PLEASE SEE DUE TO THE LAYOUT, THE FAILURE OF ONE DEVICE
 WOULD LEAVE ANY ONE AREA IN THE MEANS OF EGRESS PATH IN
 TOTAL WHICH WOULD NOT MEET THE MINIMUM LIGHTING FOR
 LIFE SAFETY. PLEASE ADJUST DEVICES OR CALL TO GO OVER
 OTHER POSSIBLE OPTIONS.
 ** PLEASE SEE THE FOLLOWING SCENARIO:AN OCCUPANT IS
 LOCATED IN THE PARKING GARAGE ON THE SECOND LEVEL (OR
 OTHER LOCATIONS IN BUILDING) WHICH DO NOT CONTAIN OF
 OVER RIDE(S) FOR LIGHTING WHEN THE LIGHTING SHUTS OFF
 DUE TO THE TIME SET. PLEASE SEE THE AREA FOR MEANS OF
 EGRESS WOULD BE A HAZARD AND SHOULD CONTAIN EITHER
 SENOR DEVICES WHICH PROVIDE COVERAGE FOR OVER RIDE OR
 OTHER MEANS OF LIGHT FOR THE OCCUPANT TO FIN THEIR WAY
 TO THE MANUAL OVER RIDE DEVICE.
 PLEASE PROVIDE TIMES OF SCHEDULING.
  
 ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE REVIEW #1**
 PLEASE SEE NFPA-101 7.8.1.3,
 7.9.2.2. PLEASE SUBMIT AND SUPPLY ALL MIN PHOTO-METRICS
 REQUIRED FOR STAIR TOWERS UNDER NORMAL AND EMERGENCY
 POWER.
 PLEASE ALSO INDICATE LIGHTING LEVELS (MIN) REQUIRED FOR
 ALL OTHER AREAS OF EGRESS. PLEASE SEE THERE ARE AREAS
 ON PLANS WHICH DO NOT SEEM TO MEET THIS.
 10FT CANDLES UNDER NORMAL AND 1FT CANDLE UNDER EM IN
 STAIRS.
 ALL OTHER AREAS 1FT MIN.
  
 5) NOTE: OK.
  
 6) NOTE: OK.
  
 7) NOTE: OK.
  
 8) NOTE: OK.
  
 9) NOTE: OK.
  
 10) NOTE: OK.
  
 11) NOTE: OK.
  
 12) NOTE: NO, NOTED ABOVE IN COMMENT #4.
  
 ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE FROM REVIEW #1**
 PLEASE SEE FIRE REVIEW COMMENTS FOR GARAGE AREAS LTS,
 REQ'D EM BACK UP.
 AS PREVIOUSLY NOTED ABOVE FOR ELECTRICAL REVIEW ALSO.
 LS101 7.9
  
 13) NOTE: NO/OK, PLEASE SEE SOME AREAS WHERE INGRESS
 INTO SPACE ARE SHOWN INDICATE A *S* AS FOR A STANDARD
 SWITCH. PLEASE SEE ANY OVER RIDE TYPE SHOWN THIS WAY
 SHOULD BE CLARIFIED ON SYMBOL LEGEND.
 PLEASE SEE SEPARATE AREAS (ELEVATOR PIT) WHICH WILL
 REQUIRE AUTOMATIC MEANS OF SHUT OFF (TIMER). PLEASE SEE
 THERE ARE OVER RIDES SHOWN ON CONTACTOR #1 WHICH DOES
 NOT INDICATE TYPE AND AMOUNT OF TIME ON THE OVER RIDE.
 PLEASE SEE OTHER AREAS WHICH A DEVICE WILL BE REQUIRED
 AND MAXIMUM TIMES FOR ALL DEVICES SHOULD BE INDICATED.
 PLEASE SEE 30MINS FOR OCCUPANCY SENSOR TYPE DEVICES AND
 4HRS MAX FOR TIMER TYPE.
 PLEASE SEE INPUT DATA IS MISSING FROM THE ENERGY
 CALCULATIONS.
 PLEASE SEE METHOD USED WILL AFFECT THE INFORMATION.
 THESE CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED ARE METHOD *B*.
 ** PLEASE SEE NEW NOTES WITH RESPECT TO CONTACTORS,
 CONTROLS AND CIRCUITING ON PLANS AND CONTACTORS.
  
 ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE FROM REVIEW #1**
 PLEASE SEE 2004 FBC CHAPTER 13 FOR CONTROLS FOR ALL
 LIGHTING.
 PLEASE INDICATE AND SHOW THE SYSTEM BEING PROPOSED.
 PLEASE PROVIDE SCHEDULING OF SYSTEMS.
 PLEASE PROVIDE OVER RIDES, LOCATIONS, AND AREAS FOR
 SEPARATE CONTROLS REQUIRED. PLEASE SEE FBC
 13-415.1.ABC.1.1, .1.2 AND .1.3.
 PLEASE SEE SHOW AND INDICATE THE TYPE OF OVER RIDE
 DEVICES, AND MAX ALLOWED TIMES. (NOTE: TIMER TYPE (4HRS
 MAX), OCCUPANT SENSOR TYPE 30MINS MAX).
 ALL AREAS WITH FLR TO CEILING HEIGHT PARTITIONS REQUIRE
 SEPARATE CONTROLS.
 PLEASE PROVIDE PERFORMANCE CALCULATIONS AND PLEASE SEE
 THE MAXIMUM PERMITTED
 "LIGHTING POWER DENSITIES" (LPD) ALLOWED FOR AREAS.
 PLEASE SEE SPACES AND USE PERMITTED IN TABLES.
 13-415.2, 13-415.2.ABC.1, TABLES? 13-415.2.B.
 ALL LPD'S ARE TO BE SHOWN.
  
 14) NOTE: NO, PLEASE SEE PLANS THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS
 DO NOT CORRELATE WITH THE MECHANICAL AND PLUMBING
 SHEETS WITH RESPECT TO THE WALL(S) FROM THE SHOWROOM OF
 THE EXISTING BUILDING AND THE ADDITION.
 PLEASE SEE THAT A PARTIAL 2HR RATED WALL DOES NOT
 CONSTITUTE A SEPARATE BUILDING BY DEFINITION IN THE
 FBC. THIS WOULD BE REQUIRED TO BE A 4 HOUR RATED FIRE
 WALL. PLEASE SEE THE DEFINITIONS OF A FIRE WALL IN THE
 FBC. THE PLANS AS SUBMITTED DO NOT COMPLY WITH THIS.
 PLEASE KNOW BASED ON THIS AND COORDINATION OF SHEETS A
 SEPARATE SERVICE FOR THIS ADDITION TO AN EXISTING
 BUILDING IS NOT GRANTED AS PREVIOUSLY STATED. PLEASE
 ALSO SEE THE PLANS STILL INDICATE MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT
 FOR THE NEW BUILDING BEING SHOWN INSTALLED ON THE
 EXISTING SHOW ROOM PORTION OF THE BUILDING.
 ** PLEASE BE SURE TO SEE NEW NOTES FOR COORDINATION
 FROM ELECTRICAL PLANS TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS.
  
  
 ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE REVIEW #1**
 PLEASE SEE THIS IS NOT BEING CONSIDERED A SEPARATE
 "BUILDING" AND IS PART OF THE CURRENT STRUCTURE AS THIS
 NEW STRUCTURE CONTAINS OPENINGS ETC FOR EGRESS ETC.
 PLEASE SEE FBC DEFINITIONS.
 PLEASE SEE NEC 230.2, AS THE NEW PROPOSED SEPARATE
 SERVICE NOT BEING FED FROM THE EXISTING SERVICE
 LOCATION GROUPED ETC IS NOT PERMITTED AS SHOWN. 230.2,
 230.72 ETC.
 IN ORDER TO GRANT THE NEW SERVICE FOR A NEW "BUILDING",
 THIS WOULD REQUIRE AND
 "FIREWALL", 4 HR RATED, COLLAPSIBLE ON BOTH SIDES WITH
 OUT AFFECTS ON THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF EITHER
 STRUCTURE. BY THE PLANS SUBMITTED, THIS IS NOT ACHIEVED
 AT THIS TIME.
  
 15) NOTE: OK.
  
 16) NOTE: OK..
  
 17) NOTE: OK.
  
 18) NOTE: NO? RESPONSE LETTER MENTIONS TO SEE REVISED
 ELECTRICAL PLANS FOR THIS HOWEVER THIS INFORMATION
 COULD NOT BE LOCATED.
 PLEASE KNOW PLANS ARE REQUIRED TO STATE THE MINIMUM, A
 *PROVISO* MAY BE SET UP TO OBTAIN THE STRUCTURAL
 CALCULATIONS LATER BEFORE ANY INSTALLATION OF BOLTS,
 BASE, ETC FOR POLES.
  
 ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE REVIEW #1**
 PLEASE SUBMIT ALL WIND LOAD CALCULATIONS FOR ROOF TOP
 LT POLES WITH
 EPA FIGURED FOR ALL LT FIXTURES PROPOSED.
 THE CALCULATIONS AND SPEC FOR POLES WILL BE REVIEWED
 FOR STRUCTURAL CONNECTIONS, WIND LOADS ETC BY THE
 STRUCTURAL REVIEWER.
 THEY MUST MEET FBC 2004 140MPH MIN, 3 SEC GUST.
  
 19) NOTE: NO? RESPONSE MENTIONS TO SEE REVISED PLANS,
 HOWEVER NO INFORMATION COULD BE FOUND FOR PREVIOUS
 REQUEST.
  
 ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE REVIEW #1**
 PLEASE SUBMIT THE MANUFACTURE SPECS /CUT SHEETS FOR
 THE TANK LESS WATER HEATER. PLEASE BE SURE THEY
 INDICATE THE
 NRTL LISTING.
 110.3, 90.7.
  
 20) NOTE:NO, SAME COMMENT. THIS IS NOTED AS THIS IS
 BEING PROPOSED AS A SEPARATE BUILDING, YET THIS IS NOT
 BEING MET AT THIS TIME.
  
 ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE REVIEW #1**
 PLEASE SEE AS PLUMBING PLANS ALSO INDICATE BEING TIED
 INTO THE EXISTING BUILDING, IT SEEMS THE PERMIT
 APPLICATION WOULD BETTER DESCRIBE PROJECT AS AN
 ADDITION.
 THIS WILL BE DECIDED BY DESIGN FOR NOTES FROM ALL
 REVIEWER(S).
  
  
 ************ NEW NOTES *********
  
 21) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE *S* SHEETS SUBMITTED CONTAIN A
 *RUBBER STAMP* FOR THE REQUIRED ORIGINAL SIGNATURE FROM
 THE ENGINEER. PLEASE SEE THE FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE
 CODE 61G15-23.002 AND FLORIDA STATUTES 471.025. THIS
 COMMENT IS MADE AND REQUIRED WHETHER OR NOT COMMENT IS
 MADE BY OTHER REVIEWER(S).
 PLEASE KNOW ONE SET OF PLANS WILL BE RETAINED AS THIS
 COMMENT HAS BEEN MADE TO THIS SAME ENGINEER ON OTHER
 PROJECTS PREVIOUSLY.
  
 22) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FIRE SPRINKLER PLANS DO NOT
 CONTAIN ANY TITLE BLOCK FOR THE ENGINEER WHICH IS
 SIGNING AND SEALING DOCUMENTS.
 PLEASE ALSO SEE THAT THE SEAL IS NOT CLEAR AND VISIBLE
 WITH INFORMATION ON SAID SEAL.
 PLEASE SEE THAT EVEN SHADOWING DOES NOT PROVIDE
 INFORMATION.
 FAC 61G15-23.002 AND 61G15-23.001.,
 THIS COMMENT IS ALSO REQUIRED WHETHER OR NOT COMMENT IS
 MADE BY ANY OTHER TRADE(S).
 ONE SET IS BEING RETAINED.
 ** PLEASE KNOW THAT THE FIRE SPRINKLERS EVEN THOUGH
 REQUIRED TO BE SHOWN WITH THE BASE BUILDING PERMITTED
 PLANS WILL STILL BE REQUIRED TO BE UNDER A SEPARATE
 PERMIT, PLANS AND FEES AT A LATE DATE.
  
 23) NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT COMPLETE DETAILS FOR FIRE ALARM
 SYSTEM BEING PROPOSED AND HOW THIS SYSTEM WILL BE TIED
 IN THE EXISTING SYSTEM. PLEASE KNOW THE BASE LOCATIONS
 AND DEVICES ARE REQUIRED AT THIS TIME FOR BASE
 BUILDING.
 PLEASE SEE THAT ALL OF THE MINIMUM LEVELS TO MEET FBC
 11-4.28.1, .2 AND .3(4) IS REQUIRED TO BE STATED ON
 PLANS.
 THIS COMMENT WAS NOT MADE ON THE PREVIOUS PLAN REVIEW
 BY THIS REVIEWER HOWEVER THIS IS NOW REQUIRED AS PART
 OF THE ELECTRICAL REVIEW.
 FBC 106.1.2 AND 106.3.5.1.2
  
 ** PLEASE KNOW THAT THE FIRE ALARM SCOPE OF WORK WILL
 STILL BE UNDER A SEPARATE PERMIT PLANS AND FEES ART A
 LATER DATE.
  
 24) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THERE ARE SEVERAL DIFFERENCES ON
 THE ARCH SHEETS, FROM THE ELECTRICAL, MECHANICAL AND
 PLUMBING SHEETS.
 WALLS DO NOT CORRELATE. (DOORS ETC)
 FBC 106.1, 106.1.2 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND
 COORDINATION ANDFBC CHAPTER 11.
  
  
 PLEASE SEE THE STAIRS AS THE ELECTRICAL PLANS SHOW
 DOORS WHICH ARE OPPOSING WHICH DO NOT MEET THE MINIMUM
 REQUIREMENTS FOR ADA. PLEASE SEE STAIRS/VESTIBULE
 AREAS. THE A SHEETS DO NOT SHOW THIS SAME DOOR SWINGS.
 PLEASE SEE CHAPTER 11 AND BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS FOR
 THIS. THIS IS FOR INFORMATION AT THIS TIME AS
 COORDINATION BETWEEN THE SHEETS IS IMPERATIVE.
  
 25) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THAT THE CIRCUITS AS SHOWN ON THE
 PLANS WHICH ARE NOTED TO THE LIGHTING CONTACTORS ARE
 NOT COMPLETE ON THE LIGHTING CONTACTORS.
 PLEASE SEE THE IDENTIFICATION OF THE CIRCUITS ON THE
 SECOND FLOOR INDICATES TO LIGHTING CONTACTOR #2,
 HOWEVER PLEASE SEE THE CONTACTOR DETAIL ON THAT SHEET
 IS LABELED *CONTACTOR #1*.
 PLEASE SEE LEVELS ANDFIXTURES WHICH MENTIONS LIGHTING
 CONTACTOR #3, YET NO DETAIL FOR A LC #3 WAS SHOWN.
 PLEASE COORDINATE.
 PLEASE SEE NOTES ABOVE WITH RESPECT TO THE CONTACTORS
 AND THE OVER RIDE DEVICES REQUIRES AND THE MAXIMUM
 AMOUNT OF TIMES ON THESE OVER RIDES.
  
 27) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 109.3.6.4.4
 PLANS WHICH ARE SIGNED, DATED AND SEALED BY AN
 ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER SHALL CONTAIN A STATEMENT THAT: *
 TO THE BEST OF THE ARCHITECT'S OR ENGINEER'S KNOWLEDGE,
 THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS COMPLY WITH THE APPLICABLE
 MINIMUM BUILDING CODES AND THE APPLICABLE FIRE-SAFETY
 STANDARDS AS DETERMINED BY THE LOCAL AUTHORITY IN
 ACCORDANCE WITH THIS SECTION AND CHAPTER (FLORIDA
 STATUTES) 633.
 THIS IS REQUIRED WHETHER OR NOT COMMENT IS MADE BY
 OTHER TRADES FOR ALL TRADES/TITLE SHEETS FOR EACH TRADE
 AND/OR TITLE BLOCKS.
  
 28) NOTE: PLEASE PROVIDE A DETAIL/NOTE FOR ALL
 EMERGENCY AND EXIT LIGHTS WHICH ARE REQUIRED TO BE
 WIRED AHEAD OF ANY SWITCHING DEVICES.
 PLEASE KNOW THIS IS NOT A NEW CODE, HOWEVER SINCE THE
 IMPLEMENTATION OF CHAPTER 13 OF THE FBC. THIS
 JURISDICTION HAS HAD NUMEROUS INSTANCES WHERE THE
 EMERGENCY FIXTURES ARE BEING WIRED ON THE LOAD OF THE
 NEW OCCUPANCY SENSORS, OVER RIDES, TIMERS ETC. THIS
 SHOULD NOT HAVE TO BE MADE ON PLANS, HOWEVER PLEASE
 PROVIDE A DETAIL CLOUDED OFF OF THE CONTACTOR OR ON A
 SEPARATE DETAIL OF SOME KIND.
 FBC 106.1.2, NEC 700.12E.
  
 29) NOTE: PLEASE SEE COLOR CODING FOR CONDUCTORS FOR
 277/480V SHOULD BE BROWN, PURPLE , YELLOW. AS NO
 277/480V IS BEING SHOWN AS PART OF THIS BUILDING, THIS
 COULD BE REDLINED ON PLANS.
  
 30) NOTE: PLEASE SEE COPY OF FS 553.80(2)(B) WITH
 RESPECT TO REPEAT CODE COMPLIANT COMMENTS. THIS IS ONLY
 A NOTICE BEING GIVEN AT THIS TIME.
 ** PLEASE KNOW BASED ON THE NOTES FOR ALL TRADES, ONE
 COMPLETE SET OF PLANS IS BEING RETAINED BY THIS
 OFFICE.
  
  
  
  
 ** PLEASE BE AWARE OF COMMENTS FROM OTHER TRADES WHICH
 MAY AFFECT ELECTRICAL PLANS.
  
 * ** IMPORTANT**
 ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE
 PICKED UP FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE
 SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL OLD/VOIDED
 SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED
 SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW
 AND STAMPING. DO NOT LEAVE ANY
 OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS.
 PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE
 OLD/VOIDED SHEETS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED
 FOR REFERENCE.
 THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND
 AVOID ANY DELAYS.
  
 ** PLEASE BE SURE TO CALL IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS OR
 COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE TYPED COMMENTS ABOVE. IF
 THERE ARE ANY COMMENTS WHICH ARE NOT CLEAR IN ANY WAY,
 NOT UNDERSTOOD OR NOT TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR, PLEASE DO
 NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE AND THIS
 REVIEWER.
  
 DEWEY PALMER
 ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW
 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT.
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 561-805-6717
 [email protected]


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved