| Date |
Text |
| 2006-06-28 00:00:00 | BUILDING REVIEW 2ND CHECKLIST: |
| | 1- PAY IMPACT FEES TO PALM BEACH COUNTY. |
| | BRING BACK COPY OF PAID RECEIPT AND |
| | STAMPED PLANS. |
| | |
| | 2- NOC IS EXPIRED AFTER 90 DAYS OF BEEN |
| | RECORDED IF WORK IS NOT COMMENCED. NEED |
| | RE-RECORDED NOC. SEE SEC. 713.13. 9(2) |
| | OF FLORIDA STATUTES. |
| | |
| | 3- PROVIDE SPECS/SECTION/DETAILS FOR |
| | INSTALLATION OF DECORATIVE STORM |
| | SHUTTERS. SEC. 106.1.2 OF CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | 4- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR: |
| | A) SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS. DADE COUNTY NOA |
| | SUBMITTED IS EXPIRED AND IT DOESN'T |
| | MATCH THE NOA SUBMITTED TO OBTAIN THE |
| | FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL. RESUBMIT. GO |
| | TO WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG TO DOWNLOAD |
| | CORRECT NOA. |
| | B) CONCRETE LINTELS. DADE COUNTY NOA |
| | SUBMITTED IS FOR 4", 6" & 12" LINTELS. |
| | NEED NOA FOR 8"X8" LINTELS AS SPECIFIED |
| | ON PLANS. |
| | ***NOTE: NOA FOR 8"X8" LINTELS IS |
| | EXPIRED. NEED TO PROVIDE CURRENT ONE. |
| | C) ALUMINUM SIDING. PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | SUBMITTED IS FOR CEMENTITIOUS SIDING |
| | PRODUCTS, NOT ALUMINUM AS SPECIFIED ON |
| | PLANS. NEED SPECIFIED PRODUCT APPROVAL. |
| | D) ALL SIMPSON STRUCTURAL CONNECTORS |
| | AS SPECIFIED ON PLANS. PRODUCT APPROVALS |
| | SUBMITTED ARE FOR USP AND ONLY ONE WAS |
| | GOOD FOR THE USP HLPTA75 CONNECTOR. THE |
| | REST OF THE PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED |
| | WERE NOT SPECIFIED ON PLANS. |
| | E) ALUMINUM VENTS SHOWN ON ELEVATIONS. |
| | F) ASPHALT SHINGLES NOA THAT MATCHES |
| | NOA SUBMITTED FOR FLORIDA PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL. GO TO WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG |
| | TO DOWNLOAD CORRECT NOA. |
| | |
| | 5- DESIGNER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND |
| | APPROVE IN WRITTING ALL PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS, INCLUDING THE STORM SHUTTERS |
| | AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 106.3.3 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS TO FBC. |
| | TYPICALLY THIS IS DONE USING THE |
| | STANDARD REVIEW STAMP USED FOR SHOP |
| | DRAWINGS REVIEW. |
| | |
| | 6- STORM SHUTTERS: |
| | A) PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED IS |
| | INCOMPLETE. IT DIDN'T INCLUDE THE DWGS. |
| | B) INSTALLATION SCHEDULE: |
| | * WHY THE DESIGN PRESSURES ARE N/A?. |
| | THIS IS THE MOST IMPORTANT INFORMATION |
| | TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE OF PRODUCT BASED ON |
| | THE CALCULATED DESIGN PRESSURES. NEED |
| | THIS INFORMATION. SEE PLANS. |
| | C) VERIFY SIZES FOR PANEL SPAN. EG: |
| | OPENINGS 8 AND 9. IF THE OPENINGS ARE |
| | 5'X6'-8" HOW COME THE PANEL SPAN IS |
| | 88"?. ALSO, THIS APPLIES TO 4' HIGH |
| | OPENINGS. WHY USING 68" LONG PANELS?. |
| | D) VERIFY STRUCTURE TO BE ATTACHED TO. |
| | THIS IS A CONCRETE BLOCK STRUCTURE, NOT |
| | POURED CONCRETE. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 7- DRAWING A-1: UPDATE CODE REFERENCE |
| | SPECIFIED FOR ATTIC ACCESS, FIREBLOCKING |
| | AND WINDOW/DOOR GLAZING PROTECTION. THIS |
| | IS A RESIDENCE THE CORRECT CODE THAT |
| | REGULATES DWELLINGS IS THE RESIDENTIAL |
| | 2004 CODE, NOT THE FBC 2004. REVISE AS |
| | REQ'D AND CITE CORRECT CODE REFERENCE |
| | SECTIONS FROM THE RESIDENTIAL CODE. |
| | |
| | 8- REVISE SURVEY. PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN |
| | FLOOD ZONE "C". NOT "B". CITY OF WPB |
| | USES COMMUNITY PANEL 120229 0015 B, |
| | DATED MARCH 1ST 1979. |
| | |
| | 9- DRAWING A-2: A) BEDROOM #1 WINDOW |
| | DOESN'T COMPLY WITH EGRESS SECTIONS |
| | R310.1.1 AND R310.1.2.BOTH WINDOWS IN |
| | FRONT ELEVATION ARE SHOWN AS 3'X4' |
| | WINDOWS. ACCORDING TO FLOOR PLAN WINDOW |
| | IS 3'X5'. CLARIFY/REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | B) WHAT ARE THE LETTERS IDENTIFYING THE |
| | OPENINGS FOR? THEY DON'T MATCH FLOOR |
| | PLAN AND THERE IS NOT LEGEND IDENTIFYING |
| | THIS LETTERS. CLARIFY AS REQUIRED. |
| | C) SPECIFY SIZE FOR MANUFACTURED |
| | ALUMINUM LOUVERS AT FRONT AND BACK |
| | ELEVATIONS. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS |
| | TO FBC 2004 AND SECTION R806. |
| | |
| | 10- DRAWING A-3: SECTION "A", WHERE IS |
| | DETAIL SHT 5? |
| | |
| | 11- DRAWING A-4: WALL SECTION "A". |
| | SPECIFY FIREBLOCKING MATERIAL AND |
| | REVISE REFERENCE FOR FIREBLOCKING. SEE |
| | RESIDENTIAL 2004 FOR CORRECT CODE |
| | SECTION. |
| | |
| | 12- DRAWING S-1: A) PROVIDE DETAIL/SPECS |
| | FOR 4"X4" WOOD POST AT REAR WOOD DECK. |
| | NEED TO SPECIFY ATTACHMENT OF WOOD POST |
| | TO FOOTING. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS |
| | TO FBC 2004. |
| | B) SPECIFY TRUSS CONNECTORS ON ROOF |
| | FRAMING PLAN. SEC. 106.1.2 OF CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | 13- DRAWING S-2: A) TYP. ONE STORY |
| | SECTION: SPECIFY SIZE AND LOCATION OF |
| | ATTIC VENTS. PROVIDE SPECIFIC |
| | INFORMATION. SECTION R806 2004. |
| | B) DETAIL H: USP RT24 IS A WOOD TO WOOD |
| | CONNECTOR. NEED TO SPECIFY WOOD TO |
| | MASONRY CONNECTOR. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 14- DRAWING S-3: A) REVISE TRUSS ANCHOR |
| | SCHEDULE. UPLIFT CAPACITY DOESN'T MATCH |
| | UPLIFT CAPACITY SHOWN ON CURRENT USP |
| | CATALOGUE. REVISE AS REQUIRED OR PROVIDE |
| | COMPLETE ENGINEERING PACKAGE SHOWING WHY |
| | CHANGING THE VALUES. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | 15- ENERGY CALCULATIONS: |
| | A) IF THIS IS A MODEL HOUSE. ENERGY |
| | CALCULATIONS NEED TO BE DONE FOR WORST |
| | CASE SCENARIO OR MUST BE SITE SPECIFIC |
| | WITH CORRECT HOUSE ORIENTATION. |
| | CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED ARE NOT FOR WORST |
| | CASE SCENARIO. |
| | B) OVERHANG LENGTH AND HEIGHT DON'T |
| | MATCH PLANS. SEE SECTION 13-601.2.A.3 |
| | FOR PROPER WAY OF CALCULATING OVERHANG |
| | LENGTH AND HEIGHT. AND REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 16- ARCHITECT'S TITLE BLOCK TO INCLUDE |
| | ALL INFORMATION REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 481 |
| | FLORIDA STATUTES AND 61G1-16.004 OF |
| | FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. SEE |
| | ATTACHED COPY.NEED NAME OF ARCHITECT |
| | SIGNING AND SEALING PLANS. |
| | |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561)805-6712 |
