| Date |
Text |
| 2006-06-29 00:00:00 | PLAN BUILDING REVIEW 2ND CHECKLIST: |
| | 1- NOC IS EXPIRED AFTER 90 DAYS OF BEEN |
| | RECORDED IF WORK IS NOT COMMENCED. NEED |
| | RE-RECORDED NOC. SEE SEC. 713.13. 9(2) |
| | OF FLORIDA STATUTES. |
| | |
| | 2- PROVIDE SPECS/SECTION/DETAILS FOR |
| | INSTALLATION OF DECORATIVE STORM |
| | SHUTTERS. SEC. 106.1.2 OF CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | 3- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR: |
| | A) SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS. DADE COUNTY NOA |
| | SUBMITTED IS EXPIRED AND IT DOESN'T |
| | MATCH THE NOA SUBMITTED TO OBTAIN THE |
| | FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL. RESUBMIT. |
| | B) CONCRETE LINTELS. DADE COUNTY NOA |
| | SUBMITTED FOR FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | WAS NOT SUBMITTED IN THIS PACKAGE. BUT, |
| | NEED TO GET ANOTHER PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | BECAUSE DADE COUNTY NOA IS EXPIRED |
| | ANYWAY. |
| | C) ALUMINUM SIDING. PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | SUBMITTED IS FOR CEMENTITIOUS SIDING |
| | PRODUCTS, NOT ALUMINUM AS SPECIFIED ON |
| | PLANS. NEED SPECIFIED PRODUCT APPROVAL. |
| | D) ALL SIMPSON STRUCTURAL CONNECTORS |
| | AS SPECIFIED ON PLANS. PRODUCT APPROVALS |
| | SUBMITTED ARE FOR USP AND ONLY ONE WAS |
| | GOOD FOR THE USP HLPTA75 CONNECTOR. THE |
| | REST OF THE PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED |
| | WERE NOT SPECIFIED ON PLANS. |
| | E) ALUMINUM VENTS. |
| | |
| | 4- DESIGNER OF RECORD TO APPROVE IN |
| | WRITTING ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS, |
| | INCLUDING THE STORM SHUTTERS AS REQUIRED |
| | BY SEC. 106.3.3 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC. |
| | TYPICALLY THIS IS DONE USING THE |
| | STANDARD REVIEW STAMP USED FOR SHOP |
| | DRAWINGS REVIEW. |
| | |
| | 5- STORM SHUTTERS: |
| | A) PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED IS |
| | INCOMPLETE. IT DIDN'T INCLUDE THE DWGS. |
| | B) INSTALLATION SCHEDULE: |
| | * WHY THE DESIGN PRESSURES ARE N/A?. |
| | THIS IS THE MOST IMPORTANT INFORMATION |
| | TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE OF PRODUCT BASED ON |
| | THE CALCULATED DESIGN PRESSURES. NEED |
| | THIS INFORMATION. SEE PLANS. |
| | C) VERIFY SIZES FOR PANEL SPAN. EG: |
| | OPENINGS 12 AND 13. IF THE OPENINGS ARE |
| | 5'X6'-8" HOW COME THE PANEL SPAN IS |
| | 88"?. ALSO, THIS APPLIES TO 4' HIGH |
| | OPENINGS. WHY USING 68" LONG PANELS?. |
| | |
| | D) VERIFY STRUCTURE TO BE ATTACHED TO. |
| | THIS IS A CONCRETE BLOCK STRUCTURE, NOT |
| | POURED CONCRETE. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 6- DRAWING A-1: A) PROVIDE COMPLETE |
| | DETAILS/SPECS FOR WOOD DECK OUTSIDE |
| | MASTER BEDROOM AND FOR WOOD STEPS AT |
| | REAR COVERED PORCH. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004 AND R11.5.3.2. |
| | B) UPDATE CODE REFERENCE SPECIFIED FOR |
| | ATTIC ACCESS, FIREBLOCKING AND |
| | WINDOW/DOOR GLAZING PROTECTION. THIS |
| | IS A RESIDENCE THE CORRECT CODE THAT |
| | REGULATES DWELLINGS IS THE RESIDENTIAL |
| | 2004 CODE, NOT THE FBC 2004. REVISE AS |
| | REQ'D AND CITE CORRECT CODE REFERENCE |
| | SECTIONS FROM THE RESIDENTIAL CODE. |
| | |
| | 7- DRAWING SP-1: A) SURVEY DOESN'T MATCH |
| | PLANS. SEE PLANS FOR PORCH DIMENSIONS |
| | AND LOCATION. |
| | B) NORTH ARROW ORIENTATION ON SITE PLAN |
| | IS INCORRECT. SEE SURVEY FOR CORRECT |
| | ORIENTATION AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 8- DRAWING A-2: A) BEDROOM #1 WINDOW |
| | DOESN'T COMPLY WITH EGRESS SECTIONS |
| | R310.1.1 AND R310.1.2.BOTH WINDOWS IN |
| | FRONT ELEVATION ARE SHOWN AS 3'X4' |
| | WINDOWS. ACCORDING TO FLOOR PLAN WINDOW |
| | IS 3'X5'. CLARIFY/REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | B) LETTERS IDENTIFYING THE OPENINGS |
| | DON'T MATCH FLOOR PLAN. REVISE AS REQ'D. |
| | C) SPECIFY SIZE FOR MANUFACTURED |
| | ALUMINUM LOUVERS AT FRONT AND BACK |
| | ELEVATIONS. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS |
| | TO FBC 2004 AND SECTION R806. |
| | |
| | 9- DRAWING A-3: A) SECTION "A": |
| | * THERE IS NOT POURED CONCRETE ARCH. |
| | SEE ELEVATIONS STRUCTURAL DWGS. REVISE. |
| | ** WHERE IS DETAIL SHT 5? |
| | |
| | 10- DRAWING A-4: A) WALL SECTION "A". |
| | SPECIFY FIREBLOCKING MATERIAL AND |
| | REVISE REFERENCE FOR FIREBLOCKING. SEE |
| | RESIDENTIAL 2004 FOR CORRECT CODE |
| | SECTION. |
| | B) WALL SECTION "B" DOESN'T MATCH |
| | STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS AND ELEVATIONS. SEE |
| | ROOF PORCH BEAM AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 11- DRAWING S-2: A) TYP. ONE STORY |
| | SECTION: SPECIFY SIZE AND LOCATION OF |
| | ATTIC VENTS. PROVIDE SPECIFIC |
| | INFORMATION. SECTION R806 2004. |
| | B) DETAIL H: USP RT24 IS A WOOD TO WOOD |
| | CONNECTOR. NEED TO SPECIFY WOOD TO |
| | MASONRY CONNECTOR. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 12- DRAWING S-3: A) REVISE TRUSS ANCHOR |
| | SCHEDULE. UPLIFT CAPACITY DOESN'T MATCH |
| | UPLIFT CAPACITY SHOWN ON CURRENT USP |
| | CATALOGUE. REVISE AS REQUIRED OR PROVIDE |
| | COMPLETE ENGINEERING PACKAGE SHOWING WHY |
| | CHANGING THE VALUES. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | 13- ENERGY CALCULATIONS: |
| | A) IF THIS IS A MODEL HOUSE. ENERGY |
| | CALCULATIONS NEED TO BE DONE FOR WORST |
| | CASE SCENARIO OR MUST BE SITE SPECIFIC |
| | WITH CORRECT HOUSE ORIENTATION. |
| | CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED ARE NOT FOR WORST |
| | CASE SCENARIO AND THEY DON'T MATCH THE |
| | ACTUAL ORIENTATION OF THE HOUSE. SEE |
| | SURVEY FOR CORRECT ORIENTATION. PROVIDE |
| | CALCULATIONS THAT COMPLY WITH EITHER |
| | WAY. |
| | B) OVERHANG LENGTH AND HEIGHT DON'T |
| | MATCH PLANS. SEE SECTION 13-601.2.A.3 |
| | FOR PROPER WAY OF CALCULATING OVERHANG |
| | LENGTH AND HEIGHT. AND REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 14- ARCHITECT'S TITLE BLOCK TO INCLUDE |
| | ALL INFORMATION REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 481 |
| | FLORIDA STATUTES AND 61G1-16.004 OF |
| | FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. SEE |
| | ATTACHED COPY.NEED NAME OF ARCHITECT |
| | SIGNING AND SEALING PLANS. |
| | |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561)805-6712 |
