Date |
Text |
2006-05-18 00:00:00 | BUILDING REVIEW SECOND CHECKLIST: |
| 1- ACCORDING TO THE DIMENSIONS GIVEN BY |
| THE ENGINEER(L:25' AND W:24') TOTAL AREA |
| IS 600SF. BUT PERMIT APPLICATION SAYS |
| 900SF. INFORMATION NEED TO MATCH. REVISE |
| AS REQUIRED. |
| |
| 2- ENGINEER TO CAREFULLY REVIEW SPECIFIC |
| PRODUCT APPROVAL TO CORRECT THE |
| FOLLOWING: |
| A) CLEARLY IDENTIFY SPECIFIC ASSEMBLY |
| FROM THE APPROVED ASSEMBLIES LISTED IN |
| THE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR WHICH THESE |
| CALCULATIONS ARE DONE FOR. |
| B) FASTENER TYPE DOESN'T MATCH |
| FASTENER TYPE SHOWN ON THE PRODUCT |
| APPROVAL. |
| C) FASTENER SPACING AT SIDE LAP (8") |
| FOR ZONE ONE DOESN'T MATCH FASTENER |
| SPACING SHOWN ON PRODUCT APPROVAL (12"). |
| D) NOA NUMBER SPECIFIED ON FIRST SHEET |
| DOESN'T MATCH NOA NUMBER SPECIFIED ON |
| SHEET ONE OF CALCULATIONS. THERE ARE |
| SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THOSE |
| TWO NOA'S. |
| E) BASE SHEET WIDTH DIMENSION IS |
| INCORRECT. SEE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR |
| CORRECT DIMENSION. |
| F) DESIGN PRESSURES ON SHEET ONE OF |
| CALCULATIONS DON'T MATCH THE DESIGN |
| PRESSURES SHOWN ON NOA 03-0130.08. |
| NOTE: ALSO, SEE CORRECT NOA NUMBER. LAST |
| TWO DIGITS AFTER THE PERIOD ARE .O8, NOT |
| .8. |
| G) FASTENER SHOWN ON THE CALCULATION |
| SHEET ONE DOESN'T MATCH FASTENER SHOWN |
| ON FIRST PAGE OF ENGINEER'S REPORT. |
| H) REVISE INFORMATION ON FASTENER |
| DIAGRAM SHEET: FASTENER SPACING AT SIDE |
| LAP FOR ZONE ONE AND CORRECT WIDTH |
| DIMENSION FOR BASE SHEET. |
| I) ENGINEER TO SIGN, SEAL AND DATE ALL |
| FOUR PAGES AS REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 471 |
| FLORIDA STATUTE AND FAC 61G15-23.002. |
| |
| NOTE: |
| ONE SET OF THE SUBMITTED PACKAGE WAS |
| RETAINED IN THIS OFFICE TO SUBMIT TO THE |
| BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS FOR |
| THEIR REVIEW. |
| |
| JULIO GOMEZ |
| BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| (561)805-6712. |