Date |
Text |
2008-07-18 10:56:55 | FAILED FOR FOLLOWING REASONS: |
| |
| |
| 1. PLEASE SHOW ON DRAWING THE DUMPSTER LOCATION WITH |
| THE MINIMUM DIMENSIONS OF THE DUMPSTER PAD APPROVED BY |
| THE CITY. |
| OUR RESPONSE :O.K |
| |
| 2. DUMPSTER DIMENSIONS MUST MEET MINIMUM LENGTH, WIDTH, |
| & HEIGHT PER CITY STANDARDS. |
| |
| ADUMPSTER SKETCH WITH MINIMUM DIMENSION CAN BE |
| FOUND AT THE CITY'S WEB PAGE AT |
| HTTP://EXCITINGCITY.COM/ENGINEERING/ENG_STANDARDS.HTM |
| IF YOU CAN NOT MEET MINIMUM DIMENSIONS, NEED A LETTER |
| FROM SANITATION DEPT APPROVING ALTERNATE ARRANGEMENT. |
| |
| OUR RESPONSE: O.K. |
| |
| 3.DUMPSTER LOCATIONMUST BE ACCESSIBLE TO CITY |
| COLLECTION TRUCK FOR LOADING/UNLOADING DUMPSTER. |
| |
| OUR RESPONSE: O.K. |
| |
| YOU STILL NEED TO PROVIDE THE RESPONSE FOR THE |
| FOLLOWING ITEMS 4 &5 ASKED BY JONATHAN BRAMLEY, |
| DIRECTOR |
| |
| 4. SHT 1 PROVIDES ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON THE |
| PROPOSED PARKING LAYOUT.AS REFERENCED ABOVE IT IS NOT |
| CLEAR THAT THE CORRECT DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE CAN BE |
| PROVIDED IN THE LOCATION THAT IS SUGGESTED. |
| |
| 5. PLEASE PROVIDE EXISTING GRADES AND CURRENT FLOW |
| LINES ON THE EXISTING SITE DETAIL.ON THE PROPOSED |
| LAYOUT PLEASE SHOW EXISTING GRADES OR FINAL GRADES,IF |
| THEY WILL CHANGE, TO DEMONSTRATE THAT ALL FLOWS WILL |
| REMAIN ON SITE AND FLOW IS INTO THE IMPOUND AREAS TO |
| SUPPORT THE PROPOSED DRAINAGE STATEMENT. |
| |
| ENGINEERS SHALL LEGIBLY INDICATE THEIR |
| NAME, ADDRESS AND LICENSE NUMBER ON EACH |
| SHEET. IF PRACTICING THROUGH A DULY |
| AUTHORIZED ENGINEERING BUSINESS, ENGIN- |
| EERS, ENGINEERS SHALL LEGIBLY INDICATE |
| THEIR NAME AND LICENSE NUMBER, AS WELL |
| AS, THE NAME, ADDRESS AND CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION |
| NUMBER OF THE ENGINEERING |
| BUSINESS ON EACH SHEET. A TITLE BLOCK |
| WILL SATISFY THIS REQUIREMENT. FAC |
| 61G15-23.002(2) - FS 471.025 |
| |
| |
| PLEASE RE SPOND ABOVE COMMENTSIN DETAIL TO EXPEDITE |
| YOUR PERMIT |
| |
| JONATHAN BRAMLEY - FOR RASIK CHOKSHI805-6723 |