Date |
Text |
2006-10-17 08:12:36 | DENIED |
| |
| |
| 1.PERMIT VALUATION IS TO LOW AND |
| SHOULD INCLUDE ALL MATERIALS AND LABOR. |
| ADDITIONAL PERMIT FEES ARE DUE.FEES |
| PAID TO DATE REFLECT ONLY A $12,000 |
| VALUATION.ADJUST VALUE AND PAY FEES |
| PRIOR TO RESUBMITTING PLANS. |
| |
| C.COMPLETE A SHUTTER SCHEDULE, SEE |
| SAMPLE ATTACHED. |
| |
| D.SUBMIT PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR AN |
| INSWING ENTRY DOOR. |
| |
| E.SUBMIT TWO SETS PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR ALL |
| STRAPS AND TIE-DOWNS USED.ONLY ONE SET OF FL 503 |
| SUBMITTED. |
| |
| F.WINDOW AND DOOR PRESSURES NOT SHOW |
| ON ALL ELAVATIONS. |
| |
| G.SUBMIT PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR |
| OVERHEAD DOORS. |
| |
| |
| K.SCOPE OF WORK IS STILL NOT CLEAR AND |
| DOES NOT MATCH PERMIT APPLICATION. |
| CLEARLY SHOW ON PLANS AREAS THAT WILL |
| NOT HAVE ANY WORK DONE AND SHOW AS |
| EXISTING.APPLICATION SHOWS ROT REPAIR |
| YET PLANS SHOW FIRE DAMAGE? |
| |
| L.THOSE PRODUCT APPROVALS WHICH ARE |
| REGULATED BY DCA RULE 9B-72 SHALL BE |
| REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE |
| DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL |
| FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL.WPB |
| AMENDMENT TO FBC 106.3.3. |
| NOTE:NOT ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS HAVE BEEN STAAMPED AND |
| NONE HAVE BEEN APPROVED BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD IN |
| WRITING. |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE |
| THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY |
| PAGES AS NECESSARY. SUBMIT ONE COPY OF |
| OLD PAGES FOR REFERENCE. A TRANSMITTAL |
| LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW |
| COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF |
| THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET |
| OR SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES |
| CAN BE FOUND WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR |
| PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. |
| |
| ART LANGE |
| CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| 561-805-6672 |