Plan Review Notes
Plan Review Notes For Permit 06082000
Permit Number 06082000
Review Stop E
Sequence Number 3
Notes
Date Text
2007-03-25 09:15:02 
  
 ****** UNSAT 3ND REVIEW******
  
 ** PLEASE KNOW THAT ANY REFERENCE TO THE FBC CHAPTER 1
 IN THE PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS CAN BE FOUND IN THE
 ADMINISTRATIVE SECTION OF THE 2004 FBC AS ADOPTED BY
 THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH.
  
 ** PLEASE SEE THAT THERE COMMENTS MADE TO SHEETS OTHER
 THAN ELECTRICAL BY THIS REVIEW. THESE COMMENTS ARE
 REQUIRED WHETHER OR NOT COMMENT IS MADE BY ANY OTHER
 TRADE.
  
 ** IMPORTANT**
 DUE TO MANY OF THE COMMENTS BELOW ONE COMPLETE SET OF
 EACH PLAN SUBMITTED ARE BEING RETAINED BY THIS OFFICE.
 PLEASE ALSO SEE THAT COMMENTS FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW
 STILL NEED TO BE ADDRESSED ALONG WITH NEW COMMENTS DUE
 TO PLANS CHANGING.
  
 1) NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT TWO COMPLETE SETS OF PLANS WITH
 ALL INFORMATION IN TWO NEAT AND ORDERLY SETS. PLEASE
 SEE THE SHEETS SUBMITTED ARE IN COMPLETE DISARRAY WITH
 MANY SHEETS LOOSE AND NOT IN ANY SETS OR BOUND
 TOGETHER??
 ** PLEASE SEE THERE IS MULTIPLE ELECTRICAL RISERS YET
 SOME CONTAIN THE SAME DATE OF THE PREVIOUS RISER
 DIAGRAM SUBMITTED. PLEASE CORRELATE ALL PLANS, SHEETS,
 DATE THE REVISED SHEETS. THE PLANS WHICH SEEMED TO BE
 REVISED SHEETS CONTAIN A DATE OF JANUARY 10, 2007
 HOWEVER THAT DATESBEFORE THE LAST ELECTRICAL REVIEW
 WHICH WAS DONE ON 2/2/07.THE PREVIOUS REVIEWED PLANS
 ALSO CONTAINED A DATE OF 1/10/07???
 FBC 106.3
  
 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE PLANS SUBMITTED STILL DO NOT
 INDICATE THE CORRECT CODES RELEVANT TO THE PLANS AND
 DESIGNS AT A MINIMUM AS REQUESTED ON THE TWO PREVIOUS
 REVIEWS. PLEASE SEE THE CODES REQUESTED ARE FOR THIS
 REVIEWER ONLY AND OTHER CODES FROM OTHER TRADES MAY BE
 NEEDED.
  
 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE REQUIRED GAS RISER PLANS WERE
 NOT SUBMITTED IN PACKAGE FOR PLUMBING REVIEW. SEE
 PLUMBING REVIEW COMMENTS.
 FBC 106.1.2
  
 4) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE MODEL OF THE GENERATOR IS STILL
 NOT INDICATED ON THE MANUFACTURES SPECS/CUT SHEETS
 SUBMITTED AND NOW THE BREAKER ON THE RISER DIAGRAM ON
 THE GENERATOR HAS NOW INCREASED WHICH NOW CORRELATES TO
 THE SINGLE PHASE GENERATOR ON SPECS?
 PLEASE SPECIFY WHICH UNIT IS BEING INSTALLED, PLEASE
 HIGHLIGHT UNIT, PLEASE REVISE RISER IF INDEED THIS IS
 NOW THE SINGLE PHASE UNIT AS IT SEEMS.PLEASE SEE THE
 FOLLOWING COMMENT #5.
 110.3, 90.7
 FBC 106.3.5.1.2
  
 5) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE CONDUCTORS ARE NOT THE CORRECT
 SIZE FROM THE GENERATOR TO THE MTS PER 310.16 BASED ON
 THE NEW 350AMP OVER CURRENT PROTECTION AS SHOWN. PLEASE
 SEE THE 300MCM IS ONLY RATED AT 285AMPS.
 240.4, 310.16.
  
 6) NOTE: PLEASE SEE A COMPLETE READABLE LAYOUT FOR ALL
 EQUIPMENT, LOCATIONS, SET-BACKS ETC WAS NOT SUBMITTED.
 THE DETAILS ON THE SHEETS ARE TOO SMALL, ARE NOT CLEAR
 AND DO NOT PROVIDE THE LOCATIONS OF ALL EQUIPMENT.
 AS THE NOW MTS IS NOT CLEAR IF IT IS SERVICE ENTRANCE
 RATED DUE THE SPECS WHICH MENTIONS EQUIPMENT RATED TO
 GO TO THE SERVICE ENTRANCE EQUIPMENT, IS THE EXISTING
 PANEL LOCATED IN CLOSE PROXIMITY AND DOES IT CONTAIN
 OVER CURRENT PROTECTION?
 IS THIS MTS SERVICE ENTRANCE RATE AND CONTAIN OVER
 CURRENT PROTECTION. THE SPECS MENTIONS FUSES AS PART OF
 THE FEATURES HOWEVER THE NOTES ON SAME SHEET SEEM TO
 CONTRADICT THIS.
 PLEASE SEE 230.76, 230.79, 230.70, 71, 230.90 ETC.
 IS THERE ANY FURTHER SPECS/CUT SHEETS WHICH INDICATE
 THE INTERNAL WIRING AND INFORMATION ON UNIT?
 110.3, 90.7.
 FBC 106.1.2, 106.3.5.1.2
  
 7) NOTE: PLEASE SEE NFPA-110 CHAPTER 7 AND BUILDING
 CODE REQUIREMENTS WHICH REQUIRE THIS UNIT TO BE MOUNTED
 A MINIMUM OF 6INCHES ABOVE THE BFE. THE PLANS/SHEETS
 SUBMITTED DO NOT INDICATE THE ELEVATIONS AND SO ON. SEE
 THE BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS FOR THIS ALSO.
  
 8) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE LOAD CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED ARE
 THE SAME AS SUBMITTED FROM PREVIOUS REVIEWED PLANS
 WHICH ARE FOR A RESIDENTIAL APPLICATION.
 PLEASE SUBMIT THE LOADS INTENDED FOR THIS UNIT AS
 COMMERCIAL.PLEASE ALSO SEE THAT BASED ON NOW A SINGLE
 PHASE UNIT BEING INSTALLED, THIS WILL REVISE SHEETS.
 PLEASE COORDINATE ALL SHEETS, PLANS, ETC.
 220.3,220.10,220.11,220.13, 220.35 ETC
 FBC 106.1.2
  
 9) NOTE: PLEASE SEE WHAT APPEARS TO BE THE LATEST RISER
 DOES NOT CONTAIN AN CONDUCTOR SIZES FROM THE METER TO
 THE MTS??
 PLEASE COMPLETE RISER.
 PLEASE SEE 310.16, 240.4.
  
 10) NOTE: PLEASE KNOW SINCE THERE WERE COMMENTS AND
 PLANS HAVE FAILED THREE TIME FOR SOME OF THE SAME
 NOTES, THE PREVIOUS REVIEW MENTIONED FS 553.80(2)(B)
 WITH RESPECT TO REPEAT COMMENTS. A FEE IS NOW ASSESSED
 IN THE AMOUNT OF $771.50 WHICH WILL BE REQUIRED TO BE
 PAID BEFORE THE NEXT RE-SUBMITTAL.
  
 11) NOTE: PLEASE SEE AS NOTED ON THE PREVIOUS REVIEW
 THE NOC WILL NEED TO BE RE-RECORDED AS IT HAS EXPIRED
 PER FS 713.13(2).
  
 * ** IMPORTANT**
 ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE
 PICKED UP FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE
 SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL OLD/VOIDED
 SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED
 SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW
 AND STAMPING. DO NOT LEAVE ANY
 OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS.
 PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE
 OLD/VOIDED SHEETS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED
 FOR REFERENCEA ND THESE SHEETS SHOULD BE ATTACHED IN
 ONE SET AND LABLED OLD/VOIDED SHEETS.
 THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND
 AVOID ANY DELAYS.
  
 ** PLEASE BE SURE TO CALL IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS OR
 COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE TYPED COMMENTS ABOVE. IF
 THERE ARE ANY COMMENTS WHICH ARE NOT CLEAR IN ANY WAY,
 NOT UNDERSTOOD OR NOT TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR, PLEASE DO
 NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE AND THIS
 REVIEWER.
  
  
 DEWEY PALMER
 ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II
 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT.
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 561-805-6717
 [email protected]


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved