| Date |
Text |
| 2006-10-06 00:00:00 | BUILDING REVIEW CHECKLIST: |
| | 1- PROVIDE ENERGY CALCULATIONS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. |
| | 13-101.2.2 FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | 2- SITE PLAN TO HAVE ALL DIMENSIONS, INCLUDING LOT |
| | SIZE,TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH SETBACKS AND DISTANCE |
| | BETWEEN BUILDINGS. |
| | |
| | 3-SHEET #5: |
| | A) BUCK DETAILS DON'T APPLY. PROPOSED ADDITION IS |
| | MASONRY CONSTRUCTION. DETAILS SHOWN ARE FOR WOOD FRAMED |
| | WALLS. NEED DETAILS THAT MATCH PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION. |
| | SEE SEC. R613.62 FOR SPECIFIC WINDOW AND DOOR BUCK |
| | REQUIREMENTS. |
| | B) ALSO, MAKE SURE DETAILS ARE FOR TYPE OF WINDOW |
| | USED. SOME DETAILS ARE FOR CASEMENT WINDOWS. THERE ARE |
| | NOT CASEMENT WINDOWS. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 4- SHEET #6: |
| | A)SIZE OF BEAM SPECIFIED ON DETAILS S-2 AND S-3 |
| | DON'T MATCH SIZE SPECIFIED ON ROOF FRAMING PLAN. REVISE |
| | AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | B)CLARIFY DETAIL S-1.IS THIS NEW CONSTRUCTION OR |
| | EXISTING. DRAWINGS CALL FOR NEW FOOTING AND NEW STUDS |
| | AT 16". OC. REVISE/CLARIFY AS REQUIRED. SEC. 106.1.2 |
| | CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | C)THERE ARE 2 DIFFERENT DETAILS F/6.0. |
| | CLARIFY/REVISE AS REQUIRED. ALSO, PROVIDE ONLY THE |
| | DETAILS THAT APPLY TO THIS JOB AND CLEARLY KEY THEM IN |
| | THE FLOOR PLANS AND FRAMING PLANS. |
| | |
| | D)PROVIDE COMPLETE SPECS FOR DETAILS S-2 AND S-3: |
| | NEED COMPLETE WALL SPECS, INCLUDING PLYWOOD SHEATHING |
| | SIZE FATENER TYPE AND SPACING. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | E) SEE SIMPSONG ANCHORSSPECIFIED ON DETAILS. SEE |
| | CURRENT SIMPSON CATALOGUEAND UPDATE NUMBER AND TYPE |
| | OFFASTENERS AS REQUIRED TO MATCH PUBLISHED VALUES. |
| | OTHERWISE, PROVIDE COMPLETE ENGINEERING ANALYSIS IF |
| | NUMBERS DIFFER FROM THOSE TESTED AND PUBLISHED BY THE |
| | MANUFACTURER. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC |
| | 2004. |
| | |
| | F)DETAIL S-1: SPECIFY STUDS CONNECTORS AT TOP AND |
| | BOTTOM. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | PROVIDE COMPLETE SPECS FOR WALL INSTALLATION. SEC. |
| | 106.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | 4- SHEET #7.0: LOCATION AND NUMBEROF VERTICAL |
| | REINFORCEMENTS SHOWN ON THIS FOUNDATION PLANDOENS'T |
| | MATCHFLOOR PLAN REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH EACH |
| | OTHER. SEC. 106.1. 2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | 5- SHEE 8.0: |
| | A)UPDATE DESIGN CRITERIA. USEFBC 2004. EDITION. |
| | DOORS AND WINDOWS ARE NOT IMPACT GLAZING. SEE PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL SUBMITTED AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | B) ROOF SHEATHING SIZE AND TYPE SHOWN ON ROOF |
| | TRANSITION DETAIL DOESN'T MATCHSIZE AND TYPESHOWN |
| | ON ROOF NAILING NOTE. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | C) MISSING DETAILE/6.0. PROVIDE DETAIL AND SPECIFY |
| | TRUSS CONNECTORS AT BOTH ENDS. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | 6- NOTICE OF COMENCEMENT IS EXPIRED AFTER 90 DAYS OF |
| | RECORDING IF WORK IS NOT STARTED. SEC. 713.13(2) |
| | FLORIDA STATUTES. NEED RE-RECORDED NOC. |
| | |
| | 7- ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS NEED TO BE REVIEWED AND |
| | APPROVED IN WRITTING AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 106.3.3 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. INCLUDING THE STORM SHUTTERS. |
| | |
| | 8- ROOF TRUSSES ARE REQUIRED FOR REVIEW PRIOR TO |
| | INSTALLATION AS REQUIRED BY SECTION R802.10 OF 2004 |
| | RESIDENTIAL CODE. |
| | |
| | 9-ENGINEEROF RECORD TO SPECIFYROOF TILE FASTENING |
| | AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 106.1.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC |
| | 2004. |
| | |
| | 10- AS REQUIRED BY RULE 9B-72, PROVIDE FLORIDA/LOCAL |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR: |
| | A)FLAT ROOF SYSTEM. NOA 03-0212.12 SUBMITTED EXPIRED |
| | ON 07/19/06. |
| | |
| | B) CONCRETE LINTELS.NOA 03-0605.04 SUBMITTED IS FOR |
| | 4", 6" & 12" WIDE LINTELS. SPECIFY ON PLANS SIZES OF |
| | LINTEL TO BE USED AND PROVIDE CORRECT PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | C)ALL SIMPSON TRUSS CONNECTORS SPECIFIED ON PLANS |
| | AND DETAILS. |
| | |
| | D)NOA FOR PGT OUTSWING ALUMINUM FRENCH DOOR THAT |
| | MATCHES ONE SUBMITTED FOR FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL. . |
| | NOA 02-0625.01 SUBMITTED DOESN'T MATCH ONE SUBMITTED |
| | FOR FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL FL253. PROVIDE MATCHING |
| | INFORMATION. |
| | |
| | E)NOA 02-0702.02 FOR"SH-4000" ALUMINUM SINGLE HUNG |
| | WINDOWS IS EXPIRED. PROVIDE CURRENT ONE. |
| | |
| | 11-SOIL TEST REPORT: |
| | A) PROVIDE 2 COPIES WITH ORIGINAL SEAL, SIGNATURE AND |
| | DATE AS REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 471 FLORIDA STATUTES. |
| | |
| | B)REPORT NEEDS TO HAVE ENGINEERING FIRM CERTIFICATE |
| | OF AUTHORIZATION # AS REQUIRED BY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE |
| | 61G15-23.002. |
| | |
| | 12- STORM SHUTTERS: |
| | A) PROVIDE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL WITH 2004 CODE |
| | VERSION. ONE SUBMITTED IS FOR 2001. |
| | |
| | B) PROVIDE KEY PLAN AND COMPLETE INSTALLATION |
| | SCHEDULE. SEE ATTACHED COPY OF CITY SAMPLE FOR |
| | INSTALLATION SCHEDULE AND PROVIDE ALL REQUIRED |
| | INFORMATION. |
| | |
| | 13- OWES $3.18 FOR RADON FEES. |
| | |
| | |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561)805-6712 |
